Back from Africa, where I was a secular missionary  in the Kayon
Ghozi's leprosary (Burundi) because of health reasons, I wrote these
lucky Flashes of mine, which got a resounding success ,on Turin's HOLY
SHROUD.
Prof. Harry Gove,which made the Holy Shroud date back to the middle-
ages in 1988 by the method  14C, already in 1995, in the light on the
latest scientific knowledge, realised that the dating was wrong .
The Mystery of the Holy Shroud print,which couldn't be made by men  at
all, must be correlated to the Mystery of the Resurrection of
Jesus,Who was wrapped in the Holy Shroud after being buried  and rose
from the death in the Holy Shroud.
The Faith we feel in our heart needn't any confirmation, but Turin's
Holy Shroud  becomes  an unequivocal  one, beyond our will.
The end of my Flashes  contains a twelve/thirteen lined brief
synthesis of my life.

Web site:
www.lorenzocrescini.it/holyshroud
personal e-mail for communications
ricercapap@lorenzocrescini.it

"Acrux"  wrote in message
news:1176275314.799883.320640@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

> Prof. Harry Gove,which made the Holy Shroud date back to the middle-
> ages in 1988 by the method  14C, already in 1995, in the light on the
> latest scientific knowledge, realised that the dating was wrong .
> The Mystery of the Holy Shroud print,which couldn't be made by men  at
> all, must be correlated to the Mystery of the Resurrection of
> Jesus,Who was wrapped in the Holy Shroud after being buried  and rose
> from the death in the Holy Shroud.
>
>
Very interesting program last week reviewing the evidence on the shroud,
although it did rather major on the agony of the form of death rather than
on the science of the material.  My interpretaion of the chap from Cambridge
was that he would prefer a sample that did not have the contamination, but
that the processes used to get down to the 'real' material were pretty good,
and did not leave an enormous margin of error - certianly not enough to put
the material back 1200 years.

One thing that has never been considered (in the published programs) is that
the images are 'flat' photo type images.  If you wrap a cloth around your
face from ear to ear, you'll get an image (say) 300 mm wide and 200mm high.
A photograph will be 150mm wide and 200mm high - this appears to be the
aspect ratio of the shroud image.  Also, the image of the front and back of
the body are almost touching, leaving no space for the crown of the head.

Once these basic observation have been explained, I might have more faith in
it being a 'real' shroud.

Keith

"Acrux"  wrote in message
news:1176275314.799883.320640@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

> Prof. Harry Gove,which made the Holy Shroud date back to the middle-
> ages in 1988 by the method  14C, already in 1995, in the light on the
> latest scientific knowledge, realised that the dating was wrong .
> The Mystery of the Holy Shroud print,which couldn't be made by men  at
> all, must be correlated to the Mystery of the Resurrection of
> Jesus,Who was wrapped in the Holy Shroud after being buried  and rose
> from the death in the Holy Shroud.
>
>
Very interesting program last week reviewing the evidence on the shroud,
although it did rather major on the agony of the form of death rather than
on the science of the material.  My interpretaion of the chap from Cambridge
was that he would prefer a sample that did not have the contamination, but
that the processes used to get down to the 'real' material were pretty good,
and did not leave an enormous margin of error - certianly not enough to put
the material back 1200 years.

One thing that has never been considered (in the published programs) is that
the images are 'flat' photo type images.  If you wrap a cloth around your
face from ear to ear, you'll get an image (say) 300 mm wide and 200mm high.
A photograph will be 150mm wide and 200mm high - this appears to be the
aspect ratio of the shroud image.  Also, the image of the front and back of
the body are almost touching, leaving no space for the crown of the head.

Once these basic observation have been explained, I might have more faith in
it being a 'real' shroud.

Keith