Why do some Trolls and KoOks choose not to archive their rants? For
posterity I have chosen to cut and paste this post into my own so it
won't disappear in a week.

>"Freemasons' Hall in London is the headquarters of the United Grand
Lodge of England and a meeting place for the Masonic Lodges in the
London area. It is in Great Queen Street between Holborn and Covent
Garden and has been a Masonic meeting place since 1775."


>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1541692698470701125


>You only need to complete a quick google search to find out what the
freemasons are all about and the controversy surrounding them. I
secretly obtained this video via deception. I would like to apologies
for the pore quality and the lengthy scenes of no interest also the
bad audio. Please understand that my activities had to be concealed
and at times near impossible to carry on filming without being
discovered.

Again, you did not have to conceal your activities. You were being
deceptive for no reason.
You should apologies for your pore spelling and creepy behaviour.


>The feeling of the lodge is an extremely earry place to be. References
in the masonry are extremely sadistic and are in many a reference to
"a supreme being", but no mentioned or depiction of Christ or any
other heavenly being (namely the God) is present. Having said that
however, there was nothing that resembled Satan.

You were not at any time in a Lodge. You were in the Hall where Lodges
meet and there is a difference.
Why would there be any mention of Christ or Mohammed in the hall?
There is no mention of Christ at a Boy Scouts meeting either but there
are references to a nonspecific Deity. This is because we don't
exclude brethren based on their particular religion.


>Security is very tight with every point covered by advanced video
surveillance. Throughout I was in the company of a mason (not in the
knowledge of what I was doing. Never the less there were others
standing behind corners observing and trying not to be noticed but
did
not seem worried that I new they were there, sometimes revealing
themselves only to return behind the scenes again.

Can you blame them for wanting to protect themselves from the
questionable activities of people with ulterior motives lurking around
the hall? It's not like they had a big net waiting for you. The only
thin "earry" about this film is you lurking around making rustling
noises under your trenchcoat.

>There were others there notably two females whom I managed to get in
shot. Also others whom I did not. It seems as if they were getting
ready for some kind of a production.


>I hope that this video can contribute in someway to the end of the
freemasons and their activities and that they are not in any way
oblivious to penetration

So you admit that you would like to see the end of Freemasons and our
activities.
I think you are a bit mixed up and should get some help. You have
accomplished little but providing yet more evidence that the
detractors of Freemasonry are a bunch of fruitcakes.