From:  Norman Scarth, Associate of the Article 6 Group,
Founder & Leader of the Anti-Crime Party,
36 Anvil Court Chambers,
BRADFORD BD8 7QW
Tel:  01274 541 213.  M:  0779 435 8691.

Email: enscarth@hotmail.com

To: Mr. Neil Cox, (Clerk to
the Honourable Mr. Justice Openshaw, QC, DL,)

& to:
Mrs. Kathryn Williamson,
Court Clerk to Bradford Crown Court,
C/o:  Bradford Crown Court, The Law Courts, Exchange Square,
Drake Street, BRADFORD BD1 1JA  Tel.(switchboard) 01274 840 274.

I acknowledge receipt of the letter dated 31st October 2007, from each
of you, writing on behalf of Mr. Justice Openshaw.

I write now for several reasons:  One is my puzzlement at your 2nd
paragraph, in which you say, "The Judge has noted that you have
associations with someone who has been excluded from the court during
the course of the present trial of Ronald Castree".  That sentence is
very strange:  It is ME that has been 'excluded', not only from 'the
court',  but from the building, according to the security staff who
blocked me with enthusiasm similar to (though thankfully less lethal)
than those who tackled Jean Charles de Menezes.  They told me they had
instruction from Judge Openshaw HIMSELF!   I would question the
legality of those instructions in relation to myself, but much more
importantly, in regard to Mr. Castree.

Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, & of the 1998
Human Rights Act, says,  "In The Determination Of His Civil Rights &
Obligations, Or Any Criminal Charge Against Him, Everyone Has The
Right A To A Fair & PUBLIC Hearing, Before An Independent & Impartial
Tribunal".

If I (& how many others?) are excluded from the trial (without any
legitimate reason), it is NOT a 'Public Hearing', & therefore is in
violation of Article 6.  I understand you are in difficult positions,
but hope you will not (by your silence) be party to such a violation.

It is quite a coincidence that not only did I fight in World War 2,
thus playing my small part in bringing into being the European
Convention on Human Rights, but I ALSO had a part in drafting the HRA
- confirmed by a letter dated 1st Sept. 1998 from Geoffrey Hoon MP
(then Lord Chancellor Irvine's spokesman in The Commons!)

The second reason I write is because I wish to lodge a Claim in the
County Court for an unpaid debt. Banned from the building, I am unable
to attend the court office to do so. This is surely 'obstructing/
perverting the course of Justice', a serious crime, subject to life
imprisonment?  I would be grateful for your comments.

The third reason I write is in the hope that with your own legal
knowledge & experience, one of you might be able to answer my original
question, which Mr. Justice Openshaw was unable or unwilling to
answer, the name of the very eminent judge of the 19th century, who
said, "The courts of Britain (or England?) are open to all, in every
sense of the words, & I trust they will always remain so".

Though Judge Openshaw felt unable to accept my little gift (no doubt
because he IS  judge), I trust you will not be quite so pernickety, &
will accept the £5 notes attached in the spirit they are sent:
appreciation of you doing something which is not strictly within your
'job description'.

Thanking you in anticipation.

Yours sincerely

Norman Scarth (Associate of The Article 6 Group).

On 9 Nov., 23:06, Old Jinglebollocks
 wrote:
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.legal/browse_thread/thread/283ed9...


As an Associate of the Article 6 Group, and as the founder and leader
of the AntiCrime Party, everything Norman does is in the public
interest.

Here is the latest:

-----------------------------------------------
Attached is a copy of my letter to Adrian Marshall, Court Manager of
Bradford Law Courts, asking for information under the 1998 Freedom of
Information Act.

His 'reply' came today:  As I predicted, he shows his contempt for the
FIA, saying only, "Further to your letter dated 22nd November received
at court today.  I have considered your letter, & in the circumstances
I am prepared to allow you back onto the court premises from today's
date".

The ARROGANCE of these Neo-Nazi apparatchiks is breathtaking!
Norman Scarth.
-----------------------------------------------

The "I" is interesting. As Masonic apparatchiks they are not allowed
to make decisions on their own. It reminds me of the puppet Robert
Maxwell (embezzler, with six fake doctorates of law to help him
steal). Maxwell (real name Abraham Lajbi Hoch) claimed that Gorbachov
would never make a decision without first consulting him. What an
utterly absurd statement. Gorbachov probably would have said "Max
WHO"?

Below is the original letter to Adrian Marshall.

Charles Douglas Wehner

-----------------------------------------------
To: Mr. Adrian Marshall, Court Manager,
The Law Courts, Exchange Square,
Drake Street, BRADFORD BD1 JA.  Tel:  Direct Line: 01274 843 502


REQUEST UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1998.

Dear Mr. Marshall,

        I acknowledge receipt of your letter dated 12th November 2007,
ref. APM.

1)      Under the Act as above, I hereby ask you to inform me of the
(REAL) reason for me being banned from Bradford Law Courts.  I have
already made comment on the nonsensical sentence in the letter sent
jointly by Mr. Neil Cox & Mrs. Kathryn Williamson, which said "... you
have associations with someone who has been excluded from the court" -
when it is ME that has been excluded!

2)      "County courts system in chaos", said HH Judge Paul Collins
(London's most senior county court judge) on the Radio 4 programme
'Law in Action' on 13th February 2007.

3)      Giving a retirement speech on 15th June 2007 the Recorder of
Leeds, HH Judge Norman Jones QC, spoke of  "... the shambles which we
call the criminal justice system".   Both those very experienced
judges blamed it on the low pay of Court Service staff.

4)      Little consolation for the victims of the injustice resulting
from the chaos & the shambles, but Judges Collins & Jones were
UNDERSTATING the case.  As Hon. Secretary of the Litigants in Person
Society, I have much more experience than just my own, able to say
with absolute authority (based on masses of evidence) that the hatred
of the Nazis for the Jews is equalled by that of ALL legal
professionals for the L.I.P.

5)      Unlike you, I lived through & fought against the (Old) Nazis,
better able than you to recognise the resurgence of Neo Nazis in
Britain now.  Deny it as you will, your conduct & that of your staff
is a worrying example, though hidden behind a nauseating pretence of
'Democracy', concern for 'Human Rights' & the 'Rule of Law'.  Instead,
we have the Rule of Law-yers - a very different thing!  They are the
new 'Master Race', who have seized 'absolute power' which, as we know,
'corrupts absolutely'.

6)      Many agree with me that the country is run by War Criminals, &
say so.  It would be rare indeed if such criminals refrained from
criminal activities at home, but, tragically, few dare to speak out on
that. Shades of Germany in the 1930s.

7)      In asking for the information as above, I have little hope
that you will show any more regard to the Act named than you show to
our other laws, or to the memory of those who gave their lives in
World War 2. They did so to preserve the time-honoured Institutions of
Great Britain.  Among those institutions are 'courts which are open to
all'.

8)      Your own letter is contradictory: You say " ... the court will
not enter into any further correspondence on this matter.", yet your
middle paragraph says "If you need to attend the counter in the County
Court to lodge a claim please contact me at the court when we can
arrange a suitable time for you to attend to that matter."

9)      It is my inalienable right - paid for by the blood of my own
brave young shipmates, & many thousands of others - to attend court, &
I have no intentions of grovelling before you or any other Neo Nazi to
be allowed to do so.  Yes, exclusion is justifiable where there has
been serious misconduct, but as you know, my own conduct has been
impeccable.

10)     Lord Denning was rated (by some) as the finest judge of the
20th century.  In his book 'WHAT NEXT IN THE LAW' he wrote about
'Abuse of Power', saying,  " Whoever may be guilty of abuse of power,
be it Government, State, Employer, Trade Union or whoever, the law
must provide a speedy remedy.  Otherwise the victims will find their
own remedy.  There will be anarchy." ".

11)     A most important warning to the nation - but is notable that
Denning excluded the judiciary from his list of those who might abuse
their power!  Other pronouncements by him have been less worthy.  It
was he who said "Better that innocent men remain in prison than that
the integrity of the judiciary be impugned".  The words themselves
belie that integrity.

12)     Prime Minister Harold Wilson said,  "When men of peace have
nothing to hope for, then men of violence have everything to kill
for".  With gun law on the streets -even from juveniles - we could say
that anarchy is here now, but it WILL get worse!

13)     I look forward to hearing from you that the ban on me entering
Bradford Law Courts has been lifted, & that you will inform me of this
without delay.

Thanking you in anticipation.  Yours sincerely


From:  Norman Scarth, Associate of the Article 6 Group, Founder &
Leader of the Anti-Crime Party, Investigative Author & Publisher,
Successful Law Reformer.

Freedom campaigners are planning yet another petition to the
government. Here are Norman Scarth's thoughts on the matter:

I hate to disillusion you, but you would do better to send a petition
to Elvis Presley, Lord Lucan or Father Christmas.

'TWO CHEERS FOR DEMOCRACY!' said E.M.Forster.  If only we had it!.

If you think that MPs are honourable men & women you are living in
Fairyland.  They are ALL corrupt - as is the European Court of Human
Rights.  I say that in spite of my success there (case 33745/96).

If you want proof of their total corruption, I've got it.

President Musharif of Pakistan is putting judges behind bars.  We
should invite him to be President here.  If you really want to do some
good, put at least half our judges & politicians behind bars.

I WOULD say hang them from the lamp posts, but I don't believe in
violence.

Norman Scarth.

In article <85163d06-2577-4d72-886c-2edc27036077
@e1g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, charleswehner@hotmail.com says...
> Freedom campaigners are planning yet another petition to the
> government. Here are Norman Scarth's thoughts on the matter:
> 
> I hate to disillusion you, but you would do better to send a petition
> to Elvis Presley, Lord Lucan or Father Christmas.
> 

Norman is quite right in believning that the government are simply not 
listening to the petitions that are presented to them.  You only have to 
read the government responses on the now discredited 'Petition the Prime 
Minister' site.

The sad part of it is that despite the fact that so many people are 
disillusioned to the point of not bothering to vote, the No, 10 petition 
site caught the imagination of the public and the responses far 
outnumbered the government's expectations.  

A real chance to involve the public has been squandered and more damage 
is being done with every response that fails to answer the concerns of 
the petitioner and his supporters.


-- 
Fenris 

RSPCA-Animadversion

http://cheetah.webtribe.net/~animadversion/

SHG

http://the-shg.org