I have connected a NAS drive directly to a PC as a temporary measure while I 
do a lot of re-jigging of my data.  This PC get's it's internet connection 
from a USB wireless adapter.  However, I've noticed that when the NAS is 
switched on, I can't get any connection via the wireless - despite it 
showing as connected.  Switch off the NAS and bingo, pages show up OK.

I'm wondering why is it that these 2 cannot just work independantly to one 
another??

Wireless Adapter (manual I.P.)
192.168.1.101 subnet 255.255.255.0

Wired Network Port (Auto I.P. from NAS DHCP)
192.254.0.100 subnet 255.255.0.0

"strid"  wrote in message 
news:GVjvk.180362$_M4.149261@newsfe18.ams2...
>I have connected a NAS drive directly to a PC as a temporary measure while 
>I do a lot of re-jigging of my data.  This PC get's it's internet 
>connection from a USB wireless adapter.  However, I've noticed that when 
>the NAS is switched on, I can't get any connection via the wireless - 
>despite it showing as connected.  Switch off the NAS and bingo, pages show 
>up OK.
>
> I'm wondering why is it that these 2 cannot just work independantly to one 
> another??
>
> Wireless Adapter (manual I.P.)
> 192.168.1.101 subnet 255.255.255.0
>
> Wired Network Port (Auto I.P. from NAS DHCP)
> 192.254.0.100 subnet 255.255.0.0

How about turning off the NAS's DHCP server and letting the router allocate 
addresses both for the wired port and the NAS? I think the problem may be 
that your PC is on two subnets, 192.168.1.x and 192.254.0.x, and TCP isn't 
sure which one to use to access the internet. Put everything in the same 
subnet and you may find it works.

I could be barking up the wrong tree, though!

On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 00:23:16 +0100
"strid"  wrote:

> I have connected a NAS drive directly to a PC as a temporary measure
> while I do a lot of re-jigging of my data.  This PC get's it's
> internet connection from a USB wireless adapter.  However, I've
> noticed that when the NAS is switched on, I can't get any connection
> via the wireless - despite it showing as connected.  Switch off the
> NAS and bingo, pages show up OK.
> 
> I'm wondering why is it that these 2 cannot just work independantly
> to one another??
> 
> Wireless Adapter (manual I.P.)
> 192.168.1.101 subnet 255.255.255.0
> 
> Wired Network Port (Auto I.P. from NAS DHCP)
> 192.254.0.100 subnet 255.255.0.0 
> 
First things first - the reserved private address space starting 192 is
a class C network i.e. only 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 so 192.254.0.0/16
isn't reserved for private use and may appear on the internet.  You're
already running a wireless network on one subnet of the reserved
address range, so set the NAS to use another of the subnets e.g.
192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0

But that's probably nothing to do with your problem, which is most
likely the default gateway setting.  Assuming you're using Windows
2k/XP/Vista, open a terminal and enter

route delete 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0
route add 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1

(substitute the address of your router if it's not 192.168.1.1).
That deletes the existing default route (which was set by the NAS when
the NIC acquired its address via DHCP) and sets a new one that points
at your router instead.

In article <GVjvk.180362$_M4.149261@newsfe18.ams2>, strid says...
> I have connected a NAS drive directly to a PC as a temporary measure while I 
> do a lot of re-jigging of my data.  This PC get's it's internet connection 
> from a USB wireless adapter.  However, I've noticed that when the NAS is 
> switched on, I can't get any connection via the wireless - despite it 
> showing as connected.  Switch off the NAS and bingo, pages show up OK.
> 
> I'm wondering why is it that these 2 cannot just work independantly to one 
> another??
> 
> Wireless Adapter (manual I.P.)
> 192.168.1.101 subnet 255.255.255.0
> 
> Wired Network Port (Auto I.P. from NAS DHCP)
> 192.254.0.100 subnet 255.255.0.0 
> 
Manually assign an IP address to the wired port and in the default 
gateway, don't enter anything.


-- 
Conor

I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't 
looking good either. - Scott Adams

"Mortimer"  wrote in message 
news:9dSdnWyxfNQ0RCDVnZ2dnUVZ8sLinZ2d@posted.plusnet...
> "strid"  wrote in message 
> news:GVjvk.180362$_M4.149261@newsfe18.ams2...
>>I have connected a NAS drive directly to a PC as a temporary measure while 
>>I do a lot of re-jigging of my data.  This PC get's it's internet 
>>connection from a USB wireless adapter.  However, I've noticed that when 
>>the NAS is switched on, I can't get any connection via the wireless - 
>>despite it showing as connected.  Switch off the NAS and bingo, pages show 
>>up OK.
>>
>> I'm wondering why is it that these 2 cannot just work independantly to 
>> one another??
>>
>> Wireless Adapter (manual I.P.)
>> 192.168.1.101 subnet 255.255.255.0
>>
>> Wired Network Port (Auto I.P. from NAS DHCP)
>> 192.254.0.100 subnet 255.255.0.0
>
> How about turning off the NAS's DHCP server and letting the router 
> allocate addresses both for the wired port and the NAS? I think the 
> problem may be that your PC is on two subnets, 192.168.1.x and 
> 192.254.0.x, and TCP isn't sure which one to use to access the internet. 
> Put everything in the same subnet and you may find it works.
>
That was the way I had it when the NAS was pugged into my router in another 
part of the house, but when I plugged it into the PC it wasn't showing up

In message <GVjvk.180362$_M4.149261@newsfe18.ams2>, strid  
writes
>I have connected a NAS drive directly to a PC as a temporary measure 
>while I do a lot of re-jigging of my data.  This PC get's it's internet 
>connection from a USB wireless adapter.  However, I've noticed that 
>when the NAS is switched on, I can't get any connection via the 
>wireless - despite it showing as connected.  Switch off the NAS and 
>bingo, pages show up OK.
>
>I'm wondering why is it that these 2 cannot just work independantly to 
>one another??
>
>Wireless Adapter (manual I.P.)
>192.168.1.101 subnet 255.255.255.0

That masks restricts the adapter to work only with 192.168.1.* 
addresses.

>
>Wired Network Port (Auto I.P. from NAS DHCP)
>192.254.0.100 subnet 255.255.0.0

That masks restricts the adapter to work only with 192.254.*.* 
addresses.

If you replace the mask for both of them with 255.0.0.0 then they could 
see each other. But even better would be to make sure that every device 
used an address in the 192.168.1 range.

You can only have one DHCP server in the network. Set it up to issue 
addresses in a limited subset of the 192.168.1 range, and choose any 
static addresses from the rest of that range. For instance my DHCP 
server here serves addresses from 192.168.0.2 up to 192.168.0.20 while 
my static addresses start at 192.168.0.40 and go up from there.




-- 
Bernard Peek
London, UK. DBA, Manager, Trainer & Author.

On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 19:42:06 +0100
"strid"  wrote:
> 
> "Mortimer"  wrote in message 
> news:9dSdnWyxfNQ0RCDVnZ2dnUVZ8sLinZ2d@posted.plusnet...

> > How about turning off the NAS's DHCP server and letting the router 
> > allocate addresses both for the wired port and the NAS? I think the 
> > problem may be that your PC is on two subnets, 192.168.1.x and 
> > 192.254.0.x, and TCP isn't sure which one to use to access the
> > internet. Put everything in the same subnet and you may find it
> > works.
> >
> That was the way I had it when the NAS was pugged into my router in
> another part of the house, but when I plugged it into the PC it
> wasn't showing up 
> 
That's because the NAS couldn't see the router to get a DHCP address -
you'd have to bridge the two network devices in the PC for that to work.

On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 00:23:16 +0100, "strid"  wrote:

> I'm wondering why is it that these 2 cannot just work independantly to one 
> another??
>
> Wireless Adapter (manual I.P.)
> 192.168.1.101 subnet 255.255.255.0
>
> Wired Network Port (Auto I.P. from NAS DHCP)
> 192.254.0.100 subnet 255.255.0.0 

Those different netmasks have different broadcast addresses so they can not
"see" each other by using ARP to discover the other's MAC address.  You
must set all devices on the LAN with the same mask and in the same subnet.

Tone

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:40:11 +0100
"Anthony R. Gold"  wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 00:23:16 +0100, "strid"  wrote:
> 
> > I'm wondering why is it that these 2 cannot just work independantly
> > to one another??
> >
> > Wireless Adapter (manual I.P.)
> > 192.168.1.101 subnet 255.255.255.0
> >
> > Wired Network Port (Auto I.P. from NAS DHCP)
> > 192.254.0.100 subnet 255.255.0.0 
> 
> Those different netmasks have different broadcast addresses so they
> can not "see" each other by using ARP to discover the other's MAC
> address.  You must set all devices on the LAN with the same mask and
> in the same subnet.
> 
He said he wants them to work independently i.e. different subnets.