32" LCD TV
Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest 32" LCD
available. They claim it's half price.
More details on the Woolies website -
http://www.woolworths.co.uk/wwstore/product.jhtml?op=details&product=50474891
--
==============================
Click it or not, it's not up to me.
But spondulas for you, if you wanna see:-
http://tinyurl.com/7m3nr
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:21:45 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
EK wrote:
> Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest
> 32" LCD available. They claim it's half price.
Never heard of Crown, don't they make paint? ;o) Can't find any reviews
either.
I reckon you'd be better spending 200 more and getting something like this:
http://www.dabs.com/uk/productview.htm?quicklinx=3R5Z. HD Ready, and a
review here: http://www.trustedreviews.com/article.aspx?art=1253.
Dan.
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:15:39 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:15:39 +0100, "Dan" wrote:
>EK wrote:
>> Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest
>> 32" LCD available. They claim it's half price.
>
>Never heard of Crown, don't they make paint? ;o) Can't find any reviews
>either.
The Crown brand has been around since the forties but I think various
people use it under licence these days.
sponix
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 20:39:54 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:15:39 +0100, "Dan" wrote:
Get your clock sorted
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 20:58:15 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
"Dan" wrote in message
news:4310ae50$0$12914$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...
> EK wrote:
>> Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest
>> 32" LCD available. They claim it's half price.
>
> Never heard of Crown, don't they make paint? ;o) Can't find any reviews
> either.
>
> I reckon you'd be better spending 200 more and getting something like
> this: http://www.dabs.com/uk/productview.htm?quicklinx=3R5Z. HD Ready, and
> a review here: http://www.trustedreviews.com/article.aspx?art=1253.
>
> Dan.
>
Crown also make paint and wallpaper - different companies.
These days Crown is another "assembler" that rebadges like Bush, Goodmans,
etc.
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:36:43 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
Walter B. wrote:
> Get your clock sorted
Cheers, on the laptop so didn't notice.
Dan.
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 01:03:59 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
EK wrote:
> Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest 32" LCD
> available. They claim it's half price.
>
> More details on the Woolies website -
> http://www.woolworths.co.uk/wwstore/product.jhtml?op=details&product=50474891
>
Can't see anything about contrast ratios, refresh rates...........
that's what really matters.
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 01:28:06 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
in 4310f90b$0$6470$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com, steeler attempted to
say...
> "Dan" wrote in message
> news:4310ae50$0$12914$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...
>> EK wrote:
>>> Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest
>>> 32" LCD available. They claim it's half price.
>>
>> Never heard of Crown, don't they make paint? ;o) Can't find any reviews
>> either.
>>
>> I reckon you'd be better spending 200 more and getting something like
>> this: http://www.dabs.com/uk/productview.htm?quicklinx=3R5Z. HD Ready,
>> and
>> a review here: http://www.trustedreviews.com/article.aspx?art=1253.
>>
>> Dan.
>>
>
> Crown also make paint and wallpaper - different companies.
>
> These days Crown is another "assembler" that rebadges like Bush, Goodmans,
> etc.
I don't think Crown is owned by Alba. A list of brands made by Alba can be
found on their website, including Bush and Goodmans
http://www.albaplc.com/html/home.htm
:-)
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 09:43:52 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
>> Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest
>> 32" LCD available. They claim it's half price.
>>
>> More details on the Woolies website -
>> http://www.woolworths.co.uk/wwstore/product.jhtml?op=details&product=50474891
>>
> Can't see anything about contrast ratios, refresh rates...........
> that's what really matters.
from Crown web site...
http://www.crowncorporation.co.uk/television/details/index.asp?ProductID=73
Channel Auto Search and Store
1366 X 768 Resolution
Brightness 500 Cd/m
Contrast Ratio 600:1
Viewing Angle:
Horizontal 170
Vertical 170
Fast Text
Stereo/NICAM/virtual Dolby
PC Compatible
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:02:39 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
"bobda" wrote in message
news:1125218598.ae114dbc284eb13b7ed89995a40805e3@teranews...
> in 4310f90b$0$6470$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com, steeler attempted to
> say...
>> "Dan" wrote in message
>> news:4310ae50$0$12914$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com...
>>> EK wrote:
>>>> Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest
>>>> 32" LCD available. They claim it's half price.
>>>
>>> Never heard of Crown, don't they make paint? ;o) Can't find any reviews
>>> either.
>>>
>>> I reckon you'd be better spending 200 more and getting something like
>>> this: http://www.dabs.com/uk/productview.htm?quicklinx=3R5Z. HD Ready,
>>> and
>>> a review here: http://www.trustedreviews.com/article.aspx?art=1253.
>>>
>>> Dan.
>>>
>>
>> Crown also make paint and wallpaper - different companies.
>>
>> These days Crown is another "assembler" that rebadges like Bush,
>> Goodmans,
>> etc.
>
> I don't think Crown is owned by Alba. A list of brands made by Alba can be
> found on their website, including Bush and Goodmans
>
> http://www.albaplc.com/html/home.htm
>
> :-)
It isn't. But it is a similar company.
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:58:08 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
EK wrote:
> Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest 32" LCD
> available. They claim it's half price.
>
> More details on the Woolies website -
> http://www.woolworths.co.uk/wwstore/product.jhtml?op=details&product=50474891
>
If you can wait (next year) the industry will be dumping cold cathode backlighting
in favour of the new hi-bright RGB LED back light. Have a google and you'll see
what I mean.
or http://neasia.nikkeibp.com/neasiaarchivedetail/000503. Probably it will mean
a lot of
low prices for the CCFL based product from now on.
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 18:51:45 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
"EK" wrote in message
news:4310a121$0$13695$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
> Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest 32"
LCD
> available. They claim it's half price.
>
> More details on the Woolies website -
>
http://www.woolworths.co.uk/wwstore/product.jhtml?op=details&product=50474891
>
Who the heck wants something that huge in their living room???
It seems strange that given that most modern estate housing has tiny room,
people want to buy massive TV sets and humungous 3 piece suites. It looks
really odd.
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:01:55 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:21:45 +0100, "EK"
wrote:
>Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest 32" LCD
>available. They claim it's half price.
>
>More details on the Woolies website -
>http://www.woolworths.co.uk/wwstore/product.jhtml?op=details&product=50474891
we saw it in a woolies branch, and the picture quality wasn;t that
good.
Lots of fuzzyness and dot crawl depite it coming from a DVD player,
mind you it was a crown or bush dvd player so that might be the root
of the problems too..
View before buying...
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:24:25 GMT
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
"Gavin" wrote in message
news:rtd5h15phbo3o6i6v83t02bl69c8j7vhob@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:21:45 +0100, "EK"
> wrote:
>
>>Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest 32"
>>LCD
>>available. They claim it's half price.
>>
>>More details on the Woolies website -
>>http://www.woolworths.co.uk/wwstore/product.jhtml?op=details&product=50474891
> we saw it in a woolies branch, and the picture quality wasn;t that
> good.
>
> Lots of fuzzyness and dot crawl depite it coming from a DVD player,
> mind you it was a crown or bush dvd player so that might be the root
> of the problems too..
LCDs are like plasmas..
they only give the best picture if it is at the panels native resolution.
HDTV will be either 1280x720 or 1920x1080 so anything that doesn't have that
resolution will not give the best picture.
So its best to realise that there are no (not that I have seen) plasmas that
will give the highest resolution and most LCDs and plasmas are XXXXx768
(1366x768 being popular as its 16:9).
There are a few plasmas that will do the lowest resolution and quite a few
LCDs.
None of the LCDs will look as good as a good plasma when being feed from a
TV signal.
(This is not the case using DVI from a PC with freeview BTW.)
So AFAICT if its TV you want (that includes most DVD players).. buy a TV or
a cheap plasma.
If its HDTV you are after then forget plasmas (even most of the expensive
ones that are "hdtv ready") and buy an LCD (or projector) with either
1920x1080 or 1280x720.
>
> View before buying...
Wise words.
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:51:13 GMT
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
I would pay a bit more and buy a branded one like a Sony
Date:29 Aug 2005 03:06:17 -0700
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
OK, please explain these two contradictory statements in your last post:-
> None of the LCDs will look as good as a good plasma when being feed from a
> TV signal.
yet....
> If its HDTV you are after then forget plasmas (even most of the expensive
> ones that are "hdtv ready") and buy an LCD (or projector) with either
> 1920x1080 or 1280x720.
So what you're saying is that LCD is not as good as plasma, except when it
comes to HDTV whereupon LCD is superior? I've used a number of plasma
screens (not cheapo ones either, we're talking Pioneer etc) and picture
quality on those is good, but it is nothing compared to an LCD - these also
have the added benefit of not aging, unlike plasma panels, although CCFL
backlights do eventually fizzle out. That's a point, are CCFL backlights
replaceable on these new LCD TVs or are they integral to the panel? That
could be a bit of a bugger in 5 years time when they die....
Hellraiser............>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:52:58 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
"JennyAdams1977" wrote in message
news:1125309977.198459.244080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I would pay a bit more and buy a branded one like a Sony
>
And as that is your stock answer to everything, we will disregard it as
always.
Hellraiser...........>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:54:01 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
"JennyAdams1977" wrote in message
news:1125309977.198459.244080@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I would pay a bit more and buy a branded one like a Sony
>
Sony used at one time to be a very good Brand, but nowadays they are just
overpriced rubbish.
JohnT
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 12:39:16 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
"Hellraiser" wrote in message
news:3ng7nsF1auuvU1@individual.net...
> OK, please explain these two contradictory statements in your last post:-
>
>> None of the LCDs will look as good as a good plasma when being feed from
>> a TV signal.
>
> yet....
>
>> If its HDTV you are after then forget plasmas (even most of the expensive
>> ones that are "hdtv ready") and buy an LCD (or projector) with either
>> 1920x1080 or 1280x720.
>
> So what you're saying is that LCD is not as good as plasma, except when it
> comes to HDTV whereupon LCD is superior?
Yes.
HDTV is a digital technology unlike normal TV (freeview is a compromise).
It is specifically designed to display at 1280x720 or 1920x1080.
If your panel uses any other resolution then interpolation will occur, this
is bad.
(Makes you wonder why so many of the panels are XXXXx768 these days?..
Good for computers bad for HDTV))
IME plasmas generally display PAL TV better than LCD does (having said that
I like my LCD panel (1280x720)).
They will not display HDTV better than LCD will.
> I've used a number of plasma screens (not cheapo ones either, we're
> talking Pioneer etc) and picture quality on those is good, but it is
> nothing compared to an LCD - these also have the added benefit of not
> aging, unlike plasma panels, although CCFL backlights do eventually fizzle
> out. That's a point, are CCFL backlights replaceable on these new LCD TVs
> or are they integral to the panel? That could be a bit of a bugger in 5
> years time when they die....
All parts are exchangeable if you can afford it.
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 12:43:19 GMT
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
> Yes.
> HDTV is a digital technology unlike normal TV (freeview is a compromise).
> It is specifically designed to display at 1280x720 or 1920x1080.
> If your panel uses any other resolution then interpolation will occur,
> this is bad.
Yeah, but when you consider the horrible MPEG2 artifacting you get on most
of the Sky channels, then a little interpolation particularly on a hi-res
screen will barely be noticeable by comparison!
> (Makes you wonder why so many of the panels are XXXXx768 these days?..
> Good for computers bad for HDTV))
>
> IME plasmas generally display PAL TV better than LCD does (having said
> that I like my LCD panel (1280x720)).
> They will not display HDTV better than LCD will.
Have to disagree there - I've seen a few LCDs on demo and side-by-side with
plasmas the LCD wipes the floor with them, even displaying a standard Sky
signal. Admittedly it's an RGB signal being fed in, so there is a minimum of
analogue interference, but the plasmas always tend to look a tad smeary by
comparison.
>> I've used a number of plasma screens (not cheapo ones either, we're
>> talking Pioneer etc) and picture quality on those is good, but it is
>> nothing compared to an LCD - these also have the added benefit of not
>> aging, unlike plasma panels, although CCFL backlights do eventually
>> fizzle out. That's a point, are CCFL backlights replaceable on these new
>> LCD TVs or are they integral to the panel? That could be a bit of a
>> bugger in 5 years time when they die....
>
> All parts are exchangeable if you can afford it.
Yeah, but will you need to exchange the entire array or just the backlight?
Backlights are cheap enough, but an entire 32" panel would be like changing
the tube in a conventional CRT - expensive enough to scrap the set.
Hellraiser..............>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:31:01 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
> Yeah, but will you need to exchange the entire array or just the
> backlight? Backlights are cheap enough, but an entire 32" panel would
> be like changing the tube in a conventional CRT - expensive enough to
> scrap the set.
>
what about the spec of this panel, is it any good ?
Brightness 500 Cd/m
Contrast Ratio 600:1
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:14:48 +0100
Author:
|
Re: 32" LCD TV
"pammyT" <fenlandfowl @talktalk.net> wrote in message
news:nIoQe.7476$CF.51780@news-1.opaltelecom.net...
>
> "EK" wrote in message
> news:4310a121$0$13695$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
>> Seen in Woolies - a 32" LCD TV at 599. Surely this is the cheapest 32"
> LCD
>> available. They claim it's half price.
>>
>> More details on the Woolies website -
>>
> http://www.woolworths.co.uk/wwstore/product.jhtml?op=details&product=50474891
>>
> Who the heck wants something that huge in their living room???
> It seems strange that given that most modern estate housing has tiny room,
> people want to buy massive TV sets and humungous 3 piece suites. It looks
> really odd.
What a dumb response!
I'm happy with my plasma that's 10" bigger.
You stick with your 14" portable if you're happy!
Date:Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:13:54 GMT
Author:
|