Does that mean you've demonstrated a scare tactic?

Does it mean they represent no threat to innocent commons?

Does it mean I will be punished in secret so I can't defend myself?

What are the implications if any of these are correct?

>"Meldon"  wrote in message 
>news:13mp1rk8qqp6b3b@corp.supernews.com...
> Does that mean you've demonstrated a scare tactic?

Me scare the RCMP???  LOL....o.k.

>
> Does it mean they represent no threat to innocent commons?

There is *always* a threat.  Ie.  you could get caught up
in a cross-fire, or you could be mistaken for someone else.

>
> Does it mean I will be punished in secret so I can't defend myself?

Just remember:  Big Brother may be watching, but millions
of little brothers are glaring back.

>
> What are the implications if any of these are correct?

In your case, if you see the cops, *RUN*...make yourself
scarce and for your own sake, don't make any waves,
don't attract attention to yourself.  Become that invisible
man, that anonymous unknown.

Heidi

"Heidi Graw"  wrote in message 
news:fl0bj.9532$wy2.7858@edtnps90...
>
>>"Meldon"  wrote in message 
>>news:13mp1rk8qqp6b3b@corp.supernews.com...
>> Does that mean you've demonstrated a scare tactic?
>
> Me scare the RCMP???  LOL....o.k.
>

By your response I guess you want me to post what you stated so that 
everyone understands what you're really about?


>>
>> Does it mean they represent no threat to innocent commons?
>
> There is *always* a threat.  Ie.  you could get caught up
> in a cross-fire, or you could be mistaken for someone else.
>

For a price, morally corrupt individuals can create, encourage and exploit 
that reality can't they?


>>
>> Does it mean I will be punished in secret so I can't defend myself?
>
> Just remember:  Big Brother may be watching, but millions
> of little brothers are glaring back.
>

That does not address the tactic of hidden agendas and secret trails does 
it?



>>
>> What are the implications if any of these are correct?
>
> In your case, if you see the cops, *RUN*...make yourself
> scarce and for your own sake, don't make any waves,
> don't attract attention to yourself.  Become that invisible
> man, that anonymous unknown.
>
> Heidi
>
>

So much to decipher...

why in my case?
why should I feel the need to run?
why should I make myself scarce?
why shouldn't I make waves?
why should I be concerned about attracting attention?
why should I become invisible?
why should I be concerned about anonymity?

You're not very good at what you are doing are you? Among other things there 
is at least one self-contradictory statement, ie., if big brother is 
watching how could I possibly be anonymous?

You've been bought and sold just like the corrupt oppressors that own you. 
We are both puppets but you earn your living at it. How proud your parents 
should be and what do you tell your kids about your professional activities?

On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:02:31 -0500, "Meldon" 
wrote:

>
>"Heidi Graw"  wrote in message 
>news:fl0bj.9532$wy2.7858@edtnps90...
>>
>>>"Meldon"  wrote in message 
>>>news:13mp1rk8qqp6b3b@corp.supernews.com...
>>> Does that mean you've demonstrated a scare tactic?
>>
>> Me scare the RCMP???  LOL....o.k.
>>
>
>By your response I guess you want me to post what you stated so that 
>everyone understands what you're really about?
>
>
>>>
>>> Does it mean they represent no threat to innocent commons?
>>
>> There is *always* a threat.  Ie.  you could get caught up
>> in a cross-fire, or you could be mistaken for someone else.
>>
>
>For a price, morally corrupt individuals can create, encourage and exploit 
>that reality can't they?
>
>
>>>
>>> Does it mean I will be punished in secret so I can't defend myself?
>>
>> Just remember:  Big Brother may be watching, but millions
>> of little brothers are glaring back.
>>
>
>That does not address the tactic of hidden agendas and secret trails does 
>it?
>
>
>
>>>
>>> What are the implications if any of these are correct?
>>
>> In your case, if you see the cops, *RUN*...make yourself
>> scarce and for your own sake, don't make any waves,
>> don't attract attention to yourself.  Become that invisible
>> man, that anonymous unknown.
>>
>> Heidi
>>
>>
>
>So much to decipher...
>
>why in my case?
>why should I feel the need to run?
>why should I make myself scarce?
>why shouldn't I make waves?
>why should I be concerned about attracting attention?
>why should I become invisible?
>why should I be concerned about anonymity?
>
>You're not very good at what you are doing are you? Among other things there 
>is at least one self-contradictory statement, ie., if big brother is 
>watching how could I possibly be anonymous?
>
>You've been bought and sold just like the corrupt oppressors that own you. 
>We are both puppets but you earn your living at it. How proud your parents 
>should be and what do you tell your kids about your professional activities? 
>

What the hell are either of you talking about?

>"David Johnston"  wrote in message 
>news:iidpm31c7gjhjqoomrudie962viat1q39s@4ax.com...

> David writes to Meldon and Heidi:
> What the hell are either of you talking about?

I have no idea, David.  I'm just responding
to Meldon's nonsense with nonsense of
my own.

After being on Usenet for a number of years,
one can't help but aquire the art of nonsense.
I've become quite the adept in this area.  ;-)

Take care,
Heidi

"Heidi Graw"  wrote in message 
news:c03bj.36858$5l3.33549@edtnps82...
>
>>"David Johnston"  wrote in message 
>>news:iidpm31c7gjhjqoomrudie962viat1q39s@4ax.com...
>
>> David writes to Meldon and Heidi:
>> What the hell are either of you talking about?
>
> I have no idea, David.  I'm just responding
> to Meldon's nonsense with nonsense of
> my own.
>
> After being on Usenet for a number of years,
> one can't help but aquire the art of nonsense.
> I've become quite the adept in this area.  ;-)
>
> Take care,
> Heidi
>

Why, may I ask, would you be so inclined to respond to nonsense, consider 
being adept in the area of nonsense something to be proud of and feel you 
have no idea what you're talking about? You didn't even mention the 
wide-screen TV or buying a movie theatre. lol

>"Meldon"  wrote in message 
>news:13mph9gd46udd91@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Heidi Graw"  wrote in message 
> news:c03bj.36858$5l3.33549@edtnps82...
>>
>>>"David Johnston"  wrote in message 
>>>news:iidpm31c7gjhjqoomrudie962viat1q39s@4ax.com...
>>
>>> David writes to Meldon and Heidi:
>>> What the hell are either of you talking about?
>>
>> I have no idea, David.  I'm just responding
>> to Meldon's nonsense with nonsense of
>> my own.
>>
>> After being on Usenet for a number of years,
>> one can't help but aquire the art of nonsense.
>> I've become quite the adept in this area.  ;-)
>>
>> Take care,
>> Heidi
>>

>Meldon wrote: Why, may I ask, would you be so inclined to respond to 
>nonsense,

For the same reason you do.  ;-)

>consider being adept in the area of nonsense something to be proud of and 
>feel you  have no idea what you're talking about?

Ah, come on, Meldon.  We all know you don't
know what you're talking about either!  And
given the volume of your posts, it seems to
me you're quite proud to demonstrate
your own skills in the art of nonsense.

>You didn't even mention the wide-screen TV or buying a movie theatre. lol

The TV holds no particular fascination for me
given there are over 200 channels which have
nothing worthwhile for me to watch.

As for buying a movie theatre, well...that
may indeed be a distinct possibility.
I've got the theatre I want in mind.  It's
in my own hometown.  I know what
films to offer and I've already identified
my target audience.  I know what I've
got in mind will be a sure-fire winner.

Do you want to be my pop-corn man?
We can fake the "Food-Safe" certificate.
No-one needs to be the wiser.  I'll even
let you clean out the toilets.  Good
deal, eh?  ;-)

Take care,
Heidi

"Heidi Graw"  wrote in message 
news:tH4bj.39002$5l3.21953@edtnps82...
>
>>"Meldon"  wrote in message 
>>news:13mph9gd46udd91@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> "Heidi Graw"  wrote in message 
>> news:c03bj.36858$5l3.33549@edtnps82...
>>>
>>>>"David Johnston"  wrote in message 
>>>>news:iidpm31c7gjhjqoomrudie962viat1q39s@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>> David writes to Meldon and Heidi:
>>>> What the hell are either of you talking about?
>>>
>>> I have no idea, David.  I'm just responding
>>> to Meldon's nonsense with nonsense of
>>> my own.
>>>
>>> After being on Usenet for a number of years,
>>> one can't help but aquire the art of nonsense.
>>> I've become quite the adept in this area.  ;-)
>>>
>>> Take care,
>>> Heidi
>>>
>
>>Meldon wrote: Why, may I ask, would you be so inclined to respond to 
>>nonsense, consider being adept in the area of nonsense something to be 
>>proud of and feel you have no idea what you're talking about? You didn't 
>>even mention the wide-screen TV or buying a movie theatre. lol
>
> For the same reason you do.  ;-)
>
>
> Ah, come on, Meldon.  We all know you don't
> know what you're talking about either!  And
> given the volume of your posts, it seems to
> me you're quite proud to demonstrate
> your own skills in the art of nonsense.
>
>>You didn't even mention the wide-screen TV or buying a movie theatre. lol
>
> The TV holds no particular fascination for me
> given there are over 200 channels which have
> nothing worthwhile for me to watch.
>
> As for buying a movie theatre, well...that
> may indeed be a distinct possibility.
> I've got the theatre I want in mind.  It's
> in my own hometown.  I know what
> films to offer and I've already identified
> my target audience.  I know what I've
> got in mind will be a sure-fire winner.
>
> Do you want to be my pop-corn man?
> We can fake the "Food-Safe" certificate.
> No-one needs to be the wiser.  I'll even
> let you clean out the toilets.  Good
> deal, eh?  ;-)
>
> Take care,
> Heidi
>
>

Much better. That's the Heidi we have all come so familiar with. Perhaps you 
had better pull out some of the 1000's of peer reviewed papers and dig a 
little deeper for ideas on some more nonsense. (gthaw, snort, chuckle)