| |
actual footage of man being run over on GWML
In todays sun newspaper
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005410590,00.html
Date:9 Sep 2005 14:44:34 -0700
Author:
|
Re: actual footage of man being run over on GWML
In message , at
14:44:34 on Fri, 9 Sep 2005, p remarked:
>In todays sun newspaper
>
>http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005410590,00.html
The Southall jinx strikes once again.
--
Roland Perry
Date:Sat, 10 Sep 2005 08:37:26 +0100
Author:
|
Re: actual footage of man being run over on GWML
Roland Perry wrote:
> The Southall jinx strikes once again.
Prat.
I've thought this ever since I've been lurking on the group, but taken
a tolerant attitude until now.
Date:10 Sep 2005 02:54:51 -0700
Author:
|
Re: actual footage of man being run over on GWML
In message , at
02:54:51 on Sat, 10 Sep 2005, scotboy1994@hotmail.co.uk remarked:
>> The Southall jinx strikes once again.
>
>Prat.
You have to admit, Southall is getting more than its fair share of
railway incidents.
--
Roland Perry
Date:Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:59:36 +0100
Author:
|
Re: actual footage of man being run over on GWML
"p" wrote in message
news:1126302274.288504.91610@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> In todays sun newspaper
Isn't "Sun newspaper" an oxymoron?
Regards
Jonathan
Date:Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:13:37 +0000 (UTC)
Author:
|
Re: actual footage of man being run over on GWML
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 21:44:34 UTC, "p" wrote:
: In todays sun newspaper
:
: http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005410590,00.html
He's not actually "run over", though, is he? Just sideswiped. If he
had been run over the bit about the policeman holding his head would
probably have meant something rather gorier.
Ian
Date:10 Sep 2005 15:41:52 GMT
Author:
|
Re: actual footage of man being run over on GWML
"Ian Johnston" wrote in message
news:cCUlhtvFIYkV-pn2-c8mwpZtv0d05@localhost...
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 21:44:34 UTC, "p" wrote:
>
> : In todays sun newspaper
> :
> : http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005410590,00.html
>
> He's not actually "run over", though, is he? Just sideswiped. If he
> had been run over the bit about the policeman holding his head would
> probably have meant something rather gorier.
While I was waiting for the video to load and I could only see the caption,
I thought the policeman *was* holding the other man's head, and I thought
"that's a bit strong for the Sun - it's going to put people off their
breakfasts" ;-)
Date:Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:51:15 +0100
Author:
|
Re: actual footage of man being run over on GWML
Martin Underwood wrote:
> While I was waiting for the video to load and I could only see the caption,
> I thought the policeman *was* holding the other man's head, and I thought
> "that's a bit strong for the Sun - it's going to put people off their
> breakfasts" ;-)
lol, what's amusing though is that the 2 track workers aren't interested
in the slightest!
Date:Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:27:57 +0100
Author:
|
Re: actual footage of man being run over on GWML
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:51:15 +0100, "Martin Underwood"
wrote:
>"Ian Johnston" wrote in message
>news:cCUlhtvFIYkV-pn2-c8mwpZtv0d05@localhost...
>> On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 21:44:34 UTC, "p" wrote:
>>
>> : In todays sun newspaper
>> :
>> : http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005410590,00.html
>>
>> He's not actually "run over", though, is he? Just sideswiped. If he
>> had been run over the bit about the policeman holding his head would
>> probably have meant something rather gorier.
>
>While I was waiting for the video to load and I could only see the caption,
>I thought the policeman *was* holding the other man's head, and I thought
>"that's a bit strong for the Sun - it's going to put people off their
>breakfasts" ;-)
>
How about a potted haugh?
Date:Sun, 11 Sep 2005 08:21:00 +1200
Author:
|
|