www.earlypregnancytests4u.co.uk

Early Pregnancy Tests 4U provide two types of dependable early-
detection pregnancy tests: the pregnancy test strip and the midstream
pregnancy test. We also provide Ovulation Tests allowing you to
predict when you ovulate. These also come in both the above types.
All tests comply both to British standards and American FDA
standards.

Our tests are upto five times more sensitive than the cheaper
versions sold by high street chemist chains and stores. Thus allowing
you to
find out if you are pregnant sooner with the pregnancy tests and to
pinpoint your ideal time to conceive with the ovulation tests.

Our Pregnancy Test Strips are over 99% accurate, and are capable of
detecting human chorionic gonadotropin, or hCG, at levels of just
10mIU/ml/hCG. That means you can begin testing accurately just 6 to 8
days after conceiving.

Ultra Sensitive 10mIU Fastest Pregnancy strip test - CE Marked 0123
INTENDED USE:

FASTEST One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test measures the presence of
the hormone Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin (HCG) in your urine for the
early detection of pregnancy.

SUMMARY AND EXPLANATION:

HCG is produced by the placenta during pregnancy, shortly after the
embryo attaches to the uterine lining. Usually HCG can be detected by
a home pregnancy test 7-10 days after conception. The further in to
the pregnancy you are the higher the levels of HCG in your urine.This
pregnancy dip strip detects HCG in urine at a concentration of 10mIU/
ml (MilliInternational Units) or greater. The concentration of HCG in
non-pregnant women is normally 5.0mIU/ml. At the time of the last
missed menstrual period, urine HCG levels are about 100mlU/ml with
peak levels of 100,000 to 200,000mlU/ml seen at the end of the first
trimester

TEST PROCEDURE:

1. WHEN CAN I CARRY OUT THE TEST?

You can take this pregnancy test from the first day after a missed
period and onwards.

2. SPECIMEN COLLECTION AND HANDLING

A urine specimen must be collected in a clean and dry container. The
first morning urine specimen is preferred since it generally contains
the highest concentration of HCG; however, urine specimens collected
at any time of the day may be used.

3. TO CARRY OUT TEST

Bring the test pouch and urine to room temperature. To begin testing,
open the sealed pouch and remove the strip.
Place the test strip vertically (straight) into the urine sample,
make
sure the arrows are pointing down. Do not allow the urine level to go
above the MAX (maximum) level line (marked by arrows) on the test
strip.
Remove the strip from the urine after 10 seconds and lay the strip on
a clean, dry surface.
Wait for coloured bands to appear. Depending on the concentration of
HCG in the urine specimen, positive results may be observed in as
short as 40 seconds. However, to confirm a negative result, the
complete reaction time (5 minutes) is required. Do not read results
after 10 minutes.
Discard the test after use.

4. INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS

Negative:   If one coloured line appears in the control region on the
test strip and there is no line in the test region, then this
indicates a negative result, no HCG has been detected in the urine.
This means you are either not pregnant or you have tested too early.
If you are not sure repeat the test in 48 hours.

Positive:    If two coloured lines appear on the test strip, one in
the test region and one in the control region, then this means there
is a strong possibility that you are pregnant — HCG has been detected
in your urine. One line may be lighter than the other, they do not
have to match and this is still a positive result.

Invalid:     If a red line appears in the test region but there is no
visible line at all in the control region of the strip then the test
is invalid. If no lines appear anywhere on the test strip then the
test is also invalid and should be repeated using another test strip.

5. QUALITY CONTROL

Built in Quality Control Features:

After addition of the urine sample, coloured bands migrate along the
membrane at the leading edge of the dye conjugate and are “removed”
from the test strip completely.


When the test is complete, you will see a pink-purple coloured band
in the “C” area of the test strip on negative samples and a pink-
purple
coloured band in the “T” and “C” area on positive samples. The
appearance of the CONTROL band indicates that the test strip is
performing properly and serves as a procedural control.


PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS:

1. SENSITIVITY

One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test will display positive results with
specimens containing HCG at the level close to or greater than 10mlU/
ml.

2. ACCURACY

Comparison studies on the One Step HCG Urine Pregnancy Test with a
legally marketed device were performed in-house and in a clinical
reference laboratory. Positive and negative results were compared and
the correlation was >99.5%.

PRINCIPLE:

The HCG assay is a rapid one-step test, based on an immunochromato
graphic technology. A membrane with an absorbent pad overlapping a
strip of fiber glass paper that is impregnated with a lyophilized
colloidal conjugate of gold particles and monoclonal solid phase
antibodies to HCG. Other absorbent pads at the end of the assay
absorb excess sample fluid. The urine sample is introduced into the
device,
and proceeds through the absorbent pad, then laterally onto a
chromatographic membrane. As it contacts the membrane, the sample
dissolves the lyophilized conjugate. In a reactive sample, the HCG
antigen will attach to the antibodies in the colloidal solution. As
the conjugate moves forward on the membrane, anti-HCG monoclonal
antibody affixed on the test zone (“T”) will bind the HCG-gold
conjugate complex, forming a pink line (“T”).
All samples will cause a pink colored line to appear in the control
zone (“C”).  This line is formed by the binding of the polyclonal
antibodies (Anti-mouse IgG) affixed onto the control zone to the
sample-colloidal gold conjugate. Presence of this line indicates that
the test has been carried out correctly. In less than 5 minutes,
levels of HCG as low as 25mlU/ml can be detected.


LIMITATION OF THE PROCEDURE:


1. Alcohol may interfere with the test result. It is not recommended
to use the test after drinking alcohol.


2 .Occasionally urine specimens containing less than 10mlU/ml also
yield positive results.


3.If you test too early HCG levels may still be low and so can give a
negative result. In this case, another urine specimen should be
obtained at least 48 hours later and tested.


4.HCG levels may remain detectable for several weeks after normal
delivery, delivery by caesarean section, spontaneous abortion or
therapeutic abortion


5.In cases where very high levels of HCG are present (>500,000mlU/ml)
a false negative result can occur due to a “Prozone” effect. If
pregnancy is still suspected, simply dilute specimen 1:1 with
deionized water and retest.


6.If a urine sample is too dilute (ie: low specific gravity) it may
not contain a representative level of HCG. If pregnancy is still
suspected, a first morning urine sample should be obtained and
retested 48 hours later.

http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061

http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918

http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/

http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
 
http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
 
http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html

Buggered off, did you?
 
I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
fool* [1] , I remain....

mad

[1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".

"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>
> http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>
> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>
> http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>
> http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>
> http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>
> http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>
> http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>
> http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>
> Buggered off, did you?

 I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
hours ago you posted:

"This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."

Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some references
to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them, support
your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the advent
of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent subculture"
was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by the
type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as judicious
reading of Dickens should have told you.

Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western governments
waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social bunkum
was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like let
alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before or
since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.


>
> I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
> fool* [1] , I remain....
>
> mad
>
> [1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".

I can come up with some more even more appropriate phrases if you like.
"Bad loser" and "a bit dim" are two of the more polite that fit. On second
thoughts please don't ask for some, I like a good verbal punch-up but you
and this subject are so tedious there is no incentive to continue.

"Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
news:NsadncrY99NMAR7VnZ2dnUVZ8rOdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>
>> http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>>
>> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>>
>> http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>>
>> http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>>
>> http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>>
>> http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>>
>> http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>>
>> http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>>
>> Buggered off, did you?
>
> I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
> hours ago you posted:
>
> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>
> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some references
> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them, support
> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the advent
> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent subculture"
> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by the
> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as judicious
> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>
> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western governments
> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social bunkum
> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like let
> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before or
> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.

Have we got a new friend?

It's been my experience that there's two sorts of people who spout this 
liberal-lefty rubbish about youngsters - those with no children, and those 
with the most ill-behaved brats you ever did see.
One wonders into which category the professor falls.

"Manky Badger" <you.must@be.joking> wrote in message 
news:0ZadnRuQIMG5Ah7VnZ2dnUVZ_qbinZ2d@giganews.com...
>
> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
> news:NsadncrY99NMAR7VnZ2dnUVZ8rOdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>>>
>>> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>>>
>>> http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>>>
>>> http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>>>
>>> http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>>>
>>> http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>>>
>>> http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>>>
>>> http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>>>
>>> Buggered off, did you?
>>
>> I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>> hours ago you posted:
>>
>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>>
>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some references
>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them, support
>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the advent
>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent 
>> subculture"
>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by 
>> the
>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as judicious
>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>
>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western 
>> governments
>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social bunkum
>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like let
>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before or
>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>
> Have we got a new friend?
>
> It's been my experience that there's two sorts of people who spout this 
> liberal-lefty rubbish about youngsters - those with no children, and those 
> with the most ill-behaved brats you ever did see.
> One wonders into which category the professor falls.

No children, definitely.  Married with kids, he/she would have picked a 
fight with their partner.  Also those that wish to replace their penis with 
the car/qualifications/golf clubs etc and wave their pseudo willy around for 
all to admire usually do so because they can't get a woman/man.  I'd say 
newly qualified male or ladette, no kids, no experience and socially inept 
with feelings of inferiority. 


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

"The Hatter"  wrote in message
news:79786$488486ee$28006@news.teranews.com...
>
> "Manky Badger" <you.must@be.joking> wrote in message
> news:0ZadnRuQIMG5Ah7VnZ2dnUVZ_qbinZ2d@giganews.com...
>>
>> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message
>> news:NsadncrY99NMAR7VnZ2dnUVZ8rOdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>
>>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>>>>
>>>> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>>>>
>>>> http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>>>>
>>>> http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>>>>
>>>> http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>>>>
>>>> http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>>>>
>>>> http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>>>>
>>>> Buggered off, did you?
>>>
>>> I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>>> hours ago you posted:
>>>
>>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>>>
>>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some
>>> references
>>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
>>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them,
>>> support
>>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the
>>> advent
>>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent
>>> subculture"
>>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by
>>> the
>>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as
>>> judicious
>>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>>
>>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western
>>> governments
>>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social
>>> bunkum
>>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like
>>> let
>>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before
>>> or
>>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>>
>> Have we got a new friend?
>>
>> It's been my experience that there's two sorts of people who spout this
>> liberal-lefty rubbish about youngsters - those with no children, and
>> those with the most ill-behaved brats you ever did see.
>> One wonders into which category the professor falls.
>
> No children, definitely.  Married with kids, he/she would have picked a
> fight with their partner.  Also those that wish to replace their penis
> with the car/qualifications/golf clubs etc and wave their pseudo willy
> around for all to admire usually do so because they can't get a
> woman/man.  I'd say newly qualified male or ladette, no kids, no
> experience and socially inept with feelings of inferiority.

I was taking a look at Friends Reunited the other day. Out of curiosity I
punched in a company I used to work for and under one profile was "I am
married with 2 children and drive a Porsche".

That was it! Period! Seeing as most of the adult population have children
it would appear that he thought he would distinguish himself by stating
"I drive a Porsche." Quite what he thought that conjured up in the eyes of
the reader I do not know. But no guessing as to what it conjured up in
mine.

Oh, I forgot to mention, he was a pain in the arse 30 years ago and still
is by the looks of it!

"Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
news:0MudnW4-D_bYTRnVnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "The Hatter"  wrote in message
> news:79786$488486ee$28006@news.teranews.com...
>>
>> "Manky Badger" <you.must@be.joking> wrote in message
>> news:0ZadnRuQIMG5Ah7VnZ2dnUVZ_qbinZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>
>>> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message
>>> news:NsadncrY99NMAR7VnZ2dnUVZ8rOdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>>>>>
>>>>> http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>>>>>
>>>>> http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Buggered off, did you?
>>>>
>>>> I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>>>> hours ago you posted:
>>>>
>>>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>>>>
>>>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some
>>>> references
>>>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
>>>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them,
>>>> support
>>>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the
>>>> advent
>>>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent
>>>> subculture"
>>>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by
>>>> the
>>>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>>>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as
>>>> judicious
>>>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western
>>>> governments
>>>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>>>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social
>>>> bunkum
>>>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like
>>>> let
>>>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before
>>>> or
>>>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>>>
>>> Have we got a new friend?
>>>
>>> It's been my experience that there's two sorts of people who spout this
>>> liberal-lefty rubbish about youngsters - those with no children, and
>>> those with the most ill-behaved brats you ever did see.
>>> One wonders into which category the professor falls.
>>
>> No children, definitely.  Married with kids, he/she would have picked a
>> fight with their partner.  Also those that wish to replace their penis
>> with the car/qualifications/golf clubs etc and wave their pseudo willy
>> around for all to admire usually do so because they can't get a
>> woman/man.  I'd say newly qualified male or ladette, no kids, no
>> experience and socially inept with feelings of inferiority.
>
> I was taking a look at Friends Reunited the other day. Out of curiosity I
> punched in a company I used to work for and under one profile was "I am
> married with 2 children and drive a Porsche".
>
> That was it! Period! Seeing as most of the adult population have children
> it would appear that he thought he would distinguish himself by stating
> "I drive a Porsche." Quite what he thought that conjured up in the eyes of
> the reader I do not know. But no guessing as to what it conjured up in
> mine.
>
> Oh, I forgot to mention, he was a pain in the arse 30 years ago and still
> is by the looks of it!

Lol, I know what it conjurs up in mine.... I am too much of a lady to say 
too! lol.

JB
x
>
>

"Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
news:0MudnW4-D_bYTRnVnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "The Hatter"  wrote in message
> news:79786$488486ee$28006@news.teranews.com...
>>
>> "Manky Badger" <you.must@be.joking> wrote in message
>> news:0ZadnRuQIMG5Ah7VnZ2dnUVZ_qbinZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>
>>> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message
>>> news:NsadncrY99NMAR7VnZ2dnUVZ8rOdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>>>>>
>>>>> http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>>>>>
>>>>> http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Buggered off, did you?
>>>>
>>>> I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>>>> hours ago you posted:
>>>>
>>>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>>>>
>>>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some
>>>> references
>>>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
>>>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them,
>>>> support
>>>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the
>>>> advent
>>>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent
>>>> subculture"
>>>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by
>>>> the
>>>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>>>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as
>>>> judicious
>>>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western
>>>> governments
>>>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>>>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social
>>>> bunkum
>>>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like
>>>> let
>>>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before
>>>> or
>>>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>>>
>>> Have we got a new friend?
>>>
>>> It's been my experience that there's two sorts of people who spout this
>>> liberal-lefty rubbish about youngsters - those with no children, and
>>> those with the most ill-behaved brats you ever did see.
>>> One wonders into which category the professor falls.
>>
>> No children, definitely.  Married with kids, he/she would have picked a
>> fight with their partner.  Also those that wish to replace their penis
>> with the car/qualifications/golf clubs etc and wave their pseudo willy
>> around for all to admire usually do so because they can't get a
>> woman/man.  I'd say newly qualified male or ladette, no kids, no
>> experience and socially inept with feelings of inferiority.
>
> I was taking a look at Friends Reunited the other day. Out of curiosity I
> punched in a company I used to work for and under one profile was "I am
> married with 2 children and drive a Porsche".
>
> That was it! Period! Seeing as most of the adult population have children
> it would appear that he thought he would distinguish himself by stating
> "I drive a Porsche." Quite what he thought that conjured up in the eyes of
> the reader I do not know. But no guessing as to what it conjured up in
> mine.
>
> Oh, I forgot to mention, he was a pain in the arse 30 years ago and still
> is by the looks of it!
>

Well looks like it's time to update my profile then.

Let's see - early retirement, self made man, financially independent, three 
cars, house paid for, no need for viagra, physically fit (for an American 
that is), and still an argumentative condescending self opionated arsehole. 
That'll do it.

F**k em if they can't take a joke.

Nigel Brooks

"Nigel Brooks"  wrote in message 
news:6ek6kjF7gf6nU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
> news:0MudnW4-D_bYTRnVnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "The Hatter"  wrote in message
>> news:79786$488486ee$28006@news.teranews.com...
>>>

>>>
>>> No children, definitely.  Married with kids, he/she would have picked 
>>> a
>>> fight with their partner.  Also those that wish to replace their penis
>>> with the car/qualifications/golf clubs etc and wave their pseudo willy
>>> around for all to admire usually do so because they can't get a
>>> woman/man.  I'd say newly qualified male or ladette, no kids, no
>>> experience and socially inept with feelings of inferiority.
>>
>> I was taking a look at Friends Reunited the other day. Out of curiosity 
>> I
>> punched in a company I used to work for and under one profile was "I am
>> married with 2 children and drive a Porsche".
>>
>> That was it! Period! Seeing as most of the adult population have 
>> children
>> it would appear that he thought he would distinguish himself by stating
>> "I drive a Porsche." Quite what he thought that conjured up in the eyes 
>> of
>> the reader I do not know. But no guessing as to what it conjured up in
>> mine.
>>
>> Oh, I forgot to mention, he was a pain in the arse 30 years ago and 
>> still
>> is by the looks of it!
>>
>
> Well looks like it's time to update my profile then.
>
> Let's see - early retirement, self made man, financially independent, 
> three cars, house paid for, no need for viagra, physically fit (for an 
> American that is), and still an argumentative condescending self 
> opionated arsehole. That'll do it.
>
> F**k em if they can't take a joke.

That's modest compared with my biography I've just written for it. It 
includes all of yours plus - states opinions as fact as my opinions are 
fact, God's gift to women and, as middle age approaches, still > than 10 
times a night!

"Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
news:4NKdnXuZzIsndRnVnZ2dnUVZ8vSdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "Nigel Brooks"  wrote in message 
> news:6ek6kjF7gf6nU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>
>> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
>> news:0MudnW4-D_bYTRnVnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>
>>> "The Hatter"  wrote in message
>>> news:79786$488486ee$28006@news.teranews.com...
>>>>
>
>>>>
>>>> No children, definitely.  Married with kids, he/she would have picked a
>>>> fight with their partner.  Also those that wish to replace their penis
>>>> with the car/qualifications/golf clubs etc and wave their pseudo willy
>>>> around for all to admire usually do so because they can't get a
>>>> woman/man.  I'd say newly qualified male or ladette, no kids, no
>>>> experience and socially inept with feelings of inferiority.
>>>
>>> I was taking a look at Friends Reunited the other day. Out of curiosity 
>>> I
>>> punched in a company I used to work for and under one profile was "I am
>>> married with 2 children and drive a Porsche".
>>>
>>> That was it! Period! Seeing as most of the adult population have 
>>> children
>>> it would appear that he thought he would distinguish himself by stating
>>> "I drive a Porsche." Quite what he thought that conjured up in the eyes 
>>> of
>>> the reader I do not know. But no guessing as to what it conjured up in
>>> mine.
>>>
>>> Oh, I forgot to mention, he was a pain in the arse 30 years ago and 
>>> still
>>> is by the looks of it!
>>>
>>
>> Well looks like it's time to update my profile then.
>>
>> Let's see - early retirement, self made man, financially independent, 
>> three cars, house paid for, no need for viagra, physically fit (for an 
>> American that is), and still an argumentative condescending self 
>> opionated arsehole. That'll do it.
>>
>> F**k em if they can't take a joke.
>
> That's modest compared with my biography I've just written for it. It 
> includes all of yours plus - states opinions as fact as my opinions are 
> fact, God's gift to women and, as middle age approaches, still > than 10 
> times a night!

I purloined some of yours and updated.  I have one complaint - when I tried 
to include "Armed Forces" the only option I get is "Other Countries" and the 
Namibian Army, Singapore, or South Africa.

Nigel Brooks

"JB"  wrote in message 
news:xrCdnXkne4ChRxnVRVnygwA@bt.com...
>
> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
> news:0MudnW4-D_bYTRnVnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@bt.com...
>> I was taking a look at Friends Reunited the other day. Out of curiosity 
>> I
>> punched in a company I used to work for and under one profile was "I am
>> married with 2 children and drive a Porsche".
>>
>> That was it! Period! Seeing as most of the adult population have 
>> children
>> it would appear that he thought he would distinguish himself by stating
>> "I drive a Porsche." Quite what he thought that conjured up in the eyes 
>> of
>> the reader I do not know. But no guessing as to what it conjured up in
>> mine.
>>
>> Oh, I forgot to mention, he was a pain in the arse 30 years ago and 
>> still
>> is by the looks of it!
>
> Lol, I know what it conjurs up in mine.... I am too much of a lady to 
> say too! lol.

A lady definitely! Too much of one certainly not. You are only 5' 3''!

"Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
news:7LidnZ9k8pcDERjVnZ2dnUVZ8hmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "JB"  wrote in message 
> news:xrCdnXkne4ChRxnVRVnygwA@bt.com...
>>
>> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
>> news:0MudnW4-D_bYTRnVnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>> I was taking a look at Friends Reunited the other day. Out of curiosity 
>>> I
>>> punched in a company I used to work for and under one profile was "I am
>>> married with 2 children and drive a Porsche".
>>>
>>> That was it! Period! Seeing as most of the adult population have 
>>> children
>>> it would appear that he thought he would distinguish himself by stating
>>> "I drive a Porsche." Quite what he thought that conjured up in the eyes 
>>> of
>>> the reader I do not know. But no guessing as to what it conjured up in
>>> mine.
>>>
>>> Oh, I forgot to mention, he was a pain in the arse 30 years ago and 
>>> still
>>> is by the looks of it!
>>
>> Lol, I know what it conjurs up in mine.... I am too much of a lady to say 
>> too! lol.
>
> A lady definitely! Too much of one certainly not. You are only 5' 3''!

As my dear Nan used to say "all good things come in little packages" x

JB
x
>
>

Toooldtocare wrote:

> 
> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
> >
> > http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
> >
> > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
> >
> > http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
> >
> > http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
> >
> > http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
> >
> > http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
> >
> > http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
> >
> > http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
> >
> > Buggered off, did you?
> 
>  I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
> hours ago you posted:
> 
> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."

I am allowed to change my mind, but you'll always be a twat!
 
> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some references
> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them, support
> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the advent
> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent subculture"
> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by the
> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as judicious
> reading of Dickens should have told you.
> 
> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western governments
> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social bunkum
> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like let
> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before or
> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.

You haven't presented any type of legitimAte argument supported with
data.  All you have said is YOUR opinion.

> > I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
> > fool* [1] , I remain....
> >
> > mad
> >
> > [1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".
> 
> I can come up with some more even more appropriate phrases if you like.
> "Bad loser" and "a bit dim" are two of the more polite that fit. On second
> thoughts please don't ask for some, I like a good verbal punch-up but you
> and this subject are so tedious there is no incentive to continue.

That's because you don't have an intellect to continue.  All we hear are
your sad, contentious opinions.

You were crossposting, too, and someone else challenged you.  You didn't
bother to respond because you're shooting with an unloaded gun.

Cite some references that indicate the presence of an adolescent
subculture is *bunk*, and you might be taken seriously.

I only said, "might", though.

Don't give me any more of your bullshit opinions, because that's all
they are.
-- 
mad

P.S.  I suggest changing your nick to "Toostupidtoknow".



Mack A. Damia wrote:

> Toooldtocare wrote:
> 
> > 
> > "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
> > news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
> > >
> > > http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
> > >
> > > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
> > >
> > > http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
> > >
> > > http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
> > >
> > > http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
> > >
> > > http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
> > >
> > > http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
> > >
> > > http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
> > >
> > > Buggered off, did you?
> > 
> >  I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
> > hours ago you posted:
> > 
> > "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
> 
> I am allowed to change my mind, but you'll always be a twat!
>  
> > Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some references
> > to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
> > miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them, support
> > your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the advent
> > of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent subculture"
> > was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by the
> > type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
> > sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as judicious
> > reading of Dickens should have told you.
> > 
> > Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western governments
> > waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
> > exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social bunkum
> > was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like let
> > alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before or
> > since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
> 
> You haven't presented any type of legitimAte argument supported with
> data.  All you have said is YOUR opinion.
> 
> > > I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
> > > fool* [1] , I remain....
> > >
> > > mad
> > >
> > > [1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".
> > 
> > I can come up with some more even more appropriate phrases if you like.
> > "Bad loser" and "a bit dim" are two of the more polite that fit. On second
> > thoughts please don't ask for some, I like a good verbal punch-up but you
> > and this subject are so tedious there is no incentive to continue.
> 
> That's because you don't have an intellect to continue.  All we hear are
> your sad, contentious opinions.
> 
> You were crossposting, too, and someone else challenged you.  You didn't
> bother to respond because you're shooting with an unloaded gun.
> 
> Cite some references that indicate the presence of an adolescent
> subculture is *bunk*, and you might be taken seriously.
> 
> I only said, "might", though.
> 
> Don't give me any more of your bullshit opinions, because that's all
> they are.
>

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:33:33 -0500, "Nigel Brooks" 
wrote:

>Let's see - early retirement, self made man, financially independent, three 
>cars, house paid for, no need for viagra, physically fit (for an American 
>that is), and still an argumentative condescending self opionated arsehole. 
>That'll do it.
>
>F**k em if they can't take a joke.

Let me see.... - early retirement (age 50), self-made, financially
independent, own and live in a beautiful two-story home on the beach
overlooking the Pacific Ocean, drive a Jaguar (also own a Toyota TRD
SR5) and am fairly physically fit for my age (for an American, that
is).

Developing quite nicely into a skeptical curmudgeon, thanks very much.
-- 
mad

"JB"  wrote in message 
news:yJ6dnRE-NreKThjVRVnyuAA@bt.com...
>
> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
> news:7LidnZ9k8pcDERjVnZ2dnUVZ8hmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>
>> "JB"  wrote in message 
>> news:xrCdnXkne4ChRxnVRVnygwA@bt.com...
>>>
>>> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
>>> news:0MudnW4-D_bYTRnVnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>> I was taking a look at Friends Reunited the other day. Out of curiosity 
>>>> I
>>>> punched in a company I used to work for and under one profile was "I am
>>>> married with 2 children and drive a Porsche".
>>>>
>>>> That was it! Period! Seeing as most of the adult population have 
>>>> children
>>>> it would appear that he thought he would distinguish himself by stating
>>>> "I drive a Porsche." Quite what he thought that conjured up in the eyes 
>>>> of
>>>> the reader I do not know. But no guessing as to what it conjured up in
>>>> mine.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I forgot to mention, he was a pain in the arse 30 years ago and 
>>>> still
>>>> is by the looks of it!
>>>
>>> Lol, I know what it conjurs up in mine.... I am too much of a lady to 
>>> say too! lol.
>>
>> A lady definitely! Too much of one certainly not. You are only 5' 3''!
>
> As my dear Nan used to say "all good things come in little packages" x

I came in a little package once ... grocery bags are so useful for those 
unexpected moments! :-) 


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

"The Hatter"  wrote in message 
news:e1a82$48872ec7$11647@news.teranews.com...
>
> "JB"  wrote in message 
> news:yJ6dnRE-NreKThjVRVnyuAA@bt.com...
>>
>> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
>> news:7LidnZ9k8pcDERjVnZ2dnUVZ8hmdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>
>>> "JB"  wrote in message 
>>> news:xrCdnXkne4ChRxnVRVnygwA@bt.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
>>>> news:0MudnW4-D_bYTRnVnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@bt.com...
>>>>> I was taking a look at Friends Reunited the other day. Out of 
>>>>> curiosity I
>>>>> punched in a company I used to work for and under one profile was "I 
>>>>> am
>>>>> married with 2 children and drive a Porsche".
>>>>>
>>>>> That was it! Period! Seeing as most of the adult population have 
>>>>> children
>>>>> it would appear that he thought he would distinguish himself by 
>>>>> stating
>>>>> "I drive a Porsche." Quite what he thought that conjured up in the 
>>>>> eyes of
>>>>> the reader I do not know. But no guessing as to what it conjured up in
>>>>> mine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, I forgot to mention, he was a pain in the arse 30 years ago and 
>>>>> still
>>>>> is by the looks of it!
>>>>
>>>> Lol, I know what it conjurs up in mine.... I am too much of a lady to 
>>>> say too! lol.
>>>
>>> A lady definitely! Too much of one certainly not. You are only 5' 3''!
>>
>> As my dear Nan used to say "all good things come in little packages" x
>
> I came in a little package once ... grocery bags are so useful for those 
> unexpected moments! :-)

Lol, :-)

JB
x

"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
news:6enahaF7vrvpU1@mid.individual.net...
> Toooldtocare wrote:
>
>>
>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>> >
>> > http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>> >
>> > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>> >
>> > http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>> >
>> > http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>> >
>> > http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>> >
>> > http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>> >
>> > http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>> >
>> > http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>> >
>> > Buggered off, did you?
>>
>>  I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>> hours ago you posted:
>>
>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>
> I am allowed to change my mind, but you'll always be a twat!
>
>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some
>> references
>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them,
>> support
>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the
>> advent
>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent
>> subculture"
>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by
>> the
>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as
>> judicious
>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>
>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western
>> governments
>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social bunkum
>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like let
>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before or
>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>
> You haven't presented any type of legitimAte argument supported with
> data.  All you have said is YOUR opinion.
>
>> > I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
>> > fool* [1] , I remain....
>> >
>> > mad
>> >
>> > [1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".
>>
>> I can come up with some more even more appropriate phrases if you like.
>> "Bad loser" and "a bit dim" are two of the more polite that fit. On
>> second
>> thoughts please don't ask for some, I like a good verbal punch-up but
>> you
>> and this subject are so tedious there is no incentive to continue.
>
> That's because you don't have an intellect to continue.  All we hear are
> your sad, contentious opinions.
>
> You were crossposting, too, and someone else challenged you.  You didn't
> bother to respond because you're shooting with an unloaded gun.
>
> Cite some references that indicate the presence of an adolescent
> subculture is *bunk*, and you might be taken seriously.
>
> I only said, "might", though.
>
> Don't give me any more of your bullshit opinions, because that's all
> they are.
> -- 
> mad
"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
news:6enahaF7vrvpU1@mid.individual.net...
> Toooldtocare wrote:
>
>>
>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>> >
>> > http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>> >
>> > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>> >
>> > http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>> >
>> > http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>> >
>> > http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>> >
>> > http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>> >
>> > http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>> >
>> > http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>> >
>> > Buggered off, did you?
>>
>>  I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>> hours ago you posted:
>>
>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>
> I am allowed to change my mind, but you'll always be a twat!

JHC, we have come across a moron here. Thick as cow dung!

>
>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some
>> references
>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them,
>> support
>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the
>> advent
>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent
>> subculture"
>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by
>> the
>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as
>> judicious
>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>
>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western
>> governments
>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social bunkum
>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like let
>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before or
>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>
> You haven't presented any type of legitimAte argument supported with
> data.  All you have said is YOUR opinion.
>
>> > I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
>> > fool* [1] , I remain....
>> >
>> > mad
>> >
>> > [1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".
>>
>> I can come up with some more even more appropriate phrases if you like.
>> "Bad loser" and "a bit dim" are two of the more polite that fit. On
>> second
>> thoughts please don't ask for some, I like a good verbal punch-up but
>> you
>> and this subject are so tedious there is no incentive to continue.
>
> That's because you don't have an intellect to continue.  All we hear are
> your sad, contentious opinions.
>
> You were crossposting, too, and someone else challenged you.  You didn't
> bother to respond because you're shooting with an unloaded gun.
>
> Cite some references that indicate the presence of an adolescent
> subculture is *bunk*, and you might be taken seriously.
>
> I only said, "might", though.
>
> Don't give me any more of your bullshit opinions, because that's all
> they are.

Look wanker, I've been out on the piss today and your shit is something I
don't need.  You said " We created an adolescent subculture with the
advent of compulsory schooling." . I said that was bollocks and nothing
you have posted has contradicted that. An adolescent subculture isn't  the
debate.That  the advent of  compulsory schooling caused said subculture
is,  Stop buying tickets for yourself and withdraw.

"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
news:6enan0F7tgj4U1@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> P.S.  I suggest changing your nick to "Toostupidtoknow".
>

I suggest you stop being a dickhead and get it right first time.

And if you want to call names  then change yours from a common and garden
nut to a peanut. For your brain is less than one and you have been well 
and truly roasted!

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:30:55 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
 wrote:

>
>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>news:6enahaF7vrvpU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Toooldtocare wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>> >
>>> > http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>>> >
>>> > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>>> >
>>> > http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>>> >
>>> > http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>>> >
>>> > http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>>> >
>>> > http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>>> >
>>> > http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>>> >
>>> > http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>>> >
>>> > Buggered off, did you?
>>>
>>>  I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>>> hours ago you posted:
>>>
>>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>>
>> I am allowed to change my mind, but you'll always be a twat!
>>
>>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some
>>> references
>>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
>>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them,
>>> support
>>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the
>>> advent
>>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent
>>> subculture"
>>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by
>>> the
>>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as
>>> judicious
>>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>>
>>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western
>>> governments
>>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social bunkum
>>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like let
>>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before or
>>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>>
>> You haven't presented any type of legitimAte argument supported with
>> data.  All you have said is YOUR opinion.
>>
>>> > I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
>>> > fool* [1] , I remain....
>>> >
>>> > mad
>>> >
>>> > [1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".
>>>
>>> I can come up with some more even more appropriate phrases if you like.
>>> "Bad loser" and "a bit dim" are two of the more polite that fit. On
>>> second
>>> thoughts please don't ask for some, I like a good verbal punch-up but
>>> you
>>> and this subject are so tedious there is no incentive to continue.
>>
>> That's because you don't have an intellect to continue.  All we hear are
>> your sad, contentious opinions.
>>
>> You were crossposting, too, and someone else challenged you.  You didn't
>> bother to respond because you're shooting with an unloaded gun.
>>
>> Cite some references that indicate the presence of an adolescent
>> subculture is *bunk*, and you might be taken seriously.
>>
>> I only said, "might", though.
>>
>> Don't give me any more of your bullshit opinions, because that's all
>> they are.
>> -- 
>> mad
>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>news:6enahaF7vrvpU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Toooldtocare wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>> >
>>> > http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>>> >
>>> > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>>> >
>>> > http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>>> >
>>> > http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>>> >
>>> > http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>>> >
>>> > http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>>> >
>>> > http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>>> >
>>> > http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>>> >
>>> > Buggered off, did you?
>>>
>>>  I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>>> hours ago you posted:
>>>
>>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>>
>> I am allowed to change my mind, but you'll always be a twat!
>
>JHC, we have come across a moron here. Thick as cow dung!
>
>>
>>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some
>>> references
>>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've failed
>>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them,
>>> support
>>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the
>>> advent
>>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent
>>> subculture"
>>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced by
>>> the
>>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as
>>> judicious
>>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>>
>>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western
>>> governments
>>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social bunkum
>>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like let
>>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before or
>>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>>
>> You haven't presented any type of legitimAte argument supported with
>> data.  All you have said is YOUR opinion.
>>
>>> > I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
>>> > fool* [1] , I remain....
>>> >
>>> > mad
>>> >
>>> > [1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".
>>>
>>> I can come up with some more even more appropriate phrases if you like.
>>> "Bad loser" and "a bit dim" are two of the more polite that fit. On
>>> second
>>> thoughts please don't ask for some, I like a good verbal punch-up but
>>> you
>>> and this subject are so tedious there is no incentive to continue.
>>
>> That's because you don't have an intellect to continue.  All we hear are
>> your sad, contentious opinions.
>>
>> You were crossposting, too, and someone else challenged you.  You didn't
>> bother to respond because you're shooting with an unloaded gun.
>>
>> Cite some references that indicate the presence of an adolescent
>> subculture is *bunk*, and you might be taken seriously.
>>
>> I only said, "might", though.
>>
>> Don't give me any more of your bullshit opinions, because that's all
>> they are.
>
>Look wanker, I've been out on the piss today and your shit is something I
>don't need.  You said " We created an adolescent subculture with the
>advent of compulsory schooling." . I said that was bollocks and nothing
>you have posted has contradicted that. An adolescent subculture isn't  the
>debate.That  the advent of  compulsory schooling caused said subculture
>is,  Stop buying tickets for yourself and withdraw.

Don't display your abject stupidity.

With the advent of compulsory schooling, we created an adolescent
subculture.  Prior to compulsory schooling, adolescents were married
and produced offspring at an early age - after the onset of puberty.

This isn't opinion; it's fact, bub.
-- 
mad

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:31:18 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
 wrote:

>
>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>news:6enan0F7tgj4U1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>
>> P.S.  I suggest changing your nick to "Toostupidtoknow".
>>
>
>I suggest you stop being a dickhead and get it right first time.

Indeeed, that's your wailing and gnashing of teeth when you have to
spot and comment on typos.

The last act of a desparate knownothing.
-- 
mad

"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message 
news:3jue84dvv90cdbj861lnfd0u9fahldl31m@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:30:55 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
>  wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>news:6enahaF7vrvpU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> Toooldtocare wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>>> >
>>>> > http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>>>> >
>>>> > http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>>>> >
>>>> > http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>>>> >
>>>> > http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>>>> >
>>>> > Buggered off, did you?
>>>>
>>>>  I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>>>> hours ago you posted:
>>>>
>>>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>>>
>>> I am allowed to change my mind, but you'll always be a twat!
>>>
>>>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some
>>>> references
>>>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've 
>>>> failed
>>>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them,
>>>> support
>>>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the
>>>> advent
>>>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent
>>>> subculture"
>>>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced 
>>>> by
>>>> the
>>>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>>>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as
>>>> judicious
>>>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western
>>>> governments
>>>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>>>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social 
>>>> bunkum
>>>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like 
>>>> let
>>>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before 
>>>> or
>>>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>>>
>>> You haven't presented any type of legitimAte argument supported with
>>> data.  All you have said is YOUR opinion.
>>>
>>>> > I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
>>>> > fool* [1] , I remain....
>>>> >
>>>> > mad
>>>> >
>>>> > [1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".
>>>>
>>>> I can come up with some more even more appropriate phrases if you 
>>>> like.
>>>> "Bad loser" and "a bit dim" are two of the more polite that fit. On
>>>> second
>>>> thoughts please don't ask for some, I like a good verbal punch-up but
>>>> you
>>>> and this subject are so tedious there is no incentive to continue.
>>>
>>> That's because you don't have an intellect to continue.  All we hear 
>>> are
>>> your sad, contentious opinions.
>>>
>>> You were crossposting, too, and someone else challenged you.  You 
>>> didn't
>>> bother to respond because you're shooting with an unloaded gun.
>>>
>>> Cite some references that indicate the presence of an adolescent
>>> subculture is *bunk*, and you might be taken seriously.
>>>
>>> I only said, "might", though.
>>>
>>> Don't give me any more of your bullshit opinions, because that's all
>>> they are.
>>> -- 
>>> mad
>>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>news:6enahaF7vrvpU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> Toooldtocare wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>>> >
>>>> > http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>>>> >
>>>> > http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>>>> >
>>>> > http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>>>> >
>>>> > http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>>>> >
>>>> > Buggered off, did you?
>>>>
>>>>  I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>>>> hours ago you posted:
>>>>
>>>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>>>
>>> I am allowed to change my mind, but you'll always be a twat!
>>
>>JHC, we have come across a moron here. Thick as cow dung!
>>
>>>
>>>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some
>>>> references
>>>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've 
>>>> failed
>>>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them,
>>>> support
>>>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the
>>>> advent
>>>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent
>>>> subculture"
>>>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced 
>>>> by
>>>> the
>>>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>>>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as
>>>> judicious
>>>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western
>>>> governments
>>>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>>>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social 
>>>> bunkum
>>>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like 
>>>> let
>>>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before 
>>>> or
>>>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>>>
>>> You haven't presented any type of legitimAte argument supported with
>>> data.  All you have said is YOUR opinion.
>>>
>>>> > I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
>>>> > fool* [1] , I remain....
>>>> >
>>>> > mad
>>>> >
>>>> > [1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".
>>>>
>>>> I can come up with some more even more appropriate phrases if you 
>>>> like.
>>>> "Bad loser" and "a bit dim" are two of the more polite that fit. On
>>>> second
>>>> thoughts please don't ask for some, I like a good verbal punch-up but
>>>> you
>>>> and this subject are so tedious there is no incentive to continue.
>>>
>>> That's because you don't have an intellect to continue.  All we hear 
>>> are
>>> your sad, contentious opinions.
>>>
>>> You were crossposting, too, and someone else challenged you.  You 
>>> didn't
>>> bother to respond because you're shooting with an unloaded gun.
>>>
>>> Cite some references that indicate the presence of an adolescent
>>> subculture is *bunk*, and you might be taken seriously.
>>>
>>> I only said, "might", though.
>>>
>>> Don't give me any more of your bullshit opinions, because that's all
>>> they are.
>>
>>Look wanker, I've been out on the piss today and your shit is something 
>>I
>>don't need.  You said " We created an adolescent subculture with the
>>advent of compulsory schooling." . I said that was bollocks and nothing
>>you have posted has contradicted that. An adolescent subculture isn't 
>>the
>>debate.That  the advent of  compulsory schooling caused said subculture
>>is,  Stop buying tickets for yourself and withdraw.
>
> Don't display your abject stupidity.
>
> With the advent of compulsory schooling, we created an adolescent
> subculture.  Prior to compulsory schooling, adolescents were married
> and produced offspring at an early age - after the onset of puberty.
>
> This isn't opinion; it's fact, bub.

Are you completely thick? There was an adolescent subculture way before 
compulsory education. Ffs read Dickens you Scouse git!

"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message 
news:2que84lr5v2dgqflallfe8ve7j0uaqmeq0@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:31:18 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
>  wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>news:6enan0F7tgj4U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>>
>>> P.S.  I suggest changing your nick to "Toostupidtoknow".
>>>
>>
>>I suggest you stop being a dickhead and get it right first time.
>
> Indeeed, that's your wailing and gnashing of teeth when you have to
> spot and comment on typos.
>
> The last act of a desparate knownothing.

Christ, you really are stupid. I wasn't criticising your spelling, I was 
laughing you had to have two cracks at this. A P.S is a sure sign of the 
desperate! You are really hopeless.

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:58:34 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
 wrote:

>
>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message 
>news:3jue84dvv90cdbj861lnfd0u9fahldl31m@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:30:55 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>>news:6enahaF7vrvpU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> Toooldtocare wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>>>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Buggered off, did you?
>>>>>
>>>>>  I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>>>>> hours ago you posted:
>>>>>
>>>>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>>>>
>>>> I am allowed to change my mind, but you'll always be a twat!
>>>>
>>>>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some
>>>>> references
>>>>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've 
>>>>> failed
>>>>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them,
>>>>> support
>>>>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the
>>>>> advent
>>>>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent
>>>>> subculture"
>>>>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced 
>>>>> by
>>>>> the
>>>>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>>>>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as
>>>>> judicious
>>>>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western
>>>>> governments
>>>>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>>>>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social 
>>>>> bunkum
>>>>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like 
>>>>> let
>>>>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before 
>>>>> or
>>>>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>>>>
>>>> You haven't presented any type of legitimAte argument supported with
>>>> data.  All you have said is YOUR opinion.
>>>>
>>>>> > I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
>>>>> > fool* [1] , I remain....
>>>>> >
>>>>> > mad
>>>>> >
>>>>> > [1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".
>>>>>
>>>>> I can come up with some more even more appropriate phrases if you 
>>>>> like.
>>>>> "Bad loser" and "a bit dim" are two of the more polite that fit. On
>>>>> second
>>>>> thoughts please don't ask for some, I like a good verbal punch-up but
>>>>> you
>>>>> and this subject are so tedious there is no incentive to continue.
>>>>
>>>> That's because you don't have an intellect to continue.  All we hear 
>>>> are
>>>> your sad, contentious opinions.
>>>>
>>>> You were crossposting, too, and someone else challenged you.  You 
>>>> didn't
>>>> bother to respond because you're shooting with an unloaded gun.
>>>>
>>>> Cite some references that indicate the presence of an adolescent
>>>> subculture is *bunk*, and you might be taken seriously.
>>>>
>>>> I only said, "might", though.
>>>>
>>>> Don't give me any more of your bullshit opinions, because that's all
>>>> they are.
>>>> -- 
>>>> mad
>>>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>>news:6enahaF7vrvpU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> Toooldtocare wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>>>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://connection.ebscohost.com/content/article/1041299750.html;jsessionid=F21EFED275D2539827B262D8FB0DD282.ehctc1
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/citation/134/3485/1061
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/detail.asp?item=100000000259381
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2248/is_134_34/ai_55884918
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www.springerlink.com/content/v68281044504r11t/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www.servicelearning.org/library/lib_cat/index.php?library_id=3381
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://members.ncss.org/se/5707/570709.html
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://web1.msue.msu.edu/msue/imp/moddp/d4110026.html
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Buggered off, did you?
>>>>>
>>>>>  I presume your Phd was not in Logic and Consistency for less than 24
>>>>> hours ago you posted:
>>>>>
>>>>> "This will be my last post to you because you're an ignorant twat."
>>>>
>>>> I am allowed to change my mind, but you'll always be a twat!
>>>
>>>JHC, we have come across a moron here. Thick as cow dung!
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Now it seems you've been a busy little bee coming up with some
>>>>> references
>>>>> to try and regain some self-respect. I have to tell you, you've 
>>>>> failed
>>>>> miserably. None of those references, and I skimmed through them,
>>>>> support
>>>>> your assertion that "We created an adolescent subculture with the
>>>>> advent
>>>>> of compulsory schooling." Not one suggests that "an adolescent
>>>>> subculture"
>>>>> was created by schools, simply that some subcultures are influenced 
>>>>> by
>>>>> the
>>>>> type of school, a deduction that didn't need a load of parasitical
>>>>> sociologists to tell us! Your assertion was ludicrous anyway as
>>>>> judicious
>>>>> reading of Dickens should have told you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed, the above references are a good example of how Western
>>>>> governments
>>>>> waste our taxes. The reports spam the years 1961 to 1992 with one
>>>>> exception in 2007.During those three decades more liberal social 
>>>>> bunkum
>>>>> was produced by people who didn't know what the real world was like 
>>>>> let
>>>>> alone be capable of getting a real job in it, than any decade before 
>>>>> or
>>>>> since. Absolute bollocks is a very fair description of the genre.
>>>>
>>>> You haven't presented any type of legitimAte argument supported with
>>>> data.  All you have said is YOUR opinion.
>>>>
>>>>> > I doubt that it knows what the word means, but being a *pretentious
>>>>> > fool* [1] , I remain....
>>>>> >
>>>>> > mad
>>>>> >
>>>>> > [1] Oh so better than an "ignorant twat".
>>>>>
>>>>> I can come up with some more even more appropriate phrases if you 
>>>>> like.
>>>>> "Bad loser" and "a bit dim" are two of the more polite that fit. On
>>>>> second
>>>>> thoughts please don't ask for some, I like a good verbal punch-up but
>>>>> you
>>>>> and this subject are so tedious there is no incentive to continue.
>>>>
>>>> That's because you don't have an intellect to continue.  All we hear 
>>>> are
>>>> your sad, contentious opinions.
>>>>
>>>> You were crossposting, too, and someone else challenged you.  You 
>>>> didn't
>>>> bother to respond because you're shooting with an unloaded gun.
>>>>
>>>> Cite some references that indicate the presence of an adolescent
>>>> subculture is *bunk*, and you might be taken seriously.
>>>>
>>>> I only said, "might", though.
>>>>
>>>> Don't give me any more of your bullshit opinions, because that's all
>>>> they are.
>>>
>>>Look wanker, I've been out on the piss today and your shit is something 
>>>I
>>>don't need.  You said " We created an adolescent subculture with the
>>>advent of compulsory schooling." . I said that was bollocks and nothing
>>>you have posted has contradicted that. An adolescent subculture isn't 
>>>the
>>>debate.That  the advent of  compulsory schooling caused said subculture
>>>is,  Stop buying tickets for yourself and withdraw.
>>
>> Don't display your abject stupidity.
>>
>> With the advent of compulsory schooling, we created an adolescent
>> subculture.  Prior to compulsory schooling, adolescents were married
>> and produced offspring at an early age - after the onset of puberty.
>>
>> This isn't opinion; it's fact, bub.
>
>Are you completely thick? There was an adolescent subculture way before 
>compulsory education. Ffs read Dickens you Scouse git!

What the fuck does Dickens have to do with the existence of an
adolescent subculture?  Your arguments are specious.

"The first compulsory education law in the American colonies was
established in Massachusetts in 1852".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_education

Dickens died in 1870, so I don't see the relevence.

Read James Coleman (*The Coleman Report*)

The adolescent subculture wasn't created overnight.  Early compulsory
schooling educated children until puberty - then they were on their
own and treated as adults.  As late as the 1930s in England, children
were compelled to attend school - but only to age 14.
-- 
mad

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:04:29 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
 wrote:

>
>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message 
>news:2que84lr5v2dgqflallfe8ve7j0uaqmeq0@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:31:18 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
>>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>>news:6enan0F7tgj4U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> P.S.  I suggest changing your nick to "Toostupidtoknow".
>>>>
>>>
>>>I suggest you stop being a dickhead and get it right first time.
>>
>> Indeeed, that's your wailing and gnashing of teeth when you have to
>> spot and comment on typos.
>>
>> The last act of a desparate knownothing.
>
>Christ, you really are stupid. I wasn't criticising your spelling, I was 
>laughing you had to have two cracks at this. A P.S is a sure sign of the 
>desperate! You are really hopeless.

I'm the stupid one? Au contaire, mon petite cretuin.

You're the one who can't express himself well enough to be understood.

You're a left-tailed idiot.

Mu = 100
-- 
mad

"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message 
news:181f84520j73t9vg3l3em7e6lj66n84doa@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:04:29 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
>  wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>news:2que84lr5v2dgqflallfe8ve7j0uaqmeq0@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:31:18 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>>>news:6enan0F7tgj4U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S.  I suggest changing your nick to "Toostupidtoknow".
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I suggest you stop being a dickhead and get it right first time.
>>>
>>> Indeeed, that's your wailing and gnashing of teeth when you have to
>>> spot and comment on typos.
>>>
>>> The last act of a desparate knownothing.
>>
>>Christ, you really are stupid. I wasn't criticising your spelling, I was
>>laughing you had to have two cracks at this. A P.S is a sure sign of the
>>desperate! You are really hopeless.
>
> I'm the stupid one? Au contaire, mon petite cretuin.


It's painful to read! lol Mon petite cretuin? Cretuin???  It's depressing 
what goes for a Phd these days.

Not just hopeless but a "cretuin", whatever the fuck that is.

Time to move on I think, this one is just not up to par!

Toooldtocare wrote:

> 
> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message 
> news:181f84520j73t9vg3l3em7e6lj66n84doa@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:04:29 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
> >  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
> >>news:2que84lr5v2dgqflallfe8ve7j0uaqmeq0@4ax.com...
> >>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:31:18 +0100, "Toooldtocare"
> >>>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>"Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
> >>>>news:6enan0F7tgj4U1@mid.individual.net...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> P.S.  I suggest changing your nick to "Toostupidtoknow".
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>I suggest you stop being a dickhead and get it right first time.
> >>>
> >>> Indeeed, that's your wailing and gnashing of teeth when you have to
> >>> spot and comment on typos.
> >>>
> >>> The last act of a desparate knownothing.
> >>
> >>Christ, you really are stupid. I wasn't criticising your spelling, I was
> >>laughing you had to have two cracks at this. A P.S is a sure sign of the
> >>desperate! You are really hopeless.
> >
> > I'm the stupid one? Au contaire, mon petite cretuin.
> 
> 
> It's painful to read! lol Mon petite cretuin? Cretuin???  It's depressing 
> what goes for a Phd these days.
> 
> Not just hopeless but a "cretuin", whatever the fuck that is.
> 
> Time to move on I think, this one is just not up to par!

You just pointed out a typographical error AGAIN.  The word is "cretin",
and from what I've read, the word fits you perfectly.
-- 
PM

"Polymath"  wrote in message
news:6epgr0F8bg24U1@mid.individual.net...
>
>> > I'm the stupid one? Au contaire, mon petite cretuin.
>>
>>
>> It's painful to read! lol Mon petite cretuin? Cretuin???  It's
>> depressing
>> what goes for a Phd these days.
>>
>> Not just hopeless but a "cretuin", whatever the fuck that is.
>>
>> Time to move on I think, this one is just not up to par!
>
> You just pointed out a typographical error AGAIN.  The word is "cretin",
> and from what I've read, the word fits you perfectly.

You are thick as that nut Macadamia.  That was my point you cretin! He
spelt it "cretuin"! I don't know what creepy group you crawled out of but
you'd best crawl back to it!

"Toooldtocare"  wrote in message 
news:RtOdnSb6jMlR5BrVnZ2dnUVZ8tjinZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
> news:6enahaF7vrvpU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Toooldtocare wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Mack A. Damia"  wrote in message
>>> news:8kp684ljh1kk2gueelnhu5b5q0os287mic@4ax.com...
>>> &g