http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/06/02/nsheds02.xml

So many migrant workers are entering Britain that they are being
housed in garden sheds.

Brick-built sheds have begun springing up in areas such as Slough,
Berks, which attract high numbers of immigrants, predominantly Polish,
because of the availability of jobs.

Council inspectors found that an "alarming number" of sheds began to
be erected in the back gardens of landlords who were already renting
the properties to immigrants.

With no running water, lavatory or cooking facilities they represent
the most basic accommodation, yet such is the shortage of housing and
willingness of workers to save every penny they earn that up to eight
people are living in a shed at a time.

Andrew Blake-Herbert, director of finance and property at Slough
Borough Council, said: "It's pretty desperate stuff but people choose
to live like this.

"The only thing we can do is close them down but we have found some
unscrupulous landlords simply wait for a bit then open them up again.

"There are no facilities at all. It's the cheapest accommodation they
can find."

About 50 sheds have been found in Slough, either existing ones that
have been adapted or purpose-built ones. It is a problem thought to be
replicated around the London area where there is a high density of
immigrants matched with a shortage of cheap and available housing.

As with all below-standard housing, the council has the option of
bringing it up to a habitable standard at the landlord's expense or
closing it down.

Mr Blake-Herbert said: "Obviously with a shed with no running water it
makes no sense to bring it up to living standard, so we close it down
and hand it back to the landlord."

Immigrants have to work for 12 months before they are eligible for
housing benefit so when they first arrive they seek the cheapest
accommodation they can find.

Mr Blake-Herbert said there was a huge problem of overcrowded
properties around Slough. Inspectors have recently found more than
1,000 two-storey houses with multiple occupancy. Some three-bedroom
houses had up to 30 people living in them.

"In extreme cases they sleep in shifts and all over the house, even on
kitchen worktops."

Tony Travers, from the London School of Economics, told The Economist
that he had been able to pinpoint some of the sheds on Google Earth,
the online mapping facility.

"You can see them in long back gardens and there is some evidence that
they are being used for informal housing."

On 2 Jun, 16:48, Steve Greene <stephen_gre...@hotmail.com.invalid>
wrote:
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/06/02/nshed...
>
> So many migrant workers are entering Britain that they are being
> housed in garden sheds.
>
> Brick-built sheds have begun springing up in areas such as Slough,
> Berks, which attract high numbers of immigrants, predominantly Polish,
> because of the availability of jobs.
>
> Council inspectors found that an "alarming number" of sheds began to
> be erected in the back gardens of landlords who were already renting
> the properties to immigrants.
>
> With no running water, lavatory or cooking facilities they represent
> the most basic accommodation, yet such is the shortage of housing and
> willingness of workers to save every penny they earn that up to eight
> people are living in a shed at a time.
>
> Andrew Blake-Herbert, director of finance and property at Slough
> Borough Council, said: "It's pretty desperate stuff but people choose
> to live like this.
>
> "The only thing we can do is close them down but we have found some
> unscrupulous landlords simply wait for a bit then open them up again.
>
> "There are no facilities at all. It's the cheapest accommodation they
> can find."
>
> About 50 sheds have been found in Slough, either existing ones that
> have been adapted or purpose-built ones. It is a problem thought to be
> replicated around the London area where there is a high density of
> immigrants matched with a shortage of cheap and available housing.
>
> As with all below-standard housing, the council has the option of
> bringing it up to a habitable standard at the landlord's expense or
> closing it down.
>
> Mr Blake-Herbert said: "Obviously with a shed with no running water it
> makes no sense to bring it up to living standard, so we close it down
> and hand it back to the landlord."
>
> Immigrants have to work for 12 months before they are eligible for
> housing benefit so when they first arrive they seek the cheapest
> accommodation they can find.
>
> Mr Blake-Herbert said there was a huge problem of overcrowded
> properties around Slough. Inspectors have recently found more than
> 1,000 two-storey houses with multiple occupancy. Some three-bedroom
> houses had up to 30 people living in them.
>
> "In extreme cases they sleep in shifts and all over the house, even on
> kitchen worktops."
>
> Tony Travers, from the London School of Economics, told The Economist
> that he had been able to pinpoint some of the sheds on Google Earth,
> the online mapping facility.
>
> "You can see them in long back gardens and there is some evidence that
> they are being used for informal housing.">

New Labour Slave Britain.

MikeinCamden@aol.com wrote:
> On 2 Jun, 16:48, Steve Greene <stephen_gre...@hotmail.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/06/02/nshed...
>>
>> So many migrant workers are entering Britain that they are being
>> housed in garden sheds.
>>
>> Brick-built sheds have begun springing up in areas such as Slough,
>> Berks, which attract high numbers of immigrants, predominantly Polish,
>> because of the availability of jobs.
>>
>> Council inspectors found that an "alarming number" of sheds began to
>> be erected in the back gardens of landlords who were already renting
>> the properties to immigrants.
>>
>> With no running water, lavatory or cooking facilities they represent
>> the most basic accommodation, yet such is the shortage of housing and
>> willingness of workers to save every penny they earn that up to eight
>> people are living in a shed at a time.
>>
>> Andrew Blake-Herbert, director of finance and property at Slough
>> Borough Council, said: "It's pretty desperate stuff but people choose
>> to live like this.
>>
>> "The only thing we can do is close them down but we have found some
>> unscrupulous landlords simply wait for a bit then open them up again.
>>
>> "There are no facilities at all. It's the cheapest accommodation they
>> can find."
>>
>> About 50 sheds have been found in Slough, either existing ones that
>> have been adapted or purpose-built ones. It is a problem thought to be
>> replicated around the London area where there is a high density of
>> immigrants matched with a shortage of cheap and available housing.
>>
>> As with all below-standard housing, the council has the option of
>> bringing it up to a habitable standard at the landlord's expense or
>> closing it down.
>>
>> Mr Blake-Herbert said: "Obviously with a shed with no running water it
>> makes no sense to bring it up to living standard, so we close it down
>> and hand it back to the landlord."
>>
>> Immigrants have to work for 12 months before they are eligible for
>> housing benefit so when they first arrive they seek the cheapest
>> accommodation they can find.
>>
>> Mr Blake-Herbert said there was a huge problem of overcrowded
>> properties around Slough. Inspectors have recently found more than
>> 1,000 two-storey houses with multiple occupancy. Some three-bedroom
>> houses had up to 30 people living in them.
>>
>> "In extreme cases they sleep in shifts and all over the house, even on
>> kitchen worktops."
>>
>> Tony Travers, from the London School of Economics, told The Economist
>> that he had been able to pinpoint some of the sheds on Google Earth,
>> the online mapping facility.
>>
>> "You can see them in long back gardens and there is some evidence that
>> they are being used for informal housing.">
> 
> New Labour Slave Britain.
> 
> 
Nice to see middle class white Brits milky those most needy

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:Zu2dnUDDg-NYbvzbRVnyhgA@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:
>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>> news:2JmdnQz0GYo5R_zbRVnyugA@bt.com...
>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>> news:xOadnU3Gf5k0SvzbnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or 
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> evidence) for this assertion...??
>>>>>>>> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is as
>>>>>>>> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
>>>>>>>> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
>>>>>>>> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford 
>>>>>>>> Hill.
>>>>>>>> It's just common knowledge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> simply not true....the majority of the population in Southall is 
>>>>>>> still English  white and the majority of properties are owned by 
>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>> Utter lies from KJ as usual !
>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Southall is primarily an Asian residential district. 1950 was when 
>>>>>> the first flock of Asians arrived in Southall, due to the closeness 
>>>>>> of Heathrow airport, and has since been increasing with many Asians, 
>>>>>> primarily Punjabis. According to Commission for Racial Equality over 
>>>>>> 55% of Southall's population of 70,000 is Indian/Pakistani."
>>>>>>
>>>>> actually the figure is 61,000 and the percentage is 65% Asian Origin. 
>>>>> The figure I used were for the London Borough of Ealing, of which 
>>>>> Southall is a part.
>>>> Caught you out making it up as you go along, again .....
>>> yeh..should get a job at BNP HQ
>>
>> You make it all so easy. You tell a barefaced lie in almost every post 
>> you make.
>>
>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>
> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster

Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
 "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and the 
majority of properties are owned by them."
 Mwahahahaha !

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:Zu2dnUDDg-NYbvzbRVnyhgA@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:
>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>> news:2JmdnQz0GYo5R_zbRVnyugA@bt.com...
>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>> news:xOadnU3Gf5k0SvzbnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or 
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> evidence) for this assertion...??
>>>>>>>> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is as
>>>>>>>> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
>>>>>>>> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
>>>>>>>> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford 
>>>>>>>> Hill.
>>>>>>>> It's just common knowledge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> simply not true....the majority of the population in Southall is 
>>>>>>> still English  white and the majority of properties are owned by 
>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>> Utter lies from KJ as usual !
>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Southall is primarily an Asian residential district. 1950 was when 
>>>>>> the first flock of Asians arrived in Southall, due to the closeness 
>>>>>> of Heathrow airport, and has since been increasing with many Asians, 
>>>>>> primarily Punjabis. According to Commission for Racial Equality over 
>>>>>> 55% of Southall's population of 70,000 is Indian/Pakistani."
>>>>>>
>>>>> actually the figure is 61,000 and the percentage is 65% Asian Origin. 
>>>>> The figure I used were for the London Borough of Ealing, of which 
>>>>> Southall is a part.
>>>> Caught you out making it up as you go along, again .....
>>> yeh..should get a job at BNP HQ
>>
>> You make it all so easy. You tell a barefaced lie in almost every post 
>> you make.
>>
>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>
> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster

Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
 "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and the 
majority of properties are owned by them."
 Mwahahahaha !

Chris X wrote:
> "kj"  wrote in message 
> news:Zu2dnUDDg-NYbvzbRVnyhgA@bt.com...
>> Chris X wrote:
>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>> news:2JmdnQz0GYo5R_zbRVnyugA@bt.com...
>>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>>> news:xOadnU3Gf5k0SvzbnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or 
>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>> evidence) for this assertion...??
>>>>>>>>> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is as
>>>>>>>>> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
>>>>>>>>> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
>>>>>>>>> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford 
>>>>>>>>> Hill.
>>>>>>>>> It's just common knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> simply not true....the majority of the population in Southall is 
>>>>>>>> still English  white and the majority of properties are owned by 
>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>> Utter lies from KJ as usual !
>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Southall is primarily an Asian residential district. 1950 was when 
>>>>>>> the first flock of Asians arrived in Southall, due to the closeness 
>>>>>>> of Heathrow airport, and has since been increasing with many Asians, 
>>>>>>> primarily Punjabis. According to Commission for Racial Equality over 
>>>>>>> 55% of Southall's population of 70,000 is Indian/Pakistani."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> actually the figure is 61,000 and the percentage is 65% Asian Origin. 
>>>>>> The figure I used were for the London Borough of Ealing, of which 
>>>>>> Southall is a part.
>>>>> Caught you out making it up as you go along, again .....
>>>> yeh..should get a job at BNP HQ
>>> You make it all so easy. You tell a barefaced lie in almost every post 
>>> you make.
>>>
>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>
>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster
> 
> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and the 
> majority of properties are owned by them."
>  Mwahahahaha !
> 
> 
> 
and then corrected myself...unlike you

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:U6WdnS-EQpJTBf_bnZ2dnUVZ8qydnZ2d@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or 
>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>> evidence) for this assertion...??
>>>>>>>>>> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is 
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
>>>>>>>>>> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
>>>>>>>>>> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford 
>>>>>>>>>> Hill.
>>>>>>>>>> It's just common knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> simply not true....the majority of the population in Southall is 
>>>>>>>>> still English  white and the majority of properties are owned by 
>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>> Utter lies from KJ as usual !
>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Southall is primarily an Asian residential district. 1950 was when 
>>>>>>>> the first flock of Asians arrived in Southall, due to the closeness 
>>>>>>>> of Heathrow airport, and has since been increasing with many 
>>>>>>>> Asians, primarily Punjabis. According to Commission for Racial 
>>>>>>>> Equality over 55% of Southall's population of 70,000 is 
>>>>>>>> Indian/Pakistani."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> actually the figure is 61,000 and the percentage is 65% Asian 
>>>>>>> Origin. The figure I used were for the London Borough of Ealing, of 
>>>>>>> which Southall is a part.
>>>>>> Caught you out making it up as you go along, again .....
>>>>> yeh..should get a job at BNP HQ
>>>> You make it all so easy. You tell a barefaced lie in almost every post 
>>>> you make.
>>>>
>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>>
>>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster
>>
>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>  Mwahahahaha !
>>
> and then corrected myself...

No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), by 
ME.
Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on every 
single lie you try to post.

Chris X wrote:
> "kj"  wrote in message 
> news:U6WdnS-EQpJTBf_bnZ2dnUVZ8qydnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence) for this assertion...??
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is 
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
>>>>>>>>>>> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
>>>>>>>>>>> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hill.
>>>>>>>>>>> It's just common knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> simply not true....the majority of the population in Southall is 
>>>>>>>>>> still English  white and the majority of properties are owned by 
>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>> Utter lies from KJ as usual !
>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Southall is primarily an Asian residential district. 1950 was when 
>>>>>>>>> the first flock of Asians arrived in Southall, due to the closeness 
>>>>>>>>> of Heathrow airport, and has since been increasing with many 
>>>>>>>>> Asians, primarily Punjabis. According to Commission for Racial 
>>>>>>>>> Equality over 55% of Southall's population of 70,000 is 
>>>>>>>>> Indian/Pakistani."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> actually the figure is 61,000 and the percentage is 65% Asian 
>>>>>>>> Origin. The figure I used were for the London Borough of Ealing, of 
>>>>>>>> which Southall is a part.
>>>>>>> Caught you out making it up as you go along, again .....
>>>>>> yeh..should get a job at BNP HQ
>>>>> You make it all so easy. You tell a barefaced lie in almost every post 
>>>>> you make.
>>>>>
>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>>>
>>>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster
>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>  Mwahahahaha !
>>>
>> and then corrected myself...
> 
> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), by 
> ME.
> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on every 
> single lie you try to post. 
> 
> 
Now Now junior don't get your nickers in a twist.....I'll look forward 
to your attempts you sad little goose stepper  :-)

X-No-Archive: yes
"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in message 
news:1180813158.102037.73730@q19g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in message
>>
>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...


>> > Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from Southall.
>> > Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.

>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or other
>> evidence) for this assertion...??

> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is as
> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford Hill.
> It's just common knowledge.



Ah.........  "common knowledge"  it is then.
Is that the same, or similar to, an 'Urban Myth'....??


Mark

X-No-Archive: yes
"Chris X"  wrote in message 
news:zOednZ_SStSXUv_bnZ2dnUVZ8tXinZ2d@giganews.com...
> "kj"  wrote in message


>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !



>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>  Mwahahahaha !


>> and then corrected myself...


> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), 
> by ME.
> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on 
> every single lie you try to post.


You are remarkable frankly.
What kind of inane dribble is it that reduces and translates a 'belief' - a 
belief that was further clarifed, accepted as being  perhaps, misplaced and 
then explained - into the notion that such a statement constitutes a 
"lie"...........??
Are you serious....??
Whatever your 'take' on the matter [..which, as per usual in threads of this 
nature, words and phrases are seized upon whilst ignoring the underlying 
subject in debate..] there is clearly a matter of interpretation as to what 
constitutes Southall in any event.
As your own link points out, it is enshrined into a parliamentary area which 
includes Ealing and as far as the Southall post code  area it includes 
Southall, Hayes, Northolt, Greenford, West Drayton and Uxbridge.
Further, it says nothing as to the OP assertion that the majority of 
landlords are asians.   That may well be the case....   it equally may not.
Thus,  do you have the evidence or figures that confirm such assertions.  In 
addition, can you clarify as to what you *believe*  Southall to consist of 
geographically......
To rely upon the link you provide  is plainly wanting in the area of actual, 
geographical definition.
Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.



Mark

mark wrote:
> X-No-Archive: yes
> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
> news:zOednZ_SStSXUv_bnZ2dnUVZ8tXinZ2d@giganews.com...
>> "kj"  wrote in message
> 
> 
>>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
> 
> 
> 
>>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>  Mwahahahaha !
> 
> 
>>> and then corrected myself...
> 
> 
>> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), 
>> by ME.
>> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on 
>> every single lie you try to post.
> 
> 
> You are remarkable frankly.
> What kind of inane dribble is it that reduces and translates a 'belief' - a 
> belief that was further clarifed, accepted as being  perhaps, misplaced and 
> then explained - into the notion that such a statement constitutes a 
> "lie"...........??
> Are you serious....??
> Whatever your 'take' on the matter [..which, as per usual in threads of this 
> nature, words and phrases are seized upon whilst ignoring the underlying 
> subject in debate..] there is clearly a matter of interpretation as to what 
> constitutes Southall in any event.
> As your own link points out, it is enshrined into a parliamentary area which 
> includes Ealing and as far as the Southall post code  area it includes 
> Southall, Hayes, Northolt, Greenford, West Drayton and Uxbridge.
> Further, it says nothing as to the OP assertion that the majority of 
> landlords are asians.   That may well be the case....   it equally may not.
> Thus,  do you have the evidence or figures that confirm such assertions.  In 
> addition, can you clarify as to what you *believe*  Southall to consist of 
> geographically......
> To rely upon the link you provide  is plainly wanting in the area of actual, 
> geographical definition.
> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.
> 
> 
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> 
I lived in the LB of Ealing and Hounslow for many years and know the 
areas very well indeed.  was actually in a pub in Southall on the night 
of the Southall Riots....it was.......interesting.

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:f5mdneaCw9yPTf_bnZ2dnUVZ8v2vnZ2d@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:

>>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>>>>
>>>>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster

>>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>  Mwahahahaha !
>>>>
>>> and then corrected myself...
>>
>> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), 
>> by ME.
>> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on 
>> every single lie you try to post.
> Now Now junior don't get your nickers in a twist.....I'll look forward to 
> your attempts you sad little goose stepper  :-)

Somehow I don't think you really *are* looking forward to being exposed as 
the discredited little globalist liar that you are, "Kev".

"mark"  wrote in message 
news:rdqdnWJXOd6lfv_bRVnysQA@bt.com...
> X-No-Archive: yes
> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
> news:zOednZ_SStSXUv_bnZ2dnUVZ8tXinZ2d@giganews.com...
>> "kj"  wrote in message
>
>
>>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>
>>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>  Mwahahahaha !
>
>
>>> and then corrected myself...
>
>> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), 
>> by ME.
>> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on 
>> every single lie you try to post.
>
>
> You are remarkable frankly.
(SNIP drivel)
> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.

He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.

X-No-Archive: yes
"Chris X"  wrote in message 
news:5rSdnc0bdbbgaf_bRVnyiwA@giganews.com...
>
> "mark"  wrote in message

>> You are remarkable frankly.
> (SNIP drivel)
>> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.

> He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.


He expressed an opinion........ hardly a lie.
You have yet to profer any credible evidence to the contrary..
Secondly, you have avoided the clear question, upon which you base your 
spurious allegation and false accusation, which calls for you to explain and 
determine what YOU  [..not anyone else...] deem to be the geographical 
confluence of *Southall*.
Unless or until you do so, it is impossible to evaluate whether or not the 
statement made by kevin is, indeed,  mis-informed.
Tell me something......  are you here for some debate or just school like 
inanities and mindless assertations...?
Your next post should include *your* definition of the point in question...


Mark

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:Zu2dnUDDg-NYbvzbRVnyhgA@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:
>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>> news:2JmdnQz0GYo5R_zbRVnyugA@bt.com...
>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>> news:xOadnU3Gf5k0SvzbnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or 
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> evidence) for this assertion...??
>>>>>>>> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is as
>>>>>>>> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
>>>>>>>> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
>>>>>>>> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford 
>>>>>>>> Hill.
>>>>>>>> It's just common knowledge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> simply not true....the majority of the population in Southall is 
>>>>>>> still English  white and the majority of properties are owned by 
>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>> Utter lies from KJ as usual !
>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Southall is primarily an Asian residential district. 1950 was when 
>>>>>> the first flock of Asians arrived in Southall, due to the closeness 
>>>>>> of Heathrow airport, and has since been increasing with many Asians, 
>>>>>> primarily Punjabis. According to Commission for Racial Equality over 
>>>>>> 55% of Southall's population of 70,000 is Indian/Pakistani."
>>>>>>
>>>>> actually the figure is 61,000 and the percentage is 65% Asian Origin. 
>>>>> The figure I used were for the London Borough of Ealing, of which 
>>>>> Southall is a part.
>>>> Caught you out making it up as you go along, again .....
>>> yeh..should get a job at BNP HQ
>>
>> You make it all so easy. You tell a barefaced lie in almost every post 
>> you make.
>>
>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>
> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster

Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
 "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and the 
majority of properties are owned by them."
 Mwahahahaha !

Chris X wrote:
> "kj"  wrote in message 
> news:Zu2dnUDDg-NYbvzbRVnyhgA@bt.com...
>> Chris X wrote:
>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>> news:2JmdnQz0GYo5R_zbRVnyugA@bt.com...
>>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>>> news:xOadnU3Gf5k0SvzbnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or 
>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>> evidence) for this assertion...??
>>>>>>>>> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is as
>>>>>>>>> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
>>>>>>>>> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
>>>>>>>>> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford 
>>>>>>>>> Hill.
>>>>>>>>> It's just common knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> simply not true....the majority of the population in Southall is 
>>>>>>>> still English  white and the majority of properties are owned by 
>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>> Utter lies from KJ as usual !
>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Southall is primarily an Asian residential district. 1950 was when 
>>>>>>> the first flock of Asians arrived in Southall, due to the closeness 
>>>>>>> of Heathrow airport, and has since been increasing with many Asians, 
>>>>>>> primarily Punjabis. According to Commission for Racial Equality over 
>>>>>>> 55% of Southall's population of 70,000 is Indian/Pakistani."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> actually the figure is 61,000 and the percentage is 65% Asian Origin. 
>>>>>> The figure I used were for the London Borough of Ealing, of which 
>>>>>> Southall is a part.
>>>>> Caught you out making it up as you go along, again .....
>>>> yeh..should get a job at BNP HQ
>>> You make it all so easy. You tell a barefaced lie in almost every post 
>>> you make.
>>>
>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>
>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster
> 
> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and the 
> majority of properties are owned by them."
>  Mwahahahaha !
> 
> 
> 
and then corrected myself...unlike you

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:U6WdnS-EQpJTBf_bnZ2dnUVZ8qydnZ2d@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or 
>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>> evidence) for this assertion...??
>>>>>>>>>> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is 
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
>>>>>>>>>> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
>>>>>>>>>> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford 
>>>>>>>>>> Hill.
>>>>>>>>>> It's just common knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> simply not true....the majority of the population in Southall is 
>>>>>>>>> still English  white and the majority of properties are owned by 
>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>> Utter lies from KJ as usual !
>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Southall is primarily an Asian residential district. 1950 was when 
>>>>>>>> the first flock of Asians arrived in Southall, due to the closeness 
>>>>>>>> of Heathrow airport, and has since been increasing with many 
>>>>>>>> Asians, primarily Punjabis. According to Commission for Racial 
>>>>>>>> Equality over 55% of Southall's population of 70,000 is 
>>>>>>>> Indian/Pakistani."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> actually the figure is 61,000 and the percentage is 65% Asian 
>>>>>>> Origin. The figure I used were for the London Borough of Ealing, of 
>>>>>>> which Southall is a part.
>>>>>> Caught you out making it up as you go along, again .....
>>>>> yeh..should get a job at BNP HQ
>>>> You make it all so easy. You tell a barefaced lie in almost every post 
>>>> you make.
>>>>
>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>>
>>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster
>>
>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>  Mwahahahaha !
>>
> and then corrected myself...

No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), by 
ME.
Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on every 
single lie you try to post.

Chris X wrote:
> "kj"  wrote in message 
> news:U6WdnS-EQpJTBf_bnZ2dnUVZ8qydnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or 
>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>> evidence) for this assertion...??
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is 
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
>>>>>>>>>>> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
>>>>>>>>>>> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hill.
>>>>>>>>>>> It's just common knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> simply not true....the majority of the population in Southall is 
>>>>>>>>>> still English  white and the majority of properties are owned by 
>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>> Utter lies from KJ as usual !
>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Southall is primarily an Asian residential district. 1950 was when 
>>>>>>>>> the first flock of Asians arrived in Southall, due to the closeness 
>>>>>>>>> of Heathrow airport, and has since been increasing with many 
>>>>>>>>> Asians, primarily Punjabis. According to Commission for Racial 
>>>>>>>>> Equality over 55% of Southall's population of 70,000 is 
>>>>>>>>> Indian/Pakistani."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> actually the figure is 61,000 and the percentage is 65% Asian 
>>>>>>>> Origin. The figure I used were for the London Borough of Ealing, of 
>>>>>>>> which Southall is a part.
>>>>>>> Caught you out making it up as you go along, again .....
>>>>>> yeh..should get a job at BNP HQ
>>>>> You make it all so easy. You tell a barefaced lie in almost every post 
>>>>> you make.
>>>>>
>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>>>
>>>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster
>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>  Mwahahahaha !
>>>
>> and then corrected myself...
> 
> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), by 
> ME.
> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on every 
> single lie you try to post. 
> 
> 
Now Now junior don't get your nickers in a twist.....I'll look forward 
to your attempts you sad little goose stepper  :-)

X-No-Archive: yes
"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in message 
news:1180813158.102037.73730@q19g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in message
>>
>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...


>> > Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from Southall.
>> > Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.

>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or other
>> evidence) for this assertion...??

> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is as
> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford Hill.
> It's just common knowledge.



Ah.........  "common knowledge"  it is then.
Is that the same, or similar to, an 'Urban Myth'....??


Mark

X-No-Archive: yes
"Chris X"  wrote in message 
news:zOednZ_SStSXUv_bnZ2dnUVZ8tXinZ2d@giganews.com...
> "kj"  wrote in message


>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !



>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>  Mwahahahaha !


>> and then corrected myself...


> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), 
> by ME.
> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on 
> every single lie you try to post.


You are remarkable frankly.
What kind of inane dribble is it that reduces and translates a 'belief' - a 
belief that was further clarifed, accepted as being  perhaps, misplaced and 
then explained - into the notion that such a statement constitutes a 
"lie"...........??
Are you serious....??
Whatever your 'take' on the matter [..which, as per usual in threads of this 
nature, words and phrases are seized upon whilst ignoring the underlying 
subject in debate..] there is clearly a matter of interpretation as to what 
constitutes Southall in any event.
As your own link points out, it is enshrined into a parliamentary area which 
includes Ealing and as far as the Southall post code  area it includes 
Southall, Hayes, Northolt, Greenford, West Drayton and Uxbridge.
Further, it says nothing as to the OP assertion that the majority of 
landlords are asians.   That may well be the case....   it equally may not.
Thus,  do you have the evidence or figures that confirm such assertions.  In 
addition, can you clarify as to what you *believe*  Southall to consist of 
geographically......
To rely upon the link you provide  is plainly wanting in the area of actual, 
geographical definition.
Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.



Mark

mark wrote:
> X-No-Archive: yes
> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
> news:zOednZ_SStSXUv_bnZ2dnUVZ8tXinZ2d@giganews.com...
>> "kj"  wrote in message
> 
> 
>>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
> 
> 
> 
>>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>  Mwahahahaha !
> 
> 
>>> and then corrected myself...
> 
> 
>> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), 
>> by ME.
>> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on 
>> every single lie you try to post.
> 
> 
> You are remarkable frankly.
> What kind of inane dribble is it that reduces and translates a 'belief' - a 
> belief that was further clarifed, accepted as being  perhaps, misplaced and 
> then explained - into the notion that such a statement constitutes a 
> "lie"...........??
> Are you serious....??
> Whatever your 'take' on the matter [..which, as per usual in threads of this 
> nature, words and phrases are seized upon whilst ignoring the underlying 
> subject in debate..] there is clearly a matter of interpretation as to what 
> constitutes Southall in any event.
> As your own link points out, it is enshrined into a parliamentary area which 
> includes Ealing and as far as the Southall post code  area it includes 
> Southall, Hayes, Northolt, Greenford, West Drayton and Uxbridge.
> Further, it says nothing as to the OP assertion that the majority of 
> landlords are asians.   That may well be the case....   it equally may not.
> Thus,  do you have the evidence or figures that confirm such assertions.  In 
> addition, can you clarify as to what you *believe*  Southall to consist of 
> geographically......
> To rely upon the link you provide  is plainly wanting in the area of actual, 
> geographical definition.
> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.
> 
> 
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> 
I lived in the LB of Ealing and Hounslow for many years and know the 
areas very well indeed.  was actually in a pub in Southall on the night 
of the Southall Riots....it was.......interesting.

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:f5mdneaCw9yPTf_bnZ2dnUVZ8v2vnZ2d@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:

>>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>>>>
>>>>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster

>>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>  Mwahahahaha !
>>>>
>>> and then corrected myself...
>>
>> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), 
>> by ME.
>> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on 
>> every single lie you try to post.
> Now Now junior don't get your nickers in a twist.....I'll look forward to 
> your attempts you sad little goose stepper  :-)

Somehow I don't think you really *are* looking forward to being exposed as 
the discredited little globalist liar that you are, "Kev".

"mark"  wrote in message 
news:rdqdnWJXOd6lfv_bRVnysQA@bt.com...
> X-No-Archive: yes
> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
> news:zOednZ_SStSXUv_bnZ2dnUVZ8tXinZ2d@giganews.com...
>> "kj"  wrote in message
>
>
>>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>
>>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>  Mwahahahaha !
>
>
>>> and then corrected myself...
>
>> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), 
>> by ME.
>> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on 
>> every single lie you try to post.
>
>
> You are remarkable frankly.
(SNIP drivel)
> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.

He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.

X-No-Archive: yes
"Chris X"  wrote in message 
news:5rSdnc0bdbbgaf_bRVnyiwA@giganews.com...
>
> "mark"  wrote in message

>> You are remarkable frankly.
> (SNIP drivel)
>> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.

> He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.


He expressed an opinion........ hardly a lie.
You have yet to profer any credible evidence to the contrary..
Secondly, you have avoided the clear question, upon which you base your 
spurious allegation and false accusation, which calls for you to explain and 
determine what YOU  [..not anyone else...] deem to be the geographical 
confluence of *Southall*.
Unless or until you do so, it is impossible to evaluate whether or not the 
statement made by kevin is, indeed,  mis-informed.
Tell me something......  are you here for some debate or just school like 
inanities and mindless assertations...?
Your next post should include *your* definition of the point in question...


Mark

Chris X wrote:
> "kj"  wrote in message 
> news:f5mdneaCw9yPTf_bnZ2dnUVZ8v2vnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Chris X wrote:
> 
>>>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster
> 
>>>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>  Mwahahahaha !
>>>>>
>>>> and then corrected myself...
>>> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly are), 
>>> by ME.
>>> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on 
>>> every single lie you try to post.
>> Now Now junior don't get your nickers in a twist.....I'll look forward to 
>> your attempts you sad little goose stepper  :-)
> 
> Somehow I don't think you really *are* looking forward to being exposed as 
> the discredited little globalist liar that you are, "Kev". 
> 
> 
course I am "Chris"

"mark"  wrote in message 
news:VvydnXlgEMx1a__bnZ2dnUVZ8saonZ2d@bt.com...
> X-No-Archive: yes
> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
> news:5rSdnc0bdbbgaf_bRVnyiwA@giganews.com...
>>
>> "mark"  wrote in message
>
>>> You are remarkable frankly.
>> (SNIP drivel)
>>> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.
>
>> He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.
>
>
> He expressed an opinion........ hardly a lie.
> You have yet to profer any credible evidence to the contrary..

He said ""the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
and the
majority of properties are owned by them."

Clearly a lie.  I exposed him.  Deal with it.

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:J9WdnRaETYqjif7bRVnyiwA@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:
>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>> news:f5mdneaCw9yPTf_bnZ2dnUVZ8v2vnZ2d@bt.com...
>>> Chris X wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster
>>
>>>>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>  Mwahahahaha !
>>>>>>
>>>>> and then corrected myself...
>>>> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly 
>>>> are), by ME.
>>>> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on 
>>>> every single lie you try to post.
>>> Now Now junior don't get your nickers in a twist.....I'll look forward 
>>> to your attempts you sad little goose stepper  :-)
>>
>> Somehow I don't think you really *are* looking forward to being exposed 
>> as the discredited little globalist liar that you are, "Kev".
> course I am "Chris"

Yes, you are.  Now STFU, "Kev".

Chris X wrote:
> "mark"  wrote in message 
> news:VvydnXlgEMx1a__bnZ2dnUVZ8saonZ2d@bt.com...
>> X-No-Archive: yes
>> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
>> news:5rSdnc0bdbbgaf_bRVnyiwA@giganews.com...
>>> "mark"  wrote in message
>>>> You are remarkable frankly.
>>> (SNIP drivel)
>>>> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.
>>> He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.
>>
>> He expressed an opinion........ hardly a lie.
>> You have yet to profer any credible evidence to the contrary..
> 
> He said ""the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
> and the
> majority of properties are owned by them."
> 
> Clearly a lie.  I exposed him.  Deal with it.
> 
> 
> 
clearly a mistake, which I corrected.   Deal with it.

Chris X wrote:
> "kj"  wrote in message 
> news:J9WdnRaETYqjif7bRVnyiwA@bt.com...
>> Chris X wrote:
>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>> news:f5mdneaCw9yPTf_bnZ2dnUVZ8v2vnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster
>>>>>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>>>>>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white 
>>>>>>> and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>>  Mwahahahaha !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> and then corrected myself...
>>>>> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly 
>>>>> are), by ME.
>>>>> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping on 
>>>>> every single lie you try to post.
>>>> Now Now junior don't get your nickers in a twist.....I'll look forward 
>>>> to your attempts you sad little goose stepper  :-)
>>> Somehow I don't think you really *are* looking forward to being exposed 
>>> as the discredited little globalist liar that you are, "Kev".
>> course I am "Chris"
> 
> Yes, you are.  Now STFU, "Kev".
> 
> 
> 
Yes, I am.  No, "Chris"

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:ceadnYCEFqx-uP7bnZ2dnUVZ8tzinZ2d@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:
>> "mark"  wrote in message 
>> news:VvydnXlgEMx1a__bnZ2dnUVZ8saonZ2d@bt.com...
>>> X-No-Archive: yes
>>> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
>>> news:5rSdnc0bdbbgaf_bRVnyiwA@giganews.com...
>>>> "mark"  wrote in message
>>>>> You are remarkable frankly.
>>>> (SNIP drivel)
>>>>> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.
>>>> He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.
>>>
>>> He expressed an opinion........ hardly a lie.
>>> You have yet to profer any credible evidence to the contrary..
>>
>> He said ""the majority of the population in Southall is still English 
>> white and the
>> majority of properties are owned by them."
>>
>> Clearly a lie.  I exposed him.  Deal with it.
>>
> clearly a mistake, which I corrected.   Deal with it.

You tried to sneakily backtrack, hoping nobody would notice. Too bad that 
*I* noticed, and you still owe Mr Nightingale an apology for your lie.  I 
suspect however, that you're too much of a slimeball to do that, aren't you 
"Kev" ?

Deal with that.

X-No-Archive: yes
"Chris X"  wrote in message 
news:L_adnZLvEr92iP7bnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "mark"  wrote in message 
> news:VvydnXlgEMx1a__bnZ2dnUVZ8saonZ2d@bt.com...
>> X-No-Archive: yes
>> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
>> news:5rSdnc0bdbbgaf_bRVnyiwA@giganews.com...
>>>
>>> "mark"  wrote in message
>>
>>>> You are remarkable frankly.
>>> (SNIP drivel)
>>>> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.
>>
>>> He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.

>> He expressed an opinion........ hardly a lie.
>> You have yet to profer any credible evidence to the contrary..
> He said ""the majority of the population in Southall is still English 
> white and the
> majority of properties are owned by them."


> Clearly a lie.  I exposed him.  Deal with it.

............. I AM dealing with it.

One last attempt.........
Define what you mean by Southall.
Now,  do understand that your absence of any meaningful clarification as to 
what geographically constitutes 'Southall',  means also that your pursuing 
comments are equally  meaningless.....
Simple......
[...I  seem to recall some other thread(s) a while back where your apparent 
lack of intellectual flexibility lead me to abandon any further attempted 
discourse.....]

Mark

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:ceadnYOEFqyJu_7bnZ2dnUVZ8tzinZ2d@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English 
>>>>>>>>>> white and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>>>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster
>>>>>>>> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this 
>>>>>>>> classic;
>>>>>>>>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English 
>>>>>>>> white and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>>>>  Mwahahahaha !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and then corrected myself...
>>>>>> No, you were corrected (and caught out as the liar that you clearly 
>>>>>> are), by ME.
>>>>>> Watch what you post from now on little boy, because I'll be jumping 
>>>>>> on every single lie you try to post.
>>>>> Now Now junior don't get your nickers in a twist.....I'll look forward 
>>>>> to your attempts you sad little goose stepper  :-)
>>>> Somehow I don't think you really *are* looking forward to being exposed 
>>>> as the discredited little globalist liar that you are, "Kev".
>>> course I am "Chris"
>>
>> Yes, you are.  Now STFU, "Kev".
>>
> Yes, I am.  No, "Chris"

You've been exposed as a "discredited little globalist liar", "Kev".
Deal with it.

"the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and the 
majority of properties are owned by them."
 - "kj" lies through his teeth on Usenet.

"mark"  wrote in message 
news:G8SdnQgoO9Mxu_7bnZ2dnUVZ8qminZ2d@bt.com...
> X-No-Archive: yes
> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
> news:L_adnZLvEr92iP7bnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@giganews.com...

>>>>> You are remarkable frankly.
>>>> (SNIP drivel)
>>>>> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.
>>>
>>>> He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.
>
>>> He expressed an opinion........ hardly a lie.
>>> You have yet to profer any credible evidence to the contrary..

>> He said ""the majority of the population in Southall is still English 
>> white and the
>> majority of properties are owned by them."
>> Clearly a lie.  I exposed him.  Deal with it.
>
> ............ I AM dealing with it.

Your sockpuppets can't save you, "Kev". Deal with it.

"the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and the 
majority of properties are owned by them."
 - "kj" gives us all a laugh with his bare-faced lies.

X-No-Archive: yes
"Chris X"  wrote in message 
news:roGdnTutPN61uv7bnZ2dnUVZ8v-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "mark"  wrote in message 
> news:G8SdnQgoO9Mxu_7bnZ2dnUVZ8qminZ2d@bt.com...
>> X-No-Archive: yes
>> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
>> news:L_adnZLvEr92iP7bnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@giganews.com...


>>>>>> You are remarkable frankly.
>>>>> (SNIP drivel)
>>>>>> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.

>>>>> He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.

>>>> He expressed an opinion........ hardly a lie.
>>>> You have yet to profer any credible evidence to the contrary..


>>> He said ""the majority of the population in Southall is still English 
>>> white and the
>>> majority of properties are owned by them."
>>> Clearly a lie.  I exposed him.  Deal with it.

>> ............ I AM dealing with it.


> Your sockpuppets can't save you, "Kev". Deal with it.

> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
> the majority of properties are owned by them."
> - "kj" gives us all a laugh with his bare-faced lies.


Oh dear.
You apparently have the mental capacity of  a  retarded, recalcitrant 
flea........
Repeating this nonsense endlessly will not make your mindless assertions any 
more truthful...
You are beginning to look foolish..
Nighty, night.

Mark

"mark"  wrote in message 
news:AOSdnUIAVIlUtf7bnZ2dnUVZ8v2vnZ2d@bt.com...
> X-No-Archive: yes
> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
> news:roGdnTutPN61uv7bnZ2dnUVZ8v-dnZ2d@giganews.com...

>>>>>>> You are remarkable frankly.
>>>>>> (SNIP drivel)
>>>>>>> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.
>
>>>>>> He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.
>
>>>>> He expressed an opinion........ hardly a lie.
>>>>> You have yet to profer any credible evidence to the contrary..
>
>>>> He said ""the majority of the population in Southall is still English 
>>>> white and the
>>>> majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>> Clearly a lie.  I exposed him.  Deal with it.
>
>>> ............ I AM dealing with it.
>
>> Your sockpuppets can't save you, "Kev". Deal with it.
>
>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>> - "kj" gives us all a laugh with his bare-faced lies.
>
> Oh dear.
> You apparently have the mental capacity of  a  retarded, recalcitrant 
> flea........

You've been done, mark/kj. Deal with it.

Chris X wrote:
> "mark"  wrote in message 
> news:AOSdnUIAVIlUtf7bnZ2dnUVZ8v2vnZ2d@bt.com...
>> X-No-Archive: yes
>> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
>> news:roGdnTutPN61uv7bnZ2dnUVZ8v-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
> 
>>>>>>>> You are remarkable frankly.
>>>>>>> (SNIP drivel)
>>>>>>>> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.
>>>>>>> He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.
>>>>>> He expressed an opinion........ hardly a lie.
>>>>>> You have yet to profer any credible evidence to the contrary..
>>>>> He said ""the majority of the population in Southall is still English 
>>>>> white and the
>>>>> majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>> Clearly a lie.  I exposed him.  Deal with it.
>>>> ............ I AM dealing with it.
>>> Your sockpuppets can't save you, "Kev". Deal with it.
>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>> - "kj" gives us all a laugh with his bare-faced lies.
>> Oh dear.
>> You apparently have the mental capacity of  a  retarded, recalcitrant 
>> flea........
> 
> You've been done, mark/kj. Deal with it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
oh dear..how sad...never mind!!!

Who's Mr. Nightengale by the way?

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:IcydnTNopfHDsv7bnZ2dnUVZ8trinZ2d@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:
>> "mark"  wrote in message 
>> news:AOSdnUIAVIlUtf7bnZ2dnUVZ8v2vnZ2d@bt.com...
>>> X-No-Archive: yes
>>> "Chris X"  wrote in message 
>>> news:roGdnTutPN61uv7bnZ2dnUVZ8v-dnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>>>>>>>>> You are remarkable frankly.
>>>>>>>> (SNIP drivel)
>>>>>>>>> Lies do not come into it, I'm afraid.

>>>>>>>> He lied, I exposed him.  Deal with it.

>>>>>>> He expressed an opinion........ hardly a lie.
>>>>>>> You have yet to profer any credible evidence to the contrary..

>>>>>> He said ""the majority of the population in Southall is still English 
>>>>>> white and the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>>>> Clearly a lie.  I exposed him.  Deal with it.

>>>>> ............ I AM dealing with it.

>>>> Your sockpuppets can't save you, "Kev". Deal with it.
>>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>> - "kj" gives us all a laugh with his bare-faced lies.

>>> Oh dear.
>>> You apparently have the mental capacity of  a  retarded, recalcitrant 
>>> flea........
>>
>> You've been done, mark/kj. Deal with it.
>>
> oh dear..how sad...never mind!!!

Better luck for you next time, eh "Kev" ?  Maybe nobody will notice your 
lies.  Tough - I will !

> Who's Mr. Nightengale by the way?

I suggest you re-read the thread and find out.

Chris X wrote:
> "kj"  wrote in message 
> 
> I suggest you re-read the thread and find out. 
> 
> 

I snipped out all that drivel ages ago...remind me..

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:Zu2dnUDDg-NYbvzbRVnyhgA@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:
>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>> news:2JmdnQz0GYo5R_zbRVnyugA@bt.com...
>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>> news:xOadnU3Gf5k0SvzbnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or 
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> evidence) for this assertion...??
>>>>>>>> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is as
>>>>>>>> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
>>>>>>>> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
>>>>>>>> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford 
>>>>>>>> Hill.
>>>>>>>> It's just common knowledge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> simply not true....the majority of the population in Southall is 
>>>>>>> still English  white and the majority of properties are owned by 
>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>> Utter lies from KJ as usual !
>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Southall is primarily an Asian residential district. 1950 was when 
>>>>>> the first flock of Asians arrived in Southall, due to the closeness 
>>>>>> of Heathrow airport, and has since been increasing with many Asians, 
>>>>>> primarily Punjabis. According to Commission for Racial Equality over 
>>>>>> 55% of Southall's population of 70,000 is Indian/Pakistani."
>>>>>>
>>>>> actually the figure is 61,000 and the percentage is 65% Asian Origin. 
>>>>> The figure I used were for the London Borough of Ealing, of which 
>>>>> Southall is a part.
>>>> Caught you out making it up as you go along, again .....
>>> yeh..should get a job at BNP HQ
>>
>> You make it all so easy. You tell a barefaced lie in almost every post 
>> you make.
>>
>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>
> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster

Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
 "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and the 
majority of properties are owned by them."
 Mwahahahaha !

Chris X wrote:
> "kj"  wrote in message 
> news:Zu2dnUDDg-NYbvzbRVnyhgA@bt.com...
>> Chris X wrote:
>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>> news:2JmdnQz0GYo5R_zbRVnyugA@bt.com...
>>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>>> news:xOadnU3Gf5k0SvzbnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>>> "kj"  wrote in message 
>>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any figures (..or 
>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>> evidence) for this assertion...??
>>>>>>>>> I don't have a paper trail of evidence on my desk no. but it is as
>>>>>>>>> common knowledge that indians are now major property owners and
>>>>>>>>> landlords in the Southall, Ealing and Slough areas, as it is that
>>>>>>>>> Blacks are in Brixton and Jews own Golder's Green and Stamford 
>>>>>>>>> Hill.
>>>>>>>>> It's just common knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> simply not true....the majority of the population in Southall is 
>>>>>>>> still English  white and the majority of properties are owned by 
>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>> Utter lies from KJ as usual !
>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Southall is primarily an Asian residential district. 1950 was when 
>>>>>>> the first flock of Asians arrived in Southall, due to the closeness 
>>>>>>> of Heathrow airport, and has since been increasing with many Asians, 
>>>>>>> primarily Punjabis. According to Commission for Racial Equality over 
>>>>>>> 55% of Southall's population of 70,000 is Indian/Pakistani."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> actually the figure is 61,000 and the percentage is 65% Asian Origin. 
>>>>>> The figure I used were for the London Borough of Ealing, of which 
>>>>>> Southall is a part.
>>>>> Caught you out making it up as you go along, again .....
>>>> yeh..should get a job at BNP HQ
>>> You make it all so easy. You tell a barefaced lie in almost every post 
>>> you make.
>>>
>>> "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and 
>>> the majority of properties are owned by them."
>>>  - A kj "classic" !
>>>
>> you are mistaking me for a BNP poster
> 
> Every Usenet server across the globe says *you* posted this classic;
>  "the majority of the population in Southall is still English  white and the 
> majority of properties are owned by them."
>  Mwahahahaha !
> 
> 
> 
and then corrected myself...unlike you

"kj"  wrote in message 
news:U6WdnS-EQpJTBf_bnZ2dnUVZ8qydnZ2d@bt.com...
> Chris X wrote:
>>>>>>>> news:p5qdnTWy_bW6TfzbnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>>>>>> Wink Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 12:31 pm, "mark"  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive: yes"Wink Nightingale"  wrote in 
>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> news:1180811672.463283.177420@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Err no. Most landlords in the slough area are Indians from 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Southall.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Immigrant scum leaching off of immigrant scum.
>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm.   You may well be right but do you have any