Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.

In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
£17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
seen their house prices hit hard.

The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
9.1 per cent.

It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
£17,000 over the past year.

In 2005, the year before the BNP got elected, Barking homes increased
with the London average.

The leaflet says: "Ask yourself. 'Can I afford to keep the BNP in
Rosedale?'"

The Tories, Labour and the Liberal Democrats are determined to defeat
the far-Right in the elections and in some areas have unofficially
agreed pacts to ensure the strongest contenders can fight off the BNP.

The BNP won Rosedale ward after claiming that the council was flooding
the area with asylum seekers and putting up council tax as a result. In
reality, the council did not house a single asylum seeker

On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> 
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
> 
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.
> 


Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

FriarTuck wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
> 
>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>
>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>
>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>> 9.1 per cent.
>>
>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>
> 
> 
> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:02:15 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> FriarTuck wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
>> 
>>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>>
>>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>>
>>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>>> 9.1 per cent.
>>>
>>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....
> 
> Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

Yeah, Good Idea, could "house" people like you in it...

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
>
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.

Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the 
intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue 
here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header. 
Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall 
at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we 
can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a 
manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?

On May 3, 12:16 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
>
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> > cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> > £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> > seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> > The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> > year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> > 9.1 per cent.
>
> > It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> > £17,000 over the past year.
>
> Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the
> intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue
> here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header.
> Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall
> at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we
> can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a
> manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?




Quite right.
Worth noting too, that they would only have "made" the money had they
sold up.
If they didn't rise by as much as the rest of London, perhaps it was
because there wasn't hoardes
of asians out bidding each other to settle there.

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.

Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP areas may 
have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the OPWTN's decrepit 
globalist system.

On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> 
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
> 
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.
> 


Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

FriarTuck wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
> 
>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>
>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>
>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>> 9.1 per cent.
>>
>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>
> 
> 
> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:02:15 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> FriarTuck wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
>> 
>>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>>
>>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>>
>>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>>> 9.1 per cent.
>>>
>>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....
> 
> Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

Yeah, Good Idea, could "house" people like you in it...

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
>
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.

Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the 
intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue 
here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header. 
Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall 
at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we 
can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a 
manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?

On May 3, 12:16 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
>
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> > cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> > £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> > seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> > The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> > year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> > 9.1 per cent.
>
> > It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> > £17,000 over the past year.
>
> Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the
> intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue
> here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header.
> Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall
> at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we
> can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a
> manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?




Quite right.
Worth noting too, that they would only have "made" the money had they
sold up.
If they didn't rise by as much as the rest of London, perhaps it was
because there wasn't hoardes
of asians out bidding each other to settle there.

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.

Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP areas may 
have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the OPWTN's decrepit 
globalist system.

On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> 
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
> 
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.
> 


Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

FriarTuck wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
> 
>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>
>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>
>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>> 9.1 per cent.
>>
>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>
> 
> 
> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:02:15 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> FriarTuck wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
>> 
>>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>>
>>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>>
>>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>>> 9.1 per cent.
>>>
>>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....
> 
> Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

Yeah, Good Idea, could "house" people like you in it...

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
>
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.

Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the 
intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue 
here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header. 
Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall 
at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we 
can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a 
manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?

On May 3, 12:16 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
>
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> > cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> > £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> > seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> > The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> > year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> > 9.1 per cent.
>
> > It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> > £17,000 over the past year.
>
> Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the
> intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue
> here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header.
> Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall
> at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we
> can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a
> manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?




Quite right.
Worth noting too, that they would only have "made" the money had they
sold up.
If they didn't rise by as much as the rest of London, perhaps it was
because there wasn't hoardes
of asians out bidding each other to settle there.

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.

Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP areas may 
have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the OPWTN's decrepit 
globalist system.

On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> 
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
> 
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.
> 


Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

FriarTuck wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
> 
>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>
>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>
>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>> 9.1 per cent.
>>
>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>
> 
> 
> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:02:15 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> FriarTuck wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
>> 
>>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>>
>>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>>
>>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>>> 9.1 per cent.
>>>
>>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....
> 
> Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

Yeah, Good Idea, could "house" people like you in it...

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
>
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.

Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the 
intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue 
here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header. 
Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall 
at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we 
can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a 
manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?

On May 3, 12:16 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
>
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> > cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> > £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> > seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> > The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> > year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> > 9.1 per cent.
>
> > It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> > £17,000 over the past year.
>
> Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the
> intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue
> here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header.
> Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall
> at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we
> can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a
> manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?




Quite right.
Worth noting too, that they would only have "made" the money had they
sold up.
If they didn't rise by as much as the rest of London, perhaps it was
because there wasn't hoardes
of asians out bidding each other to settle there.

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.

Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP areas may 
have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the OPWTN's decrepit 
globalist system.

On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> 
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
> 
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.
> 


Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

FriarTuck wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
> 
>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>
>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>
>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>> 9.1 per cent.
>>
>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>
> 
> 
> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:02:15 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> FriarTuck wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
>> 
>>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>>
>>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>>
>>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>>> 9.1 per cent.
>>>
>>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....
> 
> Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

Yeah, Good Idea, could "house" people like you in it...

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
>
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.

Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the 
intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue 
here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header. 
Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall 
at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we 
can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a 
manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?

On May 3, 12:16 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
>
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> > cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> > £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> > seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> > The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> > year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> > 9.1 per cent.
>
> > It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> > £17,000 over the past year.
>
> Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the
> intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue
> here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header.
> Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall
> at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we
> can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a
> manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?




Quite right.
Worth noting too, that they would only have "made" the money had they
sold up.
If they didn't rise by as much as the rest of London, perhaps it was
because there wasn't hoardes
of asians out bidding each other to settle there.

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.

Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP areas may 
have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the OPWTN's decrepit 
globalist system.

On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> 
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
> 
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.
> 


Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

FriarTuck wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
> 
>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>
>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>
>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>> 9.1 per cent.
>>
>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>
> 
> 
> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:02:15 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> FriarTuck wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
>> 
>>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>>
>>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>>
>>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>>> 9.1 per cent.
>>>
>>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....
> 
> Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

Yeah, Good Idea, could "house" people like you in it...

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
>
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.

Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the 
intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue 
here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header. 
Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall 
at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we 
can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a 
manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?

On May 3, 12:16 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
>
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> > cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> > £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> > seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> > The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> > year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> > 9.1 per cent.
>
> > It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> > £17,000 over the past year.
>
> Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the
> intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue
> here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header.
> Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall
> at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we
> can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a
> manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?




Quite right.
Worth noting too, that they would only have "made" the money had they
sold up.
If they didn't rise by as much as the rest of London, perhaps it was
because there wasn't hoardes
of asians out bidding each other to settle there.

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.

Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP areas may 
have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the OPWTN's decrepit 
globalist system.

On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> 
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
> 
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.
> 


Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

FriarTuck wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
> 
>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>
>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>
>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>> 9.1 per cent.
>>
>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>
> 
> 
> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:02:15 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> FriarTuck wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
>> 
>>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>>
>>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>>
>>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>>> 9.1 per cent.
>>>
>>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....
> 
> Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

Yeah, Good Idea, could "house" people like you in it...

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
>
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.

Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the 
intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue 
here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header. 
Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall 
at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we 
can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a 
manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?

On May 3, 12:16 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
>
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> > cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> > £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> > seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> > The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> > year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> > 9.1 per cent.
>
> > It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> > £17,000 over the past year.
>
> Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the
> intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue
> here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header.
> Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall
> at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we
> can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a
> manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?




Quite right.
Worth noting too, that they would only have "made" the money had they
sold up.
If they didn't rise by as much as the rest of London, perhaps it was
because there wasn't hoardes
of asians out bidding each other to settle there.

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.

Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP areas may 
have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the OPWTN's decrepit 
globalist system.

On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> 
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
> 
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.
> 


Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

FriarTuck wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
> 
>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>
>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>
>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>> 9.1 per cent.
>>
>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>
> 
> 
> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:02:15 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> FriarTuck wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
>> 
>>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>>
>>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>>
>>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>>> 9.1 per cent.
>>>
>>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....
> 
> Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

Yeah, Good Idea, could "house" people like you in it...

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
>
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.

Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the 
intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue 
here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header. 
Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall 
at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we 
can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a 
manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?

On May 3, 12:16 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
>
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> > cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> > £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> > seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> > The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> > year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> > 9.1 per cent.
>
> > It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> > £17,000 over the past year.
>
> Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the
> intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue
> here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header.
> Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall
> at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we
> can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a
> manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?




Quite right.
Worth noting too, that they would only have "made" the money had they
sold up.
If they didn't rise by as much as the rest of London, perhaps it was
because there wasn't hoardes
of asians out bidding each other to settle there.

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.

Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP areas may 
have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the OPWTN's decrepit 
globalist system.

Chris X wrote:

> 
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP
> > could cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> > 
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost
> > you £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large
> > numbers have seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP
> areas may have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the
> OPWTN's decrepit globalist system.

What the hell is "OPWTN" ?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> 
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
> 
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.
> 


Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

FriarTuck wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
> 
>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>
>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>
>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>> 9.1 per cent.
>>
>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>
> 
> 
> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:02:15 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> FriarTuck wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
>> 
>>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>>
>>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>>
>>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>>> 9.1 per cent.
>>>
>>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....
> 
> Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

Yeah, Good Idea, could "house" people like you in it...

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
>
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.

Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the 
intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue 
here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header. 
Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall 
at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we 
can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a 
manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?

On May 3, 12:16 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
>
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> > cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> > £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> > seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> > The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> > year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> > 9.1 per cent.
>
> > It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> > £17,000 over the past year.
>
> Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the
> intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue
> here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header.
> Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall
> at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we
> can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a
> manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?




Quite right.
Worth noting too, that they would only have "made" the money had they
sold up.
If they didn't rise by as much as the rest of London, perhaps it was
because there wasn't hoardes
of asians out bidding each other to settle there.

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.

Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP areas may 
have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the OPWTN's decrepit 
globalist system.

Chris X wrote:

> 
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP
> > could cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> > 
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost
> > you £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large
> > numbers have seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP
> areas may have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the
> OPWTN's decrepit globalist system.

What the hell is "OPWTN" ?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> 
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
> 
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.
> 


Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

FriarTuck wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
> 
>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>
>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>
>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>> 9.1 per cent.
>>
>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>
> 
> 
> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:02:15 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> FriarTuck wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
>> 
>>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>>
>>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>>
>>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>>> 9.1 per cent.
>>>
>>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....
> 
> Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

Yeah, Good Idea, could "house" people like you in it...

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
>
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.

Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the 
intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue 
here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header. 
Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall 
at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we 
can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a 
manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?

On May 3, 12:16 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
>
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> > cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> > £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> > seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> > The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> > year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> > 9.1 per cent.
>
> > It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> > £17,000 over the past year.
>
> Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the
> intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue
> here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header.
> Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall
> at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we
> can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a
> manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?




Quite right.
Worth noting too, that they would only have "made" the money had they
sold up.
If they didn't rise by as much as the rest of London, perhaps it was
because there wasn't hoardes
of asians out bidding each other to settle there.

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.

Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP areas may 
have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the OPWTN's decrepit 
globalist system.

Chris X wrote:

> 
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP
> > could cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> > 
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost
> > you £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large
> > numbers have seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> Typical tory bullshit - the only reason that house prices in BNP
> areas may have fallen is because they're being Africanised by the
> OPWTN's decrepit globalist system.

What the hell is "OPWTN" ?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
> 
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
> 
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
> 
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.
> 


Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

FriarTuck wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
> 
>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>
>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>
>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>> 9.1 per cent.
>>
>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>
> 
> 
> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....

Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

On Thu, 03 May 2007 12:02:15 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:

> FriarTuck wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 May 2007 11:37:14 +0100, Custard Creme wrote:
>> 
>>> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
>>> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>>>
>>> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
>>> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
>>> seen their house prices hit hard.
>>>
>>> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
>>> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
>>> 9.1 per cent.
>>>
>>> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
>>> £17,000 over the past year.
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Maybe some ordinary "British" people could afford to move there then....
> 
> Why not go the whole hog and build a BNP trailer park?

Yeah, Good Idea, could "house" people like you in it...

"Custard Creme"  wrote in message 
news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
> Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> 9.1 per cent.
>
> It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> £17,000 over the past year.

Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the 
intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue 
here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header. 
Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall 
at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we 
can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a 
manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?

On May 3, 12:16 pm, "True Blue"  wrote:
> "Custard Creme"  wrote in message
>
> news:4639bb5a_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com...
>
> > Voters in the South-East were today warned that electing the BNP could
> > cost them thousands of pounds in depressed house prices.
>
> > In one leaflet, the Conservatives claim that voting BNP "could cost you
> > £17,000" because areas that have backed the party in large numbers have
> > seen their house prices hit hard.
>
> > The leaflet claims that Barking, which elected 12 BNP councillors last
> > year, saw homes rise by 1.2 per cent compared with the London average of
> > 9.1 per cent.
>
> > It says the difference meant Barking homeowners lost out on an average
> > £17,000 over the past year.
>
> Thanks for posting this. The content of the post is secondary - the
> intrinsic and ingrained Leftist dishonesty of the poster is the real issue
> here. "House prices sink £17,000 in BNP Barking" is the lie in your header.
> Reading the post, it is stated that prices *rose* by 1.2% and did not fall
> at all. I haven't bothered to research the veracity of the content, but we
> can assume can if you're prepared to lie in a so obviously transparent a
> manner, then why should of the rest of the post hold any truth?




Quite right.
Worth noting too, tha