|
|
|
Re: Addressing the formation of the solar system
Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 8, 10:07?am, pnals...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 7, 11:31?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 7, 7:56?pm, pnals...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 7, 6:05?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > As of some odd 250~350 million years ago, Eden/Earth and our entire
> > > > ...
|
Re: Addressing the formation of the solar system
Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 7, 11:31?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 7, 7:56?pm, pnals...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 7, 6:05?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > As of some odd 250~350 million years ago, Eden/Earth and our entire
> > > solar system became surrounded and perhaps otherwise ...
|
Re: Addressing the formation of the solar system
Sun, 7 Jun 2009 23:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 7, 7:56?pm, pnals...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 7, 6:05?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > As of some odd 250~350 million years ago, Eden/Earth and our entire
> > solar system became surrounded and perhaps otherwise cosmic saturated
> > within the exact same molecular cloud that gave birth to th ...
|
Re: Addressing the formation of the solar system
Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 7, 6:05?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As of some odd 250~350 million years ago, Eden/Earth and our entire
> solar system became surrounded and perhaps otherwise cosmic saturated
> within the exact same molecular cloud that gave birth to the massive
> and extremely vibrant Sirius star/solar sy ...
|
Re: Addressing the formation of the solar system
Sun, 7 Jun 2009 18:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 15, 3:43?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 10:20?pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > How do accretion discs form in a flat plane around a star?
>
> > How does the gravitational order bring matter together in the solar
> > plane. How then does this matter proceed to become plane ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sun, 7 Jun 2009 14:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 7, 9:23?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 5:31?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I can see clearly now, but then so can ETs half as smart see even
> > better
>
> > If the extremely nearby planet Venus that gives us panspermia flu most
> > every 19 months is officiall ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Sun, 7 Jun 2009 09:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 5, 5:31?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can see clearly now, but then so can ETs half as smart see even
> better
>
> If the extremely nearby planet Venus that gives us panspermia flu most
> every 19 months is officially mainstream taboo/nondisclosure rated
> (much the same as our moon), then ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
I can see clearly now, but then so can ETs half as smart see even
better
If the extremely nearby planet Venus that gives us panspermia flu most
every 19 months is officially mainstream taboo/nondisclosure rated
(much the same taboo/banishment as for our moon or its L1), then
perhaps going further out is the onl ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Fri, 5 Jun 2009 05:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
I can see clearly now, but then so can ETs half as smart see even
better
If the extremely nearby planet Venus that gives us panspermia flu most
every 19 months is officially mainstream taboo/nondisclosure rated
(much the same as our moon), then perhaps going further out is the
only option for this paranoid Usen ...
|
Re: A retrospective look at Sirius B in its red supergiant phase
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
On May 31, 5:20?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 29, 12:12?pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 23, 10:26?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 27, 4:47?am, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Red giant stars are many, and yet still a little h ...
|
|
|
