It is well over twenty five years since I was battered and then struck by a 
car that had been driven at me. The Houghton-le-Spring, Magistrates Court 
which followed that was utterly illegal. The single magistrate who sat on 
the case had no qualifications to allow him to act alone and then dismiss 
the case. The then Houghton Magistrates Court Clerk, since retired, was 
clearly part of the cover up of that crime. There was a clear link to 
Freemasonry in this matter.



In 1994 I was accused by my next door neighbour, a National Insurance 
Inspector of being a trespasser on land which I and my late father William 
Kellett lawfully owned. This case lasted for around four years. It ended 
with a massive perversion of the course of justice carried out against me by 
a recorder. My civil law opponent and Crown employee National Insurance 
Inspector, applied to the Durham County Court for consolidation of the 
Durham and Newcastle County Court actions between. That application was 
refused by the Durham County Court on 1st June 1994. The recorder illegally 
tried the actions as a consolidated action. That caused me massive damage. I 
was made a bankrupt at the Durham County Court in 1999 from very substantial 
judicial crime which had been used against me. On 30th January, 2003, 
Northumbria Police Special Squad surrounded my home at 16A The Lyons, 
Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne and Wear. I had refused to give it up for the benefit 
of judicial and other criminals involved in these crimes used against me. I 
came very close to being shot by their marksmen despite the fact that I was 
not armed. My life was saved on that occasion by a policewoman negotiator 
named to me as "Jo". Three nights later, the Northumbria Police Special 
battered down the door to my home. When they entered my home, they 
handcuffed me. Then two of those Northumbria police officers handcuffed me 
and then attempted to impale me on a sword which had previously decorated a 
room in my home. On that occasion my life was saved by one of the 
Northumbria Police Special Squad officers who clearly did not wish to become 
a part of murder.



My Appeal against the possession of my home at Hetton-le-Hole was adjourned 
at the Middlesboro County Court on 30th January 2003. It still remains 
adjourned and ignored by that court. Citizen's arrests are now justified 
under the crime of Misconduct in Public Office which carried with it up to a 
seven year prison sentence. Very significant evidence supporting my Appeal 
against the possession of my home was provided to the judge sitting at the 
Middlesboro County Court hearing on 30th January 2003. He adjourned my 
Appeal there when I was taken by ambulance to hospital. The evidence which I 
provided to the judge at Middlesboro had a bigger significance than to just 
my case.



My attempts to obtain justice in these matters have been met with more 
crimes. Some carried out against me by police. Police, courts, Official 
Receivers, Land Registrars etc, all operate by the authority of the Crown, 
presently Queen Elizabeth II. She is the Patron of the UK Secret Society of 
Freemasonry. She was sent details of the judicial and other crimes carried 
out against me. Those at Buckingham Palace failed to even acknowledge my 
letter to him about these crimes by those employed under her authority.



The Judicial Oath of fairness sworn by all UK judges and Magistrates only to 
the UK Crown has no meaning and is a fraud of massive proportions. The UK is 
not a democracy and even some police officers are now agreeing this fact. 
Queen Elizabeth II was served with my damages claim made against her for her 
integral part in the Judicial Oath fraud which has caused me great damage. 
Those at Buckingham Palace have ignored my damages claim made against Queen 
Elizabeth II. I never expected to see a penny of it anyway but my claim made 
against Queen Elizabeth II has been done with another purpose in mind. I 
retain proof that my damages claim made against Queen Elizabeth II was 
received at Buckingham Palace.



Crown employees do carry out murder and can expect to get away with them. My 
own cases proved this fact. I am aware of other such cases. The UK requires 
an elected Head of State not the Patron of the Secret Society of UK 
Freemasonry acting as the UK Head of State. Can the UK courts be independent 
or impartial in any matters where Freemasonry has a concern with them 
operating under the authority of the UK Patron of UK Freemasonry, Queen 
Elizabeth II? They are not impartial or independent as required under 
Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. Deception is all a 
part of the way that UK Crown employees operate.



My numerous letters sent to former Prime Minister Tony Blair were ignored by 
him. He was and is in any event a Freemason. My many letters sent to present 
Prime Minister Gordon Brown have only resulted in me being given the run 
around by his Crown employed mob.



There is a lot more to add to these matters. If I remain alive long enough I 
will publicise these matters as well. The UK Press are a part of our problem 
not a solution to them.



Maurice Kellett



m.kellett@tiscali.co.uk

The history of this evil goes way back. Let us begin with Charlemagne.

Although "Freedom is the Gospel of Christ", Charlemagne ran a campaign
of WARFARE against anybody who was not a Christian. Insincere
Christianity was the result. If anybody was told by a priest that
black is white and green is yellow, he would agree - simply to save
his own life. So the Papacy lost the feedback from the congregation,
so that mistakes would be made and fear would prevent those mistakes
being reported.

On Christmas day 800, In St: Peter's in Rome, Pope Leo the Third crept
up behind Charlemagne (probably as pre-arranged), and declared him to
be Holy Roman Emperor.

The assembled crowd then synchronously shouted "To Charles, the most
pious Augustus, crowned by God, to our great and pacific emperor life
and victory"! This NEVER happens unless there have been REHEARSALS.
Every member of a crowd will not think of the same sequence of words -
particularly when they are so bombastic.

From this time on, anybody who was not Christian could be killed. The
original words of Christ tole people to "go out and convert the
heathens". That means, go onto the heath and use gentle persuasion. A
heathen is a heath dweller. Similar a "pagan" is just a "pagano", a
country dweller. Now, however, these words were becoming terms of
abuse.

Anybody who was deemed to be a "heathen" could save his life by
converting to Christianity. However, anybody who had been
excommunicated would not be allowed back. Such a "heretic" would
certainly be killed.

Henry the Eighth was excommunicated when he disobeyed the Pope,
divorced Catherine of Aragon and married Anne Boleyn who gave birth to
Elizabeth two months later.

Terrified of all the "Papists" in Britain, and on the mainland of
Europe, Henry set out to REVERSE all the beliefs of the Catholic
church. He was determined to bring down the Holy Roman Empire.

More and more people were being corrupted, to believe that evil is
good and that truth is lies. By 1712, they started calling themselves
"Free Masons". In 1717 they built the Grand Lodge of England.

In 1738, Pope Clement the Twelfth sent out an encyclical condemning
the practice.

http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Clem12/c15inemengl.htm

Each Mason "knows" that friends are there to be persecuted. When he
commits a crime, he does not do it himself. He forces his "friends" to
do it.

So democracy vanished. The law court are STAGE-MANAGED.

Similarly, the doctors are KILLERS like Harold Frederick Shipman.

As Pope Clement said, "depraved and perverted".

Charles Douglas Wehner

On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:47:54 -0700 (PDT), "charleswehner@hotmail.com"
 wrote:

>The history of this evil goes way back. Let us begin with Charlemagne.

It goes back further than that!
Why start there?

Norrie.

On 5 Jun., 19:19, Norrie  wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:47:54 -0700 (PDT), "charlesweh...@hotmail.com"
>
>  wrote:
> >The history of this evil goes way back. Let us begin with Charlemagne.
>
> It goes back further than that!
> Why start there?
>
> Norrie.

I said that the history of THIS evil goes back a long way.

The violent Holy Roman Empire was running crusades and inquisitions.
For example, William Tyndal translated the Bible into English in
defiance of the Pope. He was burned at the stake by the clergy of
Louvaine.

This is hardly Christianity.

Henry the Eighth was petrified that this might happen to him. Before
his excommunication, he had co-operated with the Pope by sending his
soldiers to guard the coast of England. When English Bibles were
landed, they were destroyed. Those caught in possession were burned at
the stake or beheaded. Henry had been on the Pope's side in a
bloodbath. Now, he was outside the church and so in personal danger.

He sent his troops to force the priests to worship the devil. Those
who escaped the troops fled to sympathisers, who built "priest holes"
in their homes for the priests and monks to hide in.

He reversed all commandments, including "Thou shallt not steal". He
sent his troops to sack the churches and monasteries, and steal the
gold and silver.

He had kept a few Tyndal Bibles for himself. Now, he had any footnotes
by Tyndal removed. He deleted whatever he wanted to delete for
political, not religious, reasons. He had it published as the "Henry
the Eighth Bible" because the Pope did not want translations
published. He could now identify "Papist" priests. They were the ones
with Latin Bibles, which became illegal in Britain - the exact reverse
of what was going on in the Holy Roman Empire.

Voltaire said the Holy Roman Empire was neither holy, nor Roman, nor
an empire. Perfectly correct.

Religious "freedom" arrived. Henry encouraged any religion that used
the English Bible, simply to dilute the number of "Papists" in
Britain.

He sent his spies into Europe to encourage devil-worship. This was to
weaken the Holy Roman Empire. Otherwise, they might raise mighty
armadas to conquer Britain, and burn non-"Papists" at the stake.

Scotland remained largely "Papist". The term "Catholic" arrived later.
England, however, had more and more non-"Papists" who were afraid of a
"crusade" being launched by the Holy Roman Emperor against Britain. It
was possible to justify wars in Europe, therefore.

At the time of Elizabeth the First, for example, Philip the Second of
Spain sent his Flanders Army to the Netherlands to stop the devil-
worshipping and restore order. Elizabeth wrote sweet letters to him
whilst simultaneously sending troops to the Netherlands to attack his
Flanders Army.

When Philip discovered this, he was furious at such treachery. He sent
an armada to Britain. However, the admiral was inexperienced. Sir
Francis Drake had the idea of using fire-ships against the armada, and
his other admirals agreed. By this means, the Spanish Armada was
repulsed.

The whole thing was an ongoing scenario of experimenting with REVERSED
MORALS. Finally, they decided that it is VIRTUE to betray your
friends.

Each member of the Freeekmasons swears an oath that he will do NOTHING
without permission. He has lost his freedom. He has become a slave. He
is then TERRORIZED into doing what he is told. They infiltrate the
medical profession, to about 99%. There, they torture and kill the
sick and pretend that the sickness was responsible. They infiltrate
the law, again to about 99%. Here, they deliver a stage-managed
performance that has been rehearsed in the lodge. You cannot influence
the pre-arranged outcome of the case.

The words "free" and "Mason" were first used by these terrorists in
1712. In 1717, they set up the Grand Lodge of England. Then they
flooded out into Europe to force people to be as evil as possible.

Catholics have confessional boxes. People were going in there, and in
the dark saying "They are forcing me to become evil. I don't want to
do this".

The priests were lost for an answer, and saw the bishops. The bishops
saw the archbishops. The archbishops saw the cardinals. The cardinals
reported to the Pope. That is how "In Eminenti" (above) came to be
issued. There were EIGHT encyclicals condemning the Masons. Here is
the eighth:

http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13human.htm

Here is an extract:

"Moreover, to be enrolled, it is necessary that the candidates promise
and undertake to be thenceforward strictly obedient to their leaders
and masters with the utmost submission and fidelity, and to be in
readiness to do their bidding upon the slightest expression of their
will; or, if disobedient, to submit to the direst penalties and death
itself. As a fact, if any are judged to have betrayed the doings of
the sect or to have resisted commands given, punishment is inflicted
on them not infrequently, and with so much audacity and dexterity that
the assassin very often escapes the detection and penalty of his
crime".

To make themselves seem to be mysterious, they often use the excuse
that they are protection the "Holy Grail". That "explains" their
secrecy. It is LIES.

They also write stories that they can trace their ancestry back to the
time of King Arthur. More nonsense. They also sometimes refer to
ancient Persia, or whatever. But this the the "brotherhood of LIES",
who are brainwashed (brain dirtied) into believing that lies are true.

In about the year 800, Aneurin wrote a "Harry Potter" fiction story
about "Owain, or the Lady of the Fountain". It was in Welsh. In about
1200, all the surviving Welsh stories were assembled in the
Mabinogion. Some Norman French poets got hold of a copy. One of them
copied the name of King Arthur, but gave him a queen with a Norman
French name, Guenevère. The Lady of the Fountain had become the Lady
of the Lake. There were people with French names, like Sire Launcelot
du Lac. The castle, Camelot, is to be pronounced in French.

The first poet died. The second poet finished the book, and it did the
rounds of Europe (for in Germany as the "Artusrunde"), before finally
reaching Britain.

It is FICTION, therefore.

Of course Masons want you to believe they are a very ancient order of
goody-goodies. The British gang calls itself "Ancient and Accepted".
You trust them, and they betray you.

Maurice Kellett found himself on the wrong side of a three-hundred
year-old terrorist gang.

However, it is not the PRIVATE problems of Maurice that should be
noted. The Freeekmasons betray US ALL.

Charles Douglas Wehner

On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:21:43 -0700 (PDT), charleswehner@hotmail.com

 wrote in :
<snip>

	Nobody likes a cleverdick!
				-- Cilla Black

-- 
Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________  CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University.    Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch]    Room 40-1-B12, CERN
        KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".

The message

from "charleswehner@hotmail.com"  contains
these words:

> The violent Holy Roman Empire was running crusades and inquisitions.

IRTA crustaceans and iniquities.

-- 
Skipweasel
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

Dr Ivan D. Reid wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:21:43 -0700 (PDT), charleswehner@hotmail.com
> 
>  wrote in :
> <snip>
> 
> 	Nobody likes a cleverdick!
> 				-- Cilla Black
> 

please don't enourage the cross-posting nutters.

The message <%2u2k.4836$E41.644@text.news.virginmedia.com>
from Esra Sdrawkcab  contains these words:

> please don't enourage the cross-posting nutters.

Just reply, removing the Shed from the crossfire.

-- 
Rusty
Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk
Separator in search of a sig

The message

from "charleswehner@hotmail.com"  contains
these words:

> On 5 Jun., 19:19, Norrie  wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:47:54 -0700 (PDT), "charlesweh...@hotmail.com"
> >
> >  wrote:
> > >The history of this evil goes way back. Let us begin with Charlemagne.
> >
> > It goes back further than that!
> > Why start there?
> >
> > Norrie.

> I said that the history of THIS evil goes back a long way.

> The violent Holy Roman Empire was running crusades and inquisitions.
> For example, William Tyndal translated the Bible into English in
> defiance of the Pope. He was burned at the stake by the clergy of
> Louvaine.

> This is hardly Christianity.

> Henry the Eighth was petrified that this might happen to him. Before
> his excommunication, he had co-operated with the Pope by sending his
> soldiers to guard the coast of England. When English Bibles were
> landed, they were destroyed. Those caught in possession were burned at
> the stake or beheaded. Henry had been on the Pope's side in a
> bloodbath. Now, he was outside the church and so in personal danger.

> He sent his troops to force the priests to worship the devil. Those
> who escaped the troops fled to sympathisers, who built "priest holes"
> in their homes for the priests and monks to hide in.

> He reversed all commandments, including "Thou shallt not steal". He
> sent his troops to sack the churches and monasteries, and steal the
> gold and silver.

> He had kept a few Tyndal Bibles for himself. Now, he had any footnotes
> by Tyndal removed. He deleted whatever he wanted to delete for
> political, not religious, reasons. He had it published as the "Henry
> the Eighth Bible" because the Pope did not want translations
> published. He could now identify "Papist" priests. They were the ones
> with Latin Bibles, which became illegal in Britain - the exact reverse
> of what was going on in the Holy Roman Empire.

> Voltaire said the Holy Roman Empire was neither holy, nor Roman, nor
> an empire. Perfectly correct.

> Religious "freedom" arrived. Henry encouraged any religion that used
> the English Bible, simply to dilute the number of "Papists" in
> Britain.

> He sent his spies into Europe to encourage devil-worship. This was to
> weaken the Holy Roman Empire. Otherwise, they might raise mighty
> armadas to conquer Britain, and burn non-"Papists" at the stake.

> Scotland remained largely "Papist". The term "Catholic" arrived later.
> England, however, had more and more non-"Papists" who were afraid of a
> "crusade" being launched by the Holy Roman Emperor against Britain. It
> was possible to justify wars in Europe, therefore.

> At the time of Elizabeth the First, for example, Philip the Second of
> Spain sent his Flanders Army to the Netherlands to stop the devil-
> worshipping and restore order. Elizabeth wrote sweet letters to him
> whilst simultaneously sending troops to the Netherlands to attack his
> Flanders Army.

> When Philip discovered this, he was furious at such treachery. He sent
> an armada to Britain. However, the admiral was inexperienced. Sir
> Francis Drake had the idea of using fire-ships against the armada, and
> his other admirals agreed. By this means, the Spanish Armada was
> repulsed.

> The whole thing was an ongoing scenario of experimenting with REVERSED
> MORALS. Finally, they decided that it is VIRTUE to betray your
> friends.

> Each member of the Freeekmasons swears an oath that he will do NOTHING
> without permission. He has lost his freedom. He has become a slave. He
> is then TERRORIZED into doing what he is told. They infiltrate the
> medical profession, to about 99%. There, they torture and kill the
> sick and pretend that the sickness was responsible. They infiltrate
> the law, again to about 99%. Here, they deliver a stage-managed
> performance that has been rehearsed in the lodge. You cannot influence
> the pre-arranged outcome of the case.

> The words "free" and "Mason" were first used by these terrorists in
> 1712. In 1717, they set up the Grand Lodge of England. Then they
> flooded out into Europe to force people to be as evil as possible.

> Catholics have confessional boxes. People were going in there, and in
> the dark saying "They are forcing me to become evil. I don't want to
> do this".

> The priests were lost for an answer, and saw the bishops. The bishops
> saw the archbishops. The archbishops saw the cardinals. The cardinals
> reported to the Pope. That is how "In Eminenti" (above) came to be
> issued. There were EIGHT encyclicals condemning the Masons. Here is
> the eighth:

> http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13human.htm

> Here is an extract:

> "Moreover, to be enrolled, it is necessary that the candidates promise
> and undertake to be thenceforward strictly obedient to their leaders
> and masters with the utmost submission and fidelity, and to be in
> readiness to do their bidding upon the slightest expression of their
> will; or, if disobedient, to submit to the direst penalties and death
> itself. As a fact, if any are judged to have betrayed the doings of
> the sect or to have resisted commands given, punishment is inflicted
> on them not infrequently, and with so much audacity and dexterity that
> the assassin very often escapes the detection and penalty of his
> crime".

> To make themselves seem to be mysterious, they often use the excuse
> that they are protection the "Holy Grail". That "explains" their
> secrecy. It is LIES.

> They also write stories that they can trace their ancestry back to the
> time of King Arthur. More nonsense. They also sometimes refer to
> ancient Persia, or whatever. But this the the "brotherhood of LIES",
> who are brainwashed (brain dirtied) into believing that lies are true.

> In about the year 800, Aneurin wrote a "Harry Potter" fiction story
> about "Owain, or the Lady of the Fountain". It was in Welsh. In about
> 1200, all the surviving Welsh stories were assembled in the
> Mabinogion. Some Norman French poets got hold of a copy. One of them
> copied the name of King Arthur, but gave him a queen with a Norman
> French name, Guenevère. The Lady of the Fountain had become the Lady
> of the Lake. There were people with French names, like Sire Launcelot
> du Lac. The castle, Camelot, is to be pronounced in French.

> The first poet died. The second poet finished the book, and it did the
> rounds of Europe (for in Germany as the "Artusrunde"), before finally
> reaching Britain.

> It is FICTION, therefore.

> Of course Masons want you to believe they are a very ancient order of
> goody-goodies. The British gang calls itself "Ancient and Accepted".
> You trust them, and they betray you.

> Maurice Kellett found himself on the wrong side of a three-hundred
> year-old terrorist gang.

> However, it is not the PRIVATE problems of Maurice that should be
> noted. The Freeekmasons betray US ALL.

> Charles Douglas Wehner

How succinct!

How very accurate?

Well, rather like having the breech where the muzzle should be.