In article , someone@here (The
One) wrote:

> Article: 67592 of uk.local.isle-of-wight
> Subject: Re: hollywood and bollywood actor and actress photos
> From: "The One" <someone@here>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:25:25 +0100
> Message-ID: 
> References: 
>  
> 
> Bytes: 2075
> Lines: 35
> NNTP-Posting-Host: mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com
> Newsgroups: uk.local.isle-of-wight
> X-Trace: 11 Jun 2008 14:25:29 +0100, mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080611-1, 11/06/2008), Outbound message
> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
> X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.108.216.173
> Path: 
> newserver.!news.merula.net!peernews.merula.net!peer3.news.newnet.co.
> uk!news.germany.com!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-onli
> ne.de!t-online.de!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!tiscali!newsfeed2.ip.tisc
> ali.net!212.74.112.120.MISMATCH!mk-nntp-1.news.uk.tiscali.com!mk-nnt
> p-2.news.uk.tiscali.com
> Xref: newserver uk.local.isle-of-wight:67592
> 
> 
> "Steve"  wrote in message 
> news:memo.20080611134501.31441C@steve.bmc...
> > In article
> > 
> > 
> ,
> > gayathri340@gmail.com (GAYATHRI) wrote:
> >
> >> *Subject:* hollywood and bollywood actor and actress photos
> >> *From:* GAYATHRI 
> >> *Date:* Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
> >>
> >> hollywood and bollywood actor and actress photos
> >> hindi movies downloads
> >> and etc
> >> -----------------------------------------------
> >> http://bibasabasu.blogspot.com
> >> -------------------------------
> >>
> > 59.92.107.163 is from India(IN) in region Southern and Eastern 
> > Asia
> >
> > whois query for 59.92.107.163...
> >
> > Results returned from whois.arin.net:
> >
> >
> > OrgName:    Asia Pacific Network Information Centre
> > OrgID:      APNIC
> > Address:    PO Box 2131
> > City:
> 
> <Waste of Time snipped>
> 
> Interesting but pointless. 
> 
> 
> 
Maybe not for you..  but for the rest of us, it saves everyone else doing
a lookup on the poster's IP address to find the abuse reporting address.
I'll save your brain any further work by telling you that there isn't an
abuse address, there is however a hostmaster address, so it's a fair
guess what the abuse address will be.

Now run along, there's a good little boy.