Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
education
16plus
behavioural
gcse+standard
governors
home-education
maths
misc
openuniversity
schools-it
staffroom
teachers
teachers.trainee
  
 
date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:18:09 GMT,    group: uk.education.teachers.trainee        back       
Re: Banning Christmas   
Féachadóir wrote:
> Scríobh mothed out :
> 
>>On 4 Nov, 02:13, "Andy"  wrote:
>>
>>>There is talk this year yet again of the UK being so multicultural now that
>>>Christmas may have to be 'toned down' or in future could be banned totally
>>
>>You need a source for this, or your article loses cred.
> 
> 
> From that most credible of sources...
> http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article412124.ece
> 

The tabloid view is often on the button.

In one month I had to throw over ten thousand dollars at a chain of 
schools in England re: paedophile teachers. The money was supposed to be 
spent in the Czech republic re: child prostitution.

However, Brit teachers were causing more sex mayhem at that particular 
point, so I had to divert it to an emergency vetting study.

The police incidently, are not in the loop, schools are largely 
off-limits. The US practice of arresting teachers not viewed as being in 
the interest of public confidence in Britain.

The British will ban just about anything, in some respects they are as 
bad as the ACLU.

They ban headscarves, crucifixes, hot cross buns, nursey rhtmes, ladies 
toilets, skirts for schoolgirls,

you name it and somewhere there is a council or school official 
preparing to ban a child from school for one of the above.

That would also include wheelchairs & conkers in the playground, 
together or separately.

In its place I have seen the strip club industry being asked to 
introduce schoolgirl boxing.



Gregory
date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:18:09 GMT   author:   Gregory

Re: Banning Christmas   
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:18:09 GMT, Gregory
 wrote:

>Féachadóir wrote:
>> Scríobh mothed out :
>> 
>>>On 4 Nov, 02:13, "Andy"  wrote:
>>>
>>>>There is talk this year yet again of the UK being so multicultural now that
>>>>Christmas may have to be 'toned down' or in future could be banned totally
>>>
>>>You need a source for this, or your article loses cred.
>> 
>> 
>> From that most credible of sources...
>> http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article412124.ece
>> 
>
>The tabloid view is often on the button.
>
>In one month I had to throw over ten thousand dollars at a chain of 
>schools in England re: paedophile teachers. The money was supposed to be 
>spent in the Czech republic re: child prostitution.
>
>However, Brit teachers were causing more sex mayhem at that particular 
>point, so I had to divert it to an emergency vetting study.
>
>The police incidently, are not in the loop, schools are largely 
>off-limits. The US practice of arresting teachers not viewed as being in 
>the interest of public confidence in Britain.
>
>The British will ban just about anything, in some respects they are as 
>bad as the ACLU.
>
>They ban headscarves, crucifixes, hot cross buns, nursey rhtmes, ladies 
>toilets, skirts for schoolgirls,
>
>you name it and somewhere there is a council or school official 
>preparing to ban a child from school for one of the above.
>
>That would also include wheelchairs & conkers in the playground, 
>together or separately.
>
>In its place I have seen the strip club industry being asked to 
>introduce schoolgirl boxing.
>
>
>
>Gregory
>

Conkers were banned years ago.

max.it (the orange cage)
date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:13:23 GMT   author:   max.it@teatime (max.it)

Re: Banning Christmas   
max.it wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:18:09 GMT, Gregory
>  wrote:
> 
> 
>>Féachadóir wrote:
>>
>>>Scríobh mothed out :
>>>
>>>
>>>>On 4 Nov, 02:13, "Andy"  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>There is talk this year yet again of the UK being so multicultural now that
>>>>>Christmas may have to be 'toned down' or in future could be banned totally
>>>>
>>>>You need a source for this, or your article loses cred.
>>>
>>>
>>>From that most credible of sources...
>>>http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article412124.ece
>>>
>>
>>The tabloid view is often on the button.
>>
>>In one month I had to throw over ten thousand dollars at a chain of 
>>schools in England re: paedophile teachers. The money was supposed to be 
>>spent in the Czech republic re: child prostitution.
>>
>>However, Brit teachers were causing more sex mayhem at that particular 
>>point, so I had to divert it to an emergency vetting study.
>>
>>The police incidently, are not in the loop, schools are largely 
>>off-limits. The US practice of arresting teachers not viewed as being in 
>>the interest of public confidence in Britain.
>>
>>The British will ban just about anything, in some respects they are as 
>>bad as the ACLU.
>>
>>They ban headscarves, crucifixes, hot cross buns, nursey rhtmes, ladies 
>>toilets, skirts for schoolgirls,
>>
>>you name it and somewhere there is a council or school official 
>>preparing to ban a child from school for one of the above.
>>
>>That would also include wheelchairs & conkers in the playground, 
>>together or separately.
>>
>>In its place I have seen the strip club industry being asked to 
>>introduce schoolgirl boxing.
>>
>>
>>
>>Gregory
>>
> 
> 
> Conkers were banned years ago.
> 
> max.it (the orange cage)


Some schools in England issue protective eyewear or hire in army 
ballistic experts.

One school in Lincolnshire takes their kids to Salisbury plain courtesy 
of the MOD.

Sadly several were squashed by a passing challenger tank. However conker 
injuries at the school dwindled to virtually nil.
date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:29:32 GMT   author:   Gregory

Re: Banning Christmas   
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:29:32 GMT, Gregory
 wrote:

>max.it wrote:
>> On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:18:09 GMT, Gregory
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Féachadóir wrote:
>>>
>>>>Scríobh mothed out :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On 4 Nov, 02:13, "Andy"  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>There is talk this year yet again of the UK being so multicultural now that
>>>>>>Christmas may have to be 'toned down' or in future could be banned totally
>>>>>
>>>>>You need a source for this, or your article loses cred.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>From that most credible of sources...
>>>>http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article412124.ece
>>>>
>>>
>>>The tabloid view is often on the button.
>>>
>>>In one month I had to throw over ten thousand dollars at a chain of 
>>>schools in England re: paedophile teachers. The money was supposed to be 
>>>spent in the Czech republic re: child prostitution.
>>>
>>>However, Brit teachers were causing more sex mayhem at that particular 
>>>point, so I had to divert it to an emergency vetting study.
>>>
>>>The police incidently, are not in the loop, schools are largely 
>>>off-limits. The US practice of arresting teachers not viewed as being in 
>>>the interest of public confidence in Britain.
>>>
>>>The British will ban just about anything, in some respects they are as 
>>>bad as the ACLU.
>>>
>>>They ban headscarves, crucifixes, hot cross buns, nursey rhtmes, ladies 
>>>toilets, skirts for schoolgirls,
>>>
>>>you name it and somewhere there is a council or school official 
>>>preparing to ban a child from school for one of the above.
>>>
>>>That would also include wheelchairs & conkers in the playground, 
>>>together or separately.
>>>
>>>In its place I have seen the strip club industry being asked to 
>>>introduce schoolgirl boxing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Gregory
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Conkers were banned years ago.
>> 
>> max.it (the orange cage)
>
>
>Some schools in England issue protective eyewear or hire in army 
>ballistic experts.
>
>One school in Lincolnshire takes their kids to Salisbury plain courtesy 
>of the MOD.
>
>Sadly several were squashed by a passing challenger tank. However conker 
>injuries at the school dwindled to virtually nil.

I have a couple of great big confiscated conkers hanging here.
They will be seasoners next year.

max.it (the orange cage)
date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 22:19:52 GMT   author:   max.it@teatime (max.it)

Re: Banning Christmas   
max.it wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:29:32 GMT, Gregory
>  wrote:
> 
> 
>>max.it wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:18:09 GMT, Gregory
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Féachadóir wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Scríobh mothed out :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 4 Nov, 02:13, "Andy"  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There is talk this year yet again of the UK being so multicultural now that
>>>>>>>Christmas may have to be 'toned down' or in future could be banned totally
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You need a source for this, or your article loses cred.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>From that most credible of sources...
>>>>
>>>>>http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article412124.ece
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The tabloid view is often on the button.
>>>>
>>>>In one month I had to throw over ten thousand dollars at a chain of 
>>>>schools in England re: paedophile teachers. The money was supposed to be 
>>>>spent in the Czech republic re: child prostitution.
>>>>
>>>>However, Brit teachers were causing more sex mayhem at that particular 
>>>>point, so I had to divert it to an emergency vetting study.
>>>>
>>>>The police incidently, are not in the loop, schools are largely 
>>>>off-limits. The US practice of arresting teachers not viewed as being in 
>>>>the interest of public confidence in Britain.
>>>>
>>>>The British will ban just about anything, in some respects they are as 
>>>>bad as the ACLU.
>>>>
>>>>They ban headscarves, crucifixes, hot cross buns, nursey rhtmes, ladies 
>>>>toilets, skirts for schoolgirls,
>>>>
>>>>you name it and somewhere there is a council or school official 
>>>>preparing to ban a child from school for one of the above.
>>>>
>>>>That would also include wheelchairs & conkers in the playground, 
>>>>together or separately.
>>>>
>>>>In its place I have seen the strip club industry being asked to 
>>>>introduce schoolgirl boxing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Gregory
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Conkers were banned years ago.
>>>
>>>max.it (the orange cage)
>>
>>
>>Some schools in England issue protective eyewear or hire in army 
>>ballistic experts.
>>
>>One school in Lincolnshire takes their kids to Salisbury plain courtesy 
>>of the MOD.
>>
>>Sadly several were squashed by a passing challenger tank. However conker 
>>injuries at the school dwindled to virtually nil.
> 
> 
> I have a couple of great big confiscated conkers hanging here.
> They will be seasoners next year.
> 
> max.it (the orange cage)


Way to go,

I have invested in carbon conkers via my contacts with Giant Cycles, 
however, I can't get them to cosmetically suffer satisfactorily enough 
to convince referees.

I have also started swing-crashing my SCR2 against anything trying to 
pass me on cycle paths.

G.
date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:37:22 GMT   author:   Gregory

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us