http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4693767.stm

In article ,
Geoffrey Mortimer  wrote:

>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4693767.stm


Um? Why?

Seems to fit the story quite well. What's wrong with it? Not
a clear front 3/4 shot?

-- 
Andy Breen ~ 	Interplanetary Scintillation Research Group
		http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/
		Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting
		 money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)

Geoffrey Mortimer wrote:

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4693767.stm
> 


Ah, the publicity-seekers of Handforth again! Flagpoles, scupltures, 
artworks, heritage nameboards ... shame they haven't managed to get a 
decent train service as well....

Charlie

"Andrew Robert Breen"  wrote in message
news:dblai0$fus2$1@central.aber.ac.uk...

> In article ,
> Geoffrey Mortimer  wrote:
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4693767.stm
>
> Um? Why?
>
> Seems to fit the story quite well. What's wrong with it? Not
> a clear front 3/4 shot?
>
> -- 
> Andy Breen ~ Interplanetary Scintillation Research Group
> http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/
> Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting
> money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)


Just cos it's a negative (possibly with a bit of colour balance messing),
don't make it art, IMHO. If you negate it back, the train under the arch in
the middle becomes clearer - can anyone identify it?

"Geoffrey Mortimer"  wrote in message
news:3k6r2aFt057hU1@individual.net...

>
> "Andrew Robert Breen"  wrote in message
> news:dblai0$fus2$1@central.aber.ac.uk...
> > In article ,
> > Geoffrey Mortimer  wrote:
> > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4693767.stm
> >
> > Um? Why?
> >
> > Seems to fit the story quite well. What's wrong with it? Not
> > a clear front 3/4 shot?
> >
> > -- 
> > Andy Breen ~ Interplanetary Scintillation Research Group
> > http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/
> > Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting
> > money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)
>
> Just cos it's a negative (possibly with a bit of colour balance messing),
> don't make it art, IMHO. If you negate it back, the train under the arch
in
> the middle becomes clearer - can anyone identify it?
>

Or the location?

At a guess, judging by the fact that it's obviously on SWT somewhere as
the train in the background is a 442, I'd hazard a guess at Surbiton
(looking towards London), given the number of running lines that are
visible (left to right, up slow, up fast, down fast, down slow, and
just visible after the points, down hampton ct.)

I stand to be corrected, however.

Regards

Matt