|
|
|
Re: If goods are paid for, can there be a theft?
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:50:05 +0000
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:11:08 +0000, Steve Walker put finger to
keyboard and typed:
>peterwn wrote:
>> On Nov 14, 8:30 am, "Steve Walker" <spam-t...@beeb.net> wrote:
>>> peterwn wrote:
>>>> On Nov 14, 7:50 am, "Iain" <s...@smaps.net> wrote:
>>>>> As we are always taught, ignorance of the law is no defence.
>>> ...
|
Fraud, theft, imbezzlement, Proving the case with no or little support
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:50:07 +0000
As this case is quite long and complex I have for the benefit of
everyone bullet pointed key issues .
1. My relationship is future son in law to my partners parents
2. Partner is one of 2 sisters and two brothers
3 Partners parents elderly (over 70)
4 Partners father entered hospital, caught MRSA , rema ...
|
Employer legal duty to ensure you take your holiday
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:45:06 +0000
I believe that it is now an employers legal duty to ensure you take
your statutory minimum holiday requirement. Is this true ?
Path: r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: trainmanUK <jamessan@hotmail.co.uk>
Newsgroups: uk.legal.moderated
Subject: Employer legal duty to ensure you take your holiday
X-P ...
|
Re: If goods are paid for, can there be a theft?
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:30:16 +0000
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:50:13 +0000, "Iain" <spam@smaps.net> wrote:
>It could be considered as mitigation that he offered payment for the wine.
>But clearly it was not being accepted at the time. Therefore no contract
>had taken place, therefore the wine did not belong to him.
Whether the person was dishones ...
|
A Friday afternoon sort of question
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:25:06 +0000
We've just received the following memo at work (names blanked, of
course) and I wondered if our landlords are obliged to do what they say
they are or if they are just using the term "to comply with current
legislation" to stop anyone arguing. I don't have a problem with what
they are suggesting, it's an idle ...
|
Re: Theft?
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:30:24 +0000
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:20:24 +0000, Ste <ste_rose0@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On 11 Nov, 22:30, Alex Heney <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>> It is dishonest because you are not taking the goods in an honest
>> belief that you are entitled to do so.
>>
>> End of story.
>
>But is it possible to have a "dishonest belie ...
|
Charity debts and Trustees
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:20:09 +0000
I am the Trustee of a small registered charity and have been advised that
the charity owes money to a small business which is threatening to take the
charity to the small claims court for settlement. Am I right in thinking
that as a Trustee I am theoretically liable for any debts of the charity?
Thanks.
...
|
Re: Theft?
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:10:04 +0000
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:25:21 +0000, Richard Miller
<richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Even if the shop was wrong in believing that they had to refuse this
> sale, this woman just decided that her wishes overrode the legal right
> of the shop, as the owner, not to sell the wine to her. That is
> repreh ...
|
Re-drafting of will
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:30:03 +0000
My mother has just arranged for her will to be
re-drafted by a new firm of solicitors that are
closer to where she lives. On advising the old
firm, they seem to insist on sending the original
will (dated 1981) to her, so she may destroy it.
Is this normal practice? Why doesn't the old firm
live dangerou ...
|
Re: Theft?
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:15:07 +0000
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:35:10 +0000, the Omrud
<usenet.omrud@gEXPUNGEmail.com> wrote:
>I said in another thread - it depends on the meaning placed on "on
>behalf of". I accept that the question is arguable.
I suggest that the only sensible interpretation is for it to mean
"using the child's money". Similar ...
|
|
|
