Complaint about urcm moderation delays
03 Nov 2009 16:33:54 +0000 (GMT)
I would like to complain about the undue delay to my postings to
uk.rec.cycling.moderated. Sometimes my messages sit in the queue for
hours while other posters' messages are approved almost immediately.
Why, just now one of the moderators (to wit, me) has approved three
messages from other people, one of them b ...
|
Question to URCM moderators about deliberate post delaying
Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:17:40 +0000
Why has my latest post (ID: <7la496F3aau66U1@mid.individual.net>) posted
at 07:26 this morning been delayed and overtaken by at least 9 others
posted since it today?
This has happened quite frequently (always?). The average response to
my posts is about 3 hours. The 4 longest responses in the log are to 4
...
|
Re: On the subject of contentious addeda
Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:44:53 +0000
On 2 Nov 2009 14:22:27 GMT, Simon Brooke
<stillyet+nntp@googlemail.com> wrote:
>Now who's being disingenuous? If you and Guy had left her alone, she'd
>have got bored months ago, and gone of to pursue her hysterical vendettas
>somewhere else. But, no, not you - the inveterate last-word-havers.
I suspect thi ...
|
Re: On the subject of contentious addeda
Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:31:40 +0000
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:51:32 +0000, "Wm..."
<tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:39:28 <7kt9ohF3aouajU1@mid.individual.net>
>uk.net.news.moderation Peter Clinch <p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk>
>
>>The Todal wrote:
>>
>>> Because I saw a post which clearly implied that some contributors m ...
|
Looking blank at ulm?
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:09:20 +0000
Vide http://www.moderation.org.uk/3display_post.php?pst_id=81394
What was the reason for rejection? None seems to have been given.
--
< Paul > ...
|
ucrm moderation borked?
Sun, 1 Nov 2009 21:45:03 -0000
Doesn't seem to be working (from where I'm looking).
--
Colin N.
Lincolnshire is mostly flat ... But the wind is mostly in
your face
...
|
Is the uk.legal.moderated system bunged up again?
Sun, 1 Nov 2009 21:16:49 +0000
I posted a short article - one line, in fact - at 20:58:59 today.
It is now 21:15, yet the most recent article shewn was 20:20:09.
Does it need Dynorod?
--
< Paul > ...
|
Re: On the subject of contentious addeda
Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:53:20 +0000
Response to Wm...:
> We've (or at least I) never quite been able to work out what the
> jms's problem with cyclists is. The fact that the problem is
> transferable to other groups and other people suggests to me a mirror
> might be useful for the jms
Dedicated moaners like jms could certainly learn from the ...
|
Re: On the subject of contentious addeda
Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:28:48 +0000
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:23:23 <lbon0rw2muw9.1e2cruwswsgva.dlg@40tude.net>
uk.net.news.moderation The Wanderer <the.wanderer@gmx.co.uk>
>D'you know, you have the most balanced view of everybody contributing. It
>must come from the monumental chips you're carrying on each shoulder.
We've (or at least I) never qui ...
|
Re: To celebrate the new group
Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:21:38 +0000
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:28:00 <7dhpe5thhp0k23g29ajmpbhdhsa983046c@4ax.com>
uk.net.news.moderation jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk>
>On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:01:03 +0000, "Wm..."
><tcnw71@blackhole.do-not-spam.me.uk> wrote:
>
>>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:11:46 <lq2pe59ndj5dufnrnanr00up8p33kog5p8@4ax.com>
>>uk.net.news.moder ...
|
