I was disappointed to see that once again, given the opportunity, not one 
member of the Question Time audience smacked Hazel Blears firmly and 
squarely in her awful, zealot face in order to wipe that smug, sneering, 
patronising smirk off it. 


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

"The Hatter"  wrote in message 
news:4ec0a$483716a9$12071@news.teranews.com...
>I was disappointed to see that once again, given the opportunity, not one 
>member of the Question Time audience smacked Hazel Blears firmly and 
>squarely in her awful, zealot face in order to wipe that smug, sneering, 
>patronising smirk off it.

I agree, there is something insufferable about her whole demeanour. I 
believe a firm clout with a sturdy bit of 4 x 2 would solve that quite 
nicely, particularly if it was on prime-time TV!

I think she must be the House of Commons equivalent of Dolores Umbridge!

"The Hatter"  wrote in message 
news:4ec0a$483716a9$12071@news.teranews.com...
>I was disappointed to see that once again, given the opportunity, not one 
>member of the Question Time audience smacked Hazel Blears firmly and 
>squarely in her awful, zealot face in order to wipe that smug, sneering, 
>patronising smirk off it.

They all smirk like that, it is a hangover from the Alistair Campbell 
days. His instruction to the highest and lowest in New, now On the Ropes 
Labour, was when in trouble look condescending. He thought it would give 
an air of confidence. Last night it made her look a half-wit.

I am amused by what Frank Fields said today. He said "he was interested in 
politics but did not know half the cabinet"! Who are these pups? Upstarts 
from nowhere! Take the Home Secretary, Jackie Nobody. She is in charge of 
our security. Heaven help us.

Harriet Harwoman was on the radio this morning. She said the "government 
was learning the lessons about energy increases". Her solution was to 
stick a few windmills somewhere and give grants for loft insulation! that 
is what the people want!

This government has been outed by the architect of its own destruction, 
Brown. The whole economic "miracle" was a sham and now we are bust. People 
are angry, as everyone is when they realise they have been conned. Sadly 
it is us who will have to pick up the pieces.

On Fri, 23 May 2008 21:18:24 +0100, "Not Today"  wrote:

>Who are these pups?

Mongrels?

"Jon.R"  wrote in message 
news:483718b7$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> "The Hatter"  wrote in message 
> news:4ec0a$483716a9$12071@news.teranews.com...
>>I was disappointed to see that once again, given the opportunity, not one 
>>member of the Question Time audience smacked Hazel Blears firmly and 
>>squarely in her awful, zealot face in order to wipe that smug, sneering, 
>>patronising smirk off it.
>
> I agree, there is something insufferable about her whole demeanour. I 
> believe a firm clout with a sturdy bit of 4 x 2 would solve that quite 
> nicely, particularly if it was on prime-time TV!

Well, a wise man once said "when you want a nail in a bit of wood you just 
take a hammer and keep hitting the nail - nothing fancy" and i'm certainly 
from this school of thought - so yes, bit of 4 x 2 and just keep hitting it 
until she's back into the real world.  You have to be practical with this 
type of thing.

Its really a reflection of public self confidence that no one took the lead 
and administered this solution on live TV.  I feel it would have been well 
received and a deserved relief for the public. 


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

On Sun, 25 May 2008 14:46:06 +0100, "The Hatter"
 wrote:

>Its really a reflection of public self confidence that no one took the lead 
>and administered this solution on live TV. 

Yes! They are confident in the knowledge that very shortly
they will be able to give her and her lot a good gubbing.
And a well deserved one at that. Democratic process
I just love it sometimes.