Windermere - Toxic
According to the BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cumbria/4110060.stm
Windermere is toxic! That'll be good for tourism. It's a pity they
banned the fast boats as this algae requires calm non-turbulent water to
flourish. I bet the National Park Authority never saw that coming!
I wonder if they'll ask us back... :)
--
xxx
Date:Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:51:34 GMT
Author:
|
Re: Windermere - Toxic
> According to the BBC:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cumbria/4110060.stm
> Windermere is toxic! That'll be good for tourism. It's a
> pity they banned the fast boats as this algae requires calm
> non-turbulent water to flourish. I bet the National Park
> Authority never saw that coming!
>
> I wonder if they'll ask us back... :)
>
All the fast boats in England couldn't stop an algae bloom in a
lake the size of Windermere.
I've seen plenty of algae in busy small waterways over the past
40 years. You underestimate nature.
Johnny-propeller-agitation-myth-buster
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Date:20 Jun 2005 16:35:56 -0500
Author:
|
Re: Windermere - Toxic
Johnny@ominous.portent wrote:
>> According to the BBC:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cumbria/4110060.stm
>> Windermere is toxic! That'll be good for tourism. It's a
>> pity they banned the fast boats as this algae requires calm
>> non-turbulent water to flourish. I bet the National Park
>> Authority never saw that coming!
>>
>> I wonder if they'll ask us back... :)
>>
>
> All the fast boats in England couldn't stop an algae bloom in a
> lake the size of Windermere.
>
> I've seen plenty of algae in busy small waterways over the past
> 40 years. You underestimate nature.
>
> Johnny-propeller-agitation-myth-buster
yup sounds like sour grapes. We have algae in some of the Texas lakes where
fast boats and water skiers flourish.
Al
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Date:Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:15:08 -0500
Author:
|
Re: Windermere - Toxic
Johnny@ominous.portent wrote:
> I've seen plenty of algae in busy small waterways over the past
> 40 years. You underestimate nature.
>
> Johnny-propeller-agitation-myth-buster
Yup, seen it too. The algae are very busy in Holland, where waterways
are heavily used. Detergents have to have low phosphates, which the
algae love.
Jp
Date:Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:24:10 -0400
Author:
|
Re: Windermere - Toxic
In news:WeEte.53501$G8.43462@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk,
xxx swallowed hard, took a lump of crayon, paused, then
frantically scribbled:
> According to the BBC:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cumbria/4110060.stm
> Windermere is toxic! That'll be good for tourism. It's a pity they
> banned the fast boats as this algae requires calm non-turbulent water
> to flourish. I bet the National Park Authority never saw that coming!
>
> I wonder if they'll ask us back...
Maybe it's a ploy to keep those beastly jetskiers etc. off the lake....
I have also seen this algae thriving in turbulent waters (two posts in
one...)
Kezzi-loves-a-good-conspiracy
Date:Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:52:28 +0100
Author:
|