|
|
|
Re: Arms Protest Ends in Riot
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
On 10 Jun, 10:38, David Hansen <SENDdavidNOhS...@spidacom.co.uk>
wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:59:51 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be BrianW
> <brianwhiteh...@hotmail.com> wrote this:-
>
> >I have nothing against the makers of the film in question. ?They have
> >every right to show their film. ?However, there is ...
|
Re: Arms Protest Ends in Riot
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 10, 9:08 am, David Hansen <SENDdavidNOhS...@spidacom.co.uk>
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:16:15 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be Doug
> <jag...@riseup.net> wrote this:-
>
> >Nope, in this case the police were acting as censors.
>
> Indeed. They chose the time of their interventions very carefully,
> so t ...
|
Re: Arms Protest Ends in Riot
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
On 10 Jun, 09:50, David Hansen <SENDdavidNOhS...@spidacom.co.uk>
wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:19:44 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be BrianW
> <brianwhiteh...@hotmail.com> wrote this:-
>
> >How on earth can you say it was the police who censored it, when it
> >was the film makers who had failed to get a certific ...
|
Re: Arms Protest Ends in Riot
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
On 10 Jun, 09:08, David Hansen <SENDdavidNOhS...@spidacom.co.uk>
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:16:15 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be Doug
> <jag...@riseup.net> wrote this:-
>
> >Nope, in this case the police were acting as censors.
>
> Indeed. They chose the time of their interventions very carefully,
> so tha ...
|
Re: Arms Protest Ends in Riot
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:08:22 +0100
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 23:16:15 -0700 (PDT) someone who may be Doug
<jagmad@riseup.net> wrote this:-
>Nope, in this case the police were acting as censors.
Indeed. They chose the time of their interventions very carefully,
so that there was not enough time to counter the intervention and
the venues were put in a ...
|
Ban all buses
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:31:24 +0100
Using DughLogic (TM), there can only be one conclusion from this tragic
story:
Pedestrian killed in bus accident
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7445475.stm
This naturally means that all bus drivers are terrorist murderers, and
should all be tarred with the same brush.
Doug, I hope you agree - ...
|
??Google Adsense introduction??
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:17:17 +0800
??Google Adsense introduction??
http://eacheaby.free-web-hosting.biz
?3?£¤?£¤?¡¤
?¡ì??¨¨¡è?¡ì
?¡ì¨®????¡ì
???£¤?£¤??
http://bluesea.go.51.net
http://www.eacheaby.com
...
|
??Beijing Hutong introduction??
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:02:50 +0800
??Beijing Hutong introduction??
http://eacheaby.free-web-hosting.biz
?3?£¤?£¤?¡¤
?¡ì??¨¨¡è?¡ì
?¡ì¨®????¡ì
???£¤?£¤??
http://bluesea.go.51.net
http://www.eacheaby.com
...
|
Re: Another killing.
Mon, 9 Jun 2008 19:39:40 +0000 (UTC)
Peter Thomas <peter.thomas@peters.welshtinplate.info> gurgled happily,
sounding much like they were saying:
>>> e.g. WWII, did Germany legally invade Poland, Did Japan legally bomb
>>> pearl harbour?
>>No. They were the pre-emptive aggressors, much like us in Iraq.
> What exactly were Germany & japan pre-em ...
|
Re: Another killing.
Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:35:05 +0100
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 00:55:09 -0700 (PDT), Doug <jagmad@riseup.net>
wrote:
>> e.g. WWII, did Germany legally invade Poland, Did Japan legally bomb
>> pearl harbour?
>>
>No. They were the pre-emptive aggressors, much like us in Iraq.
What exactly were Germany & japan pre-empting?
--
Cheers
Peter ...
|
|
|
