|
|
|
urcm Moderation Policy Announcement
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:57:54 +0000
Following discussions among ourselves, the moderators of urcm have
decided that we should explain the moderation policy/procedure that one
moderator felt strongly enough about to resign.
The policy concerns what to do if a poster habitually makes posts that
are borderline acceptable/unacceptable and, after ha ...
|
Re: Resignation from urcm mod panel
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:28:48 +0000
Response to Tom Crispin:
> My point is that those 5-10 posters on the delay-list (tindl)
> sometimes face a delay over and above those *not* on the pass-list.
>
> It is quite normal for those not on the pass-list to face a delay, but
> those on the delay-list often face an extended delay.
>
> I am not sayin ...
|
Re: Resignation from urcm mod panel
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:23:22 +0000
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:03:22 +0000, Tom Crispin
<kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>tindl
Precisely. Now shut up about the delay list which does not exist.
Guy
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/
The usenet price promise: all opinions offered in newsgroups are guaranteed
to be worth the pri ...
|
Re: Resignation from urcm mod panel
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:09:32 +0000
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:52:12 -0000, "kat" <littlelionne@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>Se?or Chris <M8R-l6ns77@mailinator.com> said
>> kat wrote:
>>> Just zis Guy, you know? <guy.chapman@spamcop.net> said
>>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:45:49 +0000, Tom Crispin
>>>> <kije.remove@this.bit.freeuk.com.munge> wrote:
>>>>
> ...
|
Re: Resignation from urcm mod panel
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:36:28 +0000
In message <la57o59gffelrf2hevmu5p8md1d3ta4o60@4ax.com>, at 08:53:55 on
Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Geoff Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk> wibbled
>On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:15:15 +0000, Sara Merriman
><saramerriman@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> The other procedural matter came as a
>>complete bombshell and it was that that ca ...
|
Re: Resignation from urcm mod panel
23 Feb 2010 19:14:42 GMT
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:39:24 +0000, Geoff Berrow wrote:
>
> Is this in any way related to the ugly, unnecessary and secret procedure
> that caused the resignation of a moderator, the revelation of which
> would bring the moderation team into disrepute?
There you have it in one sentence.
--
;; Semper ...
|
Re: Resignation from urcm mod panel
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:15:59 +0000
At 14:28:35 on Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Roger Thorpe
<myinitial.mysurname@warwick.ac.uk> wrote in
<hm0omo$33u$1@corncockle-nntp.csv.warwick.ac.uk>:
>Molly Mockford wrote:
>> At 09:15:34 on Tue, 23 Feb 2010, kat <littlelionne@hotmail.com> wrote
>>in <7uhkm7FfseU1@mid.individual.net>:
>>
>>> Tony <tony@darkstorm.i ...
|
ULM - Potentially defamatory
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:58:25 -0500
I see that Post Id:87171 was rejected, apparently because the poster had
accused Kwik-Fit of applying common sense.
I believe no one will defame the moderator with same complaint.
Tony ...
|
Re: Resignation from moderation panel
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:09:03 +0000 (UTC)
On 2010-02-23, Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> The author of the blog posting isn't, however. I think if they want
> to throw brickbats at the moderation team they should do so here. And
> as they're apparently a moderator I would have hoped they'd put
> forward their views on the moderato ...
|
Re: Resignation from urcm mod panel
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:48:45 +0000
In message <EhRgn.43637$Ym4.42025@text.news.virginmedia.com>, Alex
Potter <spambin@ap-consulting.co.uk> writes
>On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:53:07 +0000, kat wrote:
>
>>> I'd prefer to hear it from Sara.
>>
>> In the interests of fairness, I would like to hear it from both sides.
>> What they are doing, why they are ...
|
|
|
