|
|
|
date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT),
group: uk.local.kent
back
Re: John Ward
On 25 Mar, 21:17, "Itchy" <s...@spam.invalid> wrote:
> Sorry if this has already been posted (don't check on here much and me
> newserver only has posts made after 23rd March), but I've just seen John's> face on the telly saying he's been forced to resign because of comments he's
> made on his blog saying there's a strong case for compulsory sterilisation> of mothers living on benefits who have had a second child.
>
> I've certainly thought about it, I'm sure others have. But to be in the> public eye and broadcast a statement like that, that's more Hatter style ;> not Wardy. I'm in shock.
I'm not.
Wardy consistently came across as a sanctimonious old twat when he
used to post in here... was certainly trying to punch above his weight
anyway, and invariably failed thanks to his blinkered prejudiced
outlook on life always getting the better of the 'measured me' he
liked to try and promote to everyone.
> Silly man.
Indeed - the only surprise is it took him this long to fall on his own
(political) sword.
--
JackH
date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
author: unknown
|
Re: John Ward
wrote in message
news:08f21fb2-655e-4dbe-9b52-0b10bc385f6d@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 25 Mar, 21:17, "Itchy" <s...@spam.invalid> wrote:
> Sorry if this has already been posted (don't check on here much and me
> newserver only has posts made after 23rd March), but I've just seen
> John's
> face on the telly saying he's been forced to resign because of comments
> he's
> made on his blog saying there's a strong case for compulsory
> sterilisation
> of mothers living on benefits who have had a second child.
>
> I've certainly thought about it, I'm sure others have. But to be in the
> public eye and broadcast a statement like that, that's more Hatter style
> ;),
> not Wardy. I'm in shock.
I'm not.
Wardy consistently came across as a sanctimonious old twat when he
used to post in here... was certainly trying to punch above his weight
anyway, and invariably failed thanks to his blinkered prejudiced
outlook on life always getting the better of the 'measured me' he
liked to try and promote to everyone.
> Silly man.
Indeed - the only surprise is it took him this long to fall on his own
(political) sword.
--
JackH
I agree, a typical middle of the road politician, all things to all men if
a vote was in it. Middle of the road! Can't stand it.
date: Thu, 1 May 2008 10:27:25 +0100
author: Toooldtocare
|
Re: John Ward
wrote in message
news:08f21fb2-655e-4dbe-9b52-0b10bc385f6d@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On 25 Mar, 21:17, "Itchy" <s...@spam.invalid> wrote:
> Sorry if this has already been posted (don't check on here much and me
> newserver only has posts made after 23rd March), but I've just seen John's
> face on the telly saying he's been forced to resign because of comments
> he's
> made on his blog saying there's a strong case for compulsory sterilisation
> of mothers living on benefits who have had a second child.
>
> I've certainly thought about it, I'm sure others have. But to be in the
> public eye and broadcast a statement like that, that's more Hatter style
> ;),
> not Wardy. I'm in shock.
I'm not.
Wardy consistently came across as a sanctimonious old twat when he
used to post in here... was certainly trying to punch above his weight
anyway, and invariably failed thanks to his blinkered prejudiced
outlook on life always getting the better of the 'measured me' he
liked to try and promote to everyone.
So you did not like him!
Bobby
date: Sun, 4 May 2008 20:57:55 +0100
author: Bobby Bewl
|
|
|