On 8 Nov., 01:41, Old.Jinglebollo...@googlemail.com wrote:
> """"""Mr Goose also asked Castree about an attack on another little
> girl nine months after Lesley disappeared. The jury has heard that
> Castree pleaded guilty in 1976 to abduction, sexual abuse and inciting
> the girl to commit an act of gross indecency.
>
> Castree said he had no recollection of the incident involving the
> other girl but had been told that he may have had a mild breakdown and
> acted out of character as a result of exhaustion after working long
> hours.""""""
>
> ---------------
>
> Very little is being said clearly concerning the case of child sexual
> abuse attributed to Ronald CAstree in 1976. He "confessed" to it. If
> you "confessed" to a crime in England in 1976, there was perhaps a 50%
> probability that the English police had beaten the "confession" out of
> you. Some people are emotionally fragile, and can be "programmed" to
> imagine that they have committed a criime.
>
> The Ronald Castree trial doesn't add up.

We have a parallel case of Madeleine McCann. Her parents are both
"doctors". That almost always means Masons.

Suppose they were being put under pressure to commit Masonic crimes of
higher "degree", and resisted. As revenge the Masons may well have
taken "Maddy".

The mother was said to have been heard saying "THEY have taken her".

It looks like another stitch-up in progress.

Charles Douglas Wehner

"Jim Way"  wrote in
news:i0f2j.87734$392.35104@fe09.news.easynews.com: 

> 
> "Phil Kyle"  wrote in message 
> news:fi83ci$gju$18@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> "Neal Barker"  wrote in
>> news:M3c1j.61770$bj2.20817@fe08.news.easynews.com:
>>
>>>
>>> "Phil Kyle"  wrote in message
>>> news:fi3dcl$a29$22@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>>> "Craig Barker" <fat_men@greggs_pies.com.invalid> wrote in
>>>> news:tqA0j.37115$Eg2.11631@fe06.news.easynews.com:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Janitor of Lunacy"  wrote in message
>>>>> news:TmA0j.140343$vI1.77339@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "David (Supt. Condiment)" <Super Supt@invalid.com> wrote in
>>>>>> message news:iFy0j.28211$zb2.25392@fe02.news.easynews.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Janitor of Lunacy"  wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:EMu0j.139768$vI1.107462@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Janitor of Lunacy"  wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:jgu0j.29$JA1.28@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Phil Kyle"  wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:fhtq90$7d8$17@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>>>>>>>>> "Janitor of Lunacy"  wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:d0l0j.284273$lV4.148585@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:83524847-b8e3-46b5-9edc-01d11ed9ed58@o6g2000hsd.googlegr
>>>>>>>>>>> ou ps .com.. .
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16 Nov., 10:15, Phil Kyle 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> It doesn't make me a queer, OK?  I have a girlfriend.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> Neil Barker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Do girls usually have four legs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > And curly tails?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And eat dried food wot comes in a bag?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I pointed out before that this reminds me of Maurice
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kellett. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> As a Town Councillor, he was a consultant to Lord Nolan's
>>>>>>>>>>>> "House of Commons Select Committee on F'masonry".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He was no such thing. I have seen the complete list of
>>>>>>>>>>> witnesses to Nolan's 1995 Enquiry; Kellet's name does not
>>>>>>>>>>> appear on it, nor anything close.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have also examined the minutes of every Parliamentary
>>>>>>>>>>> Committee on Standards in Public Life
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are we supposed to believe that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Given your previous comments on this topic, you seem capable
>>>>>>>>> of believing anything you want to.
>>>>>>>>> But why not? The Committee meets infrequently and it only took
>>>>>>>>> me a couple of hours to
>>>>>>>>> search through the PDFs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...and whereas I spent some time doing this, to no avail,
>>>>>>>> fortune is indeed on your side because all you have to do to
>>>>>>>> prove me wrong is to produce a single verifiable
>>>>>>>> counter-example. You can do that, can't you? Go on, do it- you
>>>>>>>> know you want to. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You answered your own post! Your are defiantly a lunatic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> obviously the word "continuation" is alien to you.
>>>>>
>>>>> We had continuations every Saturday morning at the local fleapit -
>>>>> "See what happens next week!" Mind you, aliens hadn't been
>>>>> invented then, just foreigners, darkies and men from Mars.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The men from mars must've been a bit highly strung, wot with having
>>>> no women.
>>>
>>> Aye, it were kinda funny in them days how nobody spoke of families
>>> from Mars, or even animals from Mars, it were always men from Mars
>>> wot invaded Earth. Of course, we did not have high class sci-fi
>>> writers like we have nowadays.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Can you think of any high class sci-fi writers?
> 
> Yup. The bloke wot rote Dan Dare in the Eagle. Charles Chilton? 
> 
> 
> 

What about Ron Hubbard?
-- 

P
h
i
l

K
y
l
e
 
W
o
z

E
r
e