|
|
|
date: Tue, 20 May 2008 14:00:38 +0100,
group: uk.local.scot-highlands
back
Another fucking joke
An out of work pianist with Tourette's Syndrome is strolling around the
streets and bars of Soho one unemployed afternoon.
Walking down Dean Street he sees a lounge bar with a sign in the window
'Pianist wanted for evening performances'.
'Fucking get in there you cunt!' he says to himself and goes to the bar.
'Get the fucking manager of this pigshit middle class wankhole please...
you cunt', he says to a somewhat startled barman. The barman however
obliges and his manager comes upstairs.
'Can I help you sir?'
'Yes you can you fat piece of shit, I saw your poxy advert in the
cunting window and I'm here to audition.....wanker.'
The manager is naturally put off by the man's abrasive manner but his
dire need for a top class pianist forces him to agree to an audition.
The first tune the pianist plays is an uplifting jazzy number, not too
involving, yet utterly melodic. At the end the thrilled manager cries,
'Wonderful, wonderful. What was that called?'
'That song was called "Excuse me prime minister but I just twatted your
daughter, and now the bitch is blind...'
'Oh' says the manager 'err, can you play me another. Something a little
less "lively"?'
'Wanker..' interjects the pianist before launching into a powerful
ballad which leaves the manager in tears. The manager through his salty
teardrops asks him the title.
'That little number was called "Sometimes when you do a bird up the arse
you get shit on your bell-end.'
'I see' says the manager, 'Have you got any songs with less offensive
titles?'
'Well there's my jazz number "Do you want me to split your ringhole", or
there's the epic "I don't care if you're older my dear, you've still got
nice jugs".'
'Look' says the manager interrupting, I think you're a superb pianist
but the title of your songs are a little "racy". I will hire you on the
condition that you do not introduce your songs or speak to the
audience.'
'Fuck it' says the pianist 'Why not.'
On his first night everything is going superbly the crowd are lapping up
his repertoire and his silence is being received as modesty. The only
thing putting off the pianist is that in the front row there is a
gorgeous blonde in a black evening dress with a split up the side
revealing the tops of her stockings, and a plunging neckline which
boasts a proud and inviting cleavage.
During the interval the pianist has got such an impressive 'swelling'
that he decides to go to the bog and polish one off, to "relax"
himself. Just as he has "relinquished" he hears himself being
re-introduced over the P.A, so he rushes back to the stage and finishes
his act.
After the show he is at the bar relaxing when the blonde approaches him.
'Hi' she says.
'Hello' he winces, struggling to hold in the expletives. She leans over
and whispers in his ear, 'Do you know your penis is hanging out of your
trousers, and spunk is dribbling onto your shoes?'
'Know it?' says the pianist putting his beer on the bar confidently, 'I
fucking wrote it!!!'
date: Tue, 20 May 2008 00:53:26 +0100
author: Simon
|
Dictators
See Queensland Constitutional Review Commission report (pdf)
30 Office of Governor
The Constitution Act 1867, sections 11A and 11B contain provisions about the
office of Governor.Note-
The Constitution Act 1867, sections 11A and 11B are subject to section 53
(Certain measures to be supported by referendum) of that Act.
I've managed to transfer the details about the Qld constitution from the
Flora Newsletter
The Queensland Constitution 2001 / The Brigalow Corporation /
The Removal of all Ownership Rights in QLD.
---------------------------------------
1. Queensland Constitution 1867 was reframed with 114 Changes, 131 Additions
and 116 Deletions.
2. January 1998, QLD National Party documented a move to place the QLD
Governor in the Government as a Parliamentary Secretary under the QLD
Constitution 1867.
3. This became official January 29 1999, the same day the QLD Constitution
1867 was reprinted.
4. Thus the Governor was no longer a sworn representative of Her Majesty
Queen Elizabeth II, but a Public Servant of the QLD Government.
5. He was still using the Public Seal of the State on behalf of the Premier
and Parliament of QLD and maintained the appearance of the Governor to the
Sovereign People of the State.
6. During the early 1990's all important and relevant Acts were changed and
framed, but were adjourned without a definite date of reprinting.
7. On 3 December 2001, the Queensland Consitution 2001 came into being.
8. On this day, this became the "Fundamental Law of QLD".
9. 7 June 2001, all the framed Acts were reprinted and became law.
10. QLD then became, at the completion of these matters, without the assent
of any of the laws by the Crown or Her Representative, an independent
sovereign State and fractured the common law and the separation of powers in
that state.
11. 15 July 2001, The Corporations (Q) Act 1990 (Q) Reprint No 3 created in
QLD a Corporate Government. This is known as the Brigalow Corporation.
12. The State of Queensland Australia is registered with the US Securities
and Exchange Commissions under No. 0001244818.
13. The Queensland Treasury Corp is registered under No. 0000852555.
14. All Crown land, assets and infrastructure on that land including
schools, hospitals, roads, etc are subject to and responsible to the
Ministers of the State of QLD as cited at Chapter III of the QLD
Constitution 2001.
14. All Sovereign People are now persons under the Corporation, All persons
are chattel ( a piece of property that is moveable).
15. Their land, bank accounts and all items of ownership are now assets
under the Brigalow Corporation.
16. The Premier is now the Executive Leader of the Parliament of QLD.
17. All government tiers, including Local Council are now inside the
Parliament of the State of QLD.
18. The public officials are not public officials of "the Crown" but public
officials of "the State" of QLD.
19. The Common Law has been repealed from the Supreme Court Act 1995 (Q),
Reprint No. 2, reprinted as in force 2 March 2001 © State of Q 2001
20. The Supreme Court, the District Courts and the Magistrate's Courts are
now inside the Parliament of the State of QLD, and as such must obey the QLD
Constitution 2001.
21. The Australian Constitution, the Common Law & Equity, the High Court and
the Federal Government no longer have any superior governance over the State
of QLD.
22. The State of QLD and the Sovereign People of QLD have only Civil and
Statute Law in this state.
23. As private ownership can not exist under Civil and Statute Law, all
private equity and inheritance in the State is now the property of "the
State",
24. Under the civil law system, which is now subject to the Uniform Civil
Procedures Rules of the Supreme Court Act 1991(Qld), every person is guilty
until they proven their innocence.
25. There has been no Referendum of the Sovereign People to approve any of
these moves. This means they are Ultra vires, an act beyond the powers or
authority of the government.
26. Every State in Australia has begun its own "Legal Theft" of the
ownership rights of the Australian People.
Only the People can protect the rights of themselves & their families and
stop this.
Apr 15th, 2008 at 11:32 am
Just as a matter of interest (and relevant to this topic.)
I have today received a copy of a letter from the Office of the Premier
Queensland Government. It reads as follows:-
"Thankyou for your email dated ---- concerning claims that the State of
Queensland has been removed as a State of the Commonwealth of Australia and
common law is no longer recognised in Queensland. I have been requested to
reply to you on the Premier's behalf.
The comments in your correspondence have been noted. As these claims are to
be considered in a current application before the High Court of Australia,
it is inappropriate for the premier to comment at this time.
Again, thank you for bringing your views to the Premier's attention"
Yours sincerely
Stephen Beckett
Deputy Chief of Staff
I'll leave you as readers to decide what this letter means.
UK Crown employees tyranny protected by Crown Immunity illegal under
international law.
Lie of the Judicial Oath.
http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com
Murder to protect tyranny.
http://www.masonsatwork.50megs.com
date: Tue, 20 May 2008 14:00:38 +0100
author: Maurice Kellett
|
Re: Dictators
In Jarrod's "English Law" it is stated:
that each piece of land is known as an "od" (old saxon)
that every "od" in England and Wales belongs to the Queen
that the citizens are entitled to inhabit the "od" upon payment of a
"feo".
The system is "feo-odal" (feudal). The land you occupy extends as a
cone from the centre of the Earth to the end of the Universe.
When you occupy the land, you become a lord, however, not a lord of
people. You become a lord of the land (landlord) as long as the "feo"
is being paid.
Agents of the Queen are entitled to invade any property in England or
Wales, if they have the excuse that they are trying to prevent a crime
of arrest a criminal.
So "common law" never really existed. It is all part of the ***FAKE
DEBATE*** .
When the crooked government commits its crimes, it does so by Masonic
means.
The "learned judge" is often a bad criminal, but not a terrorist. His
Master Mason, however, is a fearsome ogre of a terrorist, who so
terrorizes the "judge" that the "judge" simply recites from his
script. You cannot change the outcome. The "court cases" have been
rehearsed in the Masonic lodge, and if anybody deviates from the
script, he will be tortured or even murdered.
The "learned judge" is given such phrases to say as "It is the law".
However, the act and section of the law-book is never, or rarely,
quoted. When real students of law find there is no such law, the
"judge" is told to say that it is "precedent". That is to say,
Parliament alone does not make laws but "senior judges" can make laws
as well. IT IS ALL EXCUSES.
A ***FAKE DEBATE*** is opened up, by which the victims are required to
"DEMAND A CHANGE IN THE LAW". This wastes their time, because Masons
break the law anyway.
Whether the Australians are rebelling against the corrupt British
Masonic "law", or are extending it is unclear to me at this time,
because these developments are so new.
However, former Councillor Maurice Kellett has given us good service
in drawing these matters to our attention.
Charles Douglas Wehner
date: Tue, 27 May 2008 09:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|
Re: Dictators
On Tue, 27 May 2008 09:13:31 -0700 (PDT), "charleswehner@hotmail.com"
wrote:
>In Jarrod's "English Law" it is stated:
>
>that each piece of land is known as an "od" (old saxon)
>
>that every "od" in England and Wales belongs to the Queen
So less than sod all to do with uk.local.scot-highlands.
--
Jim.
0870: Gives a whole new meaning to "Please
continue to hold, your call is important to us".
date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:55:16 +0000
author: Jim
|
Re: Dictators
On Tue, 27 May 2008 16:55:16 +0000, Jim wrote:
>On Tue, 27 May 2008 09:13:31 -0700 (PDT), "charleswehner@hotmail.com"
> wrote:
>
>>In Jarrod's "English Law" it is stated:
>>
>>that each piece of land is known as an "od" (old saxon)
>>
>>that every "od" in England and Wales belongs to the Queen
>
> So less than sod all to do with uk.local.scot-highlands.
Please read the Charter for this newsgroup.
You have posted to a newsgroup set up by
the government to plug the gaps created by the abysmal
failure of their Psychiatric Care in the Community Policy.
The uk.local hierarchy was devised to provide an outlet for
individuals who would otherwise spending their days sitting
at home wearing an aluminium foil hat waiting for a full moon
to rise. It was hoped that this would reduce the incidence
of nutters out there howling at the moon and frightening the
shit out of their neighbours. Another of HMGs aims and
objectives was to provide a distraction to take their minds
of the problem of who they were going to knife to death next.
Unfortunately, this group has been taken over by the
articulate lower middle classes who have succeeding in
driving HMGs target audience away.Independant research has
shown that it was the amount and quality of the inane drivel,
called small talk which the middle classes are adept at, which
had the effect of doing their heads in. They left to
protect what was left of their sanity. Saddly this has happened
to the whole of uk.local. hierarchy.
This newsgroup is a very good example of another HMG failure.
date: Tue, 27 May 2008 20:17:33 +0100
author: Dixie
|
Re: Dictators
Thanks for this item Charles.
Deception is now all a part of the UK Crown criminal rule.The UK should
start to try to become a democracy by ridding itself of our ruling
hypocrites. While I favour the ballot box as a method of carrying this out,
the UK Crown has substantial resources to see that the solution via the
ballot box may become impossible.
Freemasons are a part of the Crown foot soldiers. Many pub landlords in the
UK are also Freemasons. Any organised dissent against the Crown would be
picked up by them and then be passed on to Crown employed officers, police,
courts etc. to deal with. They are clearly determined that something like
the English Civil Wars will never happen again without them getting prior
knowledge of it.
Maurice Kellett.
wrote in message
news:acdf703a-7ddd-4233-a196-3f66f8931971@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> In Jarrod's "English Law" it is stated:
>
> that each piece of land is known as an "od" (old saxon)
>
> that every "od" in England and Wales belongs to the Queen
>
> that the citizens are entitled to inhabit the "od" upon payment of a
> "feo".
>
> The system is "feo-odal" (feudal). The land you occupy extends as a
> cone from the centre of the Earth to the end of the Universe.
>
> When you occupy the land, you become a lord, however, not a lord of
> people. You become a lord of the land (landlord) as long as the "feo"
> is being paid.
>
> Agents of the Queen are entitled to invade any property in England or
> Wales, if they have the excuse that they are trying to prevent a crime
> of arrest a criminal.
>
> So "common law" never really existed. It is all part of the ***FAKE
> DEBATE*** .
>
> When the crooked government commits its crimes, it does so by Masonic
> means.
>
> The "learned judge" is often a bad criminal, but not a terrorist. His
> Master Mason, however, is a fearsome ogre of a terrorist, who so
> terrorizes the "judge" that the "judge" simply recites from his
> script. You cannot change the outcome. The "court cases" have been
> rehearsed in the Masonic lodge, and if anybody deviates from the
> script, he will be tortured or even murdered.
>
> The "learned judge" is given such phrases to say as "It is the law".
> However, the act and section of the law-book is never, or rarely,
> quoted. When real students of law find there is no such law, the
> "judge" is told to say that it is "precedent". That is to say,
> Parliament alone does not make laws but "senior judges" can make laws
> as well. IT IS ALL EXCUSES.
>
> A ***FAKE DEBATE*** is opened up, by which the victims are required to
> "DEMAND A CHANGE IN THE LAW". This wastes their time, because Masons
> break the law anyway.
>
> Whether the Australians are rebelling against the corrupt British
> Masonic "law", or are extending it is unclear to me at this time,
> because these developments are so new.
>
> However, former Councillor Maurice Kellett has given us good service
> in drawing these matters to our attention.
>
>
> Charles Douglas Wehner
>
date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:07:09 +0100
author: Maurice Kellett
|
Re: Dictators
On 24 Jun., 21:07, "Maurice Kellett" wrote:
> Thanks for this item Charles.
>
> Deception is now all a part of the UK Crown criminal rule.The UK should
> start to try to become a democracy by ridding itself of our ruling
> hypocrites. While I favour the ballot box as a method of carrying this out,
> the UK Crown has substantial resources to see that the solution via the
> ballot box may become impossible.
>
> Freemasons are a part of the Crown foot soldiers. Many pub landlords in the
> UK are also Freemasons. Any organised dissent against the Crown would be
> picked up by them and then be passed on to Crown employed officers, police,
> courts etc. to deal with. They are clearly determined that something like
> the English Civil Wars will never happen again without them getting prior
> knowledge of it.
>
> Maurice Kellett.
>
This is exactly right. You have described the "ALL-SEEING EYE", which
is a network of Freeakmason spies, such as pub landlords.
The public do not know they are being spied upon. Why ever should they
be? They do nothing wrong. They assume people would only spy on them
to stop them doing wrong.
However, the Freeaks have a reversed morality and a reversed logic.
They are spying on the public to ensure that anybody who discovers
their crimes can be murdered. This sets the terrorist government free
to continue to run the CRIME, raise TAXES, and run the LAW in such a
way as to SEEM to be just.
Because nuclear bombs and the three recent wars - Kosovo, Afghanistan
and Iraq - are expensive, the Freeak government commits such crimes as
to spread heroin in its own country. This fills the war chest. Andy
McArdle saw some men dressed as senior police delivering heroin to the
Daniels gang. He reported it to other men wearing police clothes, in
the police station.
He was snatched from the street and taken to Carstairs hospital, where
men wearing doctors' clothing beat him to death.
He had sharp features, so this image is not of his natural face. It is
how he looked with his face beaten to a pulp.
http://www.normanscarth.com/design2_clip_image002_0000.jpg
It was decent of you, Maurice, to attend his funeral. You saw him
being buried. You know that the Freeak government refuses to exhume
his body for investigation, on the pretext that he was "cremated".
It is worse than Nazi Germany.
Charles Douglas Wehner
date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|
|
|