|
|
|
CT Computations and XBRL
Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:06:04 +0100
In the not-too-distant future, CT Returns, Accounts and computations will
need to be in XBRL format.
At present, we can generate 2 out of 3. The third one being computations.
for many years we have generated these in Excel.
Does anyone know of anything that would assist us in continuing to do so AND
output th ...
|
Second Job 94892
Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:54:38 -0500
>Oq)q.@mbaUvHUuefr.M!epD$ ...
|
Re: What does "absent from the UK for at least a whole tax year" actually mean?
Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:10:46 +0100
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:13:33 -0700 (PDT), PeterSaxton
<peter@petersaxton.co.uk> wrote:
>If rules cannot be framed clearly by the people who have
>responsibility for the task then they should be replaced.
But Peter, you are the only person having a problem with the rules.
Are you suggesting that everybody here ...
|
Re: What does "absent from the UK for at least a whole tax year" actually mean?
Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:26:30 +0100
On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:31:32 GMT, Ronald Raygun
<no.spam@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>PeterSaxton wrote:
>
>> On 30 Aug, 10:33, Ronald Raygun <no.s...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>>>
>>> OK, in the absence (heh!) of any additional information, "absent all
>>> week" would normally be taken to imply a 0% pr ...
|
Re: What does "absent from the UK for at least a whole tax year"
actually mean?
Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
On 30 Aug, 08:21, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:18:00 -0700 (PDT), PeterSaxton
>
>
>
>
>
> <pe...@petersaxton.co.uk> wrote:
> >On 29 Aug, 09:15, Ronald Raygun <no.s...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
> >> PeterSaxton wrote:
> >> > Let us call the following condition rul ...
|
Re: What does "absent from the UK for at least a whole tax year" actually mean?
Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:21:33 +0100
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:18:00 -0700 (PDT), PeterSaxton
<peter@petersaxton.co.uk> wrote:
>On 29 Aug, 09:15, Ronald Raygun <no.s...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
>> PeterSaxton wrote:
>> > Let us call the following condition rule 1: ?you are leaving to work
>> > abroad under a
>> > contract of employment for at l ...
|
Re: What does "absent from the UK for at least a whole tax year" actually mean?
Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:19:04 +0100
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:19:51 -0700 (PDT), PeterSaxton
<peter@petersaxton.co.uk> wrote:
>If they think it's ok to spend holidays and certain other activities
>in the UK why don't they say so?
They do!
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
"I always babble nonsense to people"
Patrick Bar ...
|
Re: What does "absent from the UK for at least a whole tax year" actually mean?
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:14:32 +0100
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:22:49 -0700 (PDT), PeterSaxton
<peter@petersaxton.co.uk> wrote:
>On 28 Aug, 21:37, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:47:21 -0700 (PDT), PeterSaxton
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <pe...@petersaxton.co.uk> wrote:
>> >On 28 Aug, 07:53, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer... ...
|
HMRC being their usual
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
"I submitted a 64-8 for my above client in June 2008 ? see attached.
I received documents from HMRC giving information about my client ?
see attached. Please note, although the national insurance number is
correct HMRC seem to be incapable of getting his name correct.
I phoned 0845 3021432 W Yorkshire and Crav ...
|
U.S. Trade Partners Visualized
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
This chart illustrates the trading volume, deficit and surplus of the
US with its major trading partners. Yes, there are countries vs. which
we have a surplus: Netherlands, Belgium, UK and Turkey.
Find more here: http://strategistnews.com/story.php?title=u-s--trade-partners-visualized ...
|
|
|
