| |
Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the £3k mark, for a lot higher
mileage.
This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
repair cost on it's own of £1000.
I'm tempted, but don't know.
--
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Date:Wed, 6 Jul 2005 20:25:07 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In article ,
carl.robson@bouncing-czechs.com says...
> Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the £3k mark, for a lot higher
> mileage.
>
> This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
>
> Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
> MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
> that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
> repair cost on it's own of £1000.
>
TBH, my "little" bump in my Mondeo could almost have been that bad. OK, I
didn't need a bonnet, but I needed a bumper, cross member (and apparently
an intercooler, but I'd have left that personally).
Cars are very modular these days. The bits that were damaged on mine just
unbolted, and the new ones went straight on.
If you're not certain, take it for a drive.
It probably doesn't help, but since my bump, the car's developed a well
known TDCI 130 problem (resonating intercooler pipework) :-/
Pete.
--
NOTE! Email address is spamtrapped. Any email will be deleted
Remove the news and underscore from my address to reply by mail
Date:Wed, 6 Jul 2005 21:16:22 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the 3k mark, for a lot higher
mileage.
This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
repair cost on it's own of 1000.
I'm tempted, but don't know.
I sold my last car as a cat C write-off. The damage was minor and purely
cosmetic but still more than the insurers valued the car at!
Darren
Date:Wed, 06 Jul 2005 20:31:29 GMT
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In article ,
pete_news@lethe.org.uk says...
>In article ,
>carl.robson@bouncing-czechs.com says...
>> Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the £3k mark, for a lot higher
>> mileage.
>>
>> This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
>> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
>>
>> Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
>> MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
>> that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
>> repair cost on it's own of £1000.
>>
>
>TBH, my "little" bump in my Mondeo could almost have been that bad. OK, I
>didn't need a bonnet, but I needed a bumper, cross member (and apparently
>an intercooler, but I'd have left that personally).
>
>Cars are very modular these days. The bits that were damaged on mine just
>unbolted, and the new ones went straight on.
>
>If you're not certain, take it for a drive.
>
>It probably doesn't help, but since my bump, the car's developed a well
>known TDCI 130 problem (resonating intercooler pipework) :-/
>
>Pete.
>
>
Cheers Pete. I know that Saabs are strong. I know that they can easily
be sorted, and I know that insurance companies write off older luxury
cars because of expensive repairs. Guess I'm just getting paranoid.
--
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Date:Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:16:58 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In article <BcXye.743$WW5.91@newsfe6-win.ntli.net>, dkj255@hotmail.con
says...
>Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the £3k mark, for a lot higher
>mileage.
>
>This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
>http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
>
>Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
>MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
>that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
>repair cost on it's own of £1000.
>
>I'm tempted, but don't know.
>
>
>I sold my last car as a cat C write-off. The damage was minor and purely
>cosmetic but still more than the insurers valued the car at!
>
>Darren
>
>
>
Cheers Darren.
I might keep a watch on that then.
It's a little too far to go to veiw/test drive. It would have to be low
enough for a spur of the moment buy it and chance it. And for a car that
normally sells at £1000 more than the current bid is at, it may actually
be selling at that sort of price.
--
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Date:Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:18:28 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
"Sleeker GT Phwoar" wrote in message
news:MPG.1d365aa4d5e9a52f989921@news.individual.net...
In article ,
pete_news@lethe.org.uk says...
>In article ,
>carl.robson@bouncing-czechs.com says...
>> Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the 3k mark, for a lot higher
>> mileage.
>>
>> This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
>> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
>>
>> Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
>> MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
>> that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
>> repair cost on it's own of 1000.
>>
>
>TBH, my "little" bump in my Mondeo could almost have been that bad. OK, I
>didn't need a bonnet, but I needed a bumper, cross member (and apparently
>an intercooler, but I'd have left that personally).
>
>Cars are very modular these days. The bits that were damaged on mine just
>unbolted, and the new ones went straight on.
>
>If you're not certain, take it for a drive.
>
>It probably doesn't help, but since my bump, the car's developed a well
>known TDCI 130 problem (resonating intercooler pipework) :-/
>
>Pete.
>
>
Cheers Pete. I know that Saabs are strong.
About as strong as a Vectra :O)
Date:Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:41:08 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In article , nospamta@ntlworld.com
says...
>
>"Sleeker GT Phwoar" wrote in message
>news:MPG.1d365aa4d5e9a52f989921@news.individual.net...
>In article ,
>pete_news@lethe.org.uk says...
>>In article ,
>>carl.robson@bouncing-czechs.com says...
>>> Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the £3k mark, for a lot higher
>>> mileage.
>>>
>>> This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
>>> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
>>>
>>> Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
>>> MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
>>> that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
>>> repair cost on it's own of £1000.
>>>
>>
>>TBH, my "little" bump in my Mondeo could almost have been that bad. OK, I
>>didn't need a bonnet, but I needed a bumper, cross member (and apparently
>>an intercooler, but I'd have left that personally).
>>
>>Cars are very modular these days. The bits that were damaged on mine just
>>unbolted, and the new ones went straight on.
>>
>>If you're not certain, take it for a drive.
>>
>>It probably doesn't help, but since my bump, the car's developed a well
>>known TDCI 130 problem (resonating intercooler pipework) :-/
>>
>>Pete.
>>
>>
>Cheers Pete. I know that Saabs are strong.
>
>About as strong as a Vectra :O)
>
>
>
No, that is the new ones. The old ones would pull a vectra to pieces,
literally. And it is more a case of the New Vectra is a Saab rather than
the New Saab is a Vectra.
the NG900 (94 onwards) was the cavalier floorpan with Saabised
suspension, styling, engine and interior.
The first 93 was based on the vectra.
The much touted new (latest model) vectra had it's suspension and
floorpan designed by Saab, for first use as an Opel/Vauxhall then across
the GM model ranges.
--
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Date:Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:14:34 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
Sleeker GT Phwoar wrote:
> Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the 3k mark, for a lot
> higher mileage.
>
> This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
>
> Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
> MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
> that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
> repair cost on it's own of 1000.
>
> I'm tempted, but don't know.
Get insurance quotes. You need to tell the insurer if it's been a previous
write off, and this could affect the premium. If you don't, you tend to get
fuck all for the car when it's hpi'd after a crash / some scrote burning it
out.
Date:Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:44:55 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
"Sleeker GT Phwoar" wrote in message
news:MPG.1d36406e531736698991b@news.individual.net...
Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the 3k mark, for a lot higher
mileage.
This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
repair cost on it's own of 1000.
I'm tempted, but don't know.
Check with your insurance company first, you may need all sorts of engineers
reports before you can get insurance.
Date:Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:39:00 +0000 (UTC)
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In article <dahmi4$dfo$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>,
me@mine.net says...
>
> Check with your insurance company first, you may need all sorts of engineers
> reports before you can get insurance.
>
>
>
Wasn't aware of that. Cheers.
--
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Date:Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:38:52 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In article <dahmht$f7$1@news.freedom2surf.net>, mrdoki@gmail.com says...
> Get insurance quotes. You need to tell the insurer if it's been a previous
> write off, and this could affect the premium. If you don't, you tend to get
> fuck all for the car when it's hpi'd after a crash / some scrote burning it
> out.
>
>
Oh bugger. Hoped with it having 12 months MOT that would be sufficient.
Damn.
--
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Date:Thu, 7 Jul 2005 08:39:34 +0100
Author:
|
Update: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In article ,
carl.robson@bouncing-czechs.com says...
> Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the £3k mark, for a lot higher
> mileage.
>
> This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
>
> Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
> MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
> that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
> repair cost on it's own of £1000.
>
> I'm tempted, but don't know.
>
He has the VIC, and the V5, as well as the 12 months MOT.
Would the inspection required to get a VIC include an
alignment/strutural inspection and check?
--
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Date:Thu, 7 Jul 2005 16:15:06 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In news:MPG.1d36406e531736698991b@news.individual.net,
Sleeker GT Phwoar decided to enlighten our
sheltered souls with a rant as follows
> Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the 3k mark, for a lot
> higher mileage.
>
> This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
>
> Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
> MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
> that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
> repair cost on it's own of 1000.
Yes.
The fact it's on a Cat C basically means bugger all. Ok, you'll get a
smaller pay out if you crash it and claim, but the car is costing you less
in the first place.
If it's straight enough, the Mot is straight, and the car drives straight,
then I wouldn't worry about it unless you're planning on trading it in at a
garage at some point. Garages can be very snotty about repaired cars.. even
though most cars on the road have been repaired at some point.
--
Pete M
Range Rover Vogue SE, Ford Capri (ressurection stalling)
Porsche 911 3.2 (For Sale)
COSOC #5
Scouse Git extraordinaire. Liverpool, Great Britain
Date:Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:36:42 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In article <42cd6828$0$18643$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>,
pete.murray@blue-nopressedmeat-yonder.co.uk says...
>In news:MPG.1d36406e531736698991b@news.individual.net,
>Sleeker GT Phwoar decided to enlighten our
>sheltered souls with a rant as follows
>> Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the £3k mark, for a lot
>> higher mileage.
>>
>> This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
>> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
>>
>> Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12 months
>> MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the picture are all
>> that it needed (he says), but the front bumper cover had an insurance
>> repair cost on it's own of £1000.
>
>Yes.
>
>The fact it's on a Cat C basically means bugger all. Ok, you'll get a
>smaller pay out if you crash it and claim, but the car is costing you less
>in the first place.
>
>If it's straight enough, the Mot is straight, and the car drives straight,
>then I wouldn't worry about it unless you're planning on trading it in at a
>garage at some point. Garages can be very snotty about repaired cars.. even
>though most cars on the road have been repaired at some point.
>
>
>
Shame it isn't a bit closer, I would get you to check it out for me.
--
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Date:Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:55:58 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In news:MPG.1d37b54b975de09e98992c@news.individual.net,
Sleeker GT Phwoar decided to enlighten our
sheltered souls with a rant as follows
> In article <42cd6828$0$18643$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>,
> pete.murray@blue-nopressedmeat-yonder.co.uk says...
>> In news:MPG.1d36406e531736698991b@news.individual.net,
>> Sleeker GT Phwoar decided to
>> enlighten our sheltered souls with a rant as follows
>>> Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the 3k mark, for a lot
>>> higher mileage.
>>>
>>> This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
>>> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
>>>
>>> Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12
>>> months MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the
>>> picture are all that it needed (he says), but the front bumper
>>> cover had an insurance repair cost on it's own of 1000.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> The fact it's on a Cat C basically means bugger all. Ok, you'll get a
>> smaller pay out if you crash it and claim, but the car is costing
>> you less in the first place.
>>
>> If it's straight enough, the Mot is straight, and the car drives
>> straight, then I wouldn't worry about it unless you're planning on
>> trading it in at a garage at some point. Garages can be very snotty
>> about repaired cars.. even though most cars on the road have been
>> repaired at some point.
>>
>>
>>
> Shame it isn't a bit closer, I would get you to check it out for me.
I've just looked at the pics for the first time, and the first thing to jump
out at me, screaming loudly "Don't buy me" was the bonnet gaps.
Ok, gaps are adjustable, but if they've not bothered to do that....
--
Pete M
Range Rover Vogue SE, Ford Capri (ressurection stalling)
Porsche 911 3.2 (For Sale)
COSOC #5
Scouse Git extraordinaire. Liverpool, Great Britain
Date:Fri, 8 Jul 2005 01:25:57 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In article <42cdc810$0$18641$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>,
pete.murray@blue-nopressedmeat-yonder.co.uk says...
>In news:MPG.1d37b54b975de09e98992c@news.individual.net,
>Sleeker GT Phwoar decided to enlighten our
>sheltered souls with a rant as follows
>> In article <42cd6828$0$18643$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>,
>> pete.murray@blue-nopressedmeat-yonder.co.uk says...
>>> In news:MPG.1d36406e531736698991b@news.individual.net,
>>> Sleeker GT Phwoar decided to
>>> enlighten our sheltered souls with a rant as follows
>>>> Saab 9000 Aeros normally start at arround the £3k mark, for a lot
>>>> higher mileage.
>>>>
>>>> This one looks (in the photos) to be well repaired.
>>>> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4559761553
>>>>
>>>> Would anyone consider a Cat C that had been repaired and had 12
>>>> months MOT? I've contacted the seller, and the repairs in the
>>>> picture are all that it needed (he says), but the front bumper
>>>> cover had an insurance repair cost on it's own of £1000.
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> The fact it's on a Cat C basically means bugger all. Ok, you'll get a
>>> smaller pay out if you crash it and claim, but the car is costing
>>> you less in the first place.
>>>
>>> If it's straight enough, the Mot is straight, and the car drives
>>> straight, then I wouldn't worry about it unless you're planning on
>>> trading it in at a garage at some point. Garages can be very snotty
>>> about repaired cars.. even though most cars on the road have been
>>> repaired at some point.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Shame it isn't a bit closer, I would get you to check it out for me.
>
>I've just looked at the pics for the first time, and the first thing to jump
>out at me, screaming loudly "Don't buy me" was the bonnet gaps.
>
>Ok, gaps are adjustable, but if they've not bothered to do that....
>
>
>
Well, he reckons it has the VIC as well as the new MOT and the V5.
But, guess you are right.
BTW, just had a look again. Can't see anything wrong from the pictures
regarding panel gaps. they are quite large. but Saabs always had fairly
large (but even) gaps.
--
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Date:Fri, 8 Jul 2005 07:37:39 +0100
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
What is the deal with buying cars from a scrapyard that have been in a
crash, obviously an insurance write-off and repairing them to be used
again on the roads?
Are there any issues one should be aware of doing this (other than
obvious safety issues) ie. I imagine the insurance companies won't be
to happy to insure a car that was once written off.
Cheers in advance.
Jon
Date:8 Jul 2005 03:31:23 -0700
Author:
|
Re: Would anyone consider a repaired Cat C write off?
In article ,
jonreynolds10@hotmail.com says...
> What is the deal with buying cars from a scrapyard that have been in a
> crash, obviously an insurance write-off and repairing them to be used
> again on the roads?
Usually from Salvage auctions rather than Yards.
Yards tend to buy the CAT A and CAT B recent cars from there for spares
(Cat B can only be broken for parts or scrap, Cat A can only be for
scrap materials. Mechanics buy Cat C and Cat D for repair)
> Are there any issues one should be aware of doing this (other than
> obvious safety issues) ie. I imagine the insurance companies won't be
> to happy to insure a car that was once written off.
>
If it is a Cat D, it can just be repaired, MOT'd and you need to tell
the insurance when you insure it.
If it is a Cat C, you need to get a Vehicle Inspection Certificate
(don't know where from) to prove it is back to road worthy, and a new
MOT, and inform the insurance. I believe the logbook/V5 also says
"Damage Repaired".
--
Carl Robson
Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
Date:Fri, 8 Jul 2005 13:06:11 +0100
Author:
|
|