|
|
|
Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:54:47 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 23, 8:11?pm, Disneygeek <edrho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 23, 11:43?am, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:00:58 -0800 (PST), Disneygeek <edrho...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >It's been suggested that possibly some third party hit the Earth and
> > >"g ...
|
Phony, Fake A Level's
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:18:32 -0800 (PST)
Our impressive documents are shipped ready to hang in your home, or at
the office.
Fakedocuments.aol.com
WE SHIP TO THE UK EVERY DAY!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Af7A6l8U328
Our company deals in GCSE Certificates, TOEFL Certificates, CELTA
Certificates, City & Guilds Certificates and every foreign d ...
|
Phony, fake GCSE's
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:18:07 -0800 (PST)
Our impressive documents are shipped ready to hang in your home, or at
the office.
Fakedocuments.aol.com
WE SHIP TO THE UK EVERY DAY!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Af7A6l8U328
Our company deals in GCSE Certificates, TOEFL Certificates, CELTA
Certificates, City & Guilds Certificates and every foreign d ...
|
Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:11:38 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 23, 11:43?am, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:00:58 -0800 (PST), Disneygeek <edrho...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >It's been suggested that possibly some third party hit the Earth and
> >"gouged out" the Moon. If so, this was way, way early in the formation
> >of the S ...
|
Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:46:17 +0100
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:56:23 -0800 (PST), BradGuth <bradguth@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Jan 23, 2:00?am, Disneygeek <edrho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 23, 1:13?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 22, 8:35?pm, Disneygeek <edrho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Jan 22, 2:06?pm, Br ...
|
Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:43:16 +0100
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:00:58 -0800 (PST), Disneygeek <edrhodes@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Jan 23, 1:13?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 22, 8:35?pm, Disneygeek <edrho...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 22, 2:06?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Jan 22, 1:59?am, Di ...
|
Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:39:14 +0100
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:07:18 -0800 (PST), pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
>BradGuth wrote:
>>
>> Cruithne 3753, go figure. ?Damn not so little thing must have snuck in
>> under the old radar (so to speak), as having arrived at -2 km/s with
>> respect to Earth, and having stuck around ever since.
>
>What's your poin ...
|
Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:47:39 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 20, 8:19?pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:10:13 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by BradGuth
> <bradg...@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> >On Jan 19, 1:27?pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:22:42 -0800 (PST), the followi ...
|
Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing?
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:14:16 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 22, 11:06?am, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:25:27 -0800 (PST), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by BradGuth
> <bradg...@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> >On Jan 21, 12:01?pm, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:56:01 -0800 (PST), the follo ...
|
internet jops in house online
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:15:18 -0800 (PST)
please acknowledge about internet jops online on computer. ...
|
|
|
