Dear Ms Lindridge,
 
I find it very difficult to follow your electronic communication to me, 
and also what it is, exactly, that you are trying to ask me?
 
I will, however, try and answer where it comes within my circle of 
knowledge.
 
Firstly, you say that you have today received the support of a Catholic, 
Conservative MP in Kent. I do not know who that might be, or why it 
appears in this particular Email to me.
 
Secondly you ask me to comment re: the Anglican Church and Freemasonry. 
a) I know nothing of Freemasonry in Norwich, b) I do not know who wrote 
the letter that you attached, as it is unsigned, and also does not say 
who wrote the letter, it merely states who it is addressed to, c) 
whoever wrote the letter says that they cannot undertand the meddling of 
the Anglican Church in Freemasonry, and then quotes from a private view 
of the Archbishop of Canterbury, d) my reading of the letter does not 
appear, in any way to criticise Freemasonry, but rather the Anglican 
Church. I note the the letter also only seeks to question on how many 
occasions there have been services for a particular Lodge at that 
church. I therefore fail to see what this has to do with the Provincial 
Grand Lodge of East Kent freemasons, and your stated concerns about some 
of them.
 
Thirdly, you say that you would like to "understand more about the Law 
Society's interest into the murder of John Monckton on 29.11.2004, 
Whitehead Monckton & Co, Freemasonry, Legal & General, the Alliance & 
Leicester and my ex-husband?", as I am not a member of the Law Society, 
I would not be able to assist your understanding in any way. I was also 
totally unaware that the Law Society had any interest in Freemasonry. 
May I respectfully suggest that you should contact the Law Society 
directly to try and obtain the understanding that you seek.
 
Fourthly, I am unable to comment on your paragraphs 4, 5 or 6, as I have 
no personal knowledge of the matters that you refer to in your letter.
 
Fifthly, in your paragraph 7, you say that you "understand the 
importance of the protection for the Province of East Kent masons 
'organised crime ring' re: mis-selling of mortgages, endowments and 
pensions", once again you are making the accusation that there is a 
Province of East Kent masons  "organised crime ring", which I have asked 
you in the past to provide evidence of, and which you have so far failed 
to furnish.
 
Sixthly, you make a number of statements in paragraphs 8 to 18, that I 
am unable to make comment on as I am unaware of any of these issues that 
you have included.
 
Lastly you ask me how many Province of East Kent Freemasons have had 
medical or insurance problems, and again I have no information with 
regard to numbers, or, if there are in fact any such people.
 
You ask me in paragraph 21 who my loyalty is to, John Bonomy and Peter 
Brooshooft or to lower ranking masons. This is a very strange question 
indeed, as I am unaware of the need to demonstrate a faithful devotion 
to anyone. I do, however, have a faithful devotion to my family, my 
faith in God and my personal beliefs. 
 
Yours sincerely
 
Philip J. Sayer (Mr).




 

 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------        
                http://www.usenet.com