Re: Is the London congestion charge good news?
On 9 Jul, 17:12, "DB001" wrote:
> Naked Gonad wrote:
> > On 8 Jul, 18:23, Naked Gonad wrote:
> >> On 7 Jul, 23:35, "DB001" wrote:
>
> >>> Naked Gonad wrote:
> >>>> On Jul 7, 7:20 pm, "Phineas Bunce"
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> "DB001" wrote in message
>
> >>>>>news:d_sck.169993$8k.40163@newsfe18.ams2...
>
> >>>>>> Phineas Bunce wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Naked Gonad" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>news:c5f7577d-66af-40e8-9c4d-2ffcff7e1503@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>>>>> This charge has reduced congestion quite substantially, any
> >>>>>>>> views?
>
> >>>>>>>> Gonad
>
> >>>>>>> Aarrrgh, we ought to be having some of them consumptive charges
> >>>>>>> for newsgroups too. That'd fix 'em.
>
> >>>>>> TAX THE PPL WHO DRIVE THE KIDS TO SCHOOL
>
> >>>>> Aarrrgh, well I never knew them bus drivers didn't pay no taxes.
> >>>>> Do they be a-gettin' expenses too like them MPs?
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Phineas Bunce
>
> >>>>> "You haven't been around here long enough to know what a real
> >>>>> sig-war is. This is a mere blip on the d.l. horizon, which any
> >>>>> long-time d.l. regular will confirm." - Neil Barker, demon.local
> >>>>> sig-bunny in chief, boasting at the commencement of hostilities,
> >>>>> Great Patriotic Sig War 2002.
>
> >>>>> Some blip! Some horizon!
>
> >>>> Sod the MP's, we should be getting their expenses.
>
> >>>> Gonad
>
> >>> AND TAX THEIR TAXIS TOO
>
> >> And prams.
>
> >> Gonad
>
> > Tax their penises.
>
> > Gonad
>
> JUST THE BOYS
> WHY NOT TAX THE NIPPLES
Fresh air?
Gonad
date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
author: Naked Gonad
|