DEFENCE 1 of 7.

DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE BAIRD. 


IN THE DURHAM COUNTY COURT.

Claim Number DH202326

CLAIMANT MISS SHIRLEY CARR
DEFENDANT Mr MAURICE KELLETT

The undersigned defendant, Mr Maurice Kellett, agrees that the 
statements that he makes below are true to the best of his knowledge and 
belief.


The words fraud and fraudulent are defined in the Oxford English 
Dictionary a copy from its definition is shown in "Exhibit 1" in the 
defendants Statement of Truth attached hereto and of which this document 
comprises as part of it.

On the 10th of November 1992 Deputy District Judge Baird sitting at the 
Durham County Court heard the defendants appeal from the court presided 
over by District Judge Scott-Phillips. That was under Durham County 
Court case number 9202063. 

It is unlawful for a Deputy District Judge to hear an appeal from the 
ruling of a District judge, namely the higher court.

The defendant was aware at the material time that Deputy District judge 
Baird would have been aware that he was not allowed to hear the above 
named appeal at the time that he did that 

The defendant held at the material time that Deputy District Judge Baird 
had practised the use of fraud against him , as defined in "Exhibit 1" 
attached hereto,  in his appeal against the ruling of District Judge 
Scott-Phillips  in case number 9202063. I refer to "Exhibit DDJB1"

The Durham County Court attempted to conceal the fraud used against me 
in the matter of Deputy District Judge Baird as I have detailed above.  
I refer to " Exhibit DDJB 2".  Eventually after a number of my further 
approaches to the Durham county Court on the matter of fraud used 
against me by Deputy District Judge Baird, the Durham County Court 
claimed that my appeal having been heard by Deputy District Judge Baird 
had been in error. There was no argument for the case that Deputy 
District Judge Baird had heard my appeal from the higher court in case 
Durham County Court case9202063. At the material time Deputy District 
Judge Baird would have been aware that he was not in error in hearing my 
appeal from the higher court as detailed above.

Then in March of 1994 I was accused by the claimant of trespass in the 
matter of land subject Newcastle County Court case number  NE401650. The 
first hearing of that case was before Deputy District Judge Baird  
sitting in chambers at the Newcastle County Court in March of 1994. I 
had not at that material time recognised Deputy District Judge Baird as 
being the one and same Deputy District Judge Baird who had practised the 
use of fraud against me as I have detailed above. Had I done that at the 
material time, I would have objected to DDJ Baird hearing the 
applicant's case of my alleged trespass on land subject of case 
NE401650.

At the material time, I required the assistance of my wife in Deputy 
District Judge Baird's chambers. My wife was refused access to DDJ 
Baird's chambers. However, access to  DDJ Baird's chambers was allowed 
to  Mr Kevin Kerrigan and  Professor Kenny both then employed at the 
University of Northumbria Law Clinic. The claimant had approached the 
latter persons for assistance in her claim for my alleged trespass on 
land subject of her case number NE401650. Deputy District Judge Baird 
having denied access to my wife into his chambers, and by failing to 
withdraw from the case subject of  case Ne401650 because I had exposed 
to the Durham County Court case number 9202063 as detailed above his 
previous use of fraud used against me as detailed in the matter of case,  
he is held to have been in gross breach of my rights under Article 6(1) 
of the European Human Rights Convention. In the circumstances I have 
detailed, Deputy District Judge Baird was not independent and impartial  
to me in case number NE401650 as he was  also required to be, and  again 
under my rights under Article 6(1) of  the European Human Rights 
Convention.

While at the material time it was reasonably plain to me that it was Mr 
Kevin Kerrigan who was acting as the applicants advocate in the hearing 
before Deputy District Judge Baird, Deputy District Judge Baird invited 
Professor Kenny to  give his opinions on the case before  DDJ  Baird.  
At that material time.

The defendant refers here to the attached "EXHIBIT WKST"
The defendant refers here to the attached "EXHIBIT MKST" 
 
I had provided Deputy District Judge Baird with two statutory 
declarations sworn both by myself and my father Mr William Kellett (now 
deceased), in support of our title to the land subject  of case 
NE401650. I had also provided copies of both of those statutory 
declarations of which I refer above, to Mr Kevin Kerrigan. By reason of 
error those statutory declarations which I refer to had not been sealed 
by the Newcastle County Court.

At the material time, Deputy District Judge Baird ignored the evidence 
of the defendant and  his fathers claim to lawful title to the land 
subject of case NE401650. Instead Deputy District Judge Baird ordered 
that the claimant be allowed to go into possession of the land subject 
of case NE401650. Deputy District Judge Baird also ordered that the 
claimant be allowed to remove a fence that the defendant had erected on 
land subject of the latter case.  The defendant had erected that fence 
in the full knowledge and agreement with his father and he had 
contributed to the expense involved with its installation. At all the 
material times, the claimant was unable to provide any evidence of her 
alleged entitlement that I was a trespasser in the matter of land 
subject of case NE401650.
  
The defendant had shown that Deputy District Judge Baird had earlier 
used fraud against him as defined by the hereto attached "Exhibit 1" in 
the matter of Durham County Court case number 9202063. Deputy District 
Judge Baird's use of fraud that he used against the defendant at the 
material time had been made known to the Durham County Court. It is 
shown by facts that no appropriate  action was taken by the Durham 
county Court against Deputy District Judge Baird for his use of  that 
serious fraud as described above. The Durham County Court were then also 
at the material time in the matter of case number NE401650 involved in 
allowing Deputy District Judge Baird to conduct the first hearing in his 
chambers of Newcastle County Court of the latter case. The defendant 
claims that the Durham County Court were thereby guilty of aiding and 
abetting the original use of fraud used against him by Deputy District 
Judge Baird as described above by failing to take any action on the 
matter of the use of Deputy District Judge Baird's use of fraud which he 
had previously used fraud  used by Deputy District Judge Baird against  
the defendant as described above, and in the circumstances shown at the 
material time, either   deliberately,  or in the alternative  were 
reckless in not insuring that Deputy District Judge Baird could not be 
given another opportunity to cause the defendant further damage in case 
NE401650. The involvement of the Durham County Court in the damage 
caused to the defendant in this matter is also shown by the attached " 
Exhibit DDJB 2".

Signed by the defendant Mr Maurice Kellett

On the 10th January 2003.

----------------------------
(Copied above is part of the huge number of facts of the serious 
judicial and police crime carried out against Maurice Kellett (e-
mail:mauricekellett@onetel.com) in cases DH400950, DH500898, NE401650. 
Maurice had contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select 
Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary 
headed by Lord Nolan. Maurice says thatInquiry was a huge whitewash job 
and had been in correspondence with Lord Nolan up until January 1998. 
The above document was submitted to the Teesside County Court as part of 
Maurice's appeal against the possession of his home at 16A The Lyons, 
Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear. Maurice's appeal was adjourned by the above 
court when he was admitted to hospital after he had taken ill.Two days 
later Maurice's home at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear came 
under an illegal Northumbria Police Special Squad siege for two and a 
half days. On the first evening of the siege Northumbria Police marksmen 
were stationed outside of Maurice's home and he came close to being shot 
by them. Maurice was not a threat to anyone else and was not armed or 
posing a threat to anyone but himself. Three nights later when the door 
to Maurice's home was battered down by the police Special Squad, two of 
them attempted to impale Maurice on an ornamental sword that had 
decorated a room in his home. This murder attempt of maurice was in full 
view of around seven other of those special squad police officers. One 
of them eventually saved Maurice's life by dragging him away from his 
murdering colleagues. These matters and many more such facts were 
reported to Washington, Tyne-Wear, Police Staton when Maurice was taken 
there afterwards under false arrest. Northumbria Police, Prime Minister 
Blair and former Home Secretary Blunkett were all informed of the above 
muder attempts made on Maurice and some of the catalogue of judicial, 
police and other crime used to bring about his situation. According to 
Maurice they continue to ignore these very serious Matters. Maurice's 
appeal against the possession of his home still remains adjourned but 
the Middlesborough County Court continues to ignore this very material 
fact. This fact all adds to the huge amount of evidence showing that the 
UK now operates what amounts to an illegal and outlawed Star Chamber 
form of justice system.

Maurice has made a damages claim against Prime Minister Tony Blair 
(which he continues to ignore) for his failure to carry out his 
obligations in the matter of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights 
Convention. This requires that all UK citizens have access to 
independent or impartial tribunals or authorites for the resolution of 
their criminal or civil rights. The UK has in fact no such authorities 
or tribunals which remains as a gross violation of Article 6(1) of the 
European Human Rights Convention and the rights of all UK citizens.

Maurice was given information earlier last year (2004) that Prime 
Minister Tony Blair is a member of the Freemasons (Secret Society). The 
person who gave that information was said to be often close to Blair. In 
late July of last year the informant went missing overnight and has not 
surfaced since then. Maurice says and has proved that murder is now all 
a part of the UK establishment to silence people (remember Dr David 
Kelly?). He now fears for the life of his informant and indeed himself.   
-------------------------------
Teesside Combined Court Centre
Russell Street
Middlesborough TS1 2AE

Case DH202326

Re:  Hearing for Monday the 16th of December 2002.

Dear Sir

First of all you will be in possession of the bundles in the above case 
held by the previous court at Durham.. 

The court cannot hear the above application for possession of property 
and land in my possession. The reason for that is it would be ultra 
vires. It could also incur penalties arising from it. The matter of Miss 
Shirley Carr's fraud etc,. used against me throughout the whole of 
proceedings that I refer to herein, are criminal in nature and in which 
the County Courts have no jurisdiction. 

The applicant, Miss Shirley Carr, having used very serious fraud  to 
allow her to arrive at this current situation, it is the duty of the 
court to report this matter to police as a matter of urgency

I refer to serious fraud etc. used by the applicant in this matter, Miss 
Shirley Carr in the Durham and Newcastle County Court cases DH400950, 
DH400898 and NE401650. It was under the latter cases  and my failure to 
pay the costs arising from it, that the applicant in this matter, Miss 
Shirley Carr, of 16 The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear DH50HT obtained 
a bankruptcy Order made against me following her use of further fraud, 
at the Durham County Court in March of 1999. That caused me further very 
serious damage.

The Order transferring the above case to the Teesside Combined Courts 
was made by District Judge Scott-Phillips on Monday 9th December 2002 
sitting at the Durham County Court. District Judge Scott-Phillips is 
mentioned amongst other persons, in my claim for damages made against 
the Durham County Court of the  February this year. My claim continues 
to be ignored by the court. On Monday the 9th of December the lady who 
answered my telephone call to the Durham County Court told me that all 
judges at the Durham County Court had been changed. Obviously that 
information which was given to me is incorrect. 

I also refer to my letter of  the 3rd of December 2002, Ref: MK DCC/12ch 
delivered to the Manager of the Durham County Court which remains 
without reply.

I hold the latter information to be in confidence, more especially as 
further damage might be caused to me by the applicant and others  
involved under the above case number. I suffer from very serious health 
problems which will cause me further damage and place my life in danger 
as a result of any further stress caused to me in the above case. Should 
the court wish to question my latter statement, I can obtain a medical 
report confirming the danger of any further stress being caused to me. 
Despite the risks that will be caused to me as outlined above, it is 
still my intention to try to attend the Teesside Court at 2.20pm on 
Monday the 16th of December 2002.  

I hold the opinion however, that the court can hear my counter claim for 
damages that I make against Miss Shirley Carr in this matter? My counter 
claim for damages under the  above application in the matter of Claim 
number DH202326, is under preparation.

The Statements that I the undersigned  Maurice Kellett have made above 
are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

For the avoidance of doubt for any other judge to adjudicate in this 
matter would be ultra vires and might involve the judge in criminal 
penalties.

Yours sincerely

(Formerly of this address before it was stolen from Maurice in early 
February 2003 following huge corruption used against him by the UK 
establishment)

Maurice Kellett
16A The Lyons
Hetton-le-Hole
Tyne-Wear DH50HT.

http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com   

More to follow.



 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------        
                http://www.usenet.com