home archive of uk.* news reader.
 
  
[OT] Radio controlled clocks   
Apologies - a tad off topic but I know several people on here have experiences
of radio controlled clocks.

We have in our kitchen a radion controlled analogue clock - it has been working
fine for a couple of years. Last time the bat went flat it just stopped.

Last week I noticed that it was 4 hours slow (or was it 8 hours fast? ;-)).
*Exactly* 4 hours. I replaced the battery and it reset to the oclock position
as it should and then sat there waiting to update to the correct time. After
about 5 mins it started it whizzing around and I though it was sorted...except
again, it set itself to be exactly 4 hours slow. I left for work and forgot
about it. having been away for a few days we've returned to find that it
has reset itself again and it now correct.

Anyone else seen this? I assume that the radio signal has been up and running
for the last few days? I've not got a clock anymore that has a signal indicator.
The clock just has a sealed unit so there is no timezone switch or anything
that might have moved.

Cheers,

Darren
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 05 20:16:04 GMT   Author:  

Re: [OT] Radio controlled clocks   
My bet would be that the hour hand has slipped on it's drive sleeve 
(possibly that the gears have jumped some teeth?). The former is probably 
easily fixable, the latter may mean the gears are worn.
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:34:47 +0100   Author:  

Re: [OT] Radio controlled clocks   
"dmc"  wrote in message news:5782@malfoy.ukc.ac.uk...

>
>
> Apologies - a tad off topic but I know several people on here have 
> experiences
> of radio controlled clocks.
>
> We have in our kitchen a radion controlled analogue clock - it has been 
> working
> fine for a couple of years. Last time the bat went flat it just stopped.
>
> Last week I noticed that it was 4 hours slow (or was it 8 hours fast? 
> ;-)).
> *Exactly* 4 hours. I replaced the battery and it reset to the oclock 
> position
> as it should and then sat there waiting to update to the correct time. 
> After
> about 5 mins it started it whizzing around and I though it was 
> sorted...except
> again, it set itself to be exactly 4 hours slow. I left for work and 
> forgot
> about it. having been away for a few days we've returned to find that it
> has reset itself again and it now correct.
>
> Anyone else seen this? I assume that the radio signal has been up and 
> running
> for the last few days? I've not got a clock anymore that has a signal 
> indicator.
> The clock just has a sealed unit so there is no timezone switch or 
> anything
> that might have moved.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Darren
>
>


The symptons you describe exactly match the problem that I had with a new 
clock (Argos about 8), it turned out the MSF signal had been off for 
maintenance work.  The clock actually only tries to synch every few hours so 
if it fails it advances exactly four hours and then waits for some time 
before trying again. Service details and other advice is available from the 
National Physical Lab web page at http://www.npl.co.uk/time/msfoutages.html

Peter
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 07:06:59 GMT   Author:  

Re: [OT] Radio controlled clocks   
In article <nodQe.53057$Il.34621@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
Peter Andrews  wrote:

>
>The symptons you describe exactly match the problem that I had with a new 
>clock (Argos about 8), it turned out the MSF signal had been off for 
>maintenance work.  The clock actually only tries to synch every few hours so 
>if it fails it advances exactly four hours and then waits for some time 
>before trying again. Service details and other advice is available from the 
>National Physical Lab web page at http://www.npl.co.uk/time/msfoutages.html



Ok, thanks for the suggestions. Over night the clock again managed to set
itself to the correct time and then forgot again this afternoon (again,
exactly 4 hours slow).

Changed the battery again to a brand new one (the other was laying in the
bottom of the drawer and it is just possible that it isn't new I guess) and
all is well. If I put the old battery back in it again sets itself to exactly
4 hours slow.

I'll give it a few days with the new battery but it looks a lot healthier.
Seems like a very odd failure mode! It's not the setting function either -
when a battery is put in this winds forward to either 12, 4 or 8 oclock
before sitting waiting for the signal. This takes a few minutes before it
whizzes around to the correct time (or in the case of the old duracell
the correct time - 4 hours!

Cheers,

Darren
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 05 19:57:00 GMT   Author: