I've decided the Lock Ness monster is a Sakusuchus (from Scotland) Bit like
Ally when you come to think of it.

Does anyone agree?

Edith.

"The Traveller"  wrote in message 
news:WqYge.5068$Fe7.57307@news000.worldonline.dk...

> I've decided the Lock Ness monster is a Sakusuchus (from Scotland) Bit 
> like
> Ally when you come to think of it.
>
> Does anyone agree?
>


No.

And what's this _Lock_ Ness thing?

ally-can-spell-Scots

"a l l y"  wrote in message
news:3ej9jkF3dts9U1@individual.net...

>
> "The Traveller"  wrote in message
> news:WqYge.5068$Fe7.57307@news000.worldonline.dk...
> > I've decided the Lock Ness monster is a Sakusuchus (from Scotland) Bit
> > like
> > Ally when you come to think of it.
> >
> > Does anyone agree?
> >
>
> No.
>
> And what's this _Lock_ Ness thing?
>
> ally-can-spell-Scots


Sorry. Lochness. That better?

Edith.

The Traveller wrote:

> I've decided the Lock Ness monster is a Sakusuchus (from Scotland) Bit like
> Ally when you come to think of it.
> 
> Does anyone agree?
> 
> Edith.


Having met Ally, I can testify that she is not at all monstrous.

I thought that Nessie was one of a breeding pair of a species known as 
Diuthinctheisaurus.

Jp

"Jpinny"  wrote in message
news:wD0he.1676$Bg4.760@fe10.lga...

> The Traveller wrote:
> > I've decided the Lock Ness monster is a Sakusuchus (from Scotland) Bit
like
> > Ally when you come to think of it.
> >
> > Does anyone agree?
> >
> > Edith.
>
> Having met Ally, I can testify that she is not at all monstrous.
>
> I thought that Nessie was one of a breeding pair of a species known as
> Diuthinctheisaurus.
>
> Jp


diurnal parallax.? Could be but I'd rather call the female Ally. Titter
titter chuckle eheheh, oooh, hold me sides rofl.

Edith

The Traveller wrote:

> "Jpinny"  wrote in message
> 
> 
> diurnal parallax.? Could be but I'd rather call the female Ally. Titter
> titter chuckle eheheh, oooh, hold me sides rofl.
> 
> Edith
> 
> 

Oh, I wouldn't know a thing about diurnal parallaxes. I never have any 
problem myself.

Jp

"Jpinny"  wrote in message
news:_R1he.12491$NZ1.7867@fe09.lga...

> The Traveller wrote:
> > "Jpinny"  wrote in message
> >
> >
> > diurnal parallax.? Could be but I'd rather call the female Ally. Titter
> > titter chuckle eheheh, oooh, hold me sides rofl.
> >
> > Edith
> >
> >
> Oh, I wouldn't know a thing about diurnal parallaxes. I never have any
> problem myself.
>
> Jp


Oh, it's nowt that Beechams powders won't cure.

Edith

The Traveller wrote:


>>Oh, I wouldn't know a thing about diurnal parallaxes. I never have any
>>problem myself.
>>
>>Jp
> 
> 
> Oh, it's nowt that Beechams powders won't cure.
> 
> Edith


They're different from Beecham's Pills, aren't they?

Jp

"Jpinny"  wrote in message
news:yx3he.12502$NZ1.381@fe09.lga...

> The Traveller wrote:
>
> >>Oh, I wouldn't know a thing about diurnal parallaxes. I never have any
> >>problem myself.
> >>
> >>Jp
> >
> >
> > Oh, it's nowt that Beechams powders won't cure.
> >
> > Edith
>
> They're different from Beecham's Pills, aren't they?
>
> Jp
>

diurnal parallaxes = The parallax of a celestial body using two points on
the surface of the earth as the earth rotates and be sure it says exlax on
the box and don't take more than one.

Edith.

"Jpinny"  wrote in message 
news:wD0he.1676$Bg4.760@fe10.lga...

> The Traveller wrote:
>> I've decided the Lock Ness monster is a Sakusuchus (from Scotland) Bit 
>> like
>> Ally when you come to think of it.
>>
>> Does anyone agree?
>>
>> Edith.
>
> Having met Ally, I can testify that she is not at all monstrous.


Thank you for testimonial!

ally

"The Traveller"  wrote in message 
news:oP0he.5129$Fe7.57359@news000.worldonline.dk...

>
> diurnal parallax.? Could be but I'd rather call the female Ally. Titter
> titter chuckle eheheh, oooh, hold me sides rofl.
>

Fine so long as we can call the male Edith.

ally

"a l l y"  wrote in message
news:3esig8F4pi6jU1@individual.net...

>
> "The Traveller"  wrote in message
> news:oP0he.5129$Fe7.57359@news000.worldonline.dk...
> >
> > diurnal parallax.? Could be but I'd rather call the female Ally. Titter
> > titter chuckle eheheh, oooh, hold me sides rofl.
> >
> Fine so long as we can call the male Edith.
>
> ally


Oh balls. Don't have any.

Edith.

"The Traveller"  wrote in message 
news:hRgie.5531$Fe7.60078@news000.worldonline.dk...

>
> "a l l y"  wrote in message
> news:3esig8F4pi6jU1@individual.net...
>>
>> "The Traveller"  wrote in message
>> news:oP0he.5129$Fe7.57359@news000.worldonline.dk...
>> >
>> > diurnal parallax.? Could be but I'd rather call the female Ally. Titter
>> > titter chuckle eheheh, oooh, hold me sides rofl.
>> >
>> Fine so long as we can call the male Edith.
>>
>> ally
>
> Oh balls. Don't have any.
>

Hmm. This makes things even worse. Now 'Edith' is a eunuch.

ally

a l l y wrote:

> "The Traveller"  wrote in message 
> news:hRgie.5531$Fe7.60078@news000.worldonline.dk...
> 
>>"a l l y"  wrote in message
>>news:3esig8F4pi6jU1@individual.net...
>>
>>>"The Traveller"  wrote in message
>>>news:oP0he.5129$Fe7.57359@news000.worldonline.dk...
>>>
>>>>diurnal parallax.? Could be but I'd rather call the female Ally. Titter
>>>>titter chuckle eheheh, oooh, hold me sides rofl.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Fine so long as we can call the male Edith.
>>>
>>>ally
>>
>>Oh balls. Don't have any.
>>
> 
> Hmm. This makes things even worse. Now 'Edith' is a eunuch.
> 
> ally 
> 

Here's something suggested by a friend who is a very distinguished 
breeder of standard Schnauzers. It claims to help your pet retain his 
natural look and (get this) his *self-esteem* after you have him seen to.

http://www.neuticles.com/index1.html

Of course, it doesn't solve the problem of not having a breeding pair 
and it has sweet Fanny Adams to do with Cumbria.

Jp

"Jpinny"  wrote in message 
news:Xukie.22660$NZ1.3741@fe09.lga...

>>
> Here's something suggested by a friend who is a very distinguished breeder 
> of standard Schnauzers. It claims to help your pet retain his natural look 
> and (get this) his *self-esteem* after you have him seen to.
>
> http://www.neuticles.com/index1.html
>
> Of course, it doesn't solve the problem of not having a breeding pair and 
> it has sweet Fanny Adams to do with Cumbria.
>

Are they serious? This isn't a wind-up? Some people really do have too much 
money these days, don't they?

A friend of mine in Edinburgh had her dog 'seen to' a couple of years ago, 
and got me to come and take some photos of his ...er... huevos.... before 
they were removed. I've known her since primary school but I still thought 
this just a wee bit odd. However, any time the pooch feels a bit lightweight 
at the rear end she can now show him the photos.

Indeed. Nothing to do with Cumbria.

ally

a l l y wrote:

> "Jpinny"  wrote in message 
> news:Xukie.22660$NZ1.3741@fe09.lga...
> 
>>Here's something suggested by a friend who is a very distinguished breeder 
>>of standard Schnauzers. It claims to help your pet retain his natural look 
>>and (get this) his *self-esteem* after you have him seen to.
>>
>>http://www.neuticles.com/index1.html
>>
>>Of course, it doesn't solve the problem of not having a breeding pair and 
>>it has sweet Fanny Adams to do with Cumbria.
>>
> 
> Are they serious? This isn't a wind-up? Some people really do have too much 
> money these days, don't they?
> 
> A friend of mine in Edinburgh had her dog 'seen to' a couple of years ago, 
> and got me to come and take some photos of his ...er... huevos.... before 
> they were removed. I've known her since primary school but I still thought 
> this just a wee bit odd. However, any time the pooch feels a bit lightweight 
> at the rear end she can now show him the photos.
> 
> Indeed. Nothing to do with Cumbria.
> 
> ally 


Good grief.

No,neuticles are genuine. My pal knows a couple of dogs who have 'em. 
They have also been shown on television, recently. They're made of 
silicone, and look like little plastic eggs, with a ridged sort of texture.

If you look at the website you will see that they also do prosthetic 
eyes for doggies, and supports for broken ear cartilege which is 
probably a good idea. I've heard of at least one dog whose droopy jowls 
were nipped and tucked, because he kept getting infections, so they did 
both sides to even him up.


Jp

"Jpinny"  wrote in message 
news:XHqie.12122$yx.11013@fe08.lga...

>
> If you look at the website you will see that they also do prosthetic eyes 
> for doggies, and supports for broken ear cartilege which is probably a 
> good idea. I've heard of at least one dog whose droopy jowls were nipped 
> and tucked, because he kept getting infections, so they did both sides to 
> even him up.
>

Yes, I was a wee bit tempted to buy the keyring or perhaps a pair of 
earrings, sporting neuticles. Great talking point that... except that when 
you told people what it was, nobody would believe you!

ally

a l l y wrote:


> Yes, I was a wee bit tempted to buy the keyring or perhaps a pair of 
> earrings, sporting neuticles. Great talking point that... except that when 
> you told people what it was, nobody would believe you!
> 
> ally 
> 
> 

Certainly a talking point, but it would only be the truth if someone 
complimented you by saying: "Those earrings really are the dog's b******s!"


Jp (lowering the tone)

On Tue, 17 May 2005 22:15:11 +0100, a l l y wrote:


> Yes, I was a wee bit tempted to buy the keyring or perhaps a pair of 
> earrings, 

What!

> sporting neuticles. 


Phew, I thought you were refering to the orignals!

TBH I'm not convinced about 'em. OK he'll look like a real dog but 
without real bollocks isn't the hormone balance going to be all to 
cock? And why do they remove 'em rather than just remove a section of 
the sperm duct like they do with humans?

-- 
Cheers                                              new5pam@howhill.com
Dave.                                             pam is missing e-mail

"Dave Liquorice"  wrote in message 
news:nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.igo2v91.pminews@news.howhill.com...

>
> TBH I'm not convinced about 'em. OK he'll look like a real dog but
> without real bollocks isn't the hormone balance going to be all to
> cock? And why do they remove 'em rather than just remove a section of
> the sperm duct like they do with humans?
>

It's probably cheaper. They just make a wee slit in the sac and pull 'em 
out, I think. Snipping sperm ducts sounds a bit more delicate and probably 
takes more time.

Falsies or no, the old dog will still have a squeaky voice...

ally

Dave Liquorice wrote:

> On Tue, 17 May 2005 22:15:11 +0100, a l l y wrote:
> 
> 
>>Yes, I was a wee bit tempted to buy the keyring or perhaps a pair of 
>>earrings, 
> 
> 
> What!
> 
> 
>>sporting neuticles. 
> 
> 
> Phew, I thought you were refering to the orignals!
> 
> TBH I'm not convinced about 'em. OK he'll look like a real dog but 
> without real bollocks isn't the hormone balance going to be all to 
> cock? And why do they remove 'em rather than just remove a section of 
> the sperm duct like they do with humans?
> 

Oh, heck

Testicles do two jobs. They make the sperms and they also make hormones. 
A vasectomy does just what you mentioned, it cuts the sperm duct from 
the sperm producing area, which only stops sperms getting out, nothing 
else; let's say that the "noodles" are prevented from getting into the 
"soup" and after a few days, die and dissolve.  Vasectomy doesn't stop 
the testicles continuing to put male hormones directly into the 
bloodstream, like any other gland. This is a good thing in humans who 
want to continue to shave and crave spectator sport, cars and - oh, yes, 
sex, but makes for aggressive, smelly, randy dogs.



Yr friendly neighbourhood Health Educator.

"Jpinny"  wrote in message
news:Qmuie.12144$yx.742@fe08.lga...

> a l l y wrote:
>
> > Yes, I was a wee bit tempted to buy the keyring or perhaps a pair of
> > earrings, sporting neuticles. Great talking point that... except that
when
> > you told people what it was, nobody would believe you!
> >
> > ally
> >
> >
> Certainly a talking point, but it would only be the truth if someone
> complimented you by saying: "Those earrings really are the dog's
b******s!"
>
>
> Jp (lowering the tone)


Gees, I've enuff with Rays Kangaroo pouch without having nuts hanging off me
ears.

Edith.

"Dave Liquorice"  wrote in message
news:nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.igo2v91.pminews@news.howhill.com...

> On Tue, 17 May 2005 22:15:11 +0100, a l l y wrote:

> TBH I'm not convinced about 'em. OK he'll look like a real dog but
> without real bollocks isn't the hormone balance going to be all to
> cock? And why do they remove 'em rather than just remove a section of
> the sperm duct like they do with humans?
>
> --
> Cheers                                              new5pam@howhill.com
> Dave.                                             pam is missing e-mail


Oh dear. I don't feel well.

Edith.

"The Traveller"  wrote in message 
news:m5Die.5675$Fe7.62198@news000.worldonline.dk...

>
> "Jpinny"  wrote in message
> news:Qmuie.12144$yx.742@fe08.lga...
>> a l l y wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, I was a wee bit tempted to buy the keyring or perhaps a pair of
>> > earrings, sporting neuticles. Great talking point that... except that
> when
>> > you told people what it was, nobody would believe you!
>> >
>> > ally
>> >
>> >
>> Certainly a talking point, but it would only be the truth if someone
>> complimented you by saying: "Those earrings really are the dog's
> b******s!"
>>
>>
>> Jp (lowering the tone)
>
> Gees, I've enuff with Rays Kangaroo pouch without having nuts hanging off 
> me
> ears.
>
> Edith.
>
>

Are you still fondling it looking for your change Edith?

On Tue, 17 May 2005 14:27:03 -0400, Jpinny  wrote:


>a l l y wrote:
>> "Jpinny"  wrote in message 
>> news:Xukie.22660$NZ1.3741@fe09.lga...
>> 
>>>Here's something suggested by a friend who is a very distinguished breeder 
>>>of standard Schnauzers. It claims to help your pet retain his natural look 
>>>and (get this) his *self-esteem* after you have him seen to.
>>>
>>>http://www.neuticles.com/index1.html
>>>
>>>Of course, it doesn't solve the problem of not having a breeding pair and 
>>>it has sweet Fanny Adams to do with Cumbria.
>>>
>> 
>> Are they serious? This isn't a wind-up? Some people really do have too much 
>> money these days, don't they?
>> 
>> A friend of mine in Edinburgh had her dog 'seen to' a couple of years ago, 
>> and got me to come and take some photos of his ...er... huevos.... before 
>> they were removed. I've known her since primary school but I still thought 
>> this just a wee bit odd. However, any time the pooch feels a bit lightweight 
>> at the rear end she can now show him the photos.
>> 
>> Indeed. Nothing to do with Cumbria.
>> 
>> ally 
>
>Good grief.
>
>No,neuticles are genuine. My pal knows a couple of dogs who have 'em. 
>They have also been shown on television, recently. They're made of 
>silicone, and look like little plastic eggs, with a ridged sort of texture.
>
>If you look at the website you will see that they also do prosthetic 
>eyes for doggies, and supports for broken ear cartilege which is 
>probably a good idea. I've heard of at least one dog whose droopy jowls 
>were nipped and tucked, because he kept getting infections, so they did 
>both sides to even him up.
>
>
>Jp


And a 12 bore cartridge only costs 25p.
I rest my case.

J.

"Ray Ingham"  wrote in message
news:8sDie.7045$E7.3344@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

>
> "The Traveller"  wrote in message
> news:m5Die.5675$Fe7.62198@news000.worldonline.dk...
> >
> > "Jpinny"  wrote in message
> > news:Qmuie.12144$yx.742@fe08.lga...
> >> a l l y wrote:
> >>
> >> > Yes, I was a wee bit tempted to buy the keyring or perhaps a pair of
> >> > earrings, sporting neuticles. Great talking point that... except that
> > when
> >> > you told people what it was, nobody would believe you!
> >> >
> >> > ally
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Certainly a talking point, but it would only be the truth if someone
> >> complimented you by saying: "Those earrings really are the dog's
> > b******s!"
> >>
> >>
> >> Jp (lowering the tone)
> >
> > Gees, I've enuff with Rays Kangaroo pouch without having nuts hanging
off
> > me
> > ears.
> >
> > Edith.
> >
> >
> Are you still fondling it looking for your change Edith?
>

Yes darling and I always think of you. At the moment you are worth 2 bob in
copper coins.

Edith.

"JH"  wrote in message
news:t82m81h753tj36va3vu9pr5270u6nvh3c6@4ax.com...

> On Tue, 17 May 2005 14:27:03 -0400, Jpinny  wrote:
snip :
> >If you look at the website you will see that they also do prosthetic
> >eyes for doggies, and supports for broken ear cartilege which is
> >probably a good idea. I've heard of at least one dog whose droopy jowls
> >were nipped and tucked, because he kept getting infections, so they did
> >both sides to even him up.
> >
> >
> >Jp
>
> And a 12 bore cartridge only costs 25p.
> I rest my case.
>
> J.


You are dreadful, JH.

Lopsided Edith.

JH wrote:

> On Tue, 17 May 2005 14:27:03 -0400, Jpinny  wrote:
> 
> 
>>a l l y wrote:
>>
>>>"Jpinny"  wrote in message 
>>>news:Xukie.22660$NZ1.3741@fe09.lga...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Here's something suggested by a friend who is a very distinguished breeder 
>>>>of standard Schnauzers. It claims to help your pet retain his natural look 
>>>>and (get this) his *self-esteem* after you have him seen to.
>>>>
>>>>http://www.neuticles.com/index1.html
>>>>
>>>>Of course, it doesn't solve the problem of not having a breeding pair and 
>>>>it has sweet Fanny Adams to do with Cumbria.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Are they serious? This isn't a wind-up? Some people really do have too much 
>>>money these days, don't they?
>>>
>>>A friend of mine in Edinburgh had her dog 'seen to' a couple of years ago, 
>>>and got me to come and take some photos of his ...er... huevos.... before 
>>>they were removed. I've known her since primary school but I still thought 
>>>this just a wee bit odd. However, any time the pooch feels a bit lightweight 
>>>at the rear end she can now show him the photos.
>>>
>>>Indeed. Nothing to do with Cumbria.
>>>
>>>ally 
>>
>>Good grief.
>>
>>No,neuticles are genuine. My pal knows a couple of dogs who have 'em. 
>>They have also been shown on television, recently. They're made of 
>>silicone, and look like little plastic eggs, with a ridged sort of texture.
>>
>>If you look at the website you will see that they also do prosthetic 
>>eyes for doggies, and supports for broken ear cartilege which is 
>>probably a good idea. I've heard of at least one dog whose droopy jowls 
>>were nipped and tucked, because he kept getting infections, so they did 
>>both sides to even him up.
>>
>>
>>Jp
> 
> 
> And a 12 bore cartridge only costs 25p.
> I rest my case.
> 
> J.


Dog or owner?

Jp

"Jpinny"  wrote in message
news:4zFie.20158$Ee6.18652@fe12.lga...

> JH wrote:
> > And a 12 bore cartridge only costs 25p.
> > I rest my case.
> >
> > J.
>
> Dog or owner?
>
> Jp


rofl

Edith

On Wed, 18 May 2005 00:26:46 +0100, a l l y wrote:


> It's probably cheaper. They just make a wee slit in the sac and pull 
> 'em out, I think. Snipping sperm ducts sounds a bit more delicate 
> and probably takes more time.


Doesn't take that long and it ain't that delicate... and the hole 
needed to get a testes through is bigger than that for a loop of duct.

Though it appears the real reason is to reduce the dogs agression and 
randyness. Sticking a couple of prosthetics in is purely a fad for the 
owner it ain't going to make the dog feel "complete" as in agressive 
or randy, no matter what the marketing puff says.

-- 
Cheers                                              new5pam@howhill.com
Dave.                                             pam is missing e-mail

"Dave Liquorice"  wrote in message
news:nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.igostj0.pminews@news.howhill.com...

> On Wed, 18 May 2005 00:26:46 +0100, a l l y wrote:
>
> > It's probably cheaper. They just make a wee slit in the sac and pull
> > 'em out, I think. Snipping sperm ducts sounds a bit more delicate
> > and probably takes more time.
>
> Doesn't take that long and it ain't that delicate... and the hole
> needed to get a testes through is bigger than that for a loop of duct.
>
> Though it appears the real reason is to reduce the dogs agression and
> randyness. Sticking a couple of prosthetics in is purely a fad for the
> owner it ain't going to make the dog feel "complete" as in agressive
> or randy, no matter what the marketing puff says.
>
> --
> Cheers                                              new5pam@howhill.com
> Dave.                                             pam is missing e-mail


I know...and men shouldn't do it either, just to prevent a law suit.

Edith

On Wed, 18 May 2005 16:17:55 +0200, The Traveller wrote:


> I know...and men shouldn't do it either, just to prevent a law suit.


So birth control is all down to the woman then? Both myself and my 
partner don't like bits of rubber, from the feel or the messing about.

-- 
Cheers                                              new5pam@howhill.com
Dave.                                             pam is missing e-mail

"Dave Liquorice"  wrote in message
news:nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.igppce2.pminews@news.howhill.com...

> On Wed, 18 May 2005 16:17:55 +0200, The Traveller wrote:
>
> > I know...and men shouldn't do it either, just to prevent a law suit.
>
> So birth control is all down to the woman then?


Yes. Absolutely. No doubt about it.

Both myself and my

> partner don't like bits of rubber, from the feel or the messing about.
>
> --
> Cheers                                              new5pam@howhill.com
> Dave.                                             pam is missing e-mail


Lol : You could try putting a knot in it.

Edith.