THIS ITEM IS POSTED FOR AND IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC INTEREST.

Law dating from ancient times is that where someone in authority whose 
duty it is to protect the citizens who employ them and they then fail or 
refuse to do that, are deemed as being guilty of such crimes against 
humanity as if they had committed the crimes themselves.

Prime Minister Tony Blair and and former Home Secretary David Blunkett 
have ignored the murder attempts made on Maurice Kellett. They are thus 
deemed guilty of  his attempted murder. Blair is also deemed guilty of 
murder in the Iraq war matter where hundreds of thousands of innocent 
lives have been lost as a result of his lies and connection with George 
Bush. The UK public are and will continue to pay the price for Blair and 
Bush's crimes.

Whistleblower.

-----------------------------

Subject: The Real Tony Blair

From: "Maurice Kellett" 

Newsgroups: uk.local.county-durham

THE REAL TONY BLAIR.

COPY OF Fax Letter SENT TO BLAIR WHICH LIKE OTHER SUCH LETTERS HAS BEEN

IGNORED BY 10 DOWNING STREET.

_______________________

The Prime Minister

Mr Tony Blair

10 Downing Street

London SW1A 2AA

10th February 2004.

Dear Mr Prime Minister

The statements that I make herein are true to the best of my knowledge 
and belief.

First I accept that those members of staff employed at 10 Downing Street 
are authorised to reply on your behalf to letters which members of the 
public have sent to you. I add that there are obvious consequences 
arising from this fact.

I am disgusted at the recent reply which I recently received from the 
Home Office which was in response to my latest letter which I sent to 
you giving notice dated 2nd December 2003 and one sent to you the 11th 
November 2003.

Those letters also detailed the murder attempt made on me by Special 
Squad police officers on the night of 4/5th February 2003. That matter 
along with the catalogue by what is without doubt an Establishment 
Masonic Mafia, has been reported to you on several occasions. It 
continues to be ignored and deceit is being used by Downing Street and 
The Home Office as an apparent ploy to cover up what has been carried 
out against me. The latter being more substantial since I contributed to 
the Nolan Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary in 
1996. The Home Office wrote that they have referred the matters that I 
reported to you to the same police force which I reported to you as 
having been involved in extensive use of serious crime against me, where 
in addition, two of its Special Squad officers had attempted to murder 
me by stabbing on the night of 4/5th February last  year. The recent 
Home Office letter does however serve to confirm that the UK indeed does 
not have any independent or impartial tribunals or authorities, which as 
you will know, are required under the European Human Rights Convention. 
That remains as a gross breach of my rights as a European Citizen.

The facts arising from this breach of my rights has caused me very 
serious damage and it was for that reason that I am claiming damages 
from you by your failure to set in motion the necessary mechanism for 
the establishment of such independent or impartial tribunals or 
authorities. The cost of those very substantial damages to me remains 
and continues to increase. Given that you continue to allow this 
situation, and it would appear from facts, that you are also ignoring 
the murder attempt made on me on the night of 4th/5th February last year 
when my home was unlawfully seized following a catalogue of judicial and 
other crime to bring about that situation, those damages are to be 
increased in an upward direction. Those two potential police murderers 
remain at large. I refuse to believe that the decision to murder me was 
made on the spot by those two police officers. Clearly that decision had 
been made by a higher level of authority and those persons also remain 
at large. Just how high in the chain of authority that decision to 
murder me might well be answered by an independent public inquiry. You 
continue to ignore my demand for this.

I state again to you that following my receipt of a letter sent to me by 
Mr Matt Dowding who was writing on your behalf from Downing Street a 
letter dated January 16, 2003, my home came under an illegal police 
siege. At around that same period of time I had been publishing 
correspondence that I received from your friend Mr Fraser Kemp MP, which 
confirmed that there are no authorities in the UK who will act on 
matters of judicial crime. You will know Mr Prime Minister that the UK 
judiciary have no public accountability whatsoever and that includes the 
use of blatant crimes used by the criminal factors employed within the 
judiciary. The judiciary have no public accountability whatsoever as has 
been shown and proved by that correspondence which I received from Mr 
Fraser Kemp MP. He had provided a dossier of evidence backing up my 
claims of Establishment crime to the Home Office, The Lord Chancellors 
Department, The Attorney General and the Parliamentary Commissioner, all 
who would not take the responsibility to act on it as Public Duty surely 
requires? Is it therefore justice for members of the public to be 
accountable to the judiciary while this state of affairs continues? Can 
any country be a democracy while this situation continues to be 
tolerated? We do have terrorists employed within the UK Establishment 
many clearly stemming from Freemasonry. They are shown to be well 
capable of carrying out serious crimes which also include murder as was 
attempted against me. Those same corrupt Establishment criminal elements 
are also attempting to cover up that murder attempt along with the 
catalogue of crime that has been used against me. I would find it 
difficult to accept that you are not aware of these facts and that 
Freemasonry is not just an innocent old boys network. I would agree that 
the rank and file members of Freemasonry know little of what the agenda 
of the higher ranks of Freemasonry is. That a Masonic Mafia exists in 
this country there is no doubt.

I had been in contact with Lord Nolan from 1996 to 1998. I had 
contributed to the Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into 
Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary headed by Lord Nolan which I 
think now public contribution to it should have been included in it a 
government health warning. I firmly believe that Inquiry covered up the 
facts of the Masonic influence/control of the judiciary which also 
exists within the justice system generally. My concerns that judges at 
the Durham and Newcastle County Courts were possibly or more probably 
Freemasons was ignored as being irrelevant by them. Lords Bingham and 
Woolf along with the Court Service also maintained that my concerns 
regarding Masonic influence in what was the blatant judicial and other 
crime being used against me at the Durham and Newcastle County Courts 
had no relevance. They were of course all wrong about that matter. That 
fact is proved under the ruling made in, The Social Security 
Commissioners Case No. CSI/136/02. The official ruling under the latter 
case was provided as evidence in my appeal for the possession of my home 
held on Thursday 30th January 2003 at the Teeside County Court. That 
court had previously wrongly ruled on the 20th January 2003 that my 
concerns at Masonic influence in my cases had no relevance. The judge at 
the 30th January 2003 hearing was provided with an official copy of that 
ruling and expressed surprise about it. I then took ill and the judge 
immediately adjourned the hearing when an ambulance was called and I was 
taken to hospital.

I was never informed, when it seems that what was in the circumstances, 
an illegal court hearing, that took place on the following Monday of 3rd 
February. It was illegal by reason that I was not informed of it and 
neither had the requisite two full working days notice of such hearing 
had been served on me. As far as I am concerned, that adjourned hearing 
of the 30th of January 1993 which I have referred to above remains as 
adjourned. All consequences that I have reported to you following that 
adjourned court hearing are also in the circumstances deemed to have 
also been illegal.

My appeal made on the 30th January at the Teesside County Court, if 
justice had really been its intent, had been successful on the grounds 
that by ignoring my concerns about possible Masonic influence in my 
case, there had been in fact been a breach of Article 6(1) of the 
European Human Rights Convention. That is verified in ruling under the 
Social Security Commissioners case as mentioned above. It seems that 
someone did not wish that ruling to prove my appeal case so ignored it. 
At the hearing of the 30th January 2003 at Teesside County Court I also 
served on the court and the opposing side the necessary protocols for my 
application for Judicial Review. That too was ignored by the courts I 
have named to you. That was further proof that other parties, and I 
believe were Masons or those doing their bidding, had decided that 
injustice would be the outcome for me which ever way that I proceeded. 
Immediately after that illegal court hearing of Monday 3rd January 2003 
police then watched as a bailiff tried to force entry to my home. That 
was again an illegal act which along with the other facts and names of 
Establishment criminals that I have detailed to you, was the reason why 
I would not give up my home. Several weeks later Baroness Scotland 
Parliamentary Spokesperson to the Home Office, proposed a law to make 
forced entry to a persons home lawful. Forced entry to a home by a 
bailiff in such circumstances still remains unlawful even if the 
bankruptcy engineered for me by none other than judicial and other 
criminals that I have named to you had not been used against me. The 
revenge carried out against me for opposing very corrupt elements of 
Freemasonry has proved that they are able to do it with the help/co-
operation of what clearly is none other than other Masonic Establishment 
criminals.

That some of our courts are being ruled by none other than criminals 
where they make up their own illegal laws as they proceed is also proved 
by the above facts. That the opposing party in my cases had been allowed 
very material perjury and had been assisted with the use of serious 
crime used against me by a solicitor then practising from Durham that I 
have previously named to you, has all been allowed by what are none 
other than Establishment criminals being paid from the public purse to 
do that.

I, like others that I am aware of, have found that The Office For the 
Supervision of Solicitors is also covering up for criminal acts being 
carried on by some solicitors. Like the Police Complaints Authority, 
they simply fail to acknowledge letters sent to them when they contain 
facts of Establishment crime that can be proved by evidence. Is this 
really the fairer Britain of your 1997 pre-election promise?

On the first evening of that siege of my home I was made aware that 
police had intended to shoot me when to opportunity arose. That fact was 
made clear to me by a woman police officer negotiator named to me as Jo 
at the scene. Had she not given me an urgent warning to stay away from 
the window of my home, then I most certainly would have been shot dead. 
It is a known fact that alleged police marksmen know only how to shoot 
to kill and not wound to disable. On the third evening of the siege, 
Special Squad police officers battered down the door of my home in the 
early hours of the morning and then handcuffed me. Several other Special 
Squad police officers stood on the lower stairs and watched as those two 
officers started to push my abdomen down onto a sword while making 
noises clearly to help co-ordinate the pressure they were exerting on 
each of my shoulders while the sword was penetrating my abdomen. One of 
those other officers dragged me away from his colleagues when I seems he 
did not wish to be part of murder. It would seem from my own case that 
UK police murder squads are now also a reality.

According to newspaper reports even C.S. Gas had also been intended to 
be used against me.

I am aware that the generally speaking, the whole UK Establishment is 
infested with members of Freemasonry. That also being very applicable to 
our justice system. I have previously demanded from you a full 
independent public inquiry into my case which would also prove this 
fact. You continue to ignore that demand. I am of course fully aware 
that such inquiry would show that UK Freemasonry does have considerable 
influence/control within the justice system. I am further concerned that 
I have been informed that the Queen is the Patron Head of UK 
Freemasonry, the Duke of Edinburgh is a Mason and that the Prince of 
Wales has quite recently become a Mason. Amongst your pre-1997 election 
promises was the matter of dealing with what was even then, public 
concerns regarding Freemasonry. It seems that now you believe that 
Freemasonry is not a secret society but a society with secrets. Both 
statements are in fact true. As a former Hetton-le-Hole Town Councillor 
I became aware of the power of Freemasonry within local government. I 
was already aware of its influence/control of the judiciary and its 
ability to conduct illegal court hearings. Mr Fraser Kemp MP was also 
informed what happened to me when I was prevented from leaving the 
Hetton Town Council Chambers and was then assaulted in full view of most 
of the Council after I protested at certain Councillors, two of them 
Masons, in failing to declare an interest in the matter of land that had 
come up for Council discussion for housing proposals for discussion on 
housing proposals. I wonder was it just coincidence when the owner of 
that land who agreed that he was a mason, asked if I owned my own home. 
It was clear that what he was implying was that unless I kept quiet 
about the matter mentioned above, then I would lose my home. No Mr Prime 
Minister, this is the way Freemasonry works. I have learned that the 
hard way. That incident alone showed just how much fear is held by even 
persons within authority if crossing Freemasons. Mr Kemp MP also ignored 
that matter when police refused to act on it.

Downing Street has also written to me that the judiciary are independent 
of the government. The Lord Chancellor as head of the judiciary is an 
unelected member of the Cabinet and therefore is part of the government. 
Can you explain under these same circumstances how the judiciary can be 
independent of the government?

I have been given information which if true, suggests that you might 
also be a member of Freemasonry. If you are in fact one, then I cannot 
consider you to be impartial or independent to what I have reported to 
you over the years since 1997. Would you wish to comment on this?

The Norwegian government implemented a law which makes the registration 
of extra judicial activities compulsory from November 2002. That might 
also be a reasonable start in the UK along with an independent authority 
who will look into all allegations of crime used by members of the 
judiciary. It does appear Mr Prime Minister that at present we have 
another ruling government that is not accountable even for its use of 
crime as my and many other cases can show. That government is clearly 
the judiciary who I would term as the other government which has become 
a power accountable to no one. The affects of this present situation are 
probably far more serious that most might at first imagine. That same 
situation also casts grave doubt on the democracy of the UK.

I again demand from you an independent public inquiry into my case. It 
is my contention that as a mass of blatant judicial and other crime has 
been used to take my home and land from me, along with around seventeen 
thousand pounds worth of my personal possessions, then it would be 
appropriate to carry out acts which could include lawfuam aware that I 
remain at risk of being murdered should I attempt to carry out such a 
lawful act. It seems however that I live with that same risk everyday 
anyway regardless for the reasons that you are now again aware of. Mr 
Prime Minister, the Hell that these criminals that I have named to you 
now lives with me every single day and a conscience that justice must 
endure is indeed a hard taskmaster.

Maurice Kellett.

Address withheld for the purposes of this posting only.

The Real Mr Blair

Copy of fax to Prime Minister and hypocrite Mr Mr Tony Blair who 
continues to ignore the matters copied below. Blair is a known member of 
the Freemasons which is probably the worlds leading Secret Society and 
cult. Queen Elizabeth II is UK Patron Head of it. Other prominent 
members of the Royal Family are and were members of Freemasonry. One of 
them is the present day Duke of Kent who is the UK Grand Master of 
Freemasonry. The person who gave me that information that Blair is a 
mason has disappeared but until I know for sure what has happened to him 
I will make no further statements about this matter. I can only write 
here that the man was often close to Blair.

It has now come to light following my recent stay there that Cumberland 
Hospital in Carlisle was built using money from Freemasonry. It appears 
from further information coming to light that Dryburn Hospital at 
Durham, another Trust Hospital like Cumberland, may also have been built 
around the same recent period of time using Masonic money. Blair opened 
both of these hospital. Being a Freemason I suppose that it would be 
expected that he would. Those who have stayed in Cumberland Hospital 
like myself, know the huge cost involved in making a phone call from 
that hospital and even to watching TV. The meals are often of starvation 
diet quantity. Its also clear now that the profits from that hospital 
are being ploughed back into Masonic funds. Trust Hospitals charge the 
NHS for the patients they treat. In my recent stay at Cumberland 
Hospital, some members of staff also told me that most, if not all of 
the hospitals doctors working at the Cumberland Hospital are known to be 
Freemasons. Dr Harold Harold Shipman the mass murderer, was also a 
Freemason. I think it clear that his murders were probably covered up 
with the assistance of other doctors who were probably also Freemasons.

Freemasonry within the medical profession as a whole has been a known 
problem to myself and many other people, including some doctors for a 
long period of time. I have obtained evidence that my medical records at 
Cumberland Hospital have been falsified. In early April I was first 
admitted to Cumberland Hospital in early April 2003 after the 
Northumbria Police Special Squad attempts to murder me at my home at 16A 
The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear DH5 0HT in Early February 2003. As 
a former Town Councillor under New Labour, I can write with all 
sincerity that New Labour may also be referred to now as New 
Conservative.

The Chief Constable of Northumbria  (now recently retired) is a known 
member of the Freemasons as was his predecessor John Stevens, now London 
Metropolitan Police Chief.

Freemasonry rules the UK and the more that I have been active in 
exposing Freemasonry for what it all too often really is, the more that 
I am absolutely convinced of this fact.

http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com

LATEST:

All UK Judges and magistrates swear an oath of fairness to all manner of 
men, to Queen Elizabeth II who is now a multi-billionaire and said to be 
the richest woman in the world. No man (or woman) can become rich 
without making their fellow mankind that same amount poorer! There are a 
number of questions arising from this which should be obvious to most 
people. Wealth has always meant power and this is a clue to my 
statement. This oath (Judicial Oath) is shown and proved time and time 
again to be a fraud. Queen Elizabeth II, Patron Head of UK Freemasonry, 
a very Secret Society, is therefore clearly involved in this fraud which 
is of massive proportions. All UK authorities, police, courts etc. 
operate under the authority of the Crown (Queen Elizabeth II). These 
authorities cannot be considered in these circumstances as being 
impartial or independent in any matters where Freemasonry has or might 
have had an involvement. This is backed up by Article 6(1) of the 
European Human Rights Convention. Britain continues to live under a 
hypocrisy and massive lie. 

All Members of Parliament also swear such similar oath to Queen 
Elizabeth II and not to the people of the UK. That the United Kingdom is 
a democracy in these circumstances would probably be laughable if the 
circumstances were not so serious.   

Maurice Kellett

bliarblair@yahoo.com

mauricekellett@onetel.com 





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----