|
|
|
date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:08:46 +0100,
group: uk.comp.home-networking
back
Stupid AOL technical support
I was called out to sort out a customer's internet connection with AOL after
she'd phoned AOL technical support and they'd got her to reset the router to
its factory state and then ended the call without telling her how to
reconfigure the router with ADSL username and password and VPI/VCI.
What planet are these AOL technical support droids on?
At least my customer now knows not to press the reset to factory state
button even if AOL tech supp tell her to!!
The original problem that she reported was that AOL was logging her out some
time after she'd successfully established a connection, and would sometimes
allow reconnection or sometimes would fail to logon. Router was fine: I
could access web sites using Internet Explorer, so it's just the crappy AOL
software. Workaround it to access AOL via www.aol.co.uk!
date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:08:46 +0100
author: Mortimer
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:08:46 +0100, "Mortimer" wrote:
>I was called out to sort out a customer's internet connection with AOL after
>she'd phoned AOL technical support and they'd got her to reset the router to
>its factory state and then ended the call without telling her how to
>reconfigure the router with ADSL username and password and VPI/VCI.
>
>What planet are these AOL technical support droids on?
>
>At least my customer now knows not to press the reset to factory state
>button even if AOL tech supp tell her to!!
>
>
>The original problem that she reported was that AOL was logging her out some
>time after she'd successfully established a connection, and would sometimes
>allow reconnection or sometimes would fail to logon. Router was fine: I
>could access web sites using Internet Explorer, so it's just the crappy AOL
>software. Workaround it to access AOL via www.aol.co.uk!
I can only say that Virgin Media "helpline" beats that for total
incompetance. They have blamed My various Hardware and software for
over four years - ever since they took over Ntlworld - for failures to
connect to various parts of the Internet. In each case it had been
their inability to operate outside their scripts on screen. In each
case I have eventually accessed the Internet - It has never been the
quality of my software or hardware.
The snag is their connection is first class. Their support is total
rubbish.
Richard from London UK -- greyhounds@ntlworld.com
Bambi,Beauty,Brian(Brutus 77-97 Bessie 87-01 Ben 95-06 @ RB)
Greyhounds are for life not just for racing!!
Whittingham Homefinding Scheme
Visit our Kennels
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/greyhounds
www.whittinghamretiredgreyhounds.co.uk
date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:49:32 +0100
author: Richard Lobb
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:49:32 +0100, Richard Lobb
wrote:
> I can only say that Virgin Media "helpline" beats that for total
> incompetance. They have blamed My various Hardware and software for
> over four years - ever since they took over Ntlworld - for failures to
> connect to various parts of the Internet. In each case it had been
> their inability to operate outside their scripts on screen. In each
> case I have eventually accessed the Internet - It has never been the
> quality of my software or hardware.
>
> The snag is their connection is first class. Their support is total
> rubbish.
With their first class connection, what was preventing your connection to
various parts of the Internet?
Tony
date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:23:33 +0100
author: Anthony R. Gold
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:23:33 +0100, "Anthony R. Gold"
wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:49:32 +0100, Richard Lobb
>wrote:
>
>> I can only say that Virgin Media "helpline" beats that for total
>> incompetance. They have blamed My various Hardware and software for
>> over four years - ever since they took over Ntlworld - for failures to
>> connect to various parts of the Internet. In each case it had been
>> their inability to operate outside their scripts on screen. In each
>> case I have eventually accessed the Internet - It has never been the
>> quality of my software or hardware.
>>
>> The snag is their connection is first class. Their support is total
>> rubbish.
>
>With their first class connection, what was preventing your connection to
>various parts of the Internet?
>
>Tony
Simply - their helpline could not cope with anything but totally
standard Microsoft software using standard responses from a script -
but instead of admitting it - they blamed my Computer's manufacturer
for poor software and/or hardware or unknown firewalls
When I finally found that out - I simply tried to vary the options -
and connected immediately.
Four years ago when using NTL ISP I had needed a username and password
to assess usergroups - Now when using Virgin Media I didn't need to
log on - but was never told so.
As I was on NTL and the connection failed when they physically changed
over - I naturally contacted the "helpline" who should have known the
difference as they had taken over NTL. But they blamed it on poor
software - firewalls - antivirus - etc etc - not on a tick box they
had been told about - as I had gone over the settings with them about
25 times over many weeks. One set of their instructions actually
deleted my hard drive! I just learned to live without usergroups.
About three years ago I bought a new HP laptop using Windows XP Home
and asked them to "Help" me connect to the internet. They spent
roughly 36 hours over 3 weeks trying to do so - Complete failure -
Blaming the quality of HP's Software etc for the failure to connect.
Eventually I contacted a premium phone helpline and the Englishman at
the other end took exactly 16 minutes to connect the machine including
two full bootups - cost £16 - well worth it. Somewhat proving the poor
standard of the Virginmedia "helpline"
Two years ago I bought a new HP Media Centre and used the "Helpline"
again as I had no wish to use wireless. Complete failure to guide me
to connect to the internet. So I used it for two years as a simple
stand alone as my HP t340 was connected to the Internet.
A few weeks ago as I had previously decided the Helpline should
actually be called the "Indian Hinderance Line" and my Internet
connected HP t340 was becoming flaky I decided to do the connections
to the Internet myself without their "help" - The media centre
connected to the Internet via IE fautlessly after being effectively
idle for two years. As far as I can recall the only difference was I
switched on the cable modem first NOT as instructed LAST - Each
virginmedia person was reading from the same wrong script!
This was when I decided try to connect to the VirginMedia usergroups
WITHOUT "help" - I tried it with NTL settings but changing address to
VirginMedia.com - error message returned "Virginmedia rejects username
and password" - so changed to "log on without username and password"
BINGO! Usergroups back online - downloaded around 250,000 posts I'd
missed!!! :-)
This is why - as I now had three computers and several printers
ethernet ready - I decided on a router to network them. I checked the
"Helpline" only to ascertain what router was recommended to connect
via wire (I do not want to use wireless) - you would not believe the
hassel it was to get them to understand I wanted a router to use
ethernet - Eventually through two layers of "Supervisors" I found out
- They wanted to sell me one with "their" software!!! I refused!!!
Did exactly as Joe here suggested and connected two computers
flawlessly - the third (HP t340) using Netgear Software connected but
is running slow.
So you see why I won't use Virginmedia "Helpline" when there is a
fount of far better knowledge on here!! :-)
Richard from London UK -- greyhounds@ntlworld.com
Bambi,Beauty,Brian(Brutus 77-97 Bessie 87-01 Ben 95-06 @ RB)
Greyhounds are for life not just for racing!!
Whittingham Homefinding Scheme
Visit our Kennels
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/greyhounds
www.whittinghamretiredgreyhounds.co.uk
date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:45:41 +0100
author: Richard Lobb
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:45:41 +0100, Richard Lobb wrote:
[...]
<Snip complaint about VM's help>
Did you find this on VM's website?
http://tinyurl.com/m89kdr
(Link to VM's ng setup)
Alternatively, you could have tried Googling for "free news servers",
although the free ones tend to be a little slow.
Chris
--
Remove prejudice to reply.
date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:17:06 GMT
author: Chris Whelan
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
Richard Lobb wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:23:33 +0100, "Anthony R. Gold"
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:49:32 +0100, Richard Lobb
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I can only say that Virgin Media "helpline" beats that for total
>>> incompetance. They have blamed My various Hardware and software for
>>> over four years - ever since they took over Ntlworld - for failures to
>>> connect to various parts of the Internet. In each case it had been
>>> their inability to operate outside their scripts on screen. In each
>>> case I have eventually accessed the Internet - It has never been the
>>> quality of my software or hardware.
>>>
>>> The snag is their connection is first class. Their support is total
>>> rubbish.
>> With their first class connection, what was preventing your connection to
>> various parts of the Internet?
>>
>> Tony
>
> Simply - their helpline could not cope with anything but totally
> standard Microsoft software using standard responses from a script -
> but instead of admitting it - they blamed my Computer's manufacturer
> for poor software and/or hardware or unknown firewalls
>
> When I finally found that out - I simply tried to vary the options -
> and connected immediately.
>
> Four years ago when using NTL ISP I had needed a username and password
> to assess usergroups - Now when using Virgin Media I didn't need to
> log on - but was never told so.
>
> As I was on NTL and the connection failed when they physically changed
> over - I naturally contacted the "helpline" who should have known the
> difference as they had taken over NTL. But they blamed it on poor
> software - firewalls - antivirus - etc etc - not on a tick box they
> had been told about - as I had gone over the settings with them about
> 25 times over many weeks. One set of their instructions actually
> deleted my hard drive! I just learned to live without usergroups.
>
> About three years ago I bought a new HP laptop using Windows XP Home
> and asked them to "Help" me connect to the internet. They spent
> roughly 36 hours over 3 weeks trying to do so - Complete failure -
> Blaming the quality of HP's Software etc for the failure to connect.
> Eventually I contacted a premium phone helpline and the Englishman at
> the other end took exactly 16 minutes to connect the machine including
> two full bootups - cost £16 - well worth it. Somewhat proving the poor
> standard of the Virginmedia "helpline"
>
> Two years ago I bought a new HP Media Centre and used the "Helpline"
> again as I had no wish to use wireless. Complete failure to guide me
> to connect to the internet. So I used it for two years as a simple
> stand alone as my HP t340 was connected to the Internet.
>
> A few weeks ago as I had previously decided the Helpline should
> actually be called the "Indian Hinderance Line" and my Internet
> connected HP t340 was becoming flaky I decided to do the connections
> to the Internet myself without their "help" - The media centre
> connected to the Internet via IE fautlessly after being effectively
> idle for two years. As far as I can recall the only difference was I
> switched on the cable modem first NOT as instructed LAST - Each
> virginmedia person was reading from the same wrong script!
>
> This was when I decided try to connect to the VirginMedia usergroups
> WITHOUT "help" - I tried it with NTL settings but changing address to
> VirginMedia.com - error message returned "Virginmedia rejects username
> and password" - so changed to "log on without username and password"
> BINGO! Usergroups back online - downloaded around 250,000 posts I'd
> missed!!! :-)
>
> This is why - as I now had three computers and several printers
> ethernet ready - I decided on a router to network them. I checked the
> "Helpline" only to ascertain what router was recommended to connect
> via wire (I do not want to use wireless) - you would not believe the
> hassel it was to get them to understand I wanted a router to use
> ethernet - Eventually through two layers of "Supervisors" I found out
> - They wanted to sell me one with "their" software!!! I refused!!!
> Did exactly as Joe here suggested and connected two computers
> flawlessly - the third (HP t340) using Netgear Software connected but
> is running slow.
>
> So you see why I won't use Virginmedia "Helpline" when there is a
> fount of far better knowledge on here!! :-)
>
> Richard from London UK -- greyhounds@ntlworld.com
> Bambi,Beauty,Brian(Brutus 77-97 Bessie 87-01 Ben 95-06 @ RB)
> Greyhounds are for life not just for racing!!
> Whittingham Homefinding Scheme
> Visit our Kennels
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/greyhounds
> www.whittinghamretiredgreyhounds.co.uk
I have to contact a range of ISP helplines from time to time when
customers have problems, and there's a fairly good correlation between
what the customer is paying monthly and the quality of support
available. The real difference is most apparent when you get to
second-line support (if it exists at all). Demon's is very good, as is
BT, but some of the cheaper ones are utterly hopeless.
My favourite anecdote was trying to get information out of the support
line for a popular accounting package a couple of years ago. (Not Sage
- their support is good.) I forget the exact details but I wanted
information about some multi-user extension which, it was claimed,
worked over the Internet. I couldn't get anyone to understand the
question, which related to port-forwarding. About 30 minutes AFTER
hearing the first human voice I was connected to a "supervisor" in the
"networking" team. I asked him what port the application used and he
didn't understand the question. "There's no port; it's just
internetting." He had never contemplated trying to set this up where
the sites had NAT or any kind of firewall, and didn't know what port 80
was. Incidentally, the next (and final) time I tried to get this
information I soon realised that the person I was talking to in this
Indian call-centre was a cut above the others. It turned out she had a
recent PhD in Computer Science. Sadly, her efforts to find out the
answer to my question drew a blank too, as she didn't have access to a
live copy and couldn't track down anyone who knew. Sage is much more
expensive, of course, but YGWYPF.
</rant>
Phil, London
date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:43:13 +0100
author: Philip Herlihy
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:17:06 GMT, Chris Whelan
wrote:
>On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:45:41 +0100, Richard Lobb wrote:
>
>[...]
>
><Snip complaint about VM's help>
>
>Did you find this on VM's website?
>
>http://tinyurl.com/m89kdr
>
>(Link to VM's ng setup)
>
>Alternatively, you could have tried Googling for "free news servers",
>although the free ones tend to be a little slow.
>
>Chris
Actually you see - I HAD been told to use user name and password by
NTL and was NEVER told anything one way or another by Virginmedia when
they took it over - I wasn't even told they were switching NTL off- I
found out when I could no longer access them. I am still using the
same ntlworld.com e-mail address that I was given years ago. So one
would expect nothing to change without due warning - NOW they have
changed about informing due to poor reputation - but their help-line
seems UNchanged.
That's why one uses helplines in the first place.
I had sent e-mails to Virginmedia and used the Indian Helpline - at no
time did they mention anything about NOT using username and password.
They blamed poor software - poor quality hardware - malware -
firewalls etc etc......not their inability to guide a known NTL user
to news.virginmedia.com when he had been successfully using
news.ntlworld.com ever since cable was laid in London.
And They Should have been able to.
I was using "free news servers" but I was PAYING for newsgroups and
not getting them due to their inadequacies.
Equally I was not able to connect my computers to the Internet anyway
with their "help" so I would not really been able to USE the internet
to access the webpage anyway - was it there four years ago?
Richard from London UK -- greyhounds@ntlworld.com
Bambi,Beauty,Brian(Brutus 77-97 Bessie 87-01 Ben 95-06 @ RB)
Greyhounds are for life not just for racing!!
Whittingham Homefinding Scheme
Visit our Kennels
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/greyhounds
www.whittinghamretiredgreyhounds.co.uk
date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:26:05 +0100
author: Richard Lobb
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
"Richard Lobb" wrote in message
news:3dqi85tu0do4eqq560l8ot3leho3p9jstb@4ax.com...
> A few weeks ago as I had previously decided the Helpline should
> actually be called the "Indian Hinderance Line" and my Internet
> connected HP t340 was becoming flaky I decided to do the connections
> to the Internet myself without their "help" - The media centre
> connected to the Internet via IE faultlessly after being effectively
> idle for two years. As far as I can recall the only difference was I
> switched on the cable modem first NOT as instructed LAST - Each
> virginmedia person was reading from the same wrong script!
LOL. I like the idea that everyone was reading from the same wrong script.
I've had plenty of experience of Indian Hinderance Lines. The "best" (worst)
was a certain ISP which has since been taken over by company whose name is a
reddish/yellow colour.
For a start they would only speak to the customer, not to me, even when the
customer faxed them a signed letter authorising me to speak on his behalf
for technical matters. The first time they received the letter, they acted
on it, but when I went back a few days later and the customer was not there,
only his wife, they would not speak to either of us. It was necessary to
pull the customer out of a business meeting so he could authorise them to
talk to me - but that authorisation would expire after 24 hours.
The gist of the problem that I was investigating was lack of DSL carrier on
a new line. Various routers all reported no carrier (ie no
upstream/downstream speed, no attenuation or noise margin stats, permanently
flashing DSL light). The ISP blamed everything in sight but would not accept
that a successful remote exchange test did not necessarily mean that a DSL
carrier would be seen at the customer's house if there was a problem on the
overhead line.
Eventually the customer sent a Solicitor's Letter (he was, after all, a
solicitor!!) using terms like Breach of Contract and Failure to Supply
Service that he was being charged for. This at least kicked them into
promising that they would refer the matter to BT. They said that a BT
engineer had been booked for a given day, but no engineer turned up. I was
called back and phoned to complain (I had to pretend I was the customer so
they'd talk to me!) and they had no record of the previous call or the
promise to book BT. They apologised (in grovelling Indian manner which was
degrading to listen to) and said that another BT engineer call had been
logged. Again nothing.
So the customer terminated the contract (I hope he got all his money back)
and switched to PlusNet, who I've found to be excellent. And they were.
Initially there was no DSL carrier, but as soon as I reported this, and the
sorry tale of woe that we'd had with the previous ISP, they immediately
arranged for BT to call. I'm not sure exactly what the engineer found (the
customer didn't call me out for that and wasn't technical enough to ask the
right questions) but they had everything going within a day or so.
So there *was* a fault on the line, but could not or would not get BT to
investigate.
date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:31:53 +0100
author: Mortimer
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:43:13 +0100, Philip Herlihy
wrote:
>I have to contact a range of ISP helplines from time to time when
>customers have problems, and there's a fairly good correlation between
>what the customer is paying monthly and the quality of support
>available. The real difference is most apparent when you get to
>second-line support (if it exists at all). Demon's is very good, as is
>BT, but some of the cheaper ones are utterly hopeless.
>
>My favourite anecdote was trying to get information out of the support
>line for a popular accounting package a couple of years ago. (Not Sage
>- their support is good.) I forget the exact details but I wanted
>information about some multi-user extension which, it was claimed,
>worked over the Internet. I couldn't get anyone to understand the
>question, which related to port-forwarding. About 30 minutes AFTER
>hearing the first human voice I was connected to a "supervisor" in the
>"networking" team. I asked him what port the application used and he
>didn't understand the question. "There's no port; it's just
>internetting." He had never contemplated trying to set this up where
>the sites had NAT or any kind of firewall, and didn't know what port 80
>was. Incidentally, the next (and final) time I tried to get this
>information I soon realised that the person I was talking to in this
>Indian call-centre was a cut above the others. It turned out she had a
>recent PhD in Computer Science. Sadly, her efforts to find out the
>answer to my question drew a blank too, as she didn't have access to a
>live copy and couldn't track down anyone who knew. Sage is much more
>expensive, of course, but YGWYPF.
>
></rant>
>
>Phil, London
Interesting point
When I first used Wordperfect in the early '80's the cost was around
£400 per programme - the help given was superb with several individual
examples of the way to do something - a personal touch - The beauty
of being able to go into Dos through Wordperfect - run another prog -
extract information from it and incorporate that info into Wordperfect
- all by 'macros' - and understand why it did what!! :-)
Now with Wordperfect Office X4 - if it's not in the FAQs the chances
of a solution is rare. It's much cheaper now - with a database -
drawing package etc included. But little help.
In all honesty a major problem with the Virginmedia help-line is
language and comprehension. They think they're speaking English but
sadly I obviously understand another English. However the fact they
all go through the identical set of responses indicates they all
follow the same "book" or script. Even when I pointed out that this
was the seventh time I had done a particular action without success-
it made no difference - it failed to solve the same problem for the
seventh time.
Richard from London UK -- greyhounds@ntlworld.com
Bambi,Beauty,Brian(Brutus 77-97 Bessie 87-01 Ben 95-06 @ RB)
Greyhounds are for life not just for racing!!
Whittingham Homefinding Scheme
Visit our Kennels
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/greyhounds
www.whittinghamretiredgreyhounds.co.uk
date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:57:24 +0100
author: Richard Lobb
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:31:53 +0100, "Mortimer" wrote:
>LOL. I like the idea that everyone was reading from the same wrong script.
>
>I've had plenty of experience of Indian Hinderance Lines. The "best" (worst)
>was a certain ISP which has since been taken over by company whose name is a
>reddish/yellow colour.
>
>So the customer terminated the contract (I hope he got all his money back)
>and switched to PlusNet, who I've found to be excellent. And they were.
>Initially there was no DSL carrier, but as soon as I reported this, and the
>sorry tale of woe that we'd had with the previous ISP, they immediately
>arranged for BT to call. I'm not sure exactly what the engineer found (the
>customer didn't call me out for that and wasn't technical enough to ask the
>right questions) but they had everything going within a day or so.
>
>So there *was* a fault on the line, but could not or would not get BT to
>investigate.
LOL - Reminds me of the reasons why I actually joined NTL in the first
place. For years I had been using the old original host groups -
before internet - and was always losing the connection even at 300
baud - let alone when I upgraded to 1200/75 -- complained continually
to BT about poor quality line. They said they'd send an engineer -
usually they didn't - but if they did - he reported nothing wrong.
THEN cable came - I was the first to join in my street - total bliss -
clear lines - fast text - What joy I had when BT wanted to know why
I'd left them!! :-)
Richard from London UK -- greyhounds@ntlworld.com
Bambi,Beauty,Brian(Brutus 77-97 Bessie 87-01 Ben 95-06 @ RB)
Greyhounds are for life not just for racing!!
Whittingham Homefinding Scheme
Visit our Kennels
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/greyhounds
www.whittinghamretiredgreyhounds.co.uk
date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:11:34 +0100
author: Richard Lobb
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:26:05 +0100, Richard Lobb wrote:
[...]
> Actually you see - I HAD been told to use user name and password by NTL
> and was NEVER told anything one way or another by Virginmedia when they
> took it over - I wasn't even told they were switching NTL off- I found
> out when I could no longer access them. I am still using the same
> ntlworld.com e-mail address that I was given years ago. So one would
> expect nothing to change without due warning - NOW they have changed
> about informing due to poor reputation - but their help-line seems
> UNchanged.
>
> That's why one uses helplines in the first place.
>
> I had sent e-mails to Virginmedia and used the Indian Helpline - at no
> time did they mention anything about NOT using username and password.
> They blamed poor software - poor quality hardware - malware - firewalls
> etc etc......not their inability to guide a known NTL user to
> news.virginmedia.com when he had been successfully using
> news.ntlworld.com ever since cable was laid in London.
>
> And They Should have been able to.
>
> I was using "free news servers" but I was PAYING for newsgroups and not
> getting them due to their inadequacies.
>
> Equally I was not able to connect my computers to the Internet anyway
> with their "help" so I would not really been able to USE the internet to
> access the webpage anyway - was it there four years ago?
I too have been with NTL almost from the beginning. When VM took over,
the usenet servers were so overloaded as to be almost unusable. VM have
upgraded them to a point were they are as good as some paid-for ones.
I most certainly did get emails advising me that the server address was
changing, and linking me to the page I provided a link to. Perhaps you
missed that somehow?
I don't pretend NTL/VM are perfect; far from it. There was an awful
problem a while back when user's webspace servers were merged, and
permissions were screwed up. So some subscribers, me included, could not
change information on our personal webspace for weeks.
However, the one time I used them when I had no connection, the Asian
lady I spoke to quickly took me through a procedure which diagnosed the
fault as my own router having failed. I was actually quite impressed!
On the other hand, folk I know that have the misfortune to use BT as
their ISP have spent days sorting out lost connection. Oh, and Sky appear
to be no better.
All in all, I would always advise others to go with cable BB if available
to them.
Chris
--
Remove prejudice to reply.
date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:56:04 GMT
author: Chris Whelan
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:56:04 GMT, Chris Whelan
wrote:
>I don't pretend NTL/VM are perfect; far from it. There was an awful
>problem a while back when user's webspace servers were merged, and
>permissions were screwed up. So some subscribers, me included, could not
>change information on our personal webspace for weeks.
>
>However, the one time I used them when I had no connection, the Asian
>lady I spoke to quickly took me through a procedure which diagnosed the
>fault as my own router having failed. I was actually quite impressed!
>
>On the other hand, folk I know that have the misfortune to use BT as
>their ISP have spent days sorting out lost connection. Oh, and Sky appear
>to be no better.
>
>All in all, I would always advise others to go with cable BB if available
>to them.
>
>Chris
Interesting
I'll bet that all of your internet software is supplied by Microsoft -
none of mine is - I don't like Microsoft - which is exactly what I
stated at the begining.
They have a script for standard replies - If you give standard replies
they give standard answers - but not if you have non standard software
or equipment.
Richard from London UK -- greyhounds@ntlworld.com
Bambi,Beauty,Brian(Brutus 77-97 Bessie 87-01 Ben 95-06 @ RB)
Greyhounds are for life not just for racing!!
Whittingham Homefinding Scheme
Visit our Kennels
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/greyhounds
www.whittinghamretiredgreyhounds.co.uk
date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:39:28 +0100
author: Richard Lobb
|
Re: Stupid AOL technical support
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:39:28 +0100, Richard Lobb wrote:
[...]
> Interesting
>
> I'll bet that all of your internet software is supplied by Microsoft -
> none of mine is - I don't like Microsoft - which is exactly what I
> stated at the begining.
You'd loose.
I don't use much MS software at all; I'm on a Linux box ATM.
When I lost connection, I sat at an XP box for the very reason you are
stating; I guessed their support would use standard scripts. However, I
use Firefox and Thunderbird on that machine.
> They have a script for standard replies - If you give standard replies
> they give standard answers - but not if you have non standard software
> or equipment.
The faulty router that the lady diagnosed was a Linksys that I had added,
so yes, I was using "non-standard" equipment.
Maybe I was just lucky, but in my conversation with her, it was clear
that she could go "off-script", and still know what she was talking about.
Chris
--
Remove prejudice to reply.
date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:29:58 GMT
author: Chris Whelan
|
|
|