Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
local
ayrshire
bath
bedfordshire
birmingham
borders-region
bristol
channel-isles
cheshire
cornwall
county-durham
cumbria
derbyshire
devon
east-anglia
essx
geordie
glasgow
hampshire
herefordshire
hertfordshire
isle-of-wight
kent
lincolnshire
london
london.info
lothians
merseyside
midlands
north-staffs
north-wales
nw-england
peterborough
scot-highlands
shropshire
somerset
south-wales
southwest
southwest.adverts
surrey
teesside
thames-valley
warwickshire
west-wales
yorkshire
yorkshire.noticeboard
  
 
date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:56:27 -0800 (PST),    group: uk.local.lincolnshire        back       
The Lies of Court   
Here is a commentary from Norman Scarth:

The legal language of the courts in Britain means that lies can become
'facts'.

Judges 'find' that certain things are facts (as though God had
spoken), no matter how outrageously untrue.  The same goes for
juries:  Thus, it was 'fact' that Timothy John Evans, Mahmood
Marchant, George Kelly (all hung), Stefan Kisko, Anthony Steele,
Robert Brown, Paul Blackburn (& a great many others) were all
'guilty', when the TRUE facts were that they were completely
innocent.

Judges & Juries should show more humility & recognise the fallibility
of mankind.  They should state "I/we believe (that certain things are
true)".  In the case of a majority verdict, the jury foreman should
say 'Ten of us believe that the Defendant is guilty (or not guilty),
two us belive otherwise'.

Judges DO think themselves to be Gods.  The so-called 'News Media'
leads the populace in worshipping them, which is itself a breach of
the first of the Ten Commandments.

Norman Scarth.
date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:56:27 -0800 (PST)   author:   unknown

Re: The Lies of Court   
On 9 Nov., 23:06, Old Jinglebollocks
 wrote:
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.legal/browse_thread/thread/283ed9...


As an Associate of the Article 6 Group, and as the founder and leader
of the AntiCrime Party, everything Norman does is in the public
interest.

Here is the latest:

-----------------------------------------------
Attached is a copy of my letter to Adrian Marshall, Court Manager of
Bradford Law Courts, asking for information under the 1998 Freedom of
Information Act.

His 'reply' came today:  As I predicted, he shows his contempt for the
FIA, saying only, "Further to your letter dated 22nd November received
at court today.  I have considered your letter, & in the circumstances
I am prepared to allow you back onto the court premises from today's
date".

The ARROGANCE of these Neo-Nazi apparatchiks is breathtaking!
Norman Scarth.
-----------------------------------------------

The "I" is interesting. As Masonic apparatchiks they are not allowed
to make decisions on their own. It reminds me of the puppet Robert
Maxwell (embezzler, with six fake doctorates of law to help him
steal). Maxwell (real name Abraham Lajbi Hoch) claimed that Gorbachov
would never make a decision without first consulting him. What an
utterly absurd statement. Gorbachov probably would have said "Max
WHO"?

Below is the original letter to Adrian Marshall.

Charles Douglas Wehner

-----------------------------------------------
To: Mr. Adrian Marshall, Court Manager,
The Law Courts, Exchange Square,
Drake Street, BRADFORD BD1 JA.  Tel:  Direct Line: 01274 843 502


REQUEST UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1998.

Dear Mr. Marshall,

        I acknowledge receipt of your letter dated 12th November 2007,
ref. APM.

1)      Under the Act as above, I hereby ask you to inform me of the
(REAL) reason for me being banned from Bradford Law Courts.  I have
already made comment on the nonsensical sentence in the letter sent
jointly by Mr. Neil Cox & Mrs. Kathryn Williamson, which said "... you
have associations with someone who has been excluded from the court" -
when it is ME that has been excluded!

2)      "County courts system in chaos", said HH Judge Paul Collins
(London's most senior county court judge) on the Radio 4 programme
'Law in Action' on 13th February 2007.

3)      Giving a retirement speech on 15th June 2007 the Recorder of
Leeds, HH Judge Norman Jones QC, spoke of  "... the shambles which we
call the criminal justice system".   Both those very experienced
judges blamed it on the low pay of Court Service staff.

4)      Little consolation for the victims of the injustice resulting
from the chaos & the shambles, but Judges Collins & Jones were
UNDERSTATING the case.  As Hon. Secretary of the Litigants in Person
Society, I have much more experience than just my own, able to say
with absolute authority (based on masses of evidence) that the hatred
of the Nazis for the Jews is equalled by that of ALL legal
professionals for the L.I.P.

5)      Unlike you, I lived through & fought against the (Old) Nazis,
better able than you to recognise the resurgence of Neo Nazis in
Britain now.  Deny it as you will, your conduct & that of your staff
is a worrying example, though hidden behind a nauseating pretence of
'Democracy', concern for 'Human Rights' & the 'Rule of Law'.  Instead,
we have the Rule of Law-yers - a very different thing!  They are the
new 'Master Race', who have seized 'absolute power' which, as we know,
'corrupts absolutely'.

6)      Many agree with me that the country is run by War Criminals, &
say so.  It would be rare indeed if such criminals refrained from
criminal activities at home, but, tragically, few dare to speak out on
that. Shades of Germany in the 1930s.

7)      In asking for the information as above, I have little hope
that you will show any more regard to the Act named than you show to
our other laws, or to the memory of those who gave their lives in
World War 2. They did so to preserve the time-honoured Institutions of
Great Britain.  Among those institutions are 'courts which are open to
all'.

8)      Your own letter is contradictory: You say " ... the court will
not enter into any further correspondence on this matter.", yet your
middle paragraph says "If you need to attend the counter in the County
Court to lodge a claim please contact me at the court when we can
arrange a suitable time for you to attend to that matter."

9)      It is my inalienable right - paid for by the blood of my own
brave young shipmates, & many thousands of others - to attend court, &
I have no intentions of grovelling before you or any other Neo Nazi to
be allowed to do so.  Yes, exclusion is justifiable where there has
been serious misconduct, but as you know, my own conduct has been
impeccable.

10)     Lord Denning was rated (by some) as the finest judge of the
20th century.  In his book 'WHAT NEXT IN THE LAW' he wrote about
'Abuse of Power', saying,  " Whoever may be guilty of abuse of power,
be it Government, State, Employer, Trade Union or whoever, the law
must provide a speedy remedy.  Otherwise the victims will find their
own remedy.  There will be anarchy." ".

11)     A most important warning to the nation - but is notable that
Denning excluded the judiciary from his list of those who might abuse
their power!  Other pronouncements by him have been less worthy.  It
was he who said "Better that innocent men remain in prison than that
the integrity of the judiciary be impugned".  The words themselves
belie that integrity.

12)     Prime Minister Harold Wilson said,  "When men of peace have
nothing to hope for, then men of violence have everything to kill
for".  With gun law on the streets -even from juveniles - we could say
that anarchy is here now, but it WILL get worse!

13)     I look forward to hearing from you that the ban on me entering
Bradford Law Courts has been lifted, & that you will inform me of this
without delay.

Thanking you in anticipation.  Yours sincerely


From:  Norman Scarth, Associate of the Article 6 Group, Founder &
Leader of the Anti-Crime Party, Investigative Author & Publisher,
Successful Law Reformer.
date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 12:53:37 -0800 (PST)   author:   unknown

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us