H.R.H. Queen Elisabeth II

Buckingham Palace

London.



20th March 2005.





Your Royal Highness I wrote to you around four years ago on the matter of 
whether you bear any responsibility to act when judges and magistrates 
breach their Judicial Oath of Fairness which is sworn by all UK judges and 
magistrates to you. The reply that I received to my letter to you came from 
the Lord Chancellors Department. It was confirmation that you will not act 
when the judicial Oath is breached by judges and magistrates. It also served 
as confirmation that the UK does not have any truly independent or impartial 
tribunals or authorities established by law for the resolution of our 
citizens criminal or civil rights. These independent or impartial tribunals 
or bodies are required under Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights 
Convention.  My own Durham and Newcastle County Court cases DH400950, 
DH400898 and NE01650 have shown and proved that the Judicial Oath is a fraud 
being carried on against the citizens of the UK nation. That Oath it is 
clear has no meaning to some or possibly even all UK judges.  Mr Fraser Kemp 
MP was asked to raise this matter by me in the House of Commons. His written 
reply to my request for that was that he is not permitted to raise issues in 
the House.



In February of 2003 Northumbria Police Special Squad officers attempted to 
shoot me after my home then at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, had 
come under what was an illegal Northumbria Police siege. My life was saved 
in that instance by a policewoman negotiator at the scene named to me as 
 "Jo".  Three nights later two of their Special Squad officers attempted to 
impale me on an ornamental sword that had decorated a room of my home. This 
latter murder attempt made on me was witnessed by at least another five or 
six of their colleagues and it was one of them who then saved my life. I was 
not armed as a threat to anyone else but myself and was then prepared to die 
as a final protest at the catalogue of crime that had been used against me 
to bring about my situation. I had contributed to the House of Commons Home 
affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and 
Judiciary and the price for doing that and my stand against Masonic crime 
which of which I was subject has cost me my thirty year marriage, two homes, 
land, finances, the death of my father and most of my personal possessions. 
I was afterwards left without even my bed to lie on.  Northumbria Police 
were heavily involved in these crimes used against me. I am aware that Mr C. 
Strachan, their present Chief Constable, a known member of Freemasonry, has 
been instrumental in allowing and assisting with these serious crimes. I 
give below a basic, but still quite lengthy summary of some of the crimes 
carried out against me by Northumbria Police and others.



I was a victim of another murder attempt in 1986 when I was battered and 
then struck by a car that was driven at me. I had unearthed land theft being 
carried on at the former British Coal Estates at Spennymoor, County Durham. 
It had a direct bearing to land that I had purchased from Durham County 
Council. There was a Masonic link with this land theft crime. The attempt on 
my life was then treated as being one of criminal assault. Two years ago a 
senior police officer told me that the matter should have been treated as 
one of the attempted murder of me. When the matter went to 
Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court, Tyne-Wear a single magistrate 
dismissed the case without it having been heard. It was verified afterwards 
by a police officer that the magistrate concerned in that matter had no 
qualifications to allow him to act alone. The Houghton le Spring Magistrates 
Court Manager, Mr Bavidge, and the Lord Chancellors Department were involved 
in covering up that matter. Northumbria Police have continued throughout the 
years since then to try to deceive me and have failed in their public duty 
to act on this matter along with a catalogue of other crime by them and 
others used against me since then.



The Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court proceedings in that matter had been 
illegal. I had reported it to Northumbria Police. The Chief Constable of 
Northumbria Police was at that time Mr. John Stevens, now Lord Stevens where 
no action whatsoever was taken on it by that force.



Myself, my wife and family later became subjects of a murder threat. The 
person who had made that threat repeated it to a Northumbria police officer. 
The officer agreed this fact. No action whatsoever was taken against the man 
who had made that threat.



In Durham County Court cases DH400950, DH400898, I was the plaintiff, and 
Newcastle County Court case NE401650 where I was the defendant. Material 
crime/misconduct was carried out against me by deputy District Judge Baird. 
He had previously heard and then refused my appeal against the judgement of 
District Judge Scott-Phillips in the matter of damage caused to our property 
following a vehicle collision with it. A Deputy District Judge is not 
allowed by law to hear any appeal let alone one from the higher court. The 
Durham County Court took no appropriate action on this matter. Instead they 
allowed Deputy District Judge Baird to cause me further damage by being the 
first judge to become involved in case NE401650 where he carried out further 
misconduct against me again causing me serious damage.



In 1996/7 I contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select 
Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary chaired 
by Lord Nolan.  That contribution was to show me that being public spirited 
was probably the greatest mistake of my life. Facts have shown throughout 
that Freemasonry does indeed rule or at the very least influence the UK 
police and judiciary.



In the matter of the Durham and Newcastle County Court cases DH400950, 
DH400898 and NE401650 District Judge Scott-Phillips denied that he had made 
an Order that I be allowed to visit the offices of solicitor Nancy Bone then 
practicing from Durham to take copies from my files in the above referenced 
cases. She had withheld them by lien from me. District Judge Scott-Phillips 
had claimed that my visit to the office of solicitor Bone only been done 
with her agreement. That was instrumental in defeating a Contempt of Court 
charge against Solicitor Bone. Later, when solicitor Bone was struck from 
the Register of Solicitors and the final hearing of the above referenced 
cases had taken place, I received documentary evidence where solicitor Bone 
also agreed that my visit to her offices had in fact been "by Order of the 
Court" and had  not been done with her permission.  In the event I was never 
able to obtain any of the material documentation that I required in the 
above cases which was a further contribution to the perversion of the course 
of justice in those cases.



Solicitor Mr Paul Graney, then practicing from Houghton-le-Spring, 
Tyne-Wear, (also since struck from the Register of Solicitors) admitted in 
his affidavit that the contents of his Statutory Declaration sworn in the 
matter of case NE401650 was materially untrue.  This matter was reported to 
Northumbria Police along with a copy of the affidavit sworn by solicitor Mr 
Paul Graney. Northumbria Police failed to take any appropriate action on 
that matter which again was a material contribution the perversion of the 
cause of justice in the above referenced cases.



In the matter of the above referenced cases, District Judge Cuthbertson 
sitting at the Durham and Sunderland County Courts heard my appeal against 
his own ruling. He had thus ruled illegally/improperly  ruled in his own 
cause.



In the matter of the above referenced cases, solicitor Alison Stott then 
practicing from Durham had been attending the Durham Newcastle County Courts 
since June of 1994 with my civil opponent, Miss Shirley Carr. It was 
believed by me that she was acting as Miss Carr's advocate. She was very 
instrumental in having me imprisoned at Durham under a Contempt of Court 
allegation in the matter of the above referenced cases. In January of 1996, 
solicitor Alison Stott declared to the Newcastle County Court, where 
recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding presided over that court, that in fact she 
had not been acting for Miss Carr but had only been assisting her as she 
declared that she had a good grasp of the situation of the cases. The 
recorders reply to solicitor Stott was, "You are either acting for Miss Carr 
or you are not?"  Solicitor Stott's reply to the recorder was, "Well I am 
now sir."  During the material times, solicitor Stott had taken on the work 
herself, without the authority of the Durham County Court, of preparing the 
judges bundles ready for trial. She then secretly passed on that work to 
litigant Miss Shirley Carr. Miss Carr then omitted material documents from 
the judge's bundles which in the circumstances I did not know the full 
extent of. On June 1st 1994, District Judge Scott-Phillips had made an Order 
at the Durham County Court refusing Miss Shirley Carr's application for 
consolidation of the three above referenced cases.



The bankruptcy claims made against me by Miss Shirley Carr following the 
perverse judgement of recorder John H Fryer-Spedding in the above referenced 
cases included full costs of solicitor Alison Stott throughout the duration 
of the cases from June 1994. That despite her declaration to the Newcastle 
County Court In January 1996 that she had not up to that time been acting 
for Miss Shirley Carr but had only been assisting her. She therefore had no 
entitlement to any costs for the material times. Her claim for costs for the 
full duration of the cases amounted to theft under the Theft Act.    Though 
I expressed my concern regarding this matter to District Judge Jones sitting 
at Durham County Court during the taxation of the cases, he failed to give 
that matter the importance which it warranted. Solicitor Stott had declared 
to the Newcastle County Court presided over by recorder  H. Fryer-Spedding 
in January of 1996 that she had not up until that time been acting for Miss 
Carr in the above case but had only been assisting her. Solicitor Stott's 
declaration referred to here was subject to affidavits sworn following it. 
Witnesses to solicitor Stott's declaration mentioned above, were Recorder 
John H Fryer-Spedding, my wife Joyce Kellett and solicitor Ms. Paula Tench. 
The material significance of solicitor Stott's declaration to the Newcastle 
County Court in January 1996 was never given the importance that it had 
required by the courts.



The above mentioned Durham County Court Order of June 1st 1994 was amongst 
those documents which Miss Carr had omitted from the judges bundle. The 
Durham County Court Order of June 1st 1994 was never appealed by Miss Carr 
and stood at the time of the final hearing of the above referenced cases 
DH400950, DH400898 and NE401650 still stood.  Recorder John H. 
Fryer-Spedding falsely alleged that the above cases had been consolidated 
and then unlawfully tried them as a consolidated action thus causing me very 
serious damage.



Miss Shirley Carr was represented in the final hearing of the above cases 
before recorder John H Fryer-Spedding at the Newcastle County Court in 
October 1996 by barrister Mr Richard Merritt. He had agreed that the above 
referenced cases had not in fact been subject of a consolidation Order under 
Miss Carr's sole case against me being NE401650.  Material documentary 
evidence is available to show this fact. He never raised any objection 
whatsoever when he was aware that the above cases were being unlawfully 
tried as a consolidated action under case number NE401650. As a barrister 
and is duty relative to that matter, he failed in his duty as an officer of 
the courts to make this fact known to the court.



Barrister Mr Richard Merritt also represented Miss Shirley Carr in my appeal 
against bankruptcy held at the London Appeal Court which followed and 
concerned the above referenced cases. He was well aware in the circumstances 
that the court presided over by recorder John H Fryer-Spedding had been 
illegal in the circumstances that I detail here. Again he never made any of 
the material facts known to that court showing that a solicitor or 
barristers obligations to our courts are also part of a fraud.



In the final hearing of the above referenced case before recorder John H. 
Fryer-Spedding, he went on with what amounted again to a catalogue of 
serious crimes that he used against me to pervert the cause of justice. This 
is evidenced by what he claimed to have seen and what he claimed not to have 
seen in the video and other evidence which I provided to the court for use 
in the above cases. My allegations against the recorder are also borne out 
by the recorders own approved transcript of judgement. Included in that was 
his agreement that it had been his intention to deprive me of my rights. His 
reason for his doing that was never mentioned. However his agreement in this 
matter alone amounted to his gross breach of my rights under Article 6(1) of 
the European Human Rights Convention. Included in his actions to pervert the 
cause of justice, recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding warned me not to draw to 
his attention the fact that Miss Carr had commenced to swear material 
perjury while I cross examined her in the witness box. He said to me that it 
was pointless me doing that. In the circumstances, I now know why it had 
been so pointless.



In the circumstances above, recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding ruled that I pay 
most of the costs of the above cases. The recorder's ruling at the Newcastle 
County Court in the above referenced cases and in the circumstances that I 
have written above, was the cause of my bankruptcy engineered from these 
crimes to defeat my prosecution and defence in the above cases.



My application for leave to appeal against the perverse ruling of recorder 
John H Fryer-Spedding was heard before Lord Justices Auld and Pill at the 
London Appeal Court. They refused my application. It was I think Lord Auld 
who argued at length that Freemasonry would not have been involved in my 
cases.  Indeed most of the short time that I was allowed to use in that 
application involved my concerns at probable Masonic influence in them. In 
the circumstances I wrote to Lords Auld and Pill asking if they would 
declare any membership of Freemasonry. Their reply which I received on their 
behalf was that they did not enter into correspondence with litigants who 
had been before them.



I appealed against the possession of my home at Hetton-le-Hole at the 
Middlesborough County Court shortly before Christmas 2002 made under the 
bankruptcy ruling made against me in the circumstances which I detail here. 
My appeal was heard by District Judge Mainwaring.  Durham County Court had 
transferred that matter to them after I made a damages claim against then 
for their part in the serious crimes which they had used against me. Durham 
County Court continues to fail to address my damages claim made against 
them. District Judge Mainwaring ruled in that appeal shortly before 
Christmas 2003 that my concerns at probable Masonic influence in my cases 
had no relevance. I had asked him to declare any membership of Freemasonry 
to me. He only claimed that he was not a Freemason when the proceedings had 
been concluded which in those circumstances had no relevance relative to my 
concerns about that matter.



On Thursday January 30th 2003 my appeal at the previous ruling of District 
Judge Mainwaring again took place at the Middlesborough County Court. I had 
supplied the judge in that matter, his name as yet unknown to me, with the 
case law ruling which was absolute proof that my concerns at Masonic 
involvement throughout my cases having been ignored by the courts throughout 
the duration of my above referenced cases, had in fact been gross violations 
of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. That judge 
expressed surprise to the court about it when he started to read it. I then 
felt ill and the Court Usher informed the judge of that. He immediately 
adjourned the case. My Appeal in that matter remains adjourned. The 
Middlesborough County Court still continues to ignore this material fact. I 
was taken to a hospital cardiac care ward when my Appeal against the 
possession of my home was adjourned.



On Monday 3rd February being around two working days later, a bailiff came 
to my home. He was accompanied by Northumbria police officers. Those police 
officers watched as the bailiff attempted to force an entry to my home. The 
law did not allow a bailiff to carry that out. A Bailiff was not allowed by 
law to force entry into any property in the course of his work. In protest 
at what was underway I doused myself in petrol and held an ornamental sword 
to my stomach that had decorated a room in my home.  I threatened to light a 
match to my clothing and fall on the sword as what I believed would have 
been my final protest at the mass of serious crime some of which I have 
mentioned above that had been used to bring about that situation.



Then the siege of my home at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, by Northumbria 
Police Special Squad officers commenced.  Water, electricity, gas and the 
telephone line to my house was cut off shortly afterwards. I required urgent 
medication for serious health problems, including insulin and was unable in 
the circumstances to take it.  I had no water to drink. On the third night 
of the police siege, Northumbria Police Special officers battered down the 
door to my home. As far I could see there were around seven or eight of 
them. I stood at the top of the stairs to my home plucking up courage to 
fall on the sword again as my final protest to the crimes that had brought 
about my situation. Two of those police officers then rushed up the stairs 
and handcuffed me. They left the sword wedged between the handcuffs. Another 
police office followed up the stairs and stopped around two steps from the 
top of them. The other two police officers took one each of my shoulders and 
then made noises as they were forcing my shoulders down pushing my abdomen 
onto the sword. I cried out in pain as the sword started to pierce my 
abdomen. The other police officer who stood near to the top of the stairs 
then took hold of the centre of the handcuffs that bound my wrists. He 
dragged me headlong down the stairs away from the other two police officers 
who were clearly attempting to murder me thus saving my life. He must also 
have dragged the sword away that had been wedged between the handcuffs that 
bound me. The murder attempt that was made on me was witnessed by around 
other four or five others of that Special Police Squad. It is now clear that 
they too have remained silent on this matter.



I was then taken to Washington, Tyne-Wear, police station under arrest. I 
reported the murder attempts made on me to the custody sergeant on duty 
there. He said reluctantly that he would include that matter in his report. 
It is now clear that Northumbria Police have totally ignored that very 
serious matter if indeed that Duty Sergeant had reported it to his senior 
authority.



Then I was taken to Sunderland Royal Hospital. I was at first refused any 
visitors until Northumbria Police were informed by my legal representative 
that what they were doing was illegal. The Hospital I understand was also 
made aware of the fact that they were implicated in this matter. Then I was 
allowed visitors but only with a police officer in attendance. One such 
police officer informed me that his instructions were to note down anything 
that he heard which might have been of interest to Northumbria Police. On 
arrival at Washington Police Station following my arrest a police doctor had 
especially ordered essential medication that I had required. That medication 
remained at Washington police station and never went with me to hospital. 
Afterward there was confusion at the Sunderland Royal Hospital at what 
medication I had required and some of the medication that I received there 
was not appropriate for my medical conditions.



In the matter of my concern of probable Masonic influence I requested the 
Durham County Court judges to declare any membership of Freemasonry 
especially given the fact that I had contributed to the House of Commons 
Home Affairs Select Committee into Freemasonry within the Police and 
Judiciary and was still in correspondence with Lord Nolan. The judges 
ignored this request. I prepared a form on which these judges could declare 
any such membership of Freemasonry. The Court manager would not allow them 
to make such declaration. His decision in this matter was backed up by the 
Court Service. When I approached Lord's Woolf and Bingham on my concern 
regarding Masonic influence in my cases, they said that my concern about 
that had no relevance to my cases. In fact, where any litigant expresses any 
concerns about the independence or impartiality of any UK court, and such 
court fails to address that matter in the first instance, which becomes an 
automatic violation of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention.



I appealed against the possession of my home at Hetton-le-Hole to the 
Middlesborough County Court. Its possession had been fabricated under the 
bankruptcy ruling made against me in the circumstances of which I detail. 
Durham County Court had transferred that matter to Middlesborough after I 
had made a damages claim against the Durham County Court for their part in 
the serious crimes which they had used against me. District Judge Mainwaring 
ruled that my concerns at probable Masonic influence in my cases had no 
relevance to them. I had asked him to declare any membership of Freemasonry 
to me. He only claimed that he was not a Freemason when the proceedings had 
been concluded which in fact had no relevance relative to my concerns about 
that matter.



In late 2002 a further hearing was arranged at the Middlesborough County 
Court to hear my appeal at the ruling made by District Judge Mainwaring just 
prior to Christmas 2002. I had supplied the judge in that matter, his name 
as yet unknown to me, with the case law ruling as proof that my concerns at 
Masonic involvement in my cases having been ignored throughout the duration 
of my above referenced cases had in fact been a violation of Article 6(1) of 
the European Human Rights Convention.



In my appeal against bankruptcy before Mr Peter Leaver Q.C. sitting at the 
London Appeal Court, he told me that he was not concerned about the evidence 
that I had provided for his use showing that serious fraud had been used 
throughout to bring my arrival to that bankruptcy situation. He Ordered 
further costs against me in my appeal against my alleged bankruptcy.



In late May of 1998 I obtained confirmation that my wife,  Joyce Kellett, 
had used forgery to register our property 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, 
Tyne-Wear, into her sole name. It had previously been registered at the HM 
Durham District Land Registry in our joint names. She had also used forgery 
to register land that had been previously in my name into her sole name. My 
wife had concealed from me the true amount of our savings and which were 
verified to be substantially well above the amount claimed from me in 
bankruptcy. I reported this matter to Northumbria Police who again failed to 
take appropriate action on it.



I informed Mr B.J. Inglis, the Official Receiver, then situated at 
Stockton-on-Tees,  the fact that I was not and could not in the above 
circumstances be a declared bankrupt. He failed to reply to my letter 
regarding this matter and was in these circumstances party to allowing that 
illegal bankruptcy made against me in the circumstances that I have 
mentioned above.



My wife, Joyce Kellett, had commenced living at our additional property 
situated at Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire, in June of 1998. I am presently 
deprived of the use of that property.  I reported the use of my wife's 
forgeries in the matter of our marital home and land that had been 
previously registered at HM Land Registry in my sole name, situated at 
Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear to the Chief Constable of North Yorkshire, Mr 
Kenworthy.  He refused to take any appropriate action on that matter. I 
informed him that in these circumstances he was liable to a lawful citizen's 
arrest for failing to carry out his public duty which amounted to the crime 
of his misconduct in public office. Following this he sent two of his 
detectives from North Yorkshire to my home at Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear to 
interview me. They saw and took with them copies of material evidence of my 
allegations of my wife's use of forgery mentioned above. Though there was 
more such similar evidence available to them, they told me that they had 
enough for them to work on. Afterwards I received a letter from North 
Yorkshire Police which said that they had insufficient evidence to act on 
and would not be taking any action on this matter. Their approach to the 
Land Registry concerned with the property at Dacre Banks was all that would 
have been required by them as part of the substantial evidence if my 
allegations.



In 1999 I was subject of arrest by Northumbria Police. It was alleged by 
them that I had breached an injunction obtained against me by Miss Shirley 
Carr. At Washington police station I was denied access to a solicitor or 
doctor. Later when I had trouble breathing I was dumped by Northumbria 
police officers outside of the Casualty Wing of Sunderland Royal Hospital. 
There I suffered further injury when a tube folded in a vein or artery which 
had been inserted into my arm. No such alleged injunction under which I had 
been arrested had existed. The Police Complaints Commission agreed by letter 
that in this matter the arrest of me by Northumbria Police had been unlawful 
and that my continued detainment by that police force had also been 
unlawful. The letter received from the Police Complaints authority regarding 
this was amongst the many such similar documents stolen from me when my home 
at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, was itself stolen from me in February 
2003.  That was with the full assistance and involvement of Northumbria 
Police. The theft of this letter is defeating a damages claim in this matter 
which I wish to make against Northumbria police.



Northumbria Police appointed acting Inspector Steve Coxon to look into some 
of my allegations made against them and others concerning such matters of 
the use of perjury carried out by Miss Shirley Carr the person also 
mentioned above. They also agreed to investigate the matter of recorder John 
Fryer-Spedding's catalogue of acts which he carried out against me to 
pervert the course of justice. That is also shown to have been another fraud 
carried out against me by Northumbria Police. It was clear that acting 
Inspector Mr S. Coxon never carried out any of the alleged investigation it 
was claimed that he had been appointed to do.



In 1997 I had been party to a regional radio broadcast where the matter of 
Freemasonry had been part of the discussion. The morning after that a man 
called at our home. He told my wife and I that unless I gave up on the 
matter of my concerns about Freemasonry our home could be burnt down. He 
cited as an example a man with the name of a Mr John Coates who he said had 
similar views on Freemasonry to myself. He said that man's Deep Freezer 
Centre had been burnt down as a result of his refusal to let his Masonic 
matters drop. In January of 1998 my wife and I heard evidence which 
suggested that in fact this mans Deep Freezer Centre said to be situated at 
South Shields, Tyne-Wear may well have been burned down. Shortly after that 
incident my wife left our marital home. In June of 1998 she commenced 
divorce proceedings against me. That matter too was reported to Northumbria 
Police who also ignored it as well.



Another false allegation was made against me by Miss Shirley Carr who is 
mentioned above. She claimed that I had approached and threatened 
harassment of her at the Sunderland County Court in matters concerning the 
above referenced cases. Northumbria Police prosecuted me under that 
allegation and I was convicted of that at the Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates 
Court. I then obtained a copy of a letter which had been written by Mr Head, 
then Chief Crown Prosecutor situated at Washington, Tyne-Wear, to solicitor, 
Mr Jackson of Hartlepool who had acted for me in that matter. Mr Head's 
letter wrote that Northumbria Police had interviewed a security officer of 
the Sunderland County Court who was on duty there at the time of Miss Carr's 
allegation that I had approached and threatened harassment of her. Mr Heads 
letter went on to say that the Security officer had told Northumbria police 
that he could recall the day in question and that nothing of note had 
occurred at the Sunderland County Court at the material time. That letter 
was withheld from the courts which had also included the London Appeal 
Court. Northumbria Police agreed that withholding such material evidence 
from the courts had amounted to a criminal act. They agreed to investigate 
that matter. Like the rest of such similar matters of crime carried out 
against me, Northumbria police never carried out an investigation into that 
either. However, Mr Head's letter to Mr Jackson was proof that they had been 
aware of these facts at the time they too were parties to my prosecution and 
conviction under the 1997 Harassment Act at Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates 
Court.



Prior to my bankruptcy mentioned above, I was a Hetton-le-Hole Town 
Councillor. I was barred from remaining in that position by virtue of the 
Bankruptcy Order made against me. While I had been a Hetton-le-Hole Town 
Councillor I raised an objection before the Council that three members of 
the Blackburn family of Councillors and their Son in Law, Mr C. Simpson, had 
failed to declare an interest in the matter of land subject of housing 
proposals part of which was owned by one of them. Two of those Councillors 
were also member of the Freemasons. At a later meeting of the Council these 
same Councillors failed to stand down on the housing proposals matter. They 
spoke to the Council in favour of those housing proposals. They were in full 
awareness that Councillor Mr J. Blackburn would become, as his Councillor 
father had agreed in the circumstances, that were the housing proposals 
relative to his land approved, a very rich man. I had again raised my 
concerns to the Council regarding this matter. I was then prevented from 
leaving the Hetton Council Chambers until an assault had been carried out 
against me by three members of the Blackburn family. I reported that matter 
to Northumbria Police. They appointed an Inspector Williams or Williamson to 
investigate that matter. A few days later he telephoned me to say that as he 
did not think that the rest of the Hetton Town Councillors who witnessed 
that assault on me and my having been prevented from leaving the Council 
Chambers, would say what they had witnessed of the incident he had therefore 
decided to take no action on that matter. Later when this Inspector retired 
I was given information that he too was a member of the Freemasons.



I was assaulted at my home by a Mr Wilf Husband a local quarry owner. He 
claimed that while I was a Councillor I had raised my objections to some 
matters dealing with his use of his quarry to Sunderland Town Council. In 
fact I had not done that but had raised my concern about that to the 
Hetton-le-Hole Town Council as had another member of the Council. Mr Husband 
called at my home and then assaulted me. I reported that matter to 
Northumbria Police as well but they never acted on that matter either which 
has been true to the many such instances of crime which has been used 
against me.   .



In the year 2000 I was arrested by Durham Constabulary under what was later 
shown to have been a false allegations made against me by a doctor since 
also known to be a member of the Freemasons as many doctors are. It was then 
necessary for me to be taken to the Dryburn Hospital Cardiac Care ward. I 
overheard a telephone conversation where the Ward Sister there was making 
arrangements for me to be transferred to the Cherry Knowle Psychiatric 
Hospital near Sunderland. I had not been subject of Sectioning under the 
Mental Health Act so to have taken me to the Cherry Knowle Hospital would 
have been a criminal act in those circumstances. There have been over five 
such similar acts to try to have me Sectioned under the Mental Health Act 
within the past two years which of course have all failed. I and others are 
aware now that this criminal ploy is extensively being used to help silence 
the victims of police and judicial crime. Mr Andy McCardle was subject of 
such similar injustice and then unlawfully imprisoned at Carstairs State 
Hospital, Scotland. He was found dead there on Boxing Day last. I and a 
colleague examined his body just prior his burial. Attempts appeared to have 
been made to conceal the fact that his lips had been glued together and that 
it was probable that his jaw had also been broken which may have been the 
cause of his death. It is my understanding that the police are now 
investigating this matter



Mr Patrick Timothy the Chief Registrar of the Durham District Land Registry 
was made aware of the facts of my wife's use of forgery to convert our 
marital home and land that has been registered to me there, into her sole 
name by means of her forgeries. He refused to take any action on those 
matters. Mr Patrick Timothy also refused to take any appropriate action on 
the matter of solicitor Mr Paul Graney having sworn material perjury in his 
Statutory Declaration that had been used to make a false entry on the Durham 
District Land Register that related to case NE401650. Durham Constabulary 
also refused to take any appropriate action on that water as well. Mr 
Timothy told me that he had the power of discretion. His alleged power of 
discretion had amounted to him being a party to what amounted to serious 
crime.



From my tape recorded interview with Mr P Timothy, I am reasonably sure that 
he is also a member of the Freemasons though he denies this.



Inspector Gibson of Durham Constabulary told me that when judges lie, as 
they did in my above referenced cases, they had to regard such judicial lies 
as a judicial decision and had therefore to protect them. He said that spoke 
on behalf of the Chief Constable of the Durham Constabulary. In the 
circumstances the crime carried out against me at Durham County Court was 
never acted on by Durham Constabulary or indeed Northumbria Police. This I 
think helps show just how serious such matters have become when a police 
force admits that it must protect judicial lies.



Northumbria police refused to accept from me a bundle of documents that 
served as evidence of my allegations of some the crime that had been used 
against me in the above referenced cases.



I represented my father, William Kellett, since deceased, then of 103 
Elemore Lane, Easington Lane, Tyne-Wear at the Sunderland County Court in 
his case also very material to the above case No. NE401650. Despite recorder 
John. H Fryer-Spedding's many lies and very apparent misunderstanding of 
material law which are evidenced in cases DH400950 DH400898 and NE401650, he 
had still ruled that my father was the most likely person to have attained 
title to the land subject of case NE401650 where I was alleged by Miss 
Shirley Carr to have been a trespasser on it. District Judge Cuthbertson, 
sitting at the Durham County Court ruled that my father's action to go back 
into possession of his land was an abuse of court time and then dismissed 
it.



I represented my father William Kellett at his Appeal against the above 
ruling of District Judge Cuthbertson sitting at the Sunderland County Court. 
My father's Appeal was held at the Sunderland County Court. Circuit Judge 
Helen Paling was the presiding judge. When she came into the courtroom she 
warned me not to speak. I was warned by the court usher on duty there that 
if I continued to try to speak I could be held in Contempt of Court and be 
imprisoned. Circuit Judge Helen Paling then dismissed my fathers Appeal. I 
reported that matter to the Lord Chancellors Department. Circuit Judge Helen 
Paling then claimed that what had taken place at the Sunderland County Court 
had been in error. There had not been any error. However such alleged error 
was never corrected and my father remained without the land that had been 
subject of case NE401650. I think it was then there was the full realisation 
that there had been a conspiracy to defeat the above case and my father was 
also subjected to that. Miss Shirley Carr never had any title to the land 
subject of case NE401560 and this is fact. In the circumstances I could not 
and was not a trespasser on that land. It is clear that had my father's case 
to go back into possession of the land subject of case NE401650, had it been 
allowed to continue, would have defeated the above case NE401650 had it been 
lawfully tried before recorder John H, Fryer-Spedding. In the circumstances 
the final hearing of the above referenced cases was unlawful. The above 
cases were never subject of a consolidation Order into Miss Shirley Carr's 
case NE401650 as had been falsely alleged by the recorder. The opposite 
situation had been true.



I also remain deprived of that land subject of case NE401650 though the 
substantial evidence is that I remain the lawful owner of it. The Durham 
District Land Registry later made a retrospective registration to Miss 
Shirley Carr of the land subject of case NE401650. This despite Miss Shirley 
Carr not having any title or grounds whatsoever to lawfully allow that. Mr 
Peed, employed at the Durham District Land Registry, agreed in his letter 
written on my behalf that it was probable that Miss Carr's registration of 
the land was in error. The false entry made on the Durham District Land 
Register following solicitor Mr Paul Graney's admission in his affidavit 
that his Statutory Declaration sworn relative to the land in the above 
referenced case was materially untrue. This was part of the conspiracy used 
to defaud me of the land subject of case NE401650.



Solicitor Alison Stott was party to that conspiracy when she withheld 
material information from the Durham District Land Registry in the matter of 
case NE401650.



The matters concerning the murder attempts made on me detailed above and 
some of the material crime used against me leading up to that were reported 
to Prime Minister Mr Tony Blair and former Home Secretary Mr D. Blunkett. 
Both of people have ignored those matters. I had required of Prime Minister 
Mr Blair a Public Inquiry into my cases. My request for that again did not 
receive a reply from No.10  Downing Street, London. I do realise that such 
Inquiry would likely show the proof of my statements made above.



The indications are that Northumbria Police are again setting me up as their 
victim.  Corrupt authority surely should never be regarded as any authority 
at all. More especially such as the situation which I have reported to you 
above regarding Northumbria Police, I have not included the full extent of 
their crime/misconduct which they have used against me over several years. 
Time does not allow me to do this at present.



It is of even greater concern to me when I was given information that Prime 
Minister Mr Tony Blair is also a Freemason. The person who supplied that 
information I understand was often close to Mr Blair in the course of his 
work. That informant has since disappeared and it was said that he had left 
his residence without even paying his bills or leaving a forward address.



I also received a threat that I would disappear or suffer a fatal accident 
unless I backed away from Masonic matters. This threat was reported to both 
Northumbria and Cumbria police who took no interest in that.



In concluding this letter to you I refer again to the Judicial Oath of 
Fairness sworn by all UK magistrates and judges to you. Had that Judicial 
Oath of fairness meant what it is supposed to mean, it is certain I would 
not have been placed in the serious situation in which I now am. It is 
because of the huge number of breaches of the Judicial Oath carried out by 
the various judges that I name here, that I firmly believe that your Royal 
Highness has an obligation to take steps to set in motion an appropriate 
action for a just and final outcome to the above matters,





I suffered a heart attack shortly after Northumbria Police Special Squad 
officers attempted to murder me at my home at Hetton-le-Hole in February of 
2002. I have remained in poor health since that time. I wish to die at my 
home at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear. How this might happen is 
immaterial to me now that my health continues to fail. I am aware of course 
that to take action to repossess my home without due consent or authority is 
likely given the circumstances described above to mean my death. It is in 
these same circumstances I request that you involve yourself in taking any 
appropriate action to allow my return to my home as a matter of urgency.



The final hearing of cases DH400950, DH400898 and NE401650 was and remains 
unlawful in the circumstances described and evidenced above. All that has 
stemmed from that also remains unlawful.



My Appeal against the possession of my home at 16A The Lyons, 
Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, adjourned at the Middlesborough County Court on 
30th January 2003 remains adjourned despite that court failing in its duty 
to take appropriate action to right this situation. The evidence that I 
produced in that Appeal against the possession of my home of the 30th 
January 2003 upholds it and I remain deprived of it in that matter alone. 
The catalogue of other facts and evidence detailed above are also all very 
material to these matters and require an independent examination.



I declare that the statements which I  Maurice Kellett, (address withheld 
for the purposes of this posting only) has made above are true to the best 
of my knowledge and belief.



Maurice Kellett

Address withheld for the purposes of this posting only.



http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com