Myreader.co.uk  
uk news, chat and community
   home   |   control panel login   |   archive   |  
 
misc
announce
answers
consultants
d-i-y
environment
environment.conservation
gov.agency.csa
gov.local
gov.social-security
gov.social-work
misc
philosophy.atheism
philosophy.humanism
philosophy.misc
radio.amateur
railway
sci.astronomy
sci.med.nursing
sci.med.pharmacy
sci.misc
sci.weather
singles
telecom
telecom.broadband
telecom.mobile
telecom.voip
test
transport
transport.air
transport.buses
transport.ferry
transport.london
transport.ride-sharing
  
 
group : uk.sci.astronomy      view archive
page nr. << back    20      21      22      23      24      25      26      27      28      29      30      31      32      33      34      35      36      37      38      39      40    next >>



Aquarid meteor shower to peak on moonless night     Thu, 1 May 2008 21:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
Bits of Halley's Comet will streak into the Earth's atmosphere before dawn on Monday during the peak of the eta Aquarid meteor shower. Moonlight will not interfere with the show, making this likely the best meteor display for northern hemisphere observers until the Perseids in August, and the best all year for sou ...

Re: Reverse Speech & The Apollo Moon Controversy     Thu, 1 May 2008 21:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
> > So, you=3Fve still got nothing outside of your subjective NASA/Apollo > > Old Testament Qur=3Fan that has fully scripted everything, so that you> > folks can=3Ft even deductively think for yourselves. ?Gee whiz, what a > > silly surprise, much the same as going into your DARPA conspired gas > > chambers inste ...

Re: Reverse Speech & The Apollo Moon Controversy     Thu, 1 May 2008 15:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
On May 1, 12:43 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2008 11:25:26 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On May 1, 11:15 am, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 May 2008 11:12:37 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >Yo ...

Re: Reverse Speech & The Apollo Moon Controversy     Thu, 1 May 2008 15:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
On May 1, 12:43 pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2008 11:25:26 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On May 1, 11:15 am, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 1 May 2008 11:12:37 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >Yo ...

Re: Lunar images from the first half of April     Thu, 1 May 2008 19:56:53 +0000 (UTC)
In uk.sci.astronomy Abo <no@spam.thanks> wrote: > Pete Lawrence wrote: >> Dramatic Appenine shadows... >> http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/lunar/2008-04-12_21-46-25_Red.jpg > Love this image! Yes, that is lovely. You can actually see the mountains. It's almost 3D. -- Andy ...

Re: Reverse Speech & The Apollo Moon Controversy     Thu, 1 May 2008 11:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
On May 1, 11:15 am, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 1 May 2008 11:12:37 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >You silly spooks and moles of the mainstream status quo may need to > >break out your big guns in order to fight the good fight against my > >array of lose cann ...

Re: Reverse Speech & The Apollo Moon Controversy     Thu, 1 May 2008 11:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
On May 1, 1:28 am, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:04:27 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >On Apr 2, 2:18 am, Disneygeek <edrho...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On Apr 1, 1:41 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > Disneygeek wrote: > > >> > > I ...

Promtastic filamence     Thu, 01 May 2008 16:35:53 +0100
Over it goes... http://www.digitalsky.org.uk/solar/2008/2008-05-01_08-08-09_SVF70ds.jpg -- Pete Lawrence http://www.digitalsky.org.uk ...

Re: Reverse Speech & The Apollo Moon Controversy     Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 2, 2:18 am, Disneygeek <edrho...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 1, 1:41 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Disneygeek wrote: > > > > I am saying what I said. Nothing more, nothing less. I have been > > > reading your posts for quite some time and I've never seen any > > > verification or ...

Refracting telescope and minium angular size     Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:33:36 -0400
How do I compute the smallest angular size which can be resolved given the size of the refractor, when no wavelengths are given? Is there a simple formula that does not involve wavelengths, or is there some standard wavelength that is assumed if none is given? Thanks for everyone's help in understanding this in ...


page nr.: page nr. << back    20      21      22      23      24      25      26      27      28      29      30      31      32      33      34      35      36      37      38      39      40    next >>
Google
 
Web myreader.co.uk


    COPYRIGHT 2007, YARDI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, ALL RIGHT RESERVE  |   contact us