Re: Proposal
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Flower of romance wrote:
> trin wrote
> >> > But you said that that was your point made. Your point can't've been
> >> > made if there is no point. Dippy.
> >> My point was made but there was no point in expanding on it. Dippy.
> > There's always a point to expanding a point - it's called the exchange
> > of i ...
|
Re: Post Office ISP
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Flower of romance wrote:
> Lady Nina wrote
> >>Just because you don't hold the view does not make it a fallacy.
> > Your evidence is lacking.
...
> > I don't know your prior level of knowledge so excuse me if I'm in a
> > grandmother/eggs situation here, but by my reading (which may of
> > course be wrong, fe ...
|
Re: Proposal
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Flower of romance wrote:
> trin wrote
> mine are size 11s. :) advice is one thing but preaching is quite another
Depends on the scenario. It can be a fine line to tread.
> thoush i appreciate that such things aren't done maliciously.
Good. :)
> Actually.. you're right. :)
I often am. ;)
> >It is ...
|
Re: Proposal
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Flower of romance wrote:
> trin wrote
> >because it is a Usenet standard.
> >This isn't just another one of them weird URP things, this is the
> >whole of Usenet thing.
>
> But patronizing seems very much a URP thing.
Not really - or, at least, no more so than anywhere else, when someone
new tries to wade ...
|
Re: Proposal
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 04:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Flower of romance wrote:
> trin wrote
> >> No. I nevere expanded on it because there's no point.
> > But you said that that was your point made. Your point can't've been
> > made if there is no point. Dippy.
> My point was made but there was no point in expanding on it. Dippy.
There's always a point to expan ...
|
Re: Proposal
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 16:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Flower of romance wrote:
> Call it a gut instinct.
I wasn't the only one who LOLed here, was I?
:)
--
trin ...
|
Re: Proposal
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 16:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
Flower of romance wrote:
> then me, then FoR, then Gid, etc.
> >> >> >> > Good manners is never a burden.
> >> >> >> Expecting other people to clear up your mess is not good manners> >> >> > Indeed, and it is *your* non standards compliant Usenet client that
> >> >> > is causing the mess..
> >> >> No. it's the ...
|
Re: Proposal
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 06:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Flower of romance <neverm...@flower.com> wrote:
> No. I nevere expanded on it because there's no point.
But you said that that was your point made. Your point can't've been
made if there is no point. Dippy.
--
trin ...
|
[Test] Please ignore.
Mon, 7 Jul 2008 18:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Actually, please don't, because I'm trying to work out if my posts are
getting through, 'cause I'm not sure I trust Ggroups sometimes to not
loose any of my posts in the ether, and I do so hate having to wait
AGES to see my own posts appear.
</strop>
:)
--
trin ...
|
Re: Post Office ISP
Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:11:55 +0100
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 00:02:59 +0100, "Flower of romance"
<nevermore@flower.com> wrote:
>
>"Lady Nina" <spamtrap2@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>news:1f2574pgodtc8gsf4sovnqv95m6g6eifek@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:04:22 +0100, "Flower of romance"
>> <nevermore@flower.com> wrote:
>>
>>>This Continent is ...
|
