Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
alt.uk
a-level business
a-levels
edinburgh.misc
games.video.playstation
law
penpals
virgin-net.oldbies
  
 
date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:10:14 -0800 (PST),    group: alt.uk.law        back       
Re: COLLECTIVE MENTAL ILLNESS   
On 30 Jan, 19:06, Special Care  wrote:
> "C'est le seule chose que je peut faire,
> Et ce n'est pas bon, Ma....."http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=L_gHszAZRsA&feature=related

--------------------

Actually this was the song I had in mind. She's lovely.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=iamNec8kl2o&feature=related
date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:10:14 -0800 (PST)   author:   Special Care

Re: COLLECTIVE MENTAL ILLNESS   
COPY OF RECENT EMAIL:
------------------------------------------------------

Hi. Just replying to a couple of points:

First - what I've actually been saying is that every baby is fixated
on his mother's anus, and this is undeniable. That means all of us
when we were infants. Nearly everybody has forgotten that part of
their lives. I never completely forgot, then in early to mid-2003, I
fully recovered the memories of the authentic perceptions, emotions
and impulses of human babies. The impulse to caress the mother's anus
is unavoidable, as all living organisms have an automatic and powerful
urge to imitate and repeat their earliest experiences, and the most
prominent early experience for all of us was the pleasure our mothers
gave us when she stroked our anuses. So if people ridicule me for
remembering and still experiencing that impulse [when I choose to feel
it], they need to be aware that they are ridiculing themselves too,
because we all had that same fixation and urge to pleasure Mother in
her anus in imitation of what she did to us. So if anyone suggests
that I'm ridiculous, crazy and a pervert, you are effectively saying
that you too are ridiculous, crazy and a pervert. It's called
Reduction to Absurdity, to prove you are not being rational.

I keep saying the mother-infant relationship is a sexual relationship
[non-penetrative], and the American Medical Association, in their
reports on paedophilia, speak similarly of non-penetrative caressing
being a sexual relationship. On that basis the mother-infant
relationship clearly is a sexual relationship and all human beings
began their lives in an intense sexual relationship with our mothers.
Next, by the universal psychological / biological law of
'imprinting' / 'brain wiring,' we all automatically had a powerful
urge to keep on imitating and repeating that sexual relationship, by
continuing to exchange the same loving, pleasurable caresses, both
with our mothers and with other children as the years passed. And the
urge to continue to caress your mother intimately was not only rooted
in 'imprinting' / 'brain wiring,' but was emotionally charged and
potentiated by the intense, near-indestructible love all infants feel
for their mothers.

The abrupt ending of the sexual relationship between mothers and
babies is the original act of child abuse. And that terrible crime
against nature, when every mother ends her sexual relationship with
her babies, is the root cause of all the pain and disharmony in this
world. That terrible act of betrayal and child abuse by every mother
is the 'Original Sin' of religious symbolism.

The origin of this madness is correctly identified in my analysis as
an ancient warmongering device, a deliberate policy by our ancestors
to ration love between human beings and to fill the world with misery
and pain, as that was needed to keep our ancestors on a war footing
and to produce effective soldiers. Thus our ancestors got stuck in
survivalist mode, and we have inherited their collective mental
illness, their pain-generating societal arrangements. And after eleven
thousand years of this idiocy, we don't even know that we are mentally
ill.

I have recovered fully the memories of infancy, and I feel the
corresponding emotion of rejection and heartbreak at the ending of the
sexual relationship with the mother. Nearly everyone else has
forgotten, because it was so terrifying and so traumatising for all of
us as we began to realise that our mothers are mentally ill and that
our mothers do not know what they are doing.
That is what Bernardo Bertolluci was getting at when he said:
"children are tortured until they tell their first lie."

Regarding the images I use, I took them from publicly displayed
educational childcare websites, and I am using them for that same
purpose, as aids to education and healing. The images of babies are
essential to convey my analysis and to enable people to grasp what the
mother-infant relationship really entails. The final image in "Your
Baby is not a Sack of Potatoes, Mrs !" is confirmation of what I said
regarding every baby's impulse to find and caress the mother's anus
exactly as the mother caressed the baby's anus. Furthermore, many
women report that when they took their babies into the shower or bath
with them, the first thing the baby did was to reach for the mother's
anus. These are babies that had not been sufficiently shamed yet, so a
glimmer of their innate sanity and primal love impulse still remained,
though it was soon to be snuffed out by the disease of toxic shame
emanating from the mother.

I accept that some people were frightened when I sent them the links
to the Google Documents presentation. They are afraid of losing the
world they imagined they were living in, a world which does not exist
and is only a fantasy derived from mass scotoma / collective self
delusion. The reality is what I have stated: the mother-infant
relationship is a sexual relationship and the original act of child
abuse is the toxic shame unleashed by every mother to 'exonerate' her
for the crime she commits against her babies when she ends her sexual
relationship with her babies.
People are so "out of it," so "far gone," that they can't see this,
and they take refuge in calling me "anally obsessive" or worse,
without grasping the fact that whatever they say about me, they are
effectively saying about themselves too, since we all had these
perceptions and impulses when we were infants, but they have been
shamed out of the rest of you and you have forgotten. By remembering,
I am displaying my sanity and inviting you to begin your recovery too.

I do not see any legal ambiguity regarding the displaying of those
images of infants for the purpose of education / healing, which is my
only purpose. In case anyone wants to know, my own attitude toward
children and young people is that I regard them as monsters and want
to avoid them. I am attracted to women of mature age only. But I do
not like living in a world where every mother is a child abuser, and I
am entitled to ask people to stop it, as soon as it becomes feasible,
after a period of re-education / reorientation among adults.
If someone wants to question the legality of peddling images of naked
babies, they might more usefully target a television advertisement now
being shown daily in Britain, promoting Johnson's baby powder, and
showing a mother caressing a naked baby, who is clearly deriving great
sensual pleasure from the mother's caresses, ending with the mother
kissing the baby on his bare bottom. I dislike seeing babies bodies
being exploited solely for financial gain, and there are numerous
other similar advertisements. Using such images as a necessary
educational / healing tool is a different matter. However, as it
happens, that ad for Johnson's baby powder unintentionally illustrates
my point: the mother-infant relationship is a non-penetrative sexual
relationship, and we all were badly torn up and heartbroken and
suffered irreparable emotional harm when our mothers abruptly ended
her sexual relationship with us, without a thought for the long-term
emotional damage she was causing us with that bewildering barrage of
toxic shame to cover her retreat and to conceal the horrendous child
abuse built into the survivalist-mode mother-infant relationship.

So, I am not asking you or anyone else to display the links to my
Google Documents presentation on your websites. However, I will just
say that if anyone wishes to do so, there is no legal problem and all
objections can be answered and demolished.

For example, after showing my early manuscript to health service
officials here, as related in "Silence of the Damned," I repeatedly
asked those people to refer the matter to the police, so that it would
be talked through fully and so that I could show these people where
they were going wrong, and then publish a transcript of the discussion
with the police as a useful educational tool for worldwide display.
But the health service officials just maintained their nervous
silence. People sense in a vague, distant way that my analysis is
correct, but they are afraid to think clearly and thus lose the world
they thought they were living in, a world which does not exist except
as a fantasy rooted in collective self delusion / mass scotoma.
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Know Yourself, Heal Yourself"
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dddp6bt4_829zpt8ffd
date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:38:36 -0700 (PDT)   author:   Special Care

Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us