THE STATEMENT COPIED BELOW HAS BEEN IGNORED BY FREEMASON TONY BLAIR


The Prime Minister
Mr Tony Blair
10 Downing Street
London  SW1A 2AA.

STATEMENT OF TRUTH.

The Statements that I the undersigned, Maurice Kellett,  make herein 
below are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

In 1986 in learned of crime that was being carried on at the then North 
East UK National Coal Board Estates Department, at Spennymoor, Co 
Durham. I was affected by it and pressed the matter with the management. 
Facts suggested that at least one of them was involved with it. After I 
would not drop the matter I was battered and then struck by a car that 
was deliberately driven at me by a man named Robert Willis Gardner 
Pringle. That same night Northumbria Police officers left me with no 
choice but to crawl most of the five or so miles to my home in the 
middle of the night during torrential rain. I was bleeding heavily from 
my injuries and the police doctor had no bandages whatsoever to help 
stem that. Police refused me hospital treatment. When I arrived home 
that morning a doctor attended me and confirmed that I had required it. 
He made a diagram of the injuries to my body that remains on my medical 
notes.

The First Use Of Crime Carried Out Against Me By Houghton-le-Spring, 
Tyne-Wear, Magistrates Court.

The matter detailed above went to Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, 
Magistrates Court, UK. One of the sitting magistrates, Mr. William 
Moseley, in regular attendance at Hetton-le-Hole Masonic Hall, was a 
very close acquaintance of  Pringle and I too had been friendly with him 
having obtained him work for his garage business. The case was dismissed 
by the court. When I approached Mr Moseley at his home on that same 
evening, he claimed that he had stood down from judgement in the Pringle 
affair. That despite it now being known that magistrates generally get 
several days prior warning of cases listed to be heard before them Much 
later a police officer told me that the Houghton Magistrates Court 
proceedings had been illegal. He said that that the remaining sitting 
magistrate, who had sat with Moseley on the bench,  had no 
qualifications to act alone. The fact of that has of late again been 
confirmed by a senior police officer. The manager of that court, a Mr 
Bavidge and the Lord Chancellors Department were parties to ignoring and 
attempting to cover up of the matter of those illegal Magistrates Court 
Proceedings. I have continued to pursue it without success. Northumbria 
Police have done their utmost to avoid investigating that matter 
throughout the years since. 


First Durham County Court Serious Crime Used Against me.
Deputy District Judge Baird,  November 1993.

In November of 1993 I and on behalf of my wife, Joyce Kellett, appealed 
at the Durham County Court in the matter of a judgement made by District 
Judge Scott-Phillips. It related to damage to our property following a 
vehicle collision with it. My appeal against District Judge Scott-
Phillips ruling  was heard by Deputy District Judge Baird who refused 
it. I learned that a Deputy District Judge is not permitted by law to 
hear any appeal. Eventually the Durham County Court admitted that fact. 
That admission came only after I had pressed the matter with the Court 
and it had clearly attempted to cover up it up. When it was clear to the 
Court that I would not let the matter go, the Court wrote that my appeal 
had been heard by the wrong judge in error. That was a lame excuse. All 
judges and indeed solicitors generally, are well aware that it is 
illegal for a Deputy District Judge, as Baird was, to hear any Appeal. 
It was eventually lawfully heard by a Circuit Judge who upheld it. 
Deputy District Judge Baird had in the circumstances, carried out a 
serious crime against me by unlawfully hearing my Appeal. It was clear 
afterwards that in that matter, It had been heard before a man who had 
carried out serious judicial criminal deception against me. It is also 
considered that the crime of Misconduct in Public Office is also of 
relevance. No action was taken on that matter by either the Durham 
County Court or any of the relevant Authorities that I reported it to. 
Those Included Durham Constabulary who were later to refuse to accept 
any evidence concerning serious crime that had been carried out by Miss 
Shirley Carr, Solicitor Alison Stott and the Durham District Land 
Registry.

Newcastle County Court March 1994.

Deputy District Judge Baird.

In March of 1994 I was accused by my next door neighbour, Miss Shirley 
Carr, of 16 the Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, who was employed as a 
National Insurance Investigator, of being a trespasser on land which 
both I and my father had been in possession of for over twenty seven 
years. The original owner of it could not and never was traced. There 
was no adverse claim made against us throughout that full period of our 
occupation. In accordance with the Law we had in those circumstances 
become the lawful owners of it. The first hearing of my alleged trespass 
on that land was before Deputy District Judge Baird. I had of course 
previously exposed him, as detailed above, for his previous use of 
Criminal Deception which he had used against me. Unfortunately I had not 
recognised or associated him at that time as being the same criminal 
judge who had been primarily involved with my appeal at Durham County 
Court a few months earlier. Though I was in need of her assistance in 
the judges chambers, D.J. Baird refused my wife access to them. They 
were situated at the Newcastle County Court. He allowed Carr two 
representatives or advocates into his Chambers. One of them was 
Professor Kenny, who was said to be a regular contributor to The Law 
Society Journal.  He would have been well aware that by speaking on the 
case as Baird had invited him to do was to say the least very improper. 
He had also paid Carr a visit at her home one Sunday afternoon which was 
not within the normal working ours of his employment. Both were employed 
at the University of Northumbria Law Clinic. Carr was in those 
circumstances unlawfully allowed the use of two advocates. DDJ Baird 
ignored my irrefutable evidence provided to him that I had not been a 
trespasser and ruled in the favour of Carr. DDJ Baird had shown in 
November 1992 that he was guilty of Criminal Deception. Having a second 
crack of the whip to pay me back for exposing his crime would all appear 
to fit in with his character. 

Shirley Carr has never been able to substantiate what is shown to have 
been her false allegation that I, or indeed my father in the 
circumstances, were trespassers on the land in question. She simply had 
no entitlement  to the land whatsoever. Recorder John H Fryer Spedding 
ruled that fact in October 1996. That despite his numerous acts, many of 
which are evidenced by his own approved transcript of judgement, were 
clearly meant to pervert the course of justice. A summary examination by 
anyone with even slight legal expertise would be able to confirm that. 
Despite that ruling, The Chief Registrar of the Durham District Land 
Registry ignored that ruling and unlawfully allowed Carr to register our 
land subject of Newcastle County Court case NE401650 into Carr's name. 
Following my meeting with Mr Timothy late last year (2002) I am 
satisfied that he too is a mason.

In March 1994 I took out a civil action against Carr at the Durham 
County Court. That followed her refusal to name the people who had 
carried out the re-roofing of her property in late 1993 (Durham County 
Court case No: DH400898.) That work had been commenced on a Saturday 
morning and had been completed by the following Sunday evening. What was 
the reason that work was done on a weekend?  They had caused damage to 
our house during that work and had also refused to identify themselves 
to us so that the normal course of law could be pursued. I also took out 
an action for damage being caused to our property following steps having 
been taken by Carr to ensure that our property received drainage coming 
from her adjoining property (Durham County Court case DH400950). It had 
no drainage facilities at the rear of it. It is clear that she had 
purchased that property at a reduced price because it had no working 
drains on it. My Durham County Court cases No. DH400950 and DH400898 
along with Carr's Newcastle County case No. NE401650 continued. On June 
1st 1994 Shirley Carr's application to the Durham County Court for 
consolidation of the cases into her case NE401650 was heard before 
District Judge Scott-Phillips. He refused her application and Ordered 
that the above cases could not be subject of consolidation. His Order 
was never subject of Appeal and stood at the time Recorder John H Fryer-
Spedding falsely alleged that the cases had been subject of 
consolidation. Then he unlawfully tried them that way as a consolidated 
case under Carr's case No: NE401650. My two prosecution cases DH400950, 
and my defence case in NE401650 had been prepared under the Order made 
on the 1st June 1994 refusing consolidation, mentioned above, of the 
cases. In the event, my case notes were of little use. However, recorder 
John H Fryer Spedding had warned me that my pointing out to him that 
Carr had commenced to swear perjury will she was under my cross 
examination, would do me no good. He also agreed that it was his 
intention to deprive me of my rights. The latter statement is agreed in 
his approved transcript of judgement. It is not difficult to see from 
the available catalogue of events, details of which are all readily 
available, that he had the prior intention that I would be his victim.  


The authorities who were made aware of that criminal act by Spedding, 
along with a catalogue of his other crimes used to defeat my cases, 
ignored it. As a further example of recorder John H Fryer-Spedding's 
perversion of the course of justice, he said that my right of way across 
the garden purchased by Carr had come to an end because that right had 
not been reserved in the conveyance of it to Carr. One of the most 
commonly used sections of law used in the conveyance of property is 
Section 62 of The Law of Property Act 1925 where included in it is all 
rights, easements, appurtenances,  privileges  etc. etc. are deemed to 
be conveyed with a property unless specifically revoked in it. That had 
not happened. Indeed the opposite was true because the vendors of that 
property had been my own parents. My father swore an affidavit agreeing 
the fact that our right of way was not revoked. That was only one part 
of the large amount of evidence that Spedding ignored. Recorder John H 
Fryer-Spedding also falsely alleged that we had required a thirty year 
term to obtain a title by adverse possession of the land subject of case 
NE401650. That was only another of his many lies. Only the twelve year 
period was in question and we had well exceeded that term anyway.


Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding was alleged to have been a judge with 
Chancery experience. I cannot think that such experience which had 
allowed him to make such untrue statements, had come from any Court of 
Law that I know of.  Spedding agreed these statement in his approved 
transcript of judgement. Video evidence taken at the time our land 
subject of case NE401650 was fenced from the garden owned by Carr was 
shown to Spedding. His statements regarding what was shown in it bore 
nothing whatsoever to the truth of what he was shown in it. Newcastle 
County Court refused me access to the tape recordings made at the 
kangaroo court held by Spedding there in October 1996. That served as 
evidence of their part in the attempted cover up of Spedding's crime 
used against me.  People who ignored these facts and many others showing 
Spedding's crimes included  Lord Justices Auld and Pill, The Court 
Service, The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner and the 
Attorney General. This has clearly been a situation where Establishment 
crime was, and remains as being protected by yet more Establishment 
crime. The fact that recorder John H Fryer-Spedding had  consistently 
lied and that is shown and proved by his own approved transcript of 
judgement, there is no doubt. His reasons for having done that to me 
remains in some doubt. However, I am sure that it had been his reward 
for me having contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select 
Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and judiciary ( 
Nolan Inquiry).

I obtained from Sunderland Local Authority substantial evidence that 
Carr had sworn very material perjury in her court submissions in the 
matter of case DH400950. Then she applied for an injunction clearly to 
deter me from seeking and taking further evidence of her crime. The 
injunction application was heard by District Judge Cuthbertson sitting 
at the Durham County Court in September 1995. D.J. Cuthbertson agreed 
that solicitor Alison Stott be allowed to prepare the draft of joint 
undertakings agreed between Carr and I in general principle. He then 
adjourned the proceedings without making it known when those proceedings 
were to recommence. In January 1996 solicitor Alison Stott declared to 
the Newcastle County Court chaired by recorder John H Fryer-Spedding 
that up to that day she had not in fact been acting for Carr but had 
only been assisting her. In those same circumstances alone, as Carr's 
assistant, solicitor Stott was party to criminal deception by failing to 
declare to the Durham County Court she was even at that time only Carr's 
assistant and had not been her advocate. That was not the least of her 
use of crimes against me. I will detail some of the others later in this 
document. Stott's declaration to the Newcastle County Court in January 
1996 mentioned above, was in fact an acknowledge of her serious use of 
crime. That same very serious crime was reported to Durham Constabulary 
and The Office For The Supervision of Solicitors who simply ignored it.

Two days after the injunction hearing before DJ Cuthbertson, my wife and 
I, received a copy of an Order made by DJ Cuthbertson granting all that 
Carr had applied for in her injunction application. I appealed against 
that Order. My Appeal was  again heard by D.J. Cuthbertson who refused 
it. In the circumstances that Appeal too had been illegal. A judge is 
not permitted by law to hear any appeal from his own judgement.  I never 
accepted the lawful validity of DJ Cuthbertson's Order. In June of 1996 
I was accused of having been in breach of DJ Cuthbertson's injunction 
Order. Part of his Order was that I was not allowed to speak to Carr. 
After that Order had been granted Carr falsely claimed to the  
Sunderland Public Health Department that our two dogs barked incessantly 
which was only another of her many lies. Shortly after that while sat in 
our garden, one of our dogs started to bark at noises coming from the 
adjoining fence between Carr's property and our own. When it carried on, 
I put some steps up against the fence and looked over it. There I saw 
Carr with something in her hand and scratching it against the fence. In 
her other hand was a microphone. It was clear even then what her 
intention had been. I called her some appropriate names in my outrage. 
She obviously tape recorded at least part of that. She had however 
edited part of that recording to her advantage. Evidence provided by 
Carr to the Courts, showed that she had secretly tape recorded a 
conversation between my wife and I while we sat in the privacy of our 
own kitchen. It had been done by her placing a microphone up to the open 
window. In July of 1995 while my wife and I had been on holiday, Mr 
Norman Pringle who lives with Carr, had gone into our property and 
altered guttering on it to allow Carr's property drainage to flow more 
freely onto ours. He agreed that he had done that in his affidavit. The 
results of his work were video filmed when my wife and I returned from 
holiday. In 1996 when my wife and I went on holiday we left a video 
camera pointing down the boundary fence between our property and Carr's. 
It had not been in use anyway as no equipment could record for the two 
weeks unattended while we were away on holiday. It had been meant as a 
deterrent to Pringle against trespassing and altering our property. 
Circuit Judge Helen Paling would I feel sure have been aware of that 
fact but still sentenced me to imprisonment. Later, which I will detail, 
she was to prove to me her unfitness to be a judge. 

An application was made in July 1996 by Carr for my imprisonment under 
her allegation that I had breached the injunction as in the above 
described circumstances, which District Judge had granted under what had 
been illegal circumstances.  I was found guilty of that allegation at 
Newcastle Crown Court by Circuit Judge Helen Paling and then sentenced 
to three months imprisonment at Durham. There I had a stroke and was 
released on appeal. My sentence was then suspended.

At the outset of the cases and around late June 1994, a solicitor by the 
name of Nancy Bone practising from Durham, made an application for Legal 
Aid for us. It was refused on the grounds that insufficient information 
had been given to the Legal aid Board by her. Bone then asked us for 
over two thousand pounds for having made that application. I would not 
pay it. In fact there had never been any mention whatsoever by Bone of 
any costs for a Legal Aid application. Then she withheld all of my files 
by lien. I made an application to the Durham County Court which was 
heard before DJ Scott-Phillips, that I be allowed to visit the Offices 
of Bone to take copies from my files to allow me to proceed. He granted 
that Order. Bone breached it and was in those circumstances guilty of 
Contempt of Court.  She had locked me out of her offices. I contacted 
the Durham County Court and was told that DJ Scott-Phillips had not 
granted such Order. The Court manager. Mr I Cuthbertson said that DJ 
Scott-Philips had told him that my visit to Bone's office had only been 
by her agreement. That was a lie but I could not prove it then. Around 
two years after the final hearing of the cases before recorder John H 
Fryer-Spedding, Bone was struck from the Register of Solicitors for 
crime/misconduct in other people's cases. Another solicitor returned my 
files that Bone had withheld. They included copies of letters that she 
had sent to the Durham County Court. In them she had referred to my 
visit to her office as being by Order of the Court. That was proof that 
the Court and/or DJ Scott-Phillips had lied about the matter and had 
protected solicitor Bone from a probable Contempt of Court conviction.

On the 1st June 1994 District Judge Scott-Phillips at the Durham County 
Court Ordered that the three cases mentioned above, DH400950, DH400898 
and NE401650 between Carr and I could not be subject of consolidation 
into one case. Solicitor Alison Stott had been going into court with 
Carr from late June 1994. In 1995 she took on the work of preparing the 
judges bundles ready for trial. She secretly passed on that work for 
Carr to carry out herself. In October 1996 recorder John H Fryer-
Spedding falsely alleged that the cases had been subject of 
consolidation.  Despite my protests he went ahead and tried them as a 
single action. After three days he ruled that I was to pay five sixth of 
all costs. His approved transcript of Judgement still serves as 
substantial evidence that it had been his prior intent to pervert the 
course of justice. I have published it along with my replies to it in 
Statement of Truth format. During the proceedings, he had warned me 
against highlighting to him that Carr was swearing perjury during my 
cross examination of her. Her contradictions of previous statements made 
on oath proved that fact. He said it would do me no good. About a week 
later I reported recorder John H Fryer-Spedding's crime to then Lord 
Chancellor Mackay. Spedding  then went into what was shown to been a 
sudden decision to retire. When Carr had prepared the judges bundles, 
without the knowledge or consent of the Durham County Court, she later 
agreed that she had deliberately left out documents which she said as 
not being important. One of them was the Order made on the 1st June 1994 
refusing her application for consolidation of the three actions that 
had, in the circumstances unlawfully, been heard before  recorder 
Spedding as a single action. In any event, he was required by Supreme 
Court rules to have seen a copy of the alleged Order for consolidation 
of the cases. There was none, only the Order refusing consolidation of 
the cases. I had prepared my two prosecution cases and one defence case 
as per the Order of the 1st June 1994  refusing consolidation of the 
cases. At what was a kangaroo court presided over by recorder Spedding I 
was thrown into complete disarray.

I sought leave to appeal recorder Spedding's judgement at the London 
High Court. It was heard before Lord's Justices Auld and Pill. I 
supplied them with a huge amount of evidence showing  evidence of the 
injustice that I was deliberately being subjected to. I also supplied 
them with a copy of the Order made by District Judge Scott-Phillips at 
Durham on 1st June 1994 refusing Carr's application for consolidation of 
the three cases. That alone should have been sufficient for granting my 
application for leave to appeal. They refused it. In 1996/97 I had 
contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee 
Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. It was common 
knowledge I had done that. I was still at that time in correspondence 
with Lord Nolan on matters concerning Freemasonry and that continued 
until January of 1998. He wrote then telling me that he was returning to 
being a Member of the Law Lords. Lord Justice Auld spent a large amount 
of the time they had allocated for my application in an attempt to 
persuade me the possibility of Masonic involvement in the injustice that 
had been dealt out was unlikely.  I wrote to LJ Auld and Pill 
afterwards. I asked that Lord Justice Auld and Pill having spent so much 
time on the matter of my concerns regarding Freemasonry would they in 
those circumstances agree their having any membership of Freemasonry. 
The letter I received from their secretary was that they did not enter 
into correspondence with litigants who had been before them. In fact 
their failure to make such denial or admission of Masonic membership was 
a breach of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. 

Solicitor Alison Stott practising from Durham, had been attending the 
Durham County Court from around late June 1994. In January 1996 she 
declared to the Newcastle County Court chaired by recorder John H Fryer 
Spedding that she had not been acting for Carr but had only been 
assisting her. There were witnesses to her declaration and affidavits 
sworn relative to it. Spedding replied to her that she was either acting 
for Carr or she was not. Her reply was that, "well I am now sir". As 
Carr's assistant Stott had no legal authority for work that she had been 
given by the Court in the matter of the injunction application against 
me in 1995 which had imprisoned me in 1996. Neither did she have any 
authority to take on the work of preparing the judges bundle or indeed 
its authority to pass that work on for Carr to carry out. Last year 
2002, Durham County Court agreed following their search of the files, 
there was no authority on record to allow solicitor Stott to prepare the 
judges bundle. That of course had also been true of the situation 
relative to Shirley Carr. That these two people had been guilty of 
serious crime there is no doubt whatsoever. The mass of evidence showing 
that still remains.

 In March 1999 I was made bankrupt at the Durham County Court in the sum 
of 15.800. Included in the bankruptcy costs were solicitor Stott's 
costs throughout which included the time period that she was, as she had 
declared in January 1996, was only Carr's assistant. My bankruptcy 
costs, having been engineered on a bed of crime, some of which is 
described here, included solicitor Stott's costs as if she had in fact 
been acting as Carr's advocate rather than her assistant as she had 
previously declared. That amounted to fraud under the Theft Act. That 
still needs to be investigated. Durham Constabulary are aware of that 
fraud but have refused to take any action on it. Those who have made 
that decision are in those circumstances shown to be liable for 
prosecution under the Regina-v-Dytham case, for Misconduct in Public 
Office. They are also held to be liable for other action. Facts and 
evidence showing that the final hearing of the cases before John H 
Fryer-Spedding had been illegal by virtue of the 1st June 1994 Order 
refusing consolidation of the cases. That too was also ignored by the 
bankruptcy court as it had also been by Lords Justices Auld and Pill. My 
appeal against that bankruptcy was refused by Mr Peter Leaver QC at the 
London Appeal Court. He said that he had no interest in the evidence 
that I had supplied to him which showed the sea of fraud used to 
engineer my bankruptcy. Part of it included the 1st June 1994 Order by 
the Durham County Court refusing consolidation of the cases. Mr Leaver 
said that he had no interest in that evidence only whether the actual 
bankruptcy proceedings had been legal. He added another two thousand 
pounds costs on for my bankruptcy appeal. Attending that appeal was 
Shirley Carr, solicitor Stott and barrister Mr Richard Merritt acting 
for Carr. Merrit had been aware that the cases had unlawfully been heard 
as a consolidated action before recorder John H Fryer-Spedding. He had 
in fact corrected his defence and prosecution case submission reflecting 
that fact  when that point had been made to known to solicitor Stott by 
my solicitor Mrs P. Tench a few weeks earlier. In those circumstances 
solicitor Stott and barrister Mr Richard Merrit are further implicated 
in the crime/misconduct used against me. It would appear at the very 
least that their obligations to the duties of their profession and to 
their duties as Officers of the Courts were ignored to the point that 
was a criminal act. 

In the matter of the land subject of my alleged trespass, solicitor 
Stott was in receipt of evidence that another solicitor, Mr Paul Graney, 
also since struck from the register of Solicitors for crime/misconduct 
in other peoples cases, had sworn perjury in a Statutory Declaration 
which had been used to lodge a caution on the land subject of the 
trespass case at the Durham District Land Registry ( NE401650). She 
failed, indeed refused to make that information known to the land 
Registry. Northumbria and Durham Constabulary ignored those matters even 
after solicitor Graney had sworn an affidavit agreeing that the 
information he had sworn in his Statutory Declaration used to register a 
caution at HM Land Registry had been untrue. Evidence by means of his 
own letters which came to light had proved that fact anyway. That 
evidence was shown to detective sergeant McGann and detective constable 
Storey at Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, Police Station. They falsely 
claimed that swearing perjury was not a police matter.

Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding ruled that Carr had no entitlement to a 
possessory title to the land subject of my alleged trespass under case 
NE401650. Despite that, Mr Patrick Timothy Chief registrar of the Durham 
District Land Registry, who was provided with a copy of that ruling, 
ignored it despite my protests. He unlawfully allowed the land subject 
of that matter to registered into Carr's name. I, and my father (since 
deceased) still have lawful title to that land despite it having been 
stolen from me by none other than crime as a mass of evidence shows. 

My father had taken an action at the Durham County Court to go back onto 
possession of the land sunject of case NE401650. Recorder John H Fryer 
Spedding had ruled, and that is included in his approved transcript of 
judgement, that my father was the most likely person to have title to 
it. His application was heard before District Judge Cuthbertson.  D.J. 
Cuthbertson ruled that my fathers application was an abuse of court time 
and then dismissed it. My father appealed that ruling. I represented him 
at the Sunderland County Court. The judge in that matter was Circuit 
Judge Helen Paling. She was the judge who had previously sentenced me to 
three months imprisonment at Durham for alleged Contempt of Court. At 
the outset of the hearing she told me to be quiet and then dismissed my 
father's appeal without my being able to present it on his behalf. My 
father ran from the courtroom when I became subject of nothing short of 
a verbal onslaught from  CJ Helen Paling. The court usher had expressed 
concern about his safety following that. I wrote to the Lord Chancellor 
about that matter. CJ Paling made an excuse then which effectively said 
that it had been a mistake. It could not have been a mistake and that 
matter was never corrected by the Court. My fathers health went 
downhill. He collapsed and died two days after my bankruptcy was 
published front page on the local Press in April 1999. The publication 
had also included that I was thereafter barred from being a Town 
Councillor by virtue of that bankruptcy ruling. He had been very upset 
at the whole affair and that was considered by a family member as being 
a contributory factor in his death.

I had been accused by Carr of approaching her at the Sunderland County 
Court and threatening  harassment of her. Her accusation had been made 
relative to the day my fathers appeal case should have been heard by CJ 
Paling at the Sunderland County Court. That allegation and another she 
had made against me had also been untrue. I was found guilty of  Carr's 
allegation at Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates court and received a huge 
fine with costs. It was that same Court who had previously carried out 
serious crime against me by its illegal proceedings in 1986 mentioned 
above. That was a matter which I had never let go of. It was at that 
time that I became sure that members of Freemasonry had been involved in 
that. My appeal against that conviction was refused. Judge Moir and two 
lay magistrates sitting at the Newcastle Combined Courts, had been 
informed a week earlier that I would require that they declare any 
membership of Freemasonry. After around a half hour adjournment, Judge 
Moir said that they would not make that declaration. Following a ruling 
in 2002, (Commissioners Case No: CSI/136/02) their judgement in that 
matter as in the cases detailed here, is shown to have been a breach of 
Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. While I had asked 
that that the barrister then acting for me, Mr Neil Addison, require 
that same declaration from the judges sitting at the London Appeal Court 
in that matter, I am unsure now as to whether he had in fact made that 
known to the judges. I have reason to believe that he had not done that 
and that suggests what I know from my  experience to be a general fear 
of mentioning anything to do with Freemasonry in our Courts.  

A few months after my Appeal against conviction for alleged harassment 
of Carr, I collected a file from solicitors Harding, Swinburne, Jackson 
& Co of Sunderland. They were the solicitors representing me in my 
appeal.  They had kept my files for a long time after my failed appeal 
under their allegation that they still needed them. Eventually I went to 
their offices and a clerk gave them to me apparently believing it had 
been agreed that I could collect them. When I  examined them at home, 
there was a copy of a letter written by Mr Head, Senior Prosecutor of 
the Washington, Tyne-Wear Crown Prosecution Service. He had written it 
to my former solicitors, Jackson's of Hartlepool, Co. Cleveland. It read 
that a security officer, a Mr Michael Golding, who was on duty in the 
Sunderland County Court at the time of the allegation made against me by 
Carr and had been spoken to by police. The letter said that Mr Golding 
had told Northumbria Police that nothing of note had occurred in the 
court at the time Carr had made that allegation of my threatening 
harassment  of her. That letter was never submitted in my defence 
evidence in my prosecution or during my appeals against it afterwards. 
Northumbria Police agreed that the evidence of that letter was material 
to my defence and that it had been a criminal act to deliberately 
withhold it from the courts. They agreed to investigate that and other 
matters of crime used against me, including the matter of the illegal 
Houghton Magistrates Court proceedings in 1986. They have never done 
that. They had allegedly appointed an acting Inspector Steve Coxon to 
deal with those matters. Weeks afterward it became very clear to me that 
all in fact he had been doing was acting and nothing else. 

I was a New Labour member of Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear,  Town Council. I 
spoke out at Council meetings against four family members, all Easington 
Lane Ward Councillors having failed to declare an interest in the matter 
of land owned by one of them which was subject of Council discussion for 
proposed housing. Instead of declaring an interest and not taking part 
in that discussion, all were part of it and two of them spoke in favour 
of that housing. When I spoke out against their failure to declare that 
interest at a Hetton Council meeting, the Councillor who owned that land 
stopped me from leaving the Council Chambers. Two of his Councillor 
family members held me while I was being pushed back from the door. The 
Councillor who owned that land subject of Council discussion, a member 
of the Freemasons, then drew his arm back in a clear action to deliver a 
blow to my head. That was prevented by Councillor Mr George Wandless who 
took hold of that man and pulled him away from me. I continued to be 
subject of threats from them. Immediately before that Council meeting, I 
had been asked by that mason Councillor if I owned my own home. I 
replied that I did. He implied that if I mentioned their failure to 
declare an interest in the land mentioned above, I might end up not 
owning it. That is exactly what has happened as a result of the serious 
crime which I have reported to you as Prime Minister since you took 
Office and before in 1997 when you were Leader of the Opposition. I made 
complaint on that matter to Northumbria Police. Inspector Williamson was 
appointed to investigate that matter. He never even approached me at 
all. He declared a few days later that as he did not think the rest of 
the Town Councillors would say what they had witnessed of the assault on 
me and what amounted to my false imprisonment by the Councillors, he had 
decided not to take any action on that matter. That Inspector retired 
several months later. I have good reason to believe that he too was a 
member of the Freemasons.

My wife, myself and our two daughters became subject of a death threat. 
A man said that he would stab us. He went on to say that if we reported 
that matter to Northumbria Police he would repeat that same threat made 
against us to them as well. A Northumbria Police officer was called. He 
went to see the man who did indeed repeat that same death threat made 
against us to him as well. No action was taken on that matter either by 
Northumbria Police. This Mr Prime Minister is the way criminal elements 
of Freemasonry works and there are a large number of other people who 
can bear witness to that. It is only one of the many reasons why all 
those employed in the public service must be compelled to declare any 
membership of Freemasonry. While I understand your government will not 
do that because of possible violations of the European Human Rights 
Convention under the Privacy Article, by using that same argument crime 
rings too could make that same claim. 

In 1999 after further false allegations made by Shirley Carr I was 
arrested and taken to Washington, Tyne-Wear,  Police Station. My request 
for a doctor to attend me was ignored. I requested a solicitor but that 
too was ignored. I asked that someone be informed as to where I was 
being held. That request too was ignored. After around two hours I had 
breathing difficulties. Only when I made a further request that a doctor 
attend me did the custody sergeant telephone one. I was allowed to speak 
with that doctor on the telephone and told him my symptoms and 
medication that I was undergoing. He informed the custody sergeant that 
I must be taken immediately to hospital. Following my admission there 
and examination, It was confirmed that I had been seriously ill. The 
Police Complaints Authority confirmed afterwards that I had been 
unlawfully arrested and that my continued detainment by Northumbria 
Police has also been unlawful. The PCA letter agreeing that was only 
part of the huge amount of documents now missing following the seizure 
of my home on 5th February 2003.

A man criminally assaulted both my wife and I at our home. He had just 
previously caused criminal damage to our property. When Northumbria 
Police were called to the scene, the man agreed that he had carried out 
those acts. Nothing was heard again from Northumbria Police on that 
matter as well.

Following having taken part in a radio discussion relative to 
Freemasonry in November of 1997 a man called at our home the following 
morning. In short he suggested that I would never be able to beat 
Freemasonry for what it is known by many to be generally up to. He 
warned that someone by the name I believe was Mr John Coates had been  
like me and would not stop voicing his concerns about Freemasonry. He 
went on to say that  his deep freezer situated at South Shields, had 
been burnt down as a result of that. His implication was that our home 
could become subject of similar treatment. In January of 1998 my wife 
and I heard evidence that the threat of having our home burnt down was 
real because a deep freezer business had in fact been burnt down at 
South Shields. I reported that matter to a Northumbria police officer 
and that was also ignored by them. My wife had asked that we sell our 
home and try to flee from the situation. That is never possible where 
Freemasonry in concerned and the reasons for that are numerous.

This type of behaviour by Northumbria Police is all too common to me. 
Its Chief Constable is reputed to be a member of Freemasonry. He had 
never issued any denial of that when I requested he do that in my 
letters sent to him. I am aware of a number of its senior officers also 
being masons. That would follow given that masons are required to give 
preference to their Masonic brothers in the well known oaths that they 
all make. Freemasonry is also known as The Brotherhood which sets them 
aside all other considerations when dealing with them.

In late 2002 a possession Order for my home was made at the Teesside 
County Court in the favour of Carr. My bankruptcy engineered on nothing 
short of a bed of crime, had allowed that situation. It had been my home 
most of the time since 1947. I appealed against it on the 20th January 
this year (2003) at the Teesside County Court. Durham County Court could 
not hear that matter because I have made a damages claim against it for 
its use of crime against me detailed above. They are continuing to 
ignore it and had previously alleged the matter had been referred to the 
London Court Service to deal with. When I contacted them weeks after the 
Durham County Court allegation that it had been referred to them, they 
told me that they had no record of that. I have heard nothing from any 
of them since that time. Judge Mainwaring-Taylor refused my application 
to set aside the possession Order for my home. He had wrongly ruled that 
my concerns at possible Masonic influence in my cases was of no 
relevance ( Commissioners Case No: CSI/136/02). 

The Durham County Court quickly arranged my appeal hearing of his 
ruling. It was heard at Teesside County Court on Thursday 30th January 
this year. I had provided the judge, as yet unnamed to me, with a copy 
of the Commissioners Case No: CSI/136/02 . It related to a litigant who 
also had concerns at possible Masonic involvement in his case which a 
tribunal had ignored. The Appeal  ruling was that by failing to instil a 
feeling of confidence in that litigant, it had been an automatic 
violation to Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention and 
the his appeal was upheld. When the judge at the Teesside County of the 
30th January started to read that CSI/136/02 ruling he was clearly 
shocked and asked if the solicitor for Carr had seen it. He indicated 
that he had. I took ill very shortly afterwards and the judge 
immediately adjourned the case. I was taken by ambulance to hospital and 
spent some time in a cardiac care ward until late the following day. I 
had provided the judge and Carr's solicitor with the necessary protocols 
required for my application for Judicial Review in my cases. I had also 
provided them with my skeleton argument which the Protocols required. 
Nothing whatsoever was heard from the courts after that.

On Monday 2nd February this year (2003)  a bailiff arrived at my home 
accompanied by Northumbria Police officers. I saw him trying to force 
entry to my home watched by police officers.  I warned them that what he 
was doing was illegal but the bailiff continued to try to force entry to 
my home. It was then that I decided to stay my ground against what had 
been nothing less than the massive use of crime that had brought about 
that situation. I took an ornamental sword used as an ornament and 
threatened to fall on it if the bailiff did not stop trying to force the 
door to my home. He still continued with his attempt to force entry.  I 
took petrol from a can in my rear garden and poured some over me and 
held an unlighted match close to me. I warned that if an entry was made 
to my home, they would just have to take what they would find of me. 
More police officers arrived. Two police negotiators started to talk to 
me. My telephone and gas supply was turned off by the police. I had told 
one of the police negotiators, a female officer named to me as Jo, that 
I would hand some evidence of my allegations of the crime used to bring 
about that situation to her through my kitchen window. It was then that 
she warned me from going near that window and it was then made clear to 
me that police marksmen had been stationed outside my home and were 
looking for an opportunity to shoot me. Jo told me she would go and have 
a word with them. 

Later that Monday evening police cut off my electricity. The next day my 
water supply off. I was able to drink a little that I presume had been 
left in the pipes. I was very sick after drinking it. When I saw the 
water the following morning it was heavily discoloured. On the third 
night Northumbria Police Special Squad officers battered down the door 
of my home. I stood at the top of the stairs of it and was trying to 
pluck up courage to fall on the sword that I held. Two Special Squad 
officers complete with riot shield, visors etc, quickly made their way 
up the stairs and hand cuffed me while they were all yelling and 
screaming presumably to distract me. Two Special Squad officers held my 
shoulders but left my sword between my hands so I could not move it. 
Then they proceeded to make noises that were very clearly meant to co-
ordinate their pressure on my shoulders while pushing my abdomen down 
onto the sword. Another Special Squad Officer was near to the top of the 
stairs. On seeing what his colleagues were attempting to do to me, he 
grabbed the handcuffs and pulled the sword away then dragged me headlong 
down the stairs away from his colleagues, the two would be murderers. I 
suffered superficial wounds to my abdomen resulting from that murder 
attempt. 

I ended up at Sunderland Royal Hospital with a twenty four hour 
continued throughout Northumbria Police guard. The next two days no one 
was allowed to visit me at the hospital. Only when they were warned by 
someone with legal knowledge that what they were continuing to do was 
also illegal did they allow me visitors. However, I was not allowed them 
without a police officer in attendance. One of them confirmed to me that 
anything that passed in the conversation between my visitors and myself  
was being noted for possible use. Essential medication that I needed and 
which a police doctor had obtained especially for me was never sent to 
hospital. That caused me problems when I ended up taking some wrong 
medication.  

Before the siege of my home  started on 2nd  February, and the just 
previous Teesside County Court proceedings, I had received a letter from 
your Mr Matt Dowding of 10 Downing Street, London. Last year I had 
forwarded on a damages claim made against you for what I consider has 
been a serious failure in what I consider to have been your duty as 
prime Minister to set in motion the necessary mechanism to allow the UK 
citizen access  to independent and impartial tribunals or authorities 
established by law for the resolution of our criminal and civil rights. 
That as you will know is a requirement of Article 6(1) of the European 
Human Rights Convention. Mr Dowding's letter of the 16th January 2003 
related to that matter. It read that my letters and claim made against 
you were being passed on to the Lord Chancellors Department to deal 
with. I have not had any communication from that Department following 
that. My claim against you is being revised in an upward direction 
following the events which have taken place in my case over this past 
year. Mr Fraser Kemp MP,  sent had copy bundles of evidence of the 
judicial and other crimes that had been used against me to, The Lord 
Chancellors Department, The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner  
and the Attorney General. None of these authorities accepted any 
responsibility to act on the matter of judicial crime or indeed the 
evidence showing that. Letters that Mr Kemp MP had received from these 
authorities confirmed that fact. I then asked in my letter to Mr Kemp MP 
if he would raise these matters for and in the general public interest 
in the House of Commons. He replied in his  letter that he was not 
permitted to raise issues in the House. That still requires an 
explanation.

There is absolutely no doubt that had we had such independent 
authorities for me to turn to as required under Article 6(1) of the 
European Human Rights Convention in the matter of the Establishment 
crime of which I am subject, the situation of the seizure of my home in 
February would not have come about. Now it has also been effectively 
confirmed via Mr Fraser Kemp MP that the Judiciary generally have become 
a law to themselves. This is itself a very serious matter in addition to 
the deprival of our rights of access to independent authorities ect, for 
the resolution of our criminal and civil rights as required under the 
European Human Rights Convention. The question that remains is who was 
it who decided that my murder was a solution to the Establishment crime 
problem? That decision had surely come from high authority? 

Finally, my wife and I, since divorced after thirty years of marriage, 
purchased a property at Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire, in the sum of 
65.000 cash in late April 1998. That purchase had been made with our 
money and while we were still married and was registered at HM Land 
Registry in my wife's name. I was made bankrupt in March 1999 in the sum 
of 15.800. I had made the Official Receiver situated at Stockton-on-
Tees, aware of that purchase. According to the law, all financial 
transactions leading up to a bankruptcy for a period of two years are 
deemed to be taken into consideration for the purposes of it. That 
section of law was ignored in my case. After that purchase my wife's own 
hand written financial accounts which she had hidden from me, showed 
that there was 27.600 remaining after that house purchase. In addition, 
she had used forgery to obtain Land Registry registration of our marital 
home into here sole name at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, which had 
previously been registered in our joint names. Land which had been 
registered at the Durham District Land Registry in my sole name, became 
registered again by means of forgery, into my wife's sole name. Evidence 
shows that she had then sold or whatever those assets which had been 
mine to the Trustee in Bankruptcy. The value of those assets  far 
exceeds the amount claimed in my bankruptcy even had it been obtained 
without the use of the mass crimes I have again reported to you.

North Yorkshire Police, in whose area my wife had purchased the property 
at Dacre Banks is, refused to act on my allegations regarding that. I 
threatened Mr Kenworthy, the North Yorkshire Chief Constable with 
citizens arrest for failing to carry out his duty on that matter. Only 
then did he send two detectives north to see me at my home at Hetton-le-
Hole, Tyne-Wear. They saw and took copies of the evidence of my wife's 
hand written accounts and were made aware of the cash house purchase by 
her at Dacre Banks. That purchase had been well within the period 
relative to bankruptcy. They detectives told me that they had sufficient 
evidence to act  and returned to North Yorkshire. Around two weeks later 
I received a letter from North Yorkshire Police saying that there was 
insufficient evidence to act on my allegations. Even a simple check at 
HM Land Registry would have provided sufficient evidence of that 65.000 
cash purchase by my wife, let alone the rest of it. That was again a 
clear indication that I was subject of a conspiracy which I attribute 
that to the influence of Freemasonry. 

The thread of their very obvious influence remained throughout and had 
started with the illegal Houghton-le-Spring Magistrate Court proceedings 
in 1986. The Magistrate, Mr William Moseley, who later claimed he had 
stood down from judgement when I asked him to explain his presence on 
the bench, was in regular attendance at Hetton-le-Hole, Masonic Hall. 
Pringle, the man who had  battered me and then struck me with his car 
that he had deliberately driven at me, supplied the local Masonic Halls 
with fruit and vegetables for use in their functions.

This is not a full account of what was carried out against me by what 
has undoubtedly  amounted to high level authority crime. It is however I 
think the most substantive. I have been subject of other crime carried 
out by a doctor and police officers where again there was evidence of a 
thread of Freemasonry involved in that as well. Indications are that the 
problem of Masonic membership within the medical profession is also a 
problem. I had been an active supporter of Mr Chris Mullin MP's Private 
Members, Secret Societies Declaration Bill which failed when it was 
talked out of time in the House of Commons several years ago. Later he 
wrote to me hinting at his concern of the number of MP's who were 
masons. Now it is my understanding that Mr Mullin MP pays his 
Constituency Office rent to the Durham Grand Lodge of Freemasonry. Just 
over a year ago he was forefront in the obtaining of a 35.000 public 
grant for the restoration of one of Sunderland's Masonic Halls.

The Court Service has advised that I employ a solicitor to act for me in 
these matters. However, again from my past experience, I have found 
solicitors generally to be involved with matters involving crime and 
misconduct. It is now a well known fact by me following my experience 
with them, and from the experience of many others that the Office For 
The Supervision Of Solicitors is more often involved in covering up 
legal profession crime and misconduct that in protecting the public from 
it. I suggest that is an all too common problem coming from self 
regulatory authorities. They have done that to me now several times. In 
addition, solicitors, being Officers of the Courts, cannot reasonably be 
claimed to be independent or impartial in matters concerning judicial 
crime. I am also very aware of substantial membership of Freemasonry 
within the legal profession generally and that too I know has been a 
factor involved in my situation.

I have previously asked that you have a Public Inquiry into my case. My 
request to you regarding that has not been granted. I am aware that if 
such Inquiry was carried out by those authorities or tribunals as 
required under Article 6(1) of the ECHR, which we simply don't have, it 
would show that all UK citizens and not just myself, have a very serious 
problem with the denial of our rights. Mr Fraser Kemp MP's letters and 
evidence sent to the various authorities I have named show  that the 
judiciary  is not accountable to the public or any authority.

A list of names is being drawn up of those involved in judicial crime 
who, by use of their crimes, have rendered themselves liable to a lawful 
citizens arrest. Such arrest  is extended to all those who fail to carry 
out their considered public duty to act on that crime or to those who 
try to prevent such lawful arrests from taking place.

I again ask that you set in motion the necessary mechanism to set up an 
Independent Inquiry into my case. It is clear from evidence that I have 
at hand that none of what is considered as being the relevant 
authorities will act on the matter of judicial crime. That same crime is 
clearly being protected generally by the police in what appears to be an 
unwritten law. It is therefore an illegal law being used by them.

My home and land was taken from me as a result of the crimes carried out 
against me, some of which I have detailed here to you, which ensured 
that situation. It is not my intention to beg for what is rightfully 
mine and which has been stolen from me. The UK justice system is without 
doubt now in a situation where it is more akin to an injustice system 
and accountable to no one. I don't think that I need to write here what 
I believe will eventually happen because of that. History is the best 
indicator.

I copy a letter written to me by Mr Benny Stone of the Court Service 
Unit dated 21st October 2003. You will see their absolute reluctance to 
act on these matters. But that has made their authority to act 
questionable in the process? This is of course the same Court Service 
which the Durham County Court had alleged that they had passed on to my 
damages claim made against it. To remind you of what I wrote earlier, 
after many months had passed I contacted the Court Service who told me 
that they had no record of my case having been passed to them by the 
Durham Country Court.

I also copy a letter to you a letter which I received from Mr Andrew 
Clark of The Home Office in what he has written is in response regarding 
Freemasonry and the Police Service. It is dated 28th October 2003. You 
will again see that the Home Office is denying any responsibility to act 
on the matters I have reported to you. 

Mr Fraser Kemp MP, Barroness Scotland of the Lord Chancellors 
Department, The Attorney General and the Parliamentary Commissioner, and 
indeed the Home Office were, according to Mr Fraser Kemp MP, all sent a 
copy dossier of evidence showing evidence of my allegations against 
those I have named here. I am sure that he too was surprised at their 
response to him having supplied that evidence by their clear failure to 
act on it. I am accusing the Establishment of being deeply involved in 
trying to cover up its own crimes. I am also well aware now that there 
are those who are capable of and consenting to my murder to achieve my 
silence on these matters. I am not deterred by that.   

I suffered a heart attack while looking for somewhere to live following 
the seizure of my home.  That had also followed the attempt to murder me 
at the time police stormed my home. I realise now the possibility of a 
further heart attack occurring and this more so because of the stress 
which I remain subjected to by the failure of any authority whatsoever 
to carry out their public duty to act on these matters. Those same 
authorities who are well known by the many victims of judicial crime and 
misconduct of playing a sort of game of frustration. These are just some 
of my reasons not to remain silent or give in to what has become 
tyrannical powers now at work in the UK.  When judges are no longer 
answerable to Parliament for their crime, as is the situation now, this 
leads our country into a very dangerous stage of its history. My natural 
instinct is to fight the Establishment crime I am subjected to rather 
than give way to it. If I have to die in that cause then so be it. The 
evil people I have named to you will ultimately be called to answer for 
their crimes whether I am dead or alive. I do not request a Public 
Inquiry into these matters. I think it appropriate in the circumstances 
which I have detailed to you that I am right to demand one. 

Perhaps from information given to me you should look more into the 
Operation Ore list and see how many of them are members of the 
Freemasons. Perhaps it would also be useful to find out how many judges 
and police officers are included on that list and who amongst them are 
still employed in the Public Service where no action against them has 
been taken either. William Hamilton the Dunblane child mass murderer was 
also a known mason. There is little doubt that his involvement in that 
matter is still cause for alarm to many over the one hundred year clamp 
down on news of the matter of his massacre at Dunblane. 
 

Signed by me Maurice Kellett

Of:

Address withheld for the purposes of this posting only 
 

On this 11th day of November 2003. 

C.C. All interested parties and publication to the general public.