-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=
-= Capital Radio - Chris Tarrant. -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=

Capital Radio DJs have been "in on it" from. the start. One of the first
things I heard in the summer of 1990 was from a Capital DJ. who said, "If
he listens to Capital then he can't be all bad" (supportive, you see.. We're
not bastards). Much of. what came over the radio in 1990 is now so far away
the precise details have been obliterated by. time. No diary was kept of the
details, and although archives. if they exist may give pointers, the
ambiguity of what broadcasters said would leave that open. to
re-interpretation.

In spring 1994, Chris Tarrant on his. Capital morning show made an aside to
someone else in the studio, about a. person he didn't identify. He said,
"You know this bloke? He says we're trying. to kill him. We should be done
for. attempted manslaughter".

That mirrored something I had said a day or two before. What. Tarrant said
was understood by the staff member in the studio he was saying it. to; they
said, "Oh. no, don't say that" to Tarrant. If any archives exist of the
morning show (probably unlikely) then. it could be found there; what he said
was so out of context that he would be very. hard put to find an explanation.
A couple of days later, someone at the site where I. was working repeated the
remark although in a different way; they said there. had been people in a
computer room when automatic fire extinguishers went. off and those people
were "thinking of suing. for attempted manslaughter".

Finally, this isn't confined to the established. radio stations. In 1990
after I. had listened to a pirate radio station in South London for about
half an hour, there was an audible phone call. in the background, followed
by total silence for a few moments, then shrieks of laughter. "So what. are
we supposed to say now? Deadly torture? He's going to talk to us. now, isn't
he?", which meant that they. could hear what I would say in my room.

6661

a miracle on the side of those in
error, men would be led into error. Schism is visible; a miracle is visible.
But schism is more a sign of error than a miracle is a sign of truth.
Therefore a miracle cannot lead into error.

But, apart from schism, error is not so obvious as a miracle is obvious.
Therefore a miracle could lead into error.

Ubi est Deus tuus?209 Miracles show Him, and are a light.

847. One of the anthems for Vespers at Christmas: Exortum est in tenebris
lumen rectis corde.[210]

848. If the compassion of God is so great that He instructs us to our
benefit, even when He hides Himself, what light ought we not to expect from
Him when He reveals Himself?

849. Will Est et non est.211 be received in faith itself as well as in
miracles? And if it is inseparable in the others...

When Saint Xavier works miracles. Saint Hilary. "Ye wretches, who oblige us
to speak of miracles."

Unjust judges, make not your own laws on the moment; judge by those which
are established, and by yourselves. Vae qui conditis leges iniquas.212

Miracles endless, false.

In order to weaken your adversaries, you disarm the whole Church.

If they say that our salvation depends upon God, they are "heretics." If
they say that they are obedient to the Pope, that is "hypocrisy." If they
are ready to subscribe to all the articles, that is not enough. If they say
that a man must not be killed for an apple, "they attack the morality of
Catholics." If miracles are done among them, it is not a sign of holiness,
and is, on the contrary a symptom of heresy.

This way in which the Church has existed is that truth has been without
dispute, or, if it has been contested, there has been the Pope, or, failing
him, there has been the Church.

850. The five propositions condemned, but no miracle; for the truth was not
attacked. But the Sorbonne... but the bull...

It is impossible that those who love God with all their heart should fail to
rec

be from God only, and not from
Abraham. Isaiah 63:16: "Doubtless thou art our Father, though Abraham be
ignorant of us, and Israel acknowledge us not. Thou art our Father and our
Redeemer."

Moses himself told them that God would not accept persons. Deut. 10:17:
"God," said he, "regardeth neither persons nor sacrifices."

The Sabbath was only a sign, Exod. 31:13; and in memory of the escape from
Egypt, Deut. 5:19. Therefore it is no longer necessary, since Egypt must be
forgotten.

Circumcision was only a sign, Gen. 17:11. And thence it came to pass that,
being in the desert, they were not circumcised, because they could not be
confounded with other peoples; and after Jesus Christ came, it was no longer
necessary.

That the circumcision of the heart is commanded. Deut. 10:16; Jeremiah 4:4:
"Be ye circumcised in heart; take away the superfluities of your heart, and
harden yourselves not. For your God is a mighty God, strong and terrible,
who accepteth not persons."

That God said He would one day do it. Deut. 30:6: "God will circumcise thine
heart, and the heart of thy seed, that thou mayest love Him with all thine
heart."

That the uncircumcised in heart shall be judged. Jeremiah 9:26: For God will
judge the uncircumcised peoples, and all the people of Israel, because he is
"uncircumcised in heart."

That the external is of no avail apart from the internal.