Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
local
ayrshire
bath
bedfordshire
birmingham
borders-region
bristol
channel-isles
cheshire
cornwall
county-durham
cumbria
derbyshire
devon
east-anglia
essx
geordie
glasgow
hampshire
herefordshire
hertfordshire
isle-of-wight
kent
lincolnshire
london
london.info
lothians
merseyside
midlands
north-staffs
north-wales
nw-england
peterborough
scot-highlands
shropshire
somerset
south-wales
southwest
southwest.adverts
surrey
teesside
thames-valley
warwickshire
west-wales
yorkshire
yorkshire.noticeboard
  
 
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:05:30 +0000 (UTC),    group: uk.local.peterborough        back       
M.I,5`Pe rsecution . b ugging a nd counter-surv eillance   
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= MI5: bugging and. counter-surveillance -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ?. I mean if
PO: >I thought that was happening to me, I'd search the place from top. to bottom,
PO: >I mean I live there I. would know if anything was out of place. If I was
PO:. >really suspicious, I would call in one of those bug detection teams which
PO:. >have those machines that pick up the transmitted radio waves. This
PO: >reminds me of BUGS, that new programme on. BBC1 on

That's exactly what we did.. We went to a competent, professional detective
agency in London, paid them. over 400 quid to debug our house. They used
scanner. devices which go to over 1 GHz and would pick up any nearby
transmitter in that range, they also checked the phones. and found
nothing... but if the tap was at the. exchange, then they wouldn't find
anything,. would they?

CS: >Doesn't this suggest to you that there are, in fact, no bugs to be. found?

You can assume that they've done this sort of thing to. other people in more
"serious" cases,. where they would know the targets would suspect the
presence of electronic. surveillance. So they will have developed techniques
and devices which. are not readily detectable either by visual inspection or
by electronic means. What those techniques might. be, I couldn't guess.

In this case, the. existence of bugging devices was clear from the
beginning, and they "rubbed it in" with what was said by the boy. on the
coach. It was almost as if. they wanted counter-surveillance people to be
called in, who. they knew would fail to detect the bugging devices, causing
loss of credibility to the other. things I would have to say relating to the
harassment.

I did all the things someone. in my situation would do to try to find the
bugs. In addition to calling in professional help using. electronic
counter-surveillance, I made a close visual inspection. of electrical
equipment, plus any points where audio or video. surveillance devices might
have. been concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal surveillance
"mini-cameras" are quite noticeable and require. visible supporting
circuitry. It seems to me. the best place to put a small video surveillance
device would be additional to. a piece of electronic equipment such as a TV
or. video. It would be necessary to physically break in to a property to fit
such a. device.

3917
date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:05:30 +0000 (UTC)   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us