|
|
|
date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:11:11 +0100,
group: uk.education.schools-it
back
Best back up protocol?
Hi,
We have several servers for a school of 1800 students each with 300 Gb
or so of storage. As I understand it we use tape to do do a diff backup
each night rotated weekly, a full each week rotated monthly and a
monthly rotated I don't know how often.
Trouble is, each time a student loses work it seems to take four or five
hours to catalogue the tape and then ages to seek out the files that
have been lost, even assuming the right tape is being used.
The demands of a school are different to a business. How do the rest of
you ensure that students on a fortnightly timetable can recover their
work in a a reasonable time?
Howard
date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:11:11 +0100
author: Howard
|
Re: Best back up protocol?
Soni tempori elseu romani yeof helsforo nisson ol sefini ill des Wed, 26 Sep
2007 21:11:11 +0100, sefini jorgo geanyet des mani yeof do
uk.education.schools-it, yawatina tan reek esk Howard
fornis do marikano es bono tan el:
>The demands of a school are different to a business. How do the rest of
>you ensure that students on a fortnightly timetable can recover their
>work in a a reasonable time?
We don't backup to tape any more. We use external hard drives.
date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:39:44 +0100
author: deKay lid
|
Re: Best back up protocol?
Howard wrote:
> Hi,
> We have several servers for a school of 1800 students each with 300 Gb
> or so of storage. As I understand it we use tape to do do a diff backup
> each night rotated weekly, a full each week rotated monthly and a
> monthly rotated I don't know how often.
> Trouble is, each time a student loses work it seems to take four or five
> hours to catalogue the tape and then ages to seek out the files that
> have been lost, even assuming the right tape is being used.
> The demands of a school are different to a business. How do the rest of
> you ensure that students on a fortnightly timetable can recover their
> work in a a reasonable time?
> Howard
Think of a pattern of frequent backups to a HD of some description
(NAS?) with less frequent tape copies for durability. Recovery of work
from HD backups can be very rapid. IIRC recovery from 4mm tapes is
quicker than from the older Travan tapes (I have spent hours recovering
a file from one of these!)
Malcolm
date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:54:09 GMT
author: Malcolm Race
|
Re: Best back up protocol?
In article , Howard
writes
>Hi,
>We have several servers for a school of 1800 students each with 300 Gb
>or so of storage. As I understand it we use tape to do do a diff backup
>each night rotated weekly, a full each week rotated monthly and a
>monthly rotated I don't know how often.
>Trouble is, each time a student loses work it seems to take four or five
>hours to catalogue the tape and then ages to seek out the files that
>have been lost, even assuming the right tape is being used.
>The demands of a school are different to a business. How do the rest of
>you ensure that students on a fortnightly timetable can recover their
>work in a a reasonable time?
>Howard
You don't mention what OS you have - if you're running 2003 - you could
turn on Shadow Copy and let them restore their own deletions
http://www.petri.co.il/what's_shadow_copy_on_windows_server_2003.htm
date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:30:57 GMT
author: Kev Crocombe
|
Re: Best back up protocol?
On 26 Sep, 21:11, Howard wrote:
> Hi,
> We have several servers for a school of 1800 students each with 300 Gb
> or so of storage. As I understand it we use tape to do do a diff backup
> each night rotated weekly, a full each week rotated monthly and a
> monthly rotated I don't know how often.
> Trouble is, each time a student loses work it seems to take four or five
> hours to catalogue the tape and then ages to seek out the files that
> have been lost, even assuming the right tape is being used.
> The demands of a school are different to a business. How do the rest of
> you ensure that students on a fortnightly timetable can recover their
> work in a a reasonable time?
> Howard
Backup to disk (ie SAN/NAS) and then backup to tape ... most stuff
that gets deleted gets spotted within a day or two so just keep that
on another volume and then back that one up during the day.
We *were* going to go for this but have decided not to right now as we
need the space on SAN too much. We will look at changing this at
Easter.
Tony
date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:59:48 -0700
author: GrumbleDook
|
Re: Best back up protocol?
> Trouble is, each time a student loses work it seems to take four or
> five hours to catalogue the tape and then ages to seek out the
> files that have been lost, even assuming the right tape is being
> used.
As others have said, back up to disc rather than tape - we just use
robocopy (resource kit; free download) to copy the whole folder every
night. We also use shadow copies so it's easy to get something back which
got messed up during the day.
We changed because of the cost (we were spending over £1000 per year on
DAT; we just bought a couple of tower PCs and stuck 4 x 500Gb drives in
each - can't remember the cost but it was less than a year's worth of tape
and it doesn't wear out like tape and gives near instant restore)
--
Steve Rochford
IT Manager, College of North West London
date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:51:24 -0500
author: unknown
|
Re: Best back up protocol?
srochford@cix.compulink.co.uk wrote:
>> Trouble is, each time a student loses work it seems to take four or
>> five hours to catalogue the tape and then ages to seek out the
>> files that have been lost, even assuming the right tape is being
>> used.
>
> As others have said, back up to disc rather than tape - we just use
> robocopy (resource kit; free download) to copy the whole folder every
> night. We also use shadow copies so it's easy to get something back which
> got messed up during the day.
>
> We changed because of the cost (we were spending over £1000 per year on
> DAT; we just bought a couple of tower PCs and stuck 4 x 500Gb drives in
> each - can't remember the cost but it was less than a year's worth of tape
> and it doesn't wear out like tape and gives near instant restore)
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Rochford
> IT Manager, College of North West London
Seems like the best idea for for restores but how many discs do you
have? We run a fortnightly timetable. If a student deletes all their
work by accident they may not realise it until two weeks later. If we
recycle the discs by overwriting older copies this would mean that we
would need at leasst 14 discs!
Howard
date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:25:31 +0100
author: Howard
|
Re: Best back up protocol?
"Howard" wrote in message
news:LoednbIC6ptDIWfbnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@pipex.net...
> Hi,
> We have several servers for a school of 1800 students each with 300 Gb or
> so of storage. As I understand it we use tape to do do a diff backup each
> night rotated weekly, a full each week rotated monthly and a monthly
> rotated I don't know how often.
> Trouble is, each time a student loses work it seems to take four or five
> hours to catalogue the tape and then ages to seek out the files that have
> been lost, even assuming the right tape is being used.
> The demands of a school are different to a business. How do the rest of
> you ensure that students on a fortnightly timetable can recover their work
> in a a reasonable time?
First you need to define "reasonable". What is a "reasonable" amount of time
to spend waiting for a restore? What is a "reasonable" budget to spend on
backup solutions? What does the intersection of those two things give you?
We use Commvault Galaxy to backup to disk on a backup server, and from there
to tape, using a weekly incremental routine. Recovery is very fast from disk
with a system like that. It isn't cheap though.
We also use Windows 2003 server, which means that Volume Shadow Copies are
available to us, we've turned that on everywhere it seems appropriate and it
is an absolute lifesaver.
date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:42:25 GMT
author: Robert Moir
|
|
|