Vote for the Corporate ....er Conservative Party

  As we have now entered the unedifying and tedious spectacle that is
the pre-election scramble for votes. I would just to remind you that
if you were thinking of voting Conservative the business, economic
landscape has changed and their basic philosophy, to take care of the
those in business (or the rich and powerful), letting them make as
much money as they can in as free environment as possible so they will
create the wealth that will create the jobs that we need to live, is
being directly affected by these changes.
  And just in case you've been on another planet this new business
world is a global corporate affair whose allegiances are to no one but
themselves. And so the profits can be invested into any country and
the jobs go to who is prepared to work for the lowest wages which as
we all know as usual is the third world. So if you're thinking what
I'm thinking and that if you're going to vote for the conservatives
the question is  Where do their loyalties lie ? To the Multi National
Corporations or the UK ?
  Now I can see an obvious objection here which is that the
Conservatives in this new climate will genuinely and obviously, fight
for the interests of the UK. But what I suspect we'd eventually end up
with, is an industrial and economic tyranny enforced by these
corporations and the Conservatives playing lip service to idea that
they care about the UK. And that means looking after themselves and
other rich people whilst selling out the poor to the lowest bidder and
telling them they must be glad of the titbits thrown their way.
  Politicians of all persuasions have a pretty poor reputation and you
have to be a pretty naive sort of person to believe that the average
Conservative MP isn't going to chase power and money. It's what
they've always done, but historically the Conservative / Business
partnership brought home the bacon for the country, it was also
tempered by a belief in the British Class system and a sense that
these actions were the best for the common good. But all that's gone
now, swept away by technological and social changes that have changed
society irrevocably leaving the Conservatives with no clear, relevant
Political position in these times.
  I'd like to reinforce the thrust of this post by pointing out the
sleaze associated with the last Conservative government was no
accident. They were following the prevailing wind and were asset
stripping the UK because it was a lost cause and were also
demonstrating their allegiance to the new rulers. So don't be fooled
by all these immigration and policing issues it's just a desperate
smokescreen, for they are resorting to playing on people's fears and
prejudices to hide the fact that on the core Business / Economy
aspects of right wing philosophy, the Conservatives are in trouble.
   So OK you may be pretty dismayed by the Labour lot but my view is
that if the wolves are surrounding your village I would suggest that
the party that at least has a tradition and a philosophy that is
supposed to be protecting the villagers from the wolves is preferable
in these present times .....or you could do something radical and vote
Liberal.
Clive

Law dating from ancient times is that where someone in authority whose duty 
it is to protect the citizens who employ them and they fail or refuse to do 
that, they are deemed as being guilty of such crimes against humanity as if 
they had committed the crimes themselves.

Prime Minister Tony Blair and and former Home Secretary David Blunkett have 
ignored the murder attempts made on Maurice Kellett. They are thus deemed 
guilty of the attempted murder of Maurice Kellett. Blair is deemed guily of 
murder in the Iraq war matter where hundreds of thousands of innocent lives 
have been lost as a result of his lies and connection with George Bush. The 
UK public are and will continue to pay the price for Blair and Bush's 
crimes.

Whistleblower.



Subject: The Real Tony Blair

From: "Maurice Kellett" 

Newsgroups: uk.local.county-durham

THE REAL TONY BLAIR.

COPY OF Fax Letter SENT TO BLAIR WHICH LIKE OTHER SUCH LETTERS HAS BEEN

IGNORED BY 10

DOWNING STREET.

_______________________

The Prime Minister

Mr Tony Blair

10 Downing Street

London SW1A 2AA

10th February 2004.

Dear Mr Prime Minister

The statements that I make herein are true to the best of my knowledge and

belief.

First I accept that those members of staff employed at 10 Downing Street are

authorised to reply on your behalf to letters which members of the public

have sent to you. I add that there are obvious consequences arising from

this fact.

I am disgusted at the recent reply which I recently received from the Home

Office which was in response to my latest letter which I sent to you giving

notice dated 2nd December 2003 and one sent to you the 11th November 2003.

Those letters also detailed the murder attempt made on me by Special Squad

police officers on the night of 4/5th February 2003. That matter along with

the catalogue by what is without doubt an Establishment Masonic Mafia, has

been reported to you on several occasions. It continues to be ignored and

deceit is being used by Downing Street and The Home Office as an apparent

ploy to cover up what has been carried out against me. The latter being more

substantial since I contributed to the Nolan Inquiry into Freemasonry within

the Police and Judiciary in 1996. The Home Office wrote that they have

referred the matters that I reported to you to the same police force which I

reported to you as having been involved in extensive use of serious crime

against me, where in addition, two of its Special Squad officers had

attempted to murder me by stabbing on the night of 4/5th February last

year.. The recent Home Office letter does however serve to confirm that the

UK indeed does not have any independent or impartial tribunals or

authorities, which as you will know, are required under the European Human

Rights Convention. That remains as a gross breach of my rights as a European

Citizen.

The facts arising from this breach of my rights has caused me very serious

damage and it was for that reason that I am claiming damages from you by

your failure to set in motion the necessary mechanism for the establishment

of such independent or impartial tribunals or authorities. The cost of those

very substantial damages to me remains and continues to increase. Given that

you continue to allow this situation, and it would appear from facts, that

you are also ignoring the murder attempt made on me on the night of 4th/5th

February last year when my home was unlawfully seized following a catalogue

of judicial and other crime to bring about that situation, those damages are

to be increased in an upward direction. Those two potential police murderers

remain at large. I refuse to believe that the decision to murder me was made

on the spot by those two police officers. Clearly that decision had been

made by a higher level of authority and those persons also remain at large.

Just how high in the chain of authority that decision to murder me might

well be answered by an independent public inquiry. You continue to ignore my

demand for this.

I state again to you that following my receipt of a letter sent to me by Mr

Matt Dowding who was writing on your behalf from Downing Street a letter

dated January 16, 2003, my home came under an illegal police siege. At

around that same period of time I had been publishing correspondence that I

received from your friend Mr Fraser Kemp MP, which confirmed that there are

no authorities in the UK who will act on matters of judicial crime. You will

know Mr Prime Minister that the UK judiciary have no public accountability

whatsoever and that includes the use of blatant crimes used by the criminal

factors employed within the judiciary. The judiciary have no public

accountability whatsoever as has been shown and proved by that

correspondence which I received from Mr Fraser Kemp MP. He had provided a

dossier of evidence backing up my claims of Establishment crime to the Home

Office, The Lord Chancellors Department, The Attorney General and the

Parliamentary Commissioner, all who would not take the responsibility to act

on it as Public Duty surely requires? Is it therefore justice for members of

the public to be accountable to the judiciary while this state of affairs

continues? Can any country be a democracy while this situation continues to

be tolerated? We do have terrorists employed within the UK Establishment

many clearly stemming from Freemasonry. They are shown to be well capable of

carrying out serious crimes which also include murder as was attempted

against me. Those same corrupt Establishment criminal elements are also

attempting to cover up that murder attempt along with the catalogue of crime

that has been used against me. I would find it difficult to accept that you

are not aware of these facts and that Freemasonry is not just an innocent

old boys network. I would agree that the rank and file members of

Freemasonry know little of what the agenda of the higher ranks of

Freemasonry is. That a Masonic Mafia exists in this country there is no

doubt.

I had been in contact with Lord Nolan from 1996 to 1998. I had contributed

to the Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the

Police and Judiciary headed by Lord Nolan which I think now public

contribution to it should have been included in it a government health

warning. I firmly believe that Inquiry covered up the facts of the Masonic

influence/control of the judiciary which also exists within the justice

system generally. My concerns that judges at the Durham and Newcastle County

Courts were possibly or more probably Freemasons was ignored as being

irrelevant by them. Lords Bingham and Woolf along with the Court Service

also maintained that my concerns regarding Masonic influence in what was the

blatant judicial and other crime being used against me at the Durham and

Newcastle County Courts had no relevance. They were of course all wrong

about that matter. That fact is proved under the ruling made in, The Social

Security Commissioners Case No. CSI/136/02. The official ruling under the

latter case was provided as evidence in my appeal for the possession of my

home held on Thursday 30th January 2003 at the Teeside County Court. That

court had previously wrongly ruled on the 20th January 2003 that my concerns

at Masonic influence in my cases had no relevance. The judge at the 30th

January 2003 hearing was provided with an official copy of that ruling and

expressed surprise about it. I then took ill and the judge immediately

adjourned the hearing when an ambulance was called and I was taken to

hospital.

I was never informed, when it seems that what was in the circumstances, an

illegal court hearing, that took place on the following Monday of 3rd

February. It was illegal by reason that I was not informed of it and neither

had the requisite two full working days notice of such hearing had been

served on me. As far as I am concerned, that adjourned hearing of the 30th

of January 1993 which I have referred to above remains as adjourned. All

consequences that I have reported to you following that adjourned court

hearing are also in the circumstances deemed to have also been illegal.

My appeal made on the 30th January at the Teesside County Court, if justice

had really been its intent, had been successful on the grounds that by

ignoring my concerns about possible Masonic influence in my case, there had

been in fact been a breach of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights

Convention. That is verified in ruling under the Social Security

Commissioners case as mentioned above. It seems that someone did not wish

that ruling to prove my appeal case so ignored it. At the hearing of the

30th January 2003 at Teesside County Court I also served on the court and

the opposing side the necessary protocols for my application for Judicial

Review. That too was ignored by the courts I have named to you. That was

further proof that other parties, and I believe were Masons or those doing

their bidding, had decided that injustice would be the outcome for me which

ever way that I proceeded. Immediately after that illegal court hearing of

Monday 3rd January 2003 police then watched as a bailiff tried to force

entry to my home. That was again an illegal act which along with the other

facts and names of Establishment criminals that I have detailed to you, was

the reason why I would not give up my home. Several weeks later Baroness

Scotland Parliamentary Spokesperson to the Home Office, proposed a law to

make forced entry to a persons home lawful. Forced entry to a home by a

bailiff in such circumstances still remains unlawful even if the bankruptcy

engineered for me by none other than judicial and other criminals that I

have named to you had not been used against me. The revenge carried out

against me for opposing very corrupt elements of Freemasonry has proved that

they are able to do it with the help/co-operation of what clearly is none

other than other Masonic Establishment criminals.

That some of our courts are being ruled by none other than criminals where

they make up their own illegal laws as they proceed is also proved by the

above facts. That the opposing party in my cases had been allowed very

material perjury and had been assisted with the use of serious crime used

against me by a solicitor then practising from Durham that I have previously

named to you, has all been allowed by what are none other than Establishment

criminals being paid from the public purse to do that.

I, like others that I am aware of, have found that The Office For the

Supervision of Solicitors is also covering up for criminal acts being

carried on by some solicitors. Like the Police Complaints Authority, they

simply fail to acknowledge letters sent to them when they contain facts of

Establishment crime that can be proved by evidence. Is this really the

fairer Britain of your 1997 pre-election promise?

On the first evening of that siege of my home I was made aware that police

had intended to shoot me when to opportunity arose. That fact was made clear

to me by a woman police officer negotiator named to me as Jo at the scene.

Had she not given me an urgent warning to stay away from the window of my

home, then I most certainly would have been shot dead. It is a known fact

that alleged police marksmen know only how to shoot to kill and not wound to

disable. On the third evening of the siege, Special Squad police officers

battered down the door of my home in the early hours of the morning and then

handcuffed me. Several other Special Squad police officers stood on the

lower stairs and watched as those two officers started to push my abdomen

down onto a sword while making noises clearly to help co-ordinate the

pressure they were exerting on each of my shoulders while the sword was

penetrating my abdomen. One of those other officers dragged me away from his

colleagues when I seems he did not wish to be part of murder. It would seem

from my own case that UK police murder squads are now also a reality.

According to Newspaper reports even C.S. Gas had also been intended to be

used against me.

I am aware that the generally speaking, the whole UK Establishment is

infested with members of Freemasonry. That also being very applicable to our

justice system. I have previously demanded from you a full independent

public inquiry into my case which would also prove this fact. You continue

to ignore that demand. I am of course fully aware that such inquiry would

show that UK Freemasonry does have considerable influence/control within the

justice system. I am further concerned that I have been informed that the

Queen is the Patron Head of UK Freemasonry, the Duke of Edinburgh is a Mason

and that the Prince of Wales has quite recently become a Mason. Amongst your

pre-1997 election promises was the matter of dealing with what was even

then, public concerns regarding Freemasonry. It seems that now you believe

that Freemasonry is not a secret society but a society with secrets. Both

statements are in fact true. As a former Hetton-le-Hole Councillor I became

aware of the power of Freemasonry within local government. I was already

aware of its influence/control of the judiciary and its ability to conduct

illegal court hearings. Mr Fraser Kemp MP was also informed what happened to

me when I was prevented from leaving the Hetton Town Council Chambers and

was then assaulted in full view of most of the Council after I protested at

certain Councillors, two of them Masons, in failing to declare an interest

in the matter of land that had come up for Council discussion for housing

proposals for discussion on housing proposals. I wonder was it just

coincidence when the owner of that land who agreed that he was a mason,

asked if I owned my own home. It was clear that what he was implying was

that unless I kept quiet about the matter mentioned above, then I would lose

my home. No Mr Prime Minister, this is the way Freemasonry works. I have

learned that the hard way. That incident alone showed just how much fear is

held by even persons within authority if crossing Freemasons. Mr Kemp MP

also ignored that matter when police refused to act on it.

Downing Street has also written to me that the judiciary are independent of

the government. The Lord Chancellor as head of the judiciary is an unelected

member of the Cabinet and therefore is part of the government. Can you

explain under these same circumstances how the judiciary can be independent

of the government?

I have been given information which if true, suggests that you might also be

a member of Freemasonry. If you are in fact one, then I cannot consider you

to be impartial or independent to what I have reported to you over the years

since 1997. Would you wish to comment on this?

The Norwegian government implemented a law which makes the registration of

extra judicial activities compulsory from November 2002. That might also be

a reasonable start in the UK along with an independent authority who will

look into all allegations of crime used by members of the judiciary. It does

appear Mr Prime Minister that at present we have another ruling government

that is not accountable even for its use of crime as my and many other cases

can show. That government is clearly the judiciary who I would term as the

other government which has become a power accountable to no one. The affects

of this present situation are probably far more serious that most might at

first imagine. That same situation also casts grave doubt on the democracy

of the UK.

I again demand from you an independent public inquiry into my case. It is my

contention that as a mass of blatant judicial and other crime has been used

to take my home and land from me, along with around seventeen thousand

pounds worth of my personal possessions, then it would be appropriate to

carry out acts which could include lawfuam aware that I remain at risk of

being murdered should I attempt to carry out such a lawful act. It seems

however that I live with that same risk everyday anyway regardless for the

reasons that you are now again aware of. Mr Prime Minister, the Hell that

these criminals that I have named to you now lives with me every single day

and a conscience that justice must endure is indeed a hard taskmaster.

Maurice Kellett.

Address withheld for the purposes of this posting only.

The Real Mr Blair

Copy of fax to Prime Minister and hypocrite Mr Mr Tony Blair who continues

to ignore the matters copied below. Blair is a known member of the

Freemasons which is probably the worlds leading Secret Society and cult.

Queen Elizabeth II is UK Patron Head of it. Other prominent members of the

Royal Family are and were members of Freemasonry. One of them is the present

day Duke of Kent who is the UK Grand Master of Freemasonry. The person who

gave me that information that Blair is a mason has disappeared but until I

know for sure what has happened to him I will make no further statements

about this matter. I can only write here that the man was often close to

Blair.

It has now come to light following my recent stay there that Cumberland

Hospital in Carlisle was built using money from Freemasonry. It appears from

further information coming to light that Dryburn Hospital at Durham, another

Trust Hospital like Cumberland, may also have been built around the same

recent period of time using Masonic money. Blair opened both of these

hospital. Being a Freemason I suppose that it would be expected that he

would. Those who have stayed in Cumberland Hospital like myself, know the

huge cost involved in making a phone call from that hospital and even to

watching TV. The meals are often of starvation diet quantity. Its also clear

now that the profits from that hospital are being ploughed back into Masonic

funds. Trust Hospitals charge the NHS for the patients they treat. In my

recent stay at Cumberland Hospital, some members of staff also told me that

most, if not all of the hospitals doctors working at the Cumberland Hospital

are known to be Freemasons. Dr Harold Harold Shipman the mass murderer, was

also a Freemason. I think it clear that his murders were probably covered up

with the assistance of other doctors who were probably also Freemasons.

Freemasonry within the medical profession as a whole has been a known

problem to myself and many other people, including some doctors for a long

period of time. I have obtained evidence that my medical records at

Cumberland Hospital have been falsified. In early April I was first admitted

to Cumberland Hospital in early April 2003 after the Northumbria Police

Special Squad attempts to murder me at my home at 16A The Lyons,

Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear DH5 0HT in Early February 2003. As a former Town

Councillor under New Labour, I can write with all sincerity that New Labour

may also be referred to now as New Conservative.

The Chief Constable of Northumbria is a known member of the Freemasons as

was his predecessor John Stevens, now London Metropolitan Police Chief.

Freemasonry rules the UK and the more that I have been active in exposing

Freemasonry for what it all too often really is, the more that I am

absolutely convinced of this fact.

http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com

"Clive"  wrote in message 
news:418ab395.0504251049.5131c4e6@posting.google.com...

> Vote for the Corporate ....er Conservative Party
>
>  As we have now entered the unedifying and tedious spectacle that is
> the pre-election scramble for votes. I would just to remind you that
> if you were thinking of voting Conservative the business, economic
> landscape has changed and their basic philosophy, to take care of the
> those in business (or the rich and powerful), letting them make as
> much money as they can in as free environment as possible so they will
> create the wealth that will create the jobs that we need to live, is
> being directly affected by these changes.
>  And just in case you've been on another planet this new business
> world is a global corporate affair whose allegiances are to no one but
> themselves. And so the profits can be invested into any country and
> the jobs go to who is prepared to work for the lowest wages which as
> we all know as usual is the third world. So if you're thinking what
> I'm thinking and that if you're going to vote for the conservatives
> the question is  Where do their loyalties lie ? To the Multi National
> Corporations or the UK ?
>  Now I can see an obvious objection here which is that the
> Conservatives in this new climate will genuinely and obviously, fight
> for the interests of the UK. But what I suspect we'd eventually end up
> with, is an industrial and economic tyranny enforced by these
> corporations and the Conservatives playing lip service to idea that
> they care about the UK. And that means looking after themselves and
> other rich people whilst selling out the poor to the lowest bidder and
> telling them they must be glad of the titbits thrown their way.
>  Politicians of all persuasions have a pretty poor reputation and you
> have to be a pretty naive sort of person to believe that the average
> Conservative MP isn't going to chase power and money. It's what
> they've always done, but historically the Conservative / Business
> partnership brought home the bacon for the country, it was also
> tempered by a belief in the British Class system and a sense that
> these actions were the best for the common good. But all that's gone
> now, swept away by technological and social changes that have changed
> society irrevocably leaving the Conservatives with no clear, relevant
> Political position in these times.
>  I'd like to reinforce the thrust of this post by pointing out the
> sleaze associated with the last Conservative government was no
> accident. They were following the prevailing wind and were asset
> stripping the UK because it was a lost cause and were also
> demonstrating their allegiance to the new rulers. So don't be fooled
> by all these immigration and policing issues it's just a desperate
> smokescreen, for they are resorting to playing on people's fears and
> prejudices to hide the fact that on the core Business / Economy
> aspects of right wing philosophy, the Conservatives are in trouble.
>   So OK you may be pretty dismayed by the Labour lot but my view is
> that if the wolves are surrounding your village I would suggest that
> the party that at least has a tradition and a philosophy that is
> supposed to be protecting the villagers from the wolves is preferable
> in these present times .....or you could do something radical and vote
> Liberal.
> Clive