| |
Credit where it's due.
My wife and I recently had an 8-in-15 Freedom of Scotland Rover. During
our 8 days' travelling, we notched up about 50-60 NR trains, but only
two were running late in any way that affected us.
One was from Stranraer to Glasgow, which ran 15 late because the boat
was late into port - we missed our connection at Kilwinning to Largs,
but got the next one all right. The other was a train from Aviemore to
Inverness, also about 15 late - no reason was given, though in examining
the photos later, I did notice that a windscreen had been cracked - and
our 9 min connection for Aberdeen was not only held for us, but we also
came in on a helpful platform.
Well done First Scotrail.
--
http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p10907004.html
(37 126 at Hereford, 11 Jun 1985)
Date:Sat, 17 Sep 2005 22:17:25 GMT
Author:
|
Re: Credit where it's due.
Chris Tolley wrote:
>
> My wife and I recently had an 8-in-15 Freedom of Scotland Rover. During
> our 8 days' travelling, we notched up about 50-60 NR trains, but only
> two were running late in any way that affected us.
My wife and I did the same 3 or 4 years ago (years start to blur after
a while!) with only one problem - coming back down the Far North line,
the train was terminated early because of a mechanical problem, but a
well organised bustitution got us to Inverness only slightly later than
the train would have done.
There were a few minor niggles, most notably the lack of cleaning
and watering facilities at the outlying stations was noticable on return
journeys. A passenger's experience of the railways can be just as
tainted by a filthy toilet as a cancelled train.
Cheers
mark-r
--
"Let's meet the panel. You couldn't ask for four finer comedians -
so that answers your next question..."
-- Humphrey Lyttleton
Date:Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:05:51 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Credit where it's due.
"Mark Robinson" wrote in message
news:432EB7AF.43789E1B@simsol.co.uk...
>
> Chris Tolley wrote:
>>
>> My wife and I recently had an 8-in-15 Freedom of Scotland Rover. During
>> our 8 days' travelling, we notched up about 50-60 NR trains, but only
>> two were running late in any way that affected us.
>
> My wife and I did the same 3 or 4 years ago (years start to blur after
> a while!) with only one problem - coming back down the Far North line,
> the train was terminated early because of a mechanical problem, but a
> well organised bustitution got us to Inverness only slightly later than
> the train would have done.
>
> There were a few minor niggles, most notably the lack of cleaning
> and watering facilities at the outlying stations was noticable on return
> journeys. A passenger's experience of the railways can be just as
> tainted by a filthy toilet as a cancelled train.
>
I did something similar in 1970. A First Class All Scotland Rover - 7Days.
Cost 33.
Excellent value as I had a Mk 1 First compartment to sleep in each night
between Glasgow/Edinburgh and Inverness or southbound as suited. Next
morning there was always a convenient Breakfast on or just off the station
before exploring the outer reaches of these fair Isles.
KW
Date:Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:26:31 GMT
Author:
|
Re: Credit where it's due.
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:05:51 +0100, Mark Robinson wrote in
, seen in uk.railway:
[....]
> There were a few minor niggles, most notably the lack of cleaning
> and watering facilities at the outlying stations was noticable on return
> journeys. A passenger's experience of the railways can be just as
> tainted by a filthy toilet as a cancelled train.
ISTR trying to make this point to TPTB on far too many previous
occasions. But they don't, can't or don't want to understand it. :-(
--
Ross, a.k.a.
Prof. E. Scrooge, CT, 153 & bar, Doctor of Cynicism (U. Life)
Hon. Pres., National Soc. for the Encouragement for Cruelty to Dogboxes
Proud to be the target of various trolls, sock puppets and other idiots
Date:Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:24:48 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Credit where it's due.
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:24:48 +0100, Ross
wrote:
>ISTR trying to make this point to TPTB on far too many previous
>occasions. But they don't, can't or don't want to understand it. :-(
I think VT make some attempt[1] to understand it, if the lovely[2] new
wooden-panelled and spotlessly-clean toilets at Crewe are anything to
go by - but I agree the regional TOCs usually do not.
Is there some kind of theory that any thread on uk.r, if prolonged
long enough, will eventually result in a discussion about the bogs?
[1] Eau de Tiolette de Voyager excepted.
[2] Those moaning about the size of the new facilities may wish to try
those on platform 5 (I think) which are more than adequate.
Neil
--
Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK
When replying please use neil at the above domain
'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read.
Date:Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:07:57 GMT
Author:
|
Re: Credit where it's due.
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:07:57 GMT, Neil Williams wrote in
, seen in uk.railway:
[...]
> Is there some kind of theory that any thread on uk.r, if prolonged
> long enough, will eventually result in a discussion about the bogs?
Bogwin rather than Godwin, perhaps?
--
Ross, a.k.a.
Prof. E. Scrooge, CT, 153 & bar, Doctor of Cynicism (U. Life)
Hon. Pres., National Soc. for the Encouragement for Cruelty to Dogboxes
Proud to be the target of various trolls, sock puppets and other idiots
Date:Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:15:46 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Credit where it's due.
Mark Robinson wrote:
> A passenger's experience of the railways can be just as
> tainted by a filthy toilet as a cancelled train.
Indeed. But in our case, that side of things was fine as well.
--
http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p10589969.html
(66 246 at Wigan North Western, 21 Jul 2004)
Date:Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:04:56 GMT
Author:
|
Re: Credit where it's due.
"Chris Tolley" wrote in message
news:1gqd4xx5dqxmt.1epx8z685ltwt.dlg@40tude.net...
> Mark Robinson wrote:
>
> > A passenger's experience of the railways can be just as
> > tainted by a filthy toilet as a cancelled train.
>
> Indeed. But in our case, that side of things was fine as well.
It seems that the Indian Railways Minister is on a mission to clean up train
toilets:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1787806,00.html
Peter
Date:Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:55:58 +0000 (UTC)
Author:
|
Re: Credit where it's due.
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:55:58 +0000 (UTC), "Peter Masson"
wrote:
>
>"Chris Tolley" wrote in message
>news:1gqd4xx5dqxmt.1epx8z685ltwt.dlg@40tude.net...
>> Mark Robinson wrote:
>>
>> > A passenger's experience of the railways can be just as
>> > tainted by a filthy toilet as a cancelled train.
>>
>> Indeed. But in our case, that side of things was fine as well.
>
>It seems that the Indian Railways Minister is on a mission to clean up train
>toilets:
>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1787806,00.html
>
>Peter
>
Is that where Branson got the idea from, then?
--
Tessy @ nospam.com
Life is complex: it has real and imaginary parts
Date:Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:43:36 GMT
Author:
|
|