On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:16:26 GMT, "Alan Holmes"
 wrote:


>>> > So where is "here", which planes allegedly fly over "one every minute 
>>> > all
>>> > day, every day"?  I doubt if WebTrak would confirm that claim. 
>>> > (WebTrak
>>> > is a replay of aircraft radar tracks, available 24-48 hours later at
>>> > http://lhr.webtrak-lochard.com )
>>>
>>> Here is Datchet!
>>
>> Datchet! that's well clear of the airport.  Try living in Hounslow.
>
>Been there, sat in my car, frightened to get out because of the shake from 
>the bloody aeroplanes a few feet above me, went back home to enjoy the noise 
>every minute!
>

Methinks you protest too much.

DG

"Derek Geldard"  wrote in message 
news:17ubc3ldi08n2g4nfbr6qtcs702cq37snh@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:16:26 GMT, "Alan Holmes"
>  wrote:
>
>
>>>> > So where is "here", which planes allegedly fly over "one every minute
>>>> > all
>>>> > day, every day"?  I doubt if WebTrak would confirm that claim.
>>>> > (WebTrak
>>>> > is a replay of aircraft radar tracks, available 24-48 hours later at
>>>> > http://lhr.webtrak-lochard.com )
>>>>
>>>> Here is Datchet!
>>>
>>> Datchet! that's well clear of the airport.  Try living in Hounslow.
>>
>>Been there, sat in my car, frightened to get out because of the shake from
>>the bloody aeroplanes a few feet above me, went back home to enjoy the 
>>noise
>>every minute!
>>
>
> Methinks you protest too much.

Methinks you have never been to the area around heathrow!

>
> DG

Alan Holmes wrote:
> "Derek Geldard"  wrote in message 
> news:17ubc3ldi08n2g4nfbr6qtcs702cq37snh@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:16:26 GMT, "Alan Holmes"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>> So where is "here", which planes allegedly fly over "one every minute
>>>>>> all
>>>>>> day, every day"?  I doubt if WebTrak would confirm that claim.
>>>>>> (WebTrak
>>>>>> is a replay of aircraft radar tracks, available 24-48 hours later at
>>>>>> http://lhr.webtrak-lochard.com )
>>>>> Here is Datchet!
>>>> Datchet! that's well clear of the airport.  Try living in Hounslow.
>>> Been there, sat in my car, frightened to get out because of the shake from
>>> the bloody aeroplanes a few feet above me, went back home to enjoy the 
>>> noise
>>> every minute!
>>>
>> Methinks you protest too much.
> 
> Methinks you have never been to the area around heathrow!
> 
>> DG 
> 
> 
We lived on one of the last roads before the end of the runway, I 
checked Google earth and it's still there, Hounslow? that's for wimps.

STOP SPAMMING BALDSPOT YOU FUCKING ASSHOLES!!
MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk wrote:
> From: richard@musicians-net.co.uk (Richard Fairhurst)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc
> Subject: A Mike Corley newsgroup?
> Date: Thu Jun  6 05:02:17 1996
>
> In article , burridge@osiris.win-uk.net (Paul
> Burridge) wrote:
>
> > In article , Owen Lewis
> (oml@eloka.demon.co.uk) writes [re: Mike Corley]:
> > >To be honest, having made the mistake of reading his magnum opus twice
> > >(like many forms of discomfort, one is prone to repeat the experience
> > >to confirm that it really is a bad as one thought), I read nothing he
> > >writes but am tempted by some of the sub-threads that develop.
> >
> > I made the grave error of showing one of his masterpieces to my
> > mother, together with some of the (less than respectful) responses
> > to it. Regrettably, she is now addicted to the Corley saga, is
> > very much an admirer of him (viewing him as a pugilistic underdog
> > deserving of great admiration) and I have to waste reams of paper
> > printing all this bilge out every other day, for her delecation.
>
> Given that Mr Corley clearly holds a certain fascination for some people,
> and that his website, although "informative",  isn't  exactly  ideal  for
> encouraging discussion of the sort that we all enjoy so  much  (including
> Mike himself, by the look of things), would  anyone  be  up  for  a  Mike
> Corley  newsgroup -  uk.fan.mike-corley,  alt.fan.mike-corley,  whatever?
> (Sorry, I'm not very well up on these things.)
>
> This would be a perfect place for Mike to post his writings,  and perhaps
> the occasional "look at the ...mike-corley newsgroup" posting in  uk.misc
> and so on would be accepted in place of the current cross-posts.