Bike Security?
Now that summer is nearly here and a few of us will be taking to the
roads and byways on our pushbikes for a welcome drink, I think it would
be an advantage for pubs to make the security of bikes on their premises
more readily available.
Agreed, there is often a post/railing available, but not always.
Maybe the Good Beer Guide should feature a symbol for pubs that offer
bike security?
Date:Tue, 3 May 2005 09:23:04 +0000 (UTC)
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
Saxman wrote:
>
> Maybe the Good Beer Guide should feature a symbol for pubs that offer
> bike security?
and pork scratchings
and useful walks nearby
and for stocking belgian beer
and ...
--
Brett
Date:Tue, 3 May 2005 21:04:11 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
Brett... wrote:
> Saxman wrote:
>
>>Maybe the Good Beer Guide should feature a symbol for pubs that offer
>>bike security?
>
>
> and pork scratchings
> and useful walks nearby
> and for stocking belgian beer
> and ...
>
The GBG states whether there's a car park, railway and underground
stations, but bikes don't matter as a form of transport?
Date:Tue, 3 May 2005 20:18:01 +0000 (UTC)
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
"Brett..." wrote:
>
> Saxman wrote:
> >
> > Maybe the Good Beer Guide should feature a symbol for pubs that offer
> > bike security?
>
> and pork scratchings
> and useful walks nearby
> and for stocking belgian beer
> and ...
If only ;-)
Then I might go back to buying a copy each year instead of alternating
with other more comprehensive guides.
John B
Date:Tue, 03 May 2005 23:53:04 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
"JohnB" wrote
>>
>> and pork scratchings
>> and useful walks nearby
>> and for stocking belgian beer
>> and ...
>
> If only ;-)
> Then I might go back to buying a copy each year instead of alternating
> with other more comprehensive guides.
>
> John B
Unfortunately you appear to be in the minority as feedback from purchasers
suggest less and not more symbols for the guide.
There was a motion at the recent national AGM on this.
Rob Shanks
Date:Wed, 4 May 2005 10:27:42 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
"Saxman" wrote in message
news:d57fto$8t7$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
> Now that summer is nearly here and a few of us will be taking to the roads
> and byways on our pushbikes for a welcome drink, I think it would be an
> advantage for pubs to make the security of bikes on their premises more
> readily available.
Get a "pub bike" that you won't miss if it gets nicked - if anyone can be
bothered to steal it in the first place.
--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net
Date:Wed, 4 May 2005 13:28:12 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
Saxman wrote:
> Brett... wrote:
>> Saxman wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe the Good Beer Guide should feature a symbol for pubs that
>>> offer bike security?
>>
>>
>> and pork scratchings
>> and useful walks nearby
>> and for stocking belgian beer
>> and ...
>>
>
> The GBG states whether there's a car park, railway and underground
> stations, but bikes don't matter as a form of transport?
It is more a case of practicalities, you can't put in everyone's favourite
symbol.
--
Brett
Date:Wed, 4 May 2005 16:15:31 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
Brett... wrote:
> It is more a case of practicalities, you can't put in everyone's favourite
> symbol.
>
Do you think the 'Oversized lined pint glasses' symbol is really
necessary, plus a few others?
Date:Wed, 4 May 2005 15:56:03 +0000 (UTC)
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
In article <d5araj$jm2$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>, Saxman
wrote:
> Brett... wrote:
> > It is more a case of practicalities, you can't put in everyone's
> > favourite symbol.
> >
> Do you think the 'Oversized lined pint glasses' symbol is really
> necessary, plus a few others?
Hey Brett, this is rather like being back in the debating hall at
Glasgow... :-)
--
Steve Pampling
Date:Wed, 04 May 2005 18:41:39 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
Rob Shanks wrote:
>
> "JohnB" wrote
> >>
> >> and pork scratchings
> >> and useful walks nearby
> >> and for stocking belgian beer
> >> and ...
> >
> > If only ;-)
> > Then I might go back to buying a copy each year instead of alternating
> > with other more comprehensive guides.
> >
> > John B
>
> Unfortunately you appear to be in the minority as feedback from purchasers
> suggest less and not more symbols for the guide.
Not according to the publishers I have been working for.
More information is being requested by readers.
> There was a motion at the recent national AGM on this.
What 'national AGM' is this then?
John B
Date:Wed, 04 May 2005 20:22:32 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
JohnB a crit :
>What 'national AGM' is this then?
>
>
Which could it be, considering the current debate is about additional
symbols in one certain organisation's "Good Beer Guide" ?
:o>
--
Warning : you may encounter French language beyond this point.
- Ben ? Qu'est-ce qu'elles font toutes l en tas ?
- 'Font gouzi-gouzi avec carotte...
(F'murrr)
Laurent Mousson, Berne, Switzerland
Date:Wed, 04 May 2005 21:55:07 +0200
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
The Submarine Captain wrote:
>
> JohnB a crit :
>
> >What 'national AGM' is this then?
> >
> Which could it be, considering the current debate is about additional
> symbols in one certain organisation's "Good Beer Guide" ?
> :o>
Dunno ;-)
Some sort of national forum set up by the Millenium Party?
John B
Date:Wed, 04 May 2005 21:07:07 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
"JohnB" wrote to reply to
>> Unfortunately you appear to be in the minority as feedback from
>> purchasers
>> suggest less and not more symbols for the guide.
>
> Not according to the publishers I have been working for.
> More information is being requested by readers.
>
Quite correct, but feedback suggest they would rather see this in written
form in the description apparently. Symbols require constant turning back to
look them up on another page making them not as popular.
BTW I'm not particularly bothered about them but we have to remember that
quite a proportion of the purchasers of the GBG are not CAMRA members or
even cask ale drinkers and so are not always aware of the reasons for the
symbols especially so when there are loads of them......
Rob
Date:Thu, 5 May 2005 00:02:55 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Bike Security?
Saxman wrote:
> Brett... wrote:
>
>> It is more a case of practicalities, you can't put in everyone's
>> favourite symbol.
>>
>
> Do you think the 'Oversized lined pint glasses' symbol is really
> necessary, plus a few others?
No I don't.
--
Brett
Date:Thu, 5 May 2005 16:09:46 +0100
Author:
|