|
|
|
date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:33:23 -0000,
group: uk.comp.homebuilt
back
Youtube playback
Have a look at this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuWx8rZojPQ in both
SD & HD there is noticeable frame rate slowdown, my CPU is not hitting
anywhere near 100%... is it the video itself or the computer I am using.
date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:33:23 -0000
author: Nick Le Lievre lid
|
Re: Youtube playback
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:33:23 -0000, "Nick Le Lievre"
<nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>Have a look at this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuWx8rZojPQ in both
>SD & HD there is noticeable frame rate slowdown, my CPU is not hitting
>anywhere near 100%... is it the video itself or the computer I am using.
It's the browser, here (2GHz C2D, 4gig). Firefox stutters, Safari
smooth. Both latest release versions.
Cheers - Jaimie
--
Only users lose drugs
date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:42:20 +0000
author: Jaimie Vandenbergh
|
Re: Youtube playback
"Jaimie Vandenbergh" wrote in message
news:mhs5f5hcggg2oish0niod4jp4t59bpjpfi@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:33:23 -0000, "Nick Le Lievre"
> <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Have a look at this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuWx8rZojPQ in
>>both
>>SD & HD there is noticeable frame rate slowdown, my CPU is not hitting
>>anywhere near 100%... is it the video itself or the computer I am using.
>
> It's the browser, here (2GHz C2D, 4gig). Firefox stutters, Safari
> smooth. Both latest release versions.
Really... that is interesting... I am using Windows 7 Internet Explorer 8,
Pentium Dual Core SU4100 1.3GHZ ULV CPU, 3GB RAM maybe I should try Safari
or Google Chrome to see if that makes a difference.
date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:58:01 -0000
author: Nick Le Lievre lid
|
Re: Youtube playback
"Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:hcusio$ai1$1@news.albasani.net...
>
> Really... that is interesting... I am using Windows 7 Internet Explorer 8,
> Pentium Dual Core SU4100 1.3GHZ ULV CPU, 3GB RAM maybe I should try Safari
> or Google Chrome to see if that makes a difference.
I installed Google Chrome and got the flash player for it from Adobe, it was
still a bit jerky but perhaps a bit better. Then I went back to Internet
Explorer 8 and tried again this time it was much much better, I do not know
if getting the flash player in Google Chrome has updated the flash player
used by IE8 as well... but when I played it just now it was smooth in the
bits which were jerky before (when the guy is dancing in the train).
date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:28:10 -0000
author: Nick Le Lievre lid
|
Re: Youtube playback
Nick Le Lievre wrote:
> Have a look at this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuWx8rZojPQ in
> both SD & HD there is noticeable frame rate slowdown, my CPU is not
> hitting anywhere near 100%... is it the video itself or the computer I
> am using.
Smooth all the way here.
Core 2 quad. No cores show more than 25% during video in HD
4Gb ram
Nvidia 8800 640Mb
Latest Firefox
8Mb connection
Win 7
date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:07:21 +0000
author: Count de Monet
|
Re: Youtube playback
"Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:hcur4i$8da$1@news.albasani.net...
> Have a look at this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuWx8rZojPQ in
> both SD & HD there is noticeable frame rate slowdown, my CPU is not
> hitting anywhere near 100%... is it the video itself or the computer I am
> using.
I don't think you understand how youTUBE works. You don't seem to have
discovered the world of "trendy video" effects. After downloading both
videos
and watching them on a DVD player they all appear exactly the same - with
the
same special effects on normal video and HD.
It's similar to effects used on TV such as when the camera is waved about to
give a fast moving display - or cut every second from one screen to the
next.
You can also do different aspects and switch them rapidly to annoy everyone
or go from wide to extreme close up in which the subject moves out of the
actual screen view.
I thought all that rubbish taught on media courses died out years ago as it
was
unpopular and LCD TVs couldn't cope with the required refresh rate.
date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:47:23 -0000
author: Roger
|
Re: Youtube playback
"Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:hcuv8d$f75$1@news.albasani.net...
> "Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
> news:hcuub9$djh$1@news.albasani.net...
>> "Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:hcusio$ai1$1@news.albasani.net...
>>>
>>> Really... that is interesting... I am using Windows 7 Internet Explorer
>>> 8, Pentium Dual Core SU4100 1.3GHZ ULV CPU, 3GB RAM maybe I should try
>>> Safari or Google Chrome to see if that makes a difference.
>>
>> I installed Google Chrome and got the flash player for it from Adobe, it
>> was still a bit jerky but perhaps a bit better. Then I went back to
>> Internet Explorer 8 and tried again this time it was much much better, I
>> do not know if getting the flash player in Google Chrome has updated the
>> flash player used by IE8 as well... but when I played it just now it was
>> smooth in the bits which were jerky before (when the guy is dancing in
>> the train).
>
> In reflection I think it depends how it buffers it because when I tried in
> IE8 again it was back to being a bit jerky in parts, I do not have a good
> connection here at the moment so the buffering could be affected, it seems
> like sometimes it skips frames in order to keep up and then when you play
> it back you notice it. It could also be down to the server load.
I do have a good connection - it still has special effects which you see as
a fault. Even if you save the files and play them through a PC or a
DVD player. The original video has the effects in it.
Nothing to do with your computer, or lack of it. No difference here between
a 3.2GHz laptop and a PC with a quad core processor and huge video card.
date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:49:53 -0000
author: Roger
|
Re: Youtube playback
Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:33:23 -0000, "Nick Le Lievre"
> <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Have a look at this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuWx8rZojPQ in both
>> SD & HD there is noticeable frame rate slowdown, my CPU is not hitting
>> anywhere near 100%... is it the video itself or the computer I am using.
>
> It's the browser, here (2GHz C2D, 4gig). Firefox stutters, Safari
> smooth. Both latest release versions.
Jumps here on Firefox 3.0.14 with similar spec while IE6(?!) is dead
smooth. Same version of Flash, I think. Youtube stuff is normally fine,
so I don't know what's so strange about this video. It's not a buffering
or CPU issue.
--
John Jordan
date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:20:57 +0000
author: John Jordan
|
Re: Youtube playback
Roger wrote:
>
> I thought all that rubbish taught on media courses died out years ago as it
> was
> unpopular and LCD TVs couldn't cope with the required refresh rate.
>
I am not talking about the intended slow downs that occur in the video
just the slight jerks throughout, I just tried this video on my iMac
running MAC OS 10.6 & Safari and it was silky smooth, I have a better
connection there so that may have figured into the equation. The fact
that it did playback smoothly once on my PDC SU4100 1.3ghz ULV machine
suggests its not the machine itself that can not handle it.
date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:31:39 +0000
author: Nick Le Lievre lid
|
Re: Youtube playback
"Nick Le Lievre" <nicklelievre@jerseymail.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:hd1bvg$q77$1@aioe.org...
>
> I am not talking about the intended slow downs that occur in the video
> just the slight jerks throughout, I just tried this video on my iMac
> running MAC OS 10.6 & Safari and it was silky smooth, I have a better
> connection there so that may have figured into the equation. The fact that
> it did playback smoothly once on my PDC SU4100 1.3ghz ULV machine suggests
> its not the machine itself that can not handle it.
Just played it on my PDC 1.3ghz ULV machine again and while the SD had some
slowdown when panning the HD was silky smooth I would say it played the best
I have seen it yet. Its strange how sometimes it plays silky smooth and
other times its noticeably jerky when panning and movements... with the same
machine and software must be a server issue.
date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:55:51 -0000
author: Nick Le Lievre lid
|
|
|