A minister from The Trinity Methodist Church in Prestatyn posed as a 
tramp and gatecrashed his own service to teach churchgoers about 
"acceptance".

None of the congregation spoke to the would be tramp, apart from a few 
who told him off and to get away from the church and their cars.

Typical of the self righteous inbreds of Prestatyn.

Oh hang on a second isn't that your church Ken?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/north_east/7497411.stm

Deary me...Deary deary me.
.
Please read the Charter for this newsgroup.

You have posted  to a newsgroup set up by
the government to plug the gaps created by the abysmal
failure of their Psychiatric Care in the Community Policy. 
The uk.local hierarchy was devised to provide an outlet for
individuals who would otherwise spending their days sitting
at home wearing an aluminium foil hat waiting for a full moon
to rise. It was hoped that this would reduce the incidence
of nutters out there howling at the moon and frightening the
shit out of their neighbours. Another of HMGs aims and 
objectives was to provide a distraction to take their minds
of the problem of who they were going to knife to death next.
Unfortunately, this group has been taken over by the 
articulate lower middle classes who have succeeding in 
driving HMGs target audience away.Independant research has
shown that it was the amount and quality of the inane drivel,
called small talk which the middle classes are adept at, which
had the effect of doing their heads in. They left to
protect what was left of their sanity. Saddly this has happened
to the whole of uk.local. hierarchy.  

This newsgroup is a very good example of another HMG failure.

In message <uhbdk.42473$jB5.8423@newsfe05.ams2>
          Telling it how it is  wrote:

> A minister from The Trinity Methodist Church in Prestatyn posed as a
> tramp and gatecrashed his own service to teach churchgoers about
> "acceptance".
> None of the congregation spoke to the would be tramp, apart from a few
> who told him off and to get away from the church and their cars.
> Typical of the self righteous inbreds of Prestatyn.
> Oh hang on a second isn't that your church Ken?

He he! No, it's not, but I have been there, I know the Rev Derek 
Rigby, and have a high regard for him and his members.

I think you have a mistaken idea of Christians: Christians are not 
necessarily better than non-Christians, but they do *aim* to be better 
- which was the point of the exercise: to point out a way in which 
they needed to improve and motivate them to re-examine themselves.

Do let me know when the landlord of your local pub or the chairman of 
the club you go to undertakes a similar stunt with the idea of 
encouraging you to become a better person.

Ken Down

-- 
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
|     Australia's premier archaeological magazine      |
|             http://www.diggingsonline.com            |
========================================================

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:01:09 +0100, Kendall K Down wrote:

> In message <uhbdk.42473$jB5.8423@newsfe05.ams2>
>           Telling it how it is  wrote:
> 
>> A minister from The Trinity Methodist Church in Prestatyn posed as a
>> tramp and gatecrashed his own service to teach churchgoers about
>> "acceptance".
>> None of the congregation spoke to the would be tramp, apart from a few
>> who told him off and to get away from the church and their cars.
>> Typical of the self righteous inbreds of Prestatyn. Oh hang on a second
>> isn't that your church Ken?
> 
> He he! No, it's not, but I have been there, I know the Rev Derek Rigby,
> and have a high regard for him and his members.
> 
> I think you have a mistaken idea of Christians: Christians are not
> necessarily better than non-Christians, but they do *aim* to be better -
> which was the point of the exercise: to point out a way in which they
> needed to improve and motivate them to re-examine themselves.
> 
> Do let me know when the landlord of your local pub or the chairman of
> the club you go to undertakes a similar stunt with the idea of
> encouraging you to become a better person.
> 
> Ken Down

By who's standard Ken, Yours?

What do you mean become a better person? What like taking the piss out of 
peoples grammar or spelling like you do? Would that make me a better 
person? Or would that make me as anal as you? Because if that's your 
standard, I would never be able to lower my standard to come down to your 
level. Sorry.

I don't have a problem with motivating people to re-examine themselves 
and pointing out ways in which they can improve there social interaction. 
Why do you think it is that I,am picking on you?

Your a hypocrite! 

So my hope is that you can re-examine your own "self" and address your 
own standards. And until then go fuck yourself and shove your hypocrisy's 
where the sun don't shine. Oh and tug out that beam in your own eye 
before you try and find a splinter in mine.

and that's the truth...

In message <VZsdk.118661$Kb.166@newsfe29.ams2>
          Telling it how it is  wrote:

> I don't have a problem with motivating people to re-examine themselves
> and pointing out ways in which they can improve there social interaction.
> Why do you think it is that I,am picking on you?
> Your a hypocrite!

So, in the interests of each helping each to improve, allow me to 
point out that you meant "their" in line 2 and "you're" in line 4.

Oh, and let me also point out that I manage to do so without resorting 
to bad language.

Ken Down

-- 
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
|     Australia's premier archaeological magazine      |
|             http://www.diggingsonline.com            |
========================================================

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:18:57 +0100, Kendall K Down wrote:

> In message <VZsdk.118661$Kb.166@newsfe29.ams2>
>           Telling it how it is  wrote:
> 
>> I don't have a problem with motivating people to re-examine themselves
>> and pointing out ways in which they can improve there social
>> interaction. Why do you think it is that I,am picking on you? Your a
>> hypocrite!
> 
> So, in the interests of each helping each to improve, allow me to point
> out that you meant "their" in line 2 and "you're" in line 4.
> Oh, and let me also point out that I manage to do so without resorting
> to bad language.

Words are words.  If you have been conditioned with guilt about using 
some words. And if you have accepted that guilt. Then that's your choice, 
your world view. 

Its not mine and I don't take kindly to being told what words I should or 
should not use because of how you have been conditioned to think about 
them. If you take offence at the words I use, then it means I have 
selected the correct words which have had the effect I wished when i used 
them them. If your a cunt. I will call you a cunt and will not stop 
because of your conditioning.

I don't want your world view, its old, worn out and it sucks.  Oh and 
line 2, Line 4. reiterates my point. 

Your an anal cunt!  

...and that's the truth.

In message <VZsdk.118661$Kb.166@newsfe29.ams2>, Telling it how it is 
 writes
> And until then go fuck yourself and shove your hypocrisy's
>where the sun don't shine. Oh and tug out that beam in your own eye
>before you try and find a splinter in mine.
>
>and that's the truth...

No, your words simply demonstrate to all your personality.Do you 
consider your attitude the result of poor parenting, poor teachers, or 
merely the result of your genes?

But the really sad thing is that you believe that what you say makes you 
sound clever.
-- 
Zillion

In message <ov0ek.134628$jB5.43109@newsfe05.ams2>, Telling it how it is 
 writes
>On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:18:57 +0100, Kendall K Down wrote:
>
>> In message <VZsdk.118661$Kb.166@newsfe29.ams2>
>>           Telling it how it is  wrote:
>>
>>> I don't have a problem with motivating people to re-examine themselves
>>> and pointing out ways in which they can improve there social
>>> interaction. Why do you think it is that I,am picking on you? Your a
>>> hypocrite!
>>
>> So, in the interests of each helping each to improve, allow me to point
>> out that you meant "their" in line 2 and "you're" in line 4.
>> Oh, and let me also point out that I manage to do so without resorting
>> to bad language.
>
>Words are words.  If you have been conditioned with guilt about using
>some words. And if you have accepted that guilt. Then that's your choice,
>your world view.
>
>Its not mine and I don't take kindly to being told what words I should or
>should not use because of how you have been conditioned to think about
>them. If you take offence at the words I use, then it means I have
>selected the correct words which have had the effect I wished when i used
>them them. If your a cunt. I will call you a cunt and will not stop
>because of your conditioning.
>
>I don't want your world view, its old, worn out and it sucks.  Oh and
>line 2, Line 4. reiterates my point.
>
>Your an anal cunt!
>
Oh dear. Don't your parents and teachers worry about how you've turned 
out - or don't they care?

Sad really.....
-- 
Zillion

On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:12:14 +0100, Zillion  wrote:

>In message <VZsdk.118661$Kb.166@newsfe29.ams2>, Telling it how it is 
> writes
>> And until then go fuck yourself and shove your hypocrisy's
>>where the sun don't shine. Oh and tug out that beam in your own eye
>>before you try and find a splinter in mine.
>>
>>and that's the truth...
>
>No, your words simply demonstrate to all your personality.Do you 
>consider your attitude the result of poor parenting, poor teachers, or 
>merely the result of your genes?
>
>But the really sad thing is that you believe that what you say makes you 
>sound clever.

Sing along together my friends, the country is doomed.
http://www.cyberhymnal.org/htm/a/b/abidewme.htm

On 11 Jul, 19:18, Kendall K Down  wrote:
> In message <VZsdk.118661$Kb....@newsfe29.ams2>
>           Telling it how it is  wrote:
>
> > I don't have a problem with motivating people to re-examine themselves
> > and pointing out ways in which they can improve there social interaction.
> > Why do you think it is that I,am picking on you?
> > Your a hypocrite!
>
> So, in the interests of each helping each to improve, allow me to
> point out that you meant "their" in line 2 and "you're" in line 4.
>
> Oh, and let me also point out that I manage to do so without resorting
> to bad language.
>
> Ken Down
>
> --
> ================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
> |     Australia's premier archaeological magazine      |
> |            http://www.diggingsonline.com           |
> ========================================================

Oh that explains it - a fascist pseudo christian..like most as it
goes. ISNT THAT RIGHT EFION JONES OF RED WHARF BAY. Nazi scum like you
executed Jesu the pyscik saint. You're going to hell Ken if you carry
on harbouring that reactionary mentality. Cheeky bunch of perverted
creeps.

PISS OFF

"Telling it how it is"  wrote in message 
news:ov0ek.134628$jB5.43109@newsfe05.ams2...
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:18:57 +0100, Kendall K Down wrote:
>
>> In message <VZsdk.118661$Kb.166@newsfe29.ams2>
>>           Telling it how it is  wrote:
>>
>>> I don't have a problem with motivating people to re-examine themselves
>>> and pointing out ways in which they can improve there social
>>> interaction. Why do you think it is that I,am picking on you? Your a
>>> hypocrite!
>>
>> So, in the interests of each helping each to improve, allow me to point
>> out that you meant "their" in line 2 and "you're" in line 4.
>> Oh, and let me also point out that I manage to do so without resorting
>> to bad language.
>
> Words are words.  If you have been conditioned with guilt about using
> some words. And if you have accepted that guilt. Then that's your choice,
> your world view.
>
> Its not mine and I don't take kindly to being told what words I should or
> should not use because of how you have been conditioned to think about
> them. If you take offence at the words I use, then it means I have
> selected the correct words which have had the effect I wished when i used
> them them. If your a cunt. I will call you a cunt and will not stop
> because of your conditioning.
>
> I don't want your world view, its old, worn out and it sucks.  Oh and
> line 2, Line 4. reiterates my point.
>
> Your an anal cunt!
>
> ...and that's the truth.

Yo Telling it how it is - let me have a guess at your social situation. 
Couldn't be arsed to learn at school.  Attitude of 'I know everything' - 
lazy, benefit scrounding lout with as much charm and wit as a dead wood 
louse?  Close?

Slagging people off does not endear you to anyone.

What's it like being on the receiving end.......

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:10:11 +0100, chris1471z wrote:

> "Telling it how it is"  wrote in message
> news:ov0ek.134628$jB5.43109@newsfe05.ams2...
>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:18:57 +0100, Kendall K Down wrote:
>>
>>> In message <VZsdk.118661$Kb.166@newsfe29.ams2>
>>>           Telling it how it is  wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't have a problem with motivating people to re-examine
>>>> themselves and pointing out ways in which they can improve there
>>>> social interaction. Why do you think it is that I,am picking on you?
>>>> Your a hypocrite!
>>>
>>> So, in the interests of each helping each to improve, allow me to
>>> point out that you meant "their" in line 2 and "you're" in line 4. Oh,
>>> and let me also point out that I manage to do so without resorting to
>>> bad language.
>>
>> Words are words.  If you have been conditioned with guilt about using
>> some words. And if you have accepted that guilt. Then that's your
>> choice, your world view.
>>
>> Its not mine and I don't take kindly to being told what words I should
>> or should not use because of how you have been conditioned to think
>> about them. If you take offence at the words I use, then it means I
>> have selected the correct words which have had the effect I wished when
>> i used them them. If your a cunt. I will call you a cunt and will not
>> stop because of your conditioning.
>>
>> I don't want your world view, its old, worn out and it sucks.  Oh and
>> line 2, Line 4. reiterates my point.
>>
>> Your an anal cunt!
>>
>> ...and that's the truth.
> 
> Yo Telling it how it is - let me have a guess at your social situation.
> Couldn't be arsed to learn at school.  Attitude of 'I know everything' -
> lazy, benefit scrounding lout with as much charm and wit as a dead wood
> louse?  Close?
> 
> Slagging people off does not endear you to anyone.

So why did you bother? 

> What's it like being on the receiving end.......

I wouldn't know, tell me about it.

"Telling it how it is"  wrote in message 
news:Oi2ik.25452$Vy5.20421@newsfe08.ams2...
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:10:11 +0100, chris1471z wrote:
>
>> "Telling it how it is"  wrote in message
>> news:ov0ek.134628$jB5.43109@newsfe05.ams2...
>>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:18:57 +0100, Kendall K Down wrote:
>>>
>>>> In message <VZsdk.118661$Kb.166@newsfe29.ams2>
>>>>           Telling it how it is  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't have a problem with motivating people to re-examine
>>>>> themselves and pointing out ways in which they can improve there
>>>>> social interaction. Why do you think it is that I,am picking on you?
>>>>> Your a hypocrite!
>>>>
>>>> So, in the interests of each helping each to improve, allow me to
>>>> point out that you meant "their" in line 2 and "you're" in line 4. Oh,
>>>> and let me also point out that I manage to do so without resorting to
>>>> bad language.
>>>
>>> Words are words.  If you have been conditioned with guilt about using
>>> some words. And if you have accepted that guilt. Then that's your
>>> choice, your world view.
>>>
>>> Its not mine and I don't take kindly to being told what words I should
>>> or should not use because of how you have been conditioned to think
>>> about them. If you take offence at the words I use, then it means I
>>> have selected the correct words which have had the effect I wished when
>>> i used them them. If your a cunt. I will call you a cunt and will not
>>> stop because of your conditioning.
>>>
>>> I don't want your world view, its old, worn out and it sucks.  Oh and
>>> line 2, Line 4. reiterates my point.
>>>
>>> Your an anal cunt!
>>>
>>> ...and that's the truth.
>>
>> Yo Telling it how it is - let me have a guess at your social situation.
>> Couldn't be arsed to learn at school.  Attitude of 'I know everything' -
>> lazy, benefit scrounding lout with as much charm and wit as a dead wood
>> louse?  Close?
>>
>> Slagging people off does not endear you to anyone.
>
> So why did you bother?
>
>> What's it like being on the receiving end.......
>
> I wouldn't know, tell me about it.


No swearing?  No name calling?

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:50:31 +0100, chris1471z wrote:

> "Telling it how it is"  wrote in message
> news:Oi2ik.25452$Vy5.20421@newsfe08.ams2...
>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:10:11 +0100, chris1471z wrote:
>>
>>> "Telling it how it is"  wrote in message
>>> news:ov0ek.134628$jB5.43109@newsfe05.ams2...
>>>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:18:57 +0100, Kendall K Down wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In message <VZsdk.118661$Kb.166@newsfe29.ams2>
>>>>>           Telling it how it is  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have a problem with motivating people to re-examine
>>>>>> themselves and pointing out ways in which they can improve there
>>>>>> social interaction. Why do you think it is that I,am picking on
>>>>>> you? Your a hypocrite!
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in the interests of each helping each to improve, allow me to
>>>>> point out that you meant "their" in line 2 and "you're" in line 4.
>>>>> Oh, and let me also point out that I manage to do so without
>>>>> resorting to bad language.
>>>>
>>>> Words are words.  If you have been conditioned with guilt about using
>>>> some words. And if you have accepted that guilt. Then that's your
>>>> choice, your world view.
>>>>
>>>> Its not mine and I don't take kindly to being told what words I
>>>> should or should not use because of how you have been conditioned to
>>>> think about them. If you take offence at the words I use, then it
>>>> means I have selected the correct words which have had the effect I
>>>> wished when i used them them. If your a cunt. I will call you a cunt
>>>> and will not stop because of your conditioning.
>>>>
>>>> I don't want your world view, its old, worn out and it sucks.  Oh and
>>>> line 2, Line 4. reiterates my point.
>>>>
>>>> Your an anal cunt!
>>>>
>>>> ...and that's the truth.
>>>
>>> Yo Telling it how it is - let me have a guess at your social
>>> situation. Couldn't be arsed to learn at school.  Attitude of 'I know
>>> everything' - lazy, benefit scrounding lout with as much charm and wit
>>> as a dead wood louse?  Close?
>>>
>>> Slagging people off does not endear you to anyone.
>>
>> So why did you bother?
>>
>>> What's it like being on the receiving end.......
>>
>> I wouldn't know, tell me about it.
> 
> 
> No swearing?  No name calling?

I tend to bite my tongue when the afflicted and genetically challenged 
enter the room. Count your "self" lucky.