Re: Is the London congestion charge good news?
On 7 Jul, 23:35, "DB001" wrote:
> Naked Gonad wrote:
> > On Jul 7, 7:20 pm, "Phineas Bunce" wrote:
> >> "DB001" wrote in message
>
> >>news:d_sck.169993$8k.40163@newsfe18.ams2...
>
> >>> Phineas Bunce wrote:
> >>>> "Naked Gonad" wrote in message
> >>>>news:c5f7577d-66af-40e8-9c4d-2ffcff7e1503@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> >>>>> This charge has reduced congestion quite substantially, any views?
>
> >>>>> Gonad
>
> >>>> Aarrrgh, we ought to be having some of them consumptive charges for
> >>>> newsgroups too. That'd fix 'em.
>
> >>> TAX THE PPL WHO DRIVE THE KIDS TO SCHOOL
>
> >> Aarrrgh, well I never knew them bus drivers didn't pay no taxes. Do
> >> they be a-gettin' expenses too like them MPs?
>
> >> --
> >> Phineas Bunce
>
> >> "You haven't been around here long enough to know what a real
> >> sig-war is. This is a mere blip on the d.l. horizon, which any
> >> long-time d.l. regular will confirm." - Neil Barker, demon.local
> >> sig-bunny in chief, boasting at the commencement of hostilities,
> >> Great Patriotic Sig War 2002.
>
> >> Some blip! Some horizon!
>
> > Sod the MP's, we should be getting their expenses.
>
> > Gonad
>
> AND TAX THEIR TAXIS TOO- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
And prams.
Gonad
date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
author: Naked Gonad
|