[Status] [Update #1] [closed] 21CN-BRAS-RED1-L-NWS 11:26
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:50:28 +0100
Posted at 2009-09-19 13:47 BST by RevK
Update #1: 2009-09-19 13:50 BST
| At 11:26:28 many lines on 21CN-BRAS-RED1-L-NWS BRAS failed. This lasted
around an hour.
This time BT spotted before I did, which is rare!
Again, still working with BT to track down these issues.
Again, this is all ISPs wit ...
|
[Status] [closed] 21CN-BRAS-RED2-SL 7pm-8pm Fri
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:08:00 +0100
Posted at 2009-09-19 08:04 BST by RevK
Update #0: 2009-09-19 08:08 BST
Sorry for the delay reporting this on the status page.
It seems that once again there were major issues affecting a 21CN BRAS
(21CN-BRAS-RED2-SL) between around 7pm and 8pm last night (Friday) and
at 01:19 this morning. It looks like BT pi ...
|
[Status] [ongoing] BT congestion
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:44:14 +0100
Posted at 2009-09-17 20:40 BST by RevK
Update #0: 2009-09-17 20:44 BST
We are seeing a new type of congestion where lines look fine until
used, and then show high latency and low throughput.
It is hard to pin down where, but we can see it is not us or our LNS -
it is in BT somewhere.
We are trying to help ...
|
Re: [Status] [closed] 21CN-BRAS-RED1-LS-BAS
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:46:07 +0100
Posted at 2009-09-17 15:46 BST by RevK
Also happened on 21CN-BRAS-RED2-SL today and was fixed within about an
hour.
URL: http://aaisp.blogspot.com/2009/09/closed-21cn-bras-red1-ls-bas.html?showComment=1253198767408#c7366134837897307572
--
AAISP Status Blog
URL:http://aaisp.blogspot.com/ ...
|
[Status] [info] 600Kb/s is acceptable for broadband?
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:43:12 +0100
Posted at 2009-09-17 14:34 BST by RevK
Update #0: 2009-09-17 14:43 BST
The handbook for BT IPStream now defines that they consider it
acceptable for a line that syncs at the full ADSL1 rate of 8,128Kb/s to
only get 600Kb/s download. This means a serious congestion fault within
their network, which they admit is ...
|
Re: [Status] [info] RADIUS blip
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:50:16 +0100
RevK wrote:
> We seem to have had some sort of RADIUS/database blip on our control
> server which has caused a few lines to have disconnect and reconnect
> lasting a few seconds. We are investigating.[IMAGE]
I don't wish to be seen as carping about the fact that these
disconnections are now over very quickly c ...
|
The 0.0.0.0 IP problem
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:35:35 +0100
I gather this is a common problem at the moment - the ADSL drops out,
and when the router tries to reconnect it appears to do so. But in fact
it is just sitting there uselessly with an IP of 0.0.0.0. Power cycling
a few times usually results in a proper connection eventually.
I realise I have all my routers le ...
|
Fax and ADSL
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:28:17 +0100
Hi,
I have two sites where a fax modem is connected to the same line as our
ADSL (via the filter where a handset would normally go).
At both sites any fax activity usually knocks out the ADSL for the
duration of the fax. Is this to be expected or should it work OK? Surely
it should be the same as a voice ca ...
|
P660HW-T1 firewall and syslog
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:23:55 +0000 (UTC)
I have knocked up a cgi perl script, that could be run stand alone, to
process the P660's syslog records.
It looks like this http://www.deezee.org/firelog.html
If there is any interest I will tart it up a bit, ie put in some
comments, and upload it.
--
Regards
Dave Saville ...
|
Incoming port 113
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:14:33 +0000 (UTC)
Just spotted in my firewall log that painless uses IDENT auth calls
src="81.187.30.51:44942" dst="192.168.0.2:113"
I am just dropping them. Two questions:
1) Why are the A&A email servers doing this? Google suggests it is
very old practice.
2) What do others do about them? GRC suggests port forwarding t ...
|
